The point is if there was a designer, he would either be an idiot or a jerk. Which seems to line up nicely with the christian god, who is some how omnipotent but needs everyone to tell him how great he is.
Ok so now we have a country full of people who did not go to school and the couple that did have been taught religious nonsense instead of useful information, what do we do now?
They are not becoming more organized, you are seeing patterns that are not there.
Intelligent Design is a nonsense term anyway, whoever designed the human eye for instance was an idiot. Somehow this same dimwit managed to give proper eyes to nautilus though. If you want to debate the existence of Idiotic Design, then we can have some philosophy, but still not science.
I think the incentive is money. Besides most devs will never port it, they will hire that work out to someone like icculus. That is what gets games ported to linux.
I would bet on your last point above all. Valve wants their own console, they are afraid of windows 8 for good reason. Making a linux steam client paves the way for their own steam box.
If you are simply willing to wait until X date or something you can always slip an app past any filter like this.
The one hope here is that the sandboxing will save you from evil behavior, since an app should not be able to do anything its permissions do not allow.
Slashdot Mirror
Only at the same wages as them. Which would not even be enough to eat, so that will not work.
So what. Maybe I do.
The point is if there was a designer, he would either be an idiot or a jerk. Which seems to line up nicely with the christian god, who is some how omnipotent but needs everyone to tell him how great he is.
Ok so now we have a country full of people who did not go to school and the couple that did have been taught religious nonsense instead of useful information, what do we do now?
Your plan would kill our economy.
Correct sir, I mixed them up. There is another bad design, not having a memory system that would check for these kinds of errors.
There is no such advantage, it just comes from our mammal ancestors they all have these mistake eyes.
No, I would prefer to have eyes without a blind spot though.
There are many other factors that prove if there was a designer he was a total idiot.
I did not mean to snub anyone, I was just pointing out the most famous of the folks to do this work.
There is no such evidence. The so called theory of irreducible complexity is utter nonsense.
I can see the merit in many theories, but those have to be testable and make useful predications. ID fails that test. It is a philosophy not science.
They are not becoming more organized, you are seeing patterns that are not there.
Intelligent Design is a nonsense term anyway, whoever designed the human eye for instance was an idiot. Somehow this same dimwit managed to give proper eyes to nautilus though. If you want to debate the existence of Idiotic Design, then we can have some philosophy, but still not science.
How fast do you think continents move?
It took Hundred Of Millions Of Years for Rodinia to break up into the continents we have now.
Because it is not science. It is not testable.
It belongs in philosophy class not science.
How is vmware hard to install?
It is in the fancy store, can't get much easier.
I think the incentive is money.
Besides most devs will never port it, they will hire that work out to someone like icculus. That is what gets games ported to linux.
Desura handles this very well. Not sure the recent bundles have keys for it, but it is very steam like and runs on linux.
bzzt wrong.
Very few of them are using any form of wine. Many were ported by icculus.
I would bet on your last point above all. Valve wants their own console, they are afraid of windows 8 for good reason. Making a linux steam client paves the way for their own steam box.
No, but it is the biggest one for the average company.
Since most users really only use them for email and phone calls an encrypted device and a lockscreen cover the typical bases.
You will need some citations for such bold claims, my understanding was that it had been totally disproven.
Heck, it only dates from the 13th century.
What hardware are you going to install that on?
I did not think they had any left suitable for the server room.
They already do, with live humans!
http://support.google.com/googleplay/bin/request.py?hl=en&contact_type=contact_policy
Does any device other than BB do that?
Do all your users want to carry two devices?
I believe 4.0 adds most of those, if not all. Other than lockscreen and device encryption I am not sure what most would want to add.
And yet BB are still bad enough devices, that all those things are a fair trade.
BB10 may fix this. Unless they allow an activesync client, I will not offer them to my users.
Sure, but this is better than nothing.
There is no platform safe from these sorts of tactics.
If you are simply willing to wait until X date or something you can always slip an app past any filter like this.
The one hope here is that the sandboxing will save you from evil behavior, since an app should not be able to do anything its permissions do not allow.