You can't determine equity in a car by taking a picture. Buying something like an A8 or 7 series BMW on time, just proves the 'owner' is a vain, ego driven idiot. Which correlates with both parties _bases_.
Which vain, ego driven party is more likely to buy a Prius?
I am but one person, I cannot tell them all.
If I could but divide myself, and share my words with all the world,
face to face, personally, then would all the world be wise,
Or at least, as wise as I.
It's also a natural response to the last group of articles that claim "AI is going to take all our jobs and enslave humanity." I've started meeting people who are literally afraid of this.
It's been downhill ever since the written word. By the eye of Ra I swear that we never should have started using hieroglyphs it only led on to demotic and worse, English. MWGA.
The big issue with actual monorails, such as the one in Vegas, is that you can't switch tracks easily, can't have Ys, and all the other things that you can do with reasonably standard rail technology.
Oh, that's really informative. I was trying to figure out what were the advantages/disadvantages of monorails, and Wikipedia didn't help at all. I can't see any advantages, though.
Worth emphasizing that any time you have a user login, you should probably be using https to protect your cookies from then on, otherwise the cookies can be hijacked with a bunch of different methods.
The global warming hoax is strong out here,
(You are a dingbat, science is real my dear)
AI enslaves and frees us from our cares,
but first it needs to learn to climb up stairs.
Please block the ads since they are worse than death,
But use a hostfile or your smoking meth.
This criemer dude has funny things to say,
But people hate him and have chased him far away.
The only thing we need is unicode support,
that's silly! Make the max-width half a screen!
That isn't tech news, that is politics!
You must be new here we read that for our kicks!
This place is owned by the far right!
This place is owned by the far left!
Propaganda! Propaganda! Comcast sucks!
I'm leaving!
(But tomorrow I'll be back.)
I can't imagine what you are trying to imply with this analogy. You must not have confidence in your belief, otherwise you would out and say it, instead of hiding behind dumb examples.
I want to add that if anyone finds their opinion exactly matching either party platform, then you are either demented or have some kind of Stockholm syndrome. The party platforms of both parties were made by a series of compromises, designed to appeal to a broad spectrum of ideologies, change often, and thus can be contradictory from time to time.
Anyone who strictly follows either party platform is a tool.
Slashdot Mirror
the resolution difference probably won't be as great as you imagine.
But the color will be better.
You can't determine equity in a car by taking a picture. Buying something like an A8 or 7 series BMW on time, just proves the 'owner' is a vain, ego driven idiot. Which correlates with both parties _bases_.
Which vain, ego driven party is more likely to buy a Prius?
Snopes is a secondary source, like Wikipedia, and as such is in no way authoritative.
It should be treated as a quick way to find a lot of relevant primary sources, and it mostly does fine at that.
Recycling aluminum is much less energy intensive compared to smelting ore......But that is not the entire picture.
Yes, that's right......energy use is only one small portion of the total cost.
Huh? Yes there is. It is economically cheaper to recycle aluminum than it is to process from ore.
No, if it weren't for the CRV then few people would recycle cans. It wouldn't be worth the effort to pick them up off the ground.
Add to that: there's almost no point in recycling aluminum. It's extremely plentiful on earth and landfills aren't actually a problem
Then link to the papers, I'll read them.
I am but one person, I cannot tell them all.
If I could but divide myself, and share my words with all the world,
face to face, personally, then would all the world be wise,
Or at least, as wise as I.
The scaremongering that "robots are taking all the jobs" started in the 1990s.
At least in the 60s and that's only because I can't find the earlier videos on youtube, but I know they existed.
It's also a natural response to the last group of articles that claim "AI is going to take all our jobs and enslave humanity." I've started meeting people who are literally afraid of this.
It's been downhill ever since the written word. By the eye of Ra I swear that we never should have started using hieroglyphs it only led on to demotic and worse, English. MWGA.
The big issue with actual monorails, such as the one in Vegas, is that you can't switch tracks easily, can't have Ys, and all the other things that you can do with reasonably standard rail technology.
Oh, that's really informative. I was trying to figure out what were the advantages/disadvantages of monorails, and Wikipedia didn't help at all. I can't see any advantages, though.
Worth emphasizing that any time you have a user login, you should probably be using https to protect your cookies from then on, otherwise the cookies can be hijacked with a bunch of different methods.
You read Slashdot as well.
Oh that was a mistake..........
The global warming hoax is strong out here,
(You are a dingbat, science is real my dear)
AI enslaves and frees us from our cares,
but first it needs to learn to climb up stairs.
Please block the ads since they are worse than death,
But use a hostfile or your smoking meth.
This criemer dude has funny things to say,
But people hate him and have chased him far away.
The only thing we need is unicode support,
that's silly! Make the max-width half a screen!
That isn't tech news, that is politics!
You must be new here we read that for our kicks!
This place is owned by the far right!
This place is owned by the far left!
Propaganda! Propaganda! Comcast sucks!
I'm leaving!
(But tomorrow I'll be back.)
Ok. I believe in science
I doubt it. If I showed you several scientific papers, you would immediately try to explain them away. What you believe in is scientism.
Excellent, well done.
Multiple peer reviewed papers have proved that the current climate models are actually rather good.
This is an out and out lie.
You make that comment frequently.
I can't imagine what you are trying to imply with this analogy. You must not have confidence in your belief, otherwise you would out and say it, instead of hiding behind dumb examples.
Assuming you don't, our next best option is to model the data we have as accurately as possible and make predictions based on those models.
The computer models we have are inaccurate, as has been demonstrated in multiple peer reviewed papers.
Either legislate unbiased search and advertising and give up the pretence of pure capitalism, or eat your dogfood and quit complaining.
If being hypocritical and complaining gets you what you want, people will be hypocritical and complain.
It doesn't matter how beautiful your theory is, it doesn't matter how smart you are. If it doesn't agree with experiment, it's wrong.
I want to add that if anyone finds their opinion exactly matching either party platform, then you are either demented or have some kind of Stockholm syndrome. The party platforms of both parties were made by a series of compromises, designed to appeal to a broad spectrum of ideologies, change often, and thus can be contradictory from time to time.
Anyone who strictly follows either party platform is a tool.
Because the voltage doesn't drop; it's the current that drops.
If resistance is the same, how do you change the current without changing the voltage?
"Believe me" is New York/New Jersey code for "I'm lying"