Moderator, please mod the parent down. This fact is totally wrong.
First Japan didn't fought their way up the Korea in the 1940s. Japan and China each supported their factions in the power struggle within Korean court. That lead to full-warfare between two nations in 1894-1995. The resulting Shimonoseki Treaty of 1895 had China acknowledge Korea as independent nation.
After Russo-Japan war of 1904-5, Korea became a Japanese protectorate and was annexed in 1910.
I am the county law librarian at one of the California County Law Libraries.
Before the court unification(Joining the muni court with superior court) We do serve as court library. But with the unification, things are very different. Some county law library still function as court library. While some had became very independent of the court.
If you live near the county seat of a larger county, then you have access to county law library that is as good as most law firm library. I had compare notes with several firm law library, and I have a bigger material budget compares to most of them. They have the advantage in that they only have to collect materials in the subject area their firm specialized in. While I have to spread my collection dollars thin on many different subjects.
California appellate court decisions are already being posted on the Judicial Council(The state's version of Judicial Conference) web site.
http://www.courtinfo.ca.gov
What new about this contract is that the older case, going back to 1850s will be aviliable free. And the cost of getting new volumes will be cheaper than what west is charging now. But I suspect West will just increase the price on West's California Reporter.(The unofficial one)
He was a library assistant at university library. The disrepected of librarian professions indirectly led to the culture revolution. More of the professors who dissed him ended up dead or worse in the cultural revolution.
<i>Driving up the 101 by where I live, I see thousands, if not millions of square feet of office space empty. If you had not worked here during the boom you would not know that at one time these offices were filled with people paying income tax to the state.</i>
Consider Steve Westly made his fortune with Ebay before ran for public office, I think it's very safe to know what 101 is like during the boom.
Don't you remember when discussing internet Sales tax, how many slashdoter mentioned that they would shop on ebay to avoid sales tax?
The legal one is harder to guess. There are really no good legal database hosted by federal government. FLITE is mostly useless. GPO Acess and THOMAS are both potential targets, but those are so important to general public, as oppose to relativly small number to researchers for DOE's PubScience.
IF they do shutdown those two. Then it's time to re-read declaration of Independence:
He has called together legislative bodies at places unusual, uncomfortable, and distant from the depository of their public Records, for the sole purpose of fatiguing them into compliance with his measures.
2.The PRC has never recognized the legitamacy of the ROC on Taiwan. Even the Chinese newspapers, when discussing Tawain's leaders, place their titles in quotes. i.e. "President" Chen
In principle they have, that's what one china two systems means. In practice they're less than happy with that, of course, not the least because ROC officials are so obviously working to Helsinkify Taiwan and return it to it's state as a vassal of Japan instead. And A-bians title in quotes is hardly limited to the mainland - you must admit, the circumstances of his election are suspicious, to say the least.
He received more vote then either of his two opponets. What's suspicious about that?
part of the US. Taiwan was ruled by Japan through the end of WWII, yes, but then again, for most of that time so was Manchuria, ("Manchuguo" ring a bell?) what's your point? Taiwan has been part of China for centuries, and a few years of occupation doesn't exactly change that.
Treaty of Shimonoseki of 1895? 50 years are hardly a few years.
Territory given up in international treaty is very different from simple occupation.
Not to mention that Taiwanese still remember how their supposed "brothers" betrayed them in 1895.
If they were belligerent they would have hit something with them. Or hit someone, somewhere, outside of China maybe? Let's see, there was the dustup with India, and they intervened at the very last minute to prevent North Korea from becoming a US stronghold, but other than that I can't think of any instances of belligerence from the PRC. They tend to stick to terrorising people inside China, which is bad, and I'm not condoning it, but belligerence implies terrorising people distant from your own borders, and I just don't see that in the PRC.
Invasion of Vietnam in the late 70s/early 80s? Don't forgot that.
Slashdot Mirror
Moderator, please mod the parent down. This fact is totally wrong.
p ?s rc=menu02_06
First Japan didn't fought their way up the Korea in the 1940s. Japan and China each supported their factions in the power struggle within Korean court. That lead to full-warfare between two nations in 1894-1995. The resulting Shimonoseki Treaty of 1895 had China acknowledge Korea as independent nation.
After Russo-Japan war of 1904-5, Korea became a Japanese protectorate and was annexed in 1910.
http://www.koreainfogate.com/aboutkorea/item.as
For China does not have excuse of "memory of 1940" for their action against the U.N. force.
I am the county law librarian at one of the California County Law Libraries.
Before the court unification(Joining the muni court with superior court) We do serve as court library. But with the unification, things are very different. Some county law library still function as court library. While some had became very independent of the court.
If you live near the county seat of a larger county, then you have access to county law library that is as good as most law firm library. I had compare notes with several firm law library, and I have a bigger material budget compares to most of them. They have the advantage in that they only have to collect materials in the subject area their firm specialized in. While I have to spread my collection dollars thin on many different subjects.
California appellate court decisions are already being posted on the Judicial Council(The state's version of Judicial Conference) web site.
http://www.courtinfo.ca.gov
What new about this contract is that the older case, going back to 1850s will be aviliable free. And the cost of getting new volumes will be cheaper than what west is charging now. But I suspect West will just increase the price on West's California Reporter.(The unofficial one)
But last time I Shepardized it, if you are outside of 2nd Circ. it doesn't help you.
He was a library assistant at university library. The disrepected of librarian professions indirectly led to the culture revolution. More of the professors who dissed him ended up dead or worse in the cultural revolution.
Don't make librarian mad.
<i>Driving up the 101 by where I live, I see thousands, if not millions of square feet of office space empty. If you had not worked here during the boom you would not know that at one time these offices were filled with people paying income tax to the state.</i>
Consider Steve Westly made his fortune with Ebay before ran for public office, I think it's very safe to know what 101 is like during the boom.
Don't you remember when discussing internet Sales tax, how many slashdoter mentioned that they would shop on ebay to avoid sales tax?
He didn't get Stanford MBA for nothing.
Anyone care to guess which useful databases are about to be locked off to anyone who can't cough up the required dough?
The argriculture database is defintely Agricola
The legal one is harder to guess. There are really no good legal database hosted by federal government. FLITE is mostly useless. GPO Acess and THOMAS are both potential targets, but those are so important to general public, as oppose to relativly small number to researchers for DOE's PubScience.
IF they do shutdown those two. Then it's time to re-read declaration of Independence:
2.The PRC has never recognized the legitamacy of the ROC on Taiwan. Even the Chinese newspapers, when discussing Tawain's leaders, place their titles in quotes. i.e. "President" Chen
In principle they have, that's what one china two systems means. In practice they're less than happy with that, of course, not the least because ROC officials are so obviously working to Helsinkify Taiwan and return it to it's state as a vassal of Japan instead. And A-bians title in quotes is hardly limited to the mainland - you must admit, the circumstances of his election are suspicious, to say the least.
He received more vote then either of his two opponets. What's suspicious about that?
part of the US. Taiwan was ruled by Japan through the end of WWII, yes, but then again, for most of that time so was Manchuria, ("Manchuguo" ring a bell?) what's your point? Taiwan has been part of China for centuries, and a few years of occupation doesn't exactly change that.
Treaty of Shimonoseki of 1895? 50 years are hardly a few years.
Taiwan Documents.org
Territory given up in international treaty is very different from simple occupation.
Not to mention that Taiwanese still remember how their supposed "brothers" betrayed them in 1895.
If they were belligerent they would have hit something with them. Or hit someone, somewhere, outside of China maybe? Let's see, there was the dustup with India, and they intervened at the very last minute to prevent North Korea from becoming a US stronghold, but other than that I can't think of any instances of belligerence from the PRC. They tend to stick to terrorising people inside China, which is bad, and I'm not condoning it, but belligerence implies terrorising people distant from your own borders, and I just don't see that in the PRC.
Invasion of Vietnam in the late 70s/early 80s? Don't forgot that.