That practice time should be well in play by 14 or 15, not 18-25. Unfortunately, our culture, government, and school system seem dead set on encouraging dependence, spinelessness and sacklessness in kids, creating permanent, psychologically fragile children. Some politicians are now even pushing for moving the legal adult age to 25 instead of looking at how their own social(ist) engineering policies are damaging our society.
Oh I see. Well a bias in females IS systematic, just like it is for males, the system being biology. It it compels both sexes to different preferences and behavior. The way products are marketed at both strongly suggests that. If pink and fluffy sells to women, that's what will be marketed towards them.
Instinctively, women expect certain roles of men just as men expect certain roles from women.
Feminists want to upset that apple cart by telling men they can't have expectations of women while encouraging women to have even greater expectations of men. His contributions to the relationship are mandatory and hers are now optional. He's also expected to fill in the gaps left by her 'empowerment', by force of law if necessary, just so she can pretend she's both a baby-raising housewife and a CEO. Life involves hard choices. Men who go for that CEO position make sacrifices too. It should be no different for women. Kids or the high power career, not both.
The results of all this are several generations of pantywaist 'hipster' men with sizable stockholm syndrome complexes, and special snowflake harpies who've lost their femininity by age 23. No wonder marriage rates are tumbling.
Of course they can. However, most women into science tend not to be the pink frilly princess types...and no it's not because of some evil male conspiracy. It's mostly biology.
How so? Feminists are always talking about natural distributions of behavior in boys and men, usually when the behavior is considered negative (even when it's normal and healthy). It's a bit rich to assume that the bias towards pink and fluffy is systematic and not just a normal response in females stemming from innate biological differences.
I know, but it was quite the hellzone radiation wise in 1986. People in pripyat and surrounding areas were exposed quite severely.
Today, the exposure at the plant itself where people are working, is still quite toxic. It's not just about the strength of the exposure, it's the length of time and how it propagated through your body (alpha/beta/gamma). Eating food grown there every day puts you at greater risk.
60 minutes regularly misrepresents facts for the sake of drama or propping up political narratives. I guess even chernobyl wasn't 'scary' enough for them to resist embellishing it.
I stopped reading at 'micro aggressions'. That shit is tumblr style delusion.
As far as I'm concerned, if she is as smart as claimed was able to meet the demands of the jobs she's had, then that's great. That's how it's supposed to work. However, it sounds like she's lobbying for affirmative action which is the opposite. Thumbs down for that.
Based on the fear mongering tripe put out there by feminists, you could've fooled me.. World out to get them? Like patriarchy 'theory'? Or were you referring to the garbage based on it that's actual reality, like primary 'aggressor', mandatory arrest, title9, VAWA, and the abuse inherent in 'family' court and in HR depts? There are plenty of reasons men just submit nowadays. They're told to by their fathers (if they're even still allowed to see their kids) and by feminism in school and in media, so as adults, they walk a fine line between being too submissive and losing her to someone else, and being too assertive and getting hit with a 'domestic violence' charge because he dared defy her.
Why should she grow up and act like an adult when she can walk all over him making petty demands for control, knowing he can't do much about it?
Why is it ok for women to still expect men to be the white knight providers and/or submissive bitches (whichever gives her the upper hand or benefit atm) while it's no longer ok for men to expect women to be women, and wives? What do women bring to the table these days? I am not sure as all I've been hearing is what I'm expected to bring, and what I shouldn't expect in return.
Yes, but they are rated for less power so it is more likely the fan will turn on. The higher quality components in the higher power unit will run cooler at lower draw and probably last longer too.
I find it amazing that there are still people out there whose egos are so great, they feel the need to elevate themselves above others on completely arbitrary things.
Slashdot Mirror
Thank you. Exactly. People are pantywaists about safety these days. That's what we get for letting effeminate pussies make policy and media.
Nah.. not enough of an impact. If/when self driving cars become the norm, then expect it. A much bigger impact means much more infamy.
That practice time should be well in play by 14 or 15, not 18-25. Unfortunately, our culture, government, and school system seem dead set on encouraging dependence, spinelessness and sacklessness in kids, creating permanent, psychologically fragile children. Some politicians are now even pushing for moving the legal adult age to 25 instead of looking at how their own social(ist) engineering policies are damaging our society.
only if you want to fund the rearing of those babies out of your own pocket.
Excuse me, I don't like your tone. You also used 'mens' which discriminates against women. Please check your privilege. Chimps are people too!
Agreed. Both camps love their dogmatic, emotional convictions.
Oh I see.
Well a bias in females IS systematic, just like it is for males, the system being biology. It it compels both sexes to different preferences and behavior. The way products are marketed at both strongly suggests that. If pink and fluffy sells to women, that's what will be marketed towards them.
Yup. Like those canadians, this article is more an example of what happens when impressionable young adults are spoonfed reality defying propaganda.
Instinctively, women expect certain roles of men just as men expect certain roles from women.
Feminists want to upset that apple cart by telling men they can't have expectations of women while encouraging women to have even greater expectations of men. His contributions to the relationship are mandatory and hers are now optional. He's also expected to fill in the gaps left by her 'empowerment', by force of law if necessary, just so she can pretend she's both a baby-raising housewife and a CEO. Life involves hard choices. Men who go for that CEO position make sacrifices too. It should be no different for women. Kids or the high power career, not both.
The results of all this are several generations of pantywaist 'hipster' men with sizable stockholm syndrome complexes, and special snowflake harpies who've lost their femininity by age 23. No wonder marriage rates are tumbling.
Of course they can. However, most women into science tend not to be the pink frilly princess types...and no it's not because of some evil male conspiracy. It's mostly biology.
How so? Feminists are always talking about natural distributions of behavior in boys and men, usually when the behavior is considered negative (even when it's normal and healthy). It's a bit rich to assume that the bias towards pink and fluffy is systematic and not just a normal response in females stemming from innate biological differences.
That's all true. It's too bad we don't have more media that actually tries for objectivity and correctness.
My statement implies a general behavior, not just for this piece.
I know, but it was quite the hellzone radiation wise in 1986. People in pripyat and surrounding areas were exposed quite severely.
Today, the exposure at the plant itself where people are working, is still quite toxic. It's not just about the strength of the exposure, it's the length of time and how it propagated through your body (alpha/beta/gamma). Eating food grown there every day puts you at greater risk.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?...
60 minutes regularly misrepresents facts for the sake of drama or propping up political narratives. I guess even chernobyl wasn't 'scary' enough for them to resist embellishing it.
Fire them.
SJWs make their livings off maximizing that defensive response in order to psychologically and socially disarm their opponents.
I stopped reading at 'micro aggressions'. That shit is tumblr style delusion.
As far as I'm concerned, if she is as smart as claimed was able to meet the demands of the jobs she's had, then that's great. That's how it's supposed to work. However, it sounds like she's lobbying for affirmative action which is the opposite. Thumbs down for that.
Based on the fear mongering tripe put out there by feminists, you could've fooled me.. World out to get them? Like patriarchy 'theory'? Or were you referring to the garbage based on it that's actual reality, like primary 'aggressor', mandatory arrest, title9, VAWA, and the abuse inherent in 'family' court and in HR depts? There are plenty of reasons men just submit nowadays. They're told to by their fathers (if they're even still allowed to see their kids) and by feminism in school and in media, so as adults, they walk a fine line between being too submissive and losing her to someone else, and being too assertive and getting hit with a 'domestic violence' charge because he dared defy her.
Why should she grow up and act like an adult when she can walk all over him making petty demands for control, knowing he can't do much about it?
Why is it ok for women to still expect men to be the white knight providers and/or submissive bitches (whichever gives her the upper hand or benefit atm) while it's no longer ok for men to expect women to be women, and wives? What do women bring to the table these days? I am not sure as all I've been hearing is what I'm expected to bring, and what I shouldn't expect in return.
Yes, but they are rated for less power so it is more likely the fan will turn on. The higher quality components in the higher power unit will run cooler at lower draw and probably last longer too.
People like you are the reason tyranny rears its ugly head so often.
I find it amazing that there are still people out there whose egos are so great, they feel the need to elevate themselves above others on completely arbitrary things.
Just as he couldn't care less about her wishes for a 'nice' effeminate living room that does nothing well but looks 'fabulous.'
Women hate men gaming for the same reasons they hate men watching porn. They offer pleasure she cannot control.