He was lying, he didn't change his mind. If h changes his mind that quickly in such a short period of time about someone who he's known for decades, then he's a complete moron, and that's worse than lying.
Does anyone see Congress approving anything Trump asks for?
Yes, for example, from his platform, a Republican congress would approve repealing Obamacare (they've already done it what, a dozen times already?). They would likely increase spending for mental healthcare as a way to handle mass-shootings (again, Republicans have already tried to do that in the last year).
Will they vote for the wall? Maybe, if Trump can actually get Mexico to pay for it. If Trump gets his way, he'll have a bunch of copycats, and then congress will be filled with hucksters. Wait.....
He seems like a one-issue, "no new taxes/spending" kind of guy.
he really bears no marks of being a person who could be sold as a moderating influence to Trump.
It kind of makes you wonder if Trump actually is on the conservative side of the divide, despite spending plenty of money on democrats in the past (and avowing liberal opinions).
Because people vote based on what thy say. Imagine you voted for someone to do something, then they changed their mind and did the opposite. The more common scenario was that they were lying (see for example: Mitt Romney on abortion, Obama on gay marriage, Arlen Specter on party).
People are allowed to change their minds, but politicians should have a good reason why, which Sanders did not.
Microsoft won't be subject to another anti-trust lawsuit because they pay their 'bills', donating to politicians.
Antitrust lawsuits are almost always political tools.
Why do people think that Silcon valley is the be all and end all of software development?
It pays better. That's why for me.
Yeah, it's true that housing costs are expensive, but where else can you get $170k-$200k? That's more than enough to make up for the increased expenses.
Too much focus on New Technology that the organization may not implement. Too much focus on older technology that we are trying to faze out, or had removed a long time ago.
So no new technology, and no old technology.
I think I see your problem.
FFS it's shit like this which makes outsiders look at the Linux community and wonder why we can't just get over things and focus on actual issues, like making desktops that rival Windows and focus on the actual issues with Linux rather than these trivial matters.
Code quality is the actual issue....otherwise we might as well give up and just use Windows. We want a clean, good system.
Java isn't supposed to be able to get out of its sandbox without permission, yet it's the source of many vulnerabilities. Why would we trust Rust to be any safer?
You don't know what you are talking about. Rust is built to make avoid memory leaks and buffer overflows. It does a good job at that.
Java doesn't have a problem with memory overflows, either, but you got confused between the plugin and the language. The Java language was fine, the plugin (with its sandbox) had problems.
I think gmail set the precedent, by collapsing the quoted text, and setting the cursor at the top of the screen. At least, the disappearance of bottom-posting seems to coincide with the rise of gmail in my memory.
Since you are having trouble distinguishing the difference between a proof and an argument, that is just further evidence you're off your groove today. Take a rest.
He was lying, he didn't change his mind. If h changes his mind that quickly in such a short period of time about someone who he's known for decades, then he's a complete moron, and that's worse than lying.
It's knowable within the 95% confidence level.
That's optimistic.
If you're going to mention French economists, you might as well point out that France actually did implement an income tax that high.....
What's in his tax returns that he is hiding?
That one's obvious.....he doesn't have as much money as he claims.
Does anyone see Congress approving anything Trump asks for?
Yes, for example, from his platform, a Republican congress would approve repealing Obamacare (they've already done it what, a dozen times already?). They would likely increase spending for mental healthcare as a way to handle mass-shootings (again, Republicans have already tried to do that in the last year).
Will they vote for the wall? Maybe, if Trump can actually get Mexico to pay for it. If Trump gets his way, he'll have a bunch of copycats, and then congress will be filled with hucksters. Wait.....
He was lying.
You can't judge by appearance.........but Pence does kind of look homosexual.
he really bears no marks of being a person who could be sold as a moderating influence to Trump.
It kind of makes you wonder if Trump actually is on the conservative side of the divide, despite spending plenty of money on democrats in the past (and avowing liberal opinions).
tbh he comes across as kind of a blockhead, so maybe he matches Donald Trump. I can't stand listening to him, so in that sense he matches Trump.
Because people vote based on what thy say. Imagine you voted for someone to do something, then they changed their mind and did the opposite. The more common scenario was that they were lying (see for example: Mitt Romney on abortion, Obama on gay marriage, Arlen Specter on party).
People are allowed to change their minds, but politicians should have a good reason why, which Sanders did not.
Microsoft won't be subject to another anti-trust lawsuit because they pay their 'bills', donating to politicians.
Antitrust lawsuits are almost always political tools.
According to them, the robot tried evasive action, when the kid changed direction and ran directly into the robot. At which point the robot halted.
Why do people think that Silcon valley is the be all and end all of software development?
It pays better. That's why for me.
Yeah, it's true that housing costs are expensive, but where else can you get $170k-$200k? That's more than enough to make up for the increased expenses.
Too much focus on New Technology that the organization may not implement. Too much focus on older technology that we are trying to faze out, or had removed a long time ago.
So no new technology, and no old technology.
I think I see your problem.
Every major city I've ever lived in across the US has been teeming with job openings in the tech sector.
Sometimes it feels like there's nothing but software jobs in Silicon Valley.
Yeah. I was hoping I would never have to hear about Sarah Palin again.
FFS it's shit like this which makes outsiders look at the Linux community and wonder why we can't just get over things and focus on actual issues, like making desktops that rival Windows and focus on the actual issues with Linux rather than these trivial matters.
Code quality is the actual issue....otherwise we might as well give up and just use Windows. We want a clean, good system.
Java isn't supposed to be able to get out of its sandbox without permission, yet it's the source of many vulnerabilities. Why would we trust Rust to be any safer?
You don't know what you are talking about. Rust is built to make avoid memory leaks and buffer overflows. It does a good job at that.
Java doesn't have a problem with memory overflows, either, but you got confused between the plugin and the language. The Java language was fine, the plugin (with its sandbox) had problems.
At least your argument there is based in facts, instead of abstractly saying "all things are unknowable" like that other guy. So good job.
I think gmail set the precedent, by collapsing the quoted text, and setting the cursor at the top of the screen. At least, the disappearance of bottom-posting seems to coincide with the rise of gmail in my memory.
He has influence over comments. He doesn't have influence over systemd.
Tengrism. There is nothing but the sky.
Descartes proved that.
He made an argument about it, not a proof.
Since you are having trouble distinguishing the difference between a proof and an argument, that is just further evidence you're off your groove today. Take a rest.
I don't know that he would have been better
You don't know you exist.
Yeah, it was both a bad plan, and also poorly implemented.