Slashdot Mirror


90% Of Software Developers Work Outside Silicon Valley (qz.com)

An anonymous reader shares a Quartz report: So much code to write, so few developers. The chronic talent shortage afflicting Silicon Valley is now all over the US -- and the developers are too. A study by the software trade group The App Association analyzed government and private sector data to map where software developers live, and it identified 223,054 open positions around the country. It found that most developers live far away from the technology epicenter of Silicon Valley, and job openings follow a similar pattern. The upshot: Silicon Valley-style talent wars are moving away from tech hubs to smaller metro and even rural areas. Everywhere from rural Vermont to the middle of Montana is in need of programmers. "You can find places where you didn't expect software developers to be, but they are part of the local economy," said association spokesman Jonathan Godfrey in an interview. "It's pretty much everywhere."

180 comments

  1. Yeah, overseas by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hooray for cheap, outsourced code monkeys!

    1. Re:Yeah, overseas by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Google can't wait until 90% of developers work in India.

    2. Re:Yeah, overseas by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They do, but here in the Valley we call it Sunnyvale.

  2. It's Simple Economics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Why would I pay $3000/month to share a ROOM with four other people making $120K when I can BUY a four bedroom house on one acre of land in the country for $825/month on half that salary anywhere between the Rocky and Appalachian mountain ranges? I'd take the boring enterprise 9-5 job at a no-name B2B service company any day of the week and enjoy my big house and yard with my kids any day of the week.

    1. Re:It's Simple Economics by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 1

      Why would I pay $3000/month to share a ROOM with four other people

      You don't. Even in the heart of SV, you can rent your own room for about $1000/month. You can find $700-$800 rooms in south San Jose, or Fremont. Or $500 in Gilroy, but the commute will eat up the savings. Go to Craigslist, click on "sby", then "rooms for rent".

    2. Re:It's Simple Economics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A couple of months ago I bought a 30-acre spread in rural North Florida for under half what I'm paying in rent for my current place in South Florida -- which doesn't even have its own *yard*. And recruiters express surprise when I tell them I'm not willing to relocate to California.

    3. Re:It's Simple Economics by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      Why would I pay $3000/month to share a ROOM with four other people [...]

      I pay $1477 for a 475-sqf studio apartment in San Jose, where I lived there by myself for 10+ years and make only $50K per year in IT support.

    4. Re:It's Simple Economics by SecurityGuy · · Score: 1

      You don't. Even in the heart of SV, you can rent your own room for about $1000/month.

      Or you can buy a decent house here for that. So am I surprised most software developers don't live in Silicon Valley? No. For the same reason I never moved there.

      Aside from that, as mcmonkey quite correctly pointed out, most of everything is outside of Silicon Valley. Most of anything is outside of any given city.

    5. Re:It's Simple Economics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Montreal, Canada

      I spend $975/month for 5 rooms, 10 minutes from downtown by metro, 20 minutes by bus or 15 minutes by bike to work at an enterprise software company, $15 to $25 for a taxi ride to as much nightlife as one could handle.

      And here, in san francisco, you're spending $25 more, for a room. *shrug*

    6. Re:It's Simple Economics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      that's more than my mortgage for a 3000 sqf single family home. And I live in Denver which isn't exactly the lowest of cost places to live.

    7. Re:It's Simple Economics by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      that's more than my mortgage for a 3000 sqf single family home.

      When I first moved in 10+ years ago, the rent was $800 per month, the security deposit was $199 and I got a free microwave oven. What I pay in rent today is actually $300 below current market rate.

    8. Re:It's Simple Economics by snoig · · Score: 1

      You haven't been to Denver lately.

    9. Re:It's Simple Economics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Why would I pay $3000/month to share a ROOM with four other people [...]

      I pay $1477 for a 475-sqf studio apartment in San Jose, where I lived there by myself for 10+ years and make only $50K per year in IT support.

      Meanwhile I pay less than that for a 4-bedroom house with a full basement, 2-car garage, and a half-acre yard less than an hour outside of Chicago, close to my own city's downtown and local Metra station. I also make at over 50% more than you here as well, sounds like you're getting ripped off considering the area.

    10. Re:It's Simple Economics by ProzacPatient · · Score: 1

      I'm a remote developer for a mid-sized company doing a boring 9-5 enterprise job and I live in rural North Carolina where I pay $797/mo for a 2,200/sqft 3 bedroom house on an acre of land on a quiet private road. I also have great neighbors, everyone in town knows each other and I have reasonably fast internet with fiber coming within the next 5 years. You couldn't pay me enough to live in, or in any place like, overcrowded and overpriced Silicone Valley instead of where I do now.

    11. Re:It's Simple Economics by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 1

      It's not. We bought a 2200 sqf three-story house for $6000 in cash. (Not in the US, before you ask).

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    12. Re:It's Simple Economics by Pulzar · · Score: 1

      I spend $975/month for 5 rooms, 10 minutes from downtown by metro, 20 minutes by bus or 15 minutes by bike to work at an enterprise software company, $15 to $25 for a taxi ride to as much nightlife as one could handle.

      Yeah, but you get paid less, the taxes are high, you have fewer jobs to choose from, and the weather sucks for large chunks of the year. The closest major city is the most boring place in Canada, and Toronto is 5 hours away. Good skiing available nearby, at least. And a lot of strip clubs :).

      Pros and cons to everything. I'd still take Montreal over SV, but there are many affordable places better (for techies) than both.

      --
      Never underestimate the bandwidth of a 747 filled with CD-ROMs.
    13. Re:It's Simple Economics by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      [...] sounds like you're getting ripped off considering the area.

      Unless like most people, I was born and raised here. I'm not yet ready to let the hipsters run me out of town.

    14. Re:It's Simple Economics by DigiShaman · · Score: 1

      The cold hard factual brutal reality of the situation of SanFran is this: This is the city of the young college graduate working campus. It's the first place you go as a professional first to cut your teeth on prior to leaving to another state/city to get married, have children, and settle down. SanFran will ALWAYS have a perpetual flow of a young expendable *cheap* workforce. Now add to the fact you've got unlimited H1Bs living in communes for the very same reason (prior to going back home to China and India) and you've got exactly what simple is of San Fran - a giant youth working campus/city. IT IS NOT A PLACE TO RAISE A FAMILY!!

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
    15. Re:It's Simple Economics by lgw · · Score: 1

      That's actually cheaper than the the tech area of downtown Seattle, where a small studio apartment runs ~$1800 if you're moving in now. Of course, there are also 50-somehting new highrises going up in Seattle, mostly residential, so maybe that will help a bit.

      San Jose is high, but it's not crazy. I found the pay more than offset the cost - just stay away from SF. Seattle is bordering on crazy, but at least they're building out.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    16. Re:It's Simple Economics by bhcompy · · Score: 1

      Seattle has inexpensive commutable areas much closer than SV. I have a friend who commutes from Tracy to Redwood City. That's fucking ridiculous(2-3 hours if you don't pay tolls, 1.5-2.5 hours if you do). Renton to Seattle(or Redmond or Bellevue or whatever) is 30 minutes.

    17. Re:It's Simple Economics by Sowelu · · Score: 1

      When?

    18. Re:It's Simple Economics by Sowelu · · Score: 1

      When I worked for AMZN, parking was like $200/mo after company reimbursement, so there are definitely financial incentives to living somewhere within walking distance. (I lived somewhere where busing would turn a 40 minute commute to a 70 minute one, and I value an hour a day not on the road.) Hell, it would be a pretty tough call on how much less space I'm willing to live in to trade for a ten minute walking commute. Back when I was single at least--not so much now.

    19. Re:It's Simple Economics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pay the same for house but with a 3 car garage and make $164k, and 15 minutes from downtown Kansas City. People need to get out of the rat race.

    20. Re:It's Simple Economics by luis_a_espinal · · Score: 1

      Why would I pay $3000/month to share a ROOM with four other people making $120K when I can BUY a four bedroom house on one acre of land in the country for $825/month on half that salary anywhere between the Rocky and Appalachian mountain ranges? I'd take the boring enterprise 9-5 job at a no-name B2B service company any day of the week and enjoy my big house and yard with my kids any day of the week.

      I agree with you, partly, on the wisdom of paying crazy rent in the valley. But I have misgivings about living away from major metropolitan areas because the smaller the metro area, the less number of employers. Less expensive real state tends to correlate with a smaller number of employers (and thus a greater risk when things go south.)

      So there is a balance where, at least for me, I prefer to pay the extra cost of living in a large metropolitan area (say, Atlanta, South Florida, Dallas, Denver, Portland or Seattle) as insurance against being bound to a very small number of employers.

      But as some point, as you mention, the increased cost makes no sense because it begins to trample on quality of life. If I were to pay so much for renting in the Valley, I might as well move to a megapolis like NYC or Tokyo (much larger, more interesting places with a sufficiently large number of employers.)

    21. Re:It's Simple Economics by luis_a_espinal · · Score: 1

      You don't. Even in the heart of SV, you can rent your own room for about $1000/month.

      Or you can buy a decent house here for that. So am I surprised most software developers don't live in Silicon Valley? No. For the same reason I never moved there.

      Aside from that, as mcmonkey quite correctly pointed out, most of everything is outside of Silicon Valley. Most of anything is outside of any given city.

      Are you sure about that? Because I pretty much gave up trying to move to the valley because I could not find anything decent for that price. Yeah, I could find that in very shitty areas, but what would be the point of that? I did the math, and pretty much I would have to earn 3X of what I make now to afford the type of housing, schools and amenities that I currently provide my family (and I live in South Florida, not the cheapest of regions.)

    22. Re:It's Simple Economics by Hognoxious · · Score: 0

      What I used to pay in rent was actually $300 below current market rate.

      FTFY.

      Signed,
          Your landlord.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    23. Re:It's Simple Economics by luis_a_espinal · · Score: 1

      Why would I pay $3000/month to share a ROOM with four other people [...]

      I pay $1477 for a 475-sqf studio apartment in San Jose, where I lived there by myself for 10+ years and make only $50K per year in IT support.

      You can make almost twice as much and pay the same amount for a 2-bedroom apartment rental with 1-car garage in a decent area here in South Florida. You are getting ripped off. What the hell are you doing there?

    24. Re:It's Simple Economics by luis_a_espinal · · Score: 2

      [...] sounds like you're getting ripped off considering the area.

      Unless like most people, I was born and raised here. I'm not yet ready to let the hipsters run me out of town.

      But you are certainly bleeding money. Money is not everything, but by God, do the math. You could be losing between $300K to $500K in wages in 10 years if you stay where you are. That's not chump change.

    25. Re:It's Simple Economics by lgw · · Score: 1

      Redmond and Bellevue aren't cheap by non-SV standards (I pay north of $2400 for a two bedroom) and the commute is getting measurably longer. Hopefully that will settle down once all this new housing comes online.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    26. Re:It's Simple Economics by stinerman · · Score: 1

      I have a 1500 sq. ft. house that is $800/mo including escrow and PMI. My commute is 5 minutes.

      My salary would probably have to quintuple before I'd even consider going to SV for work.

    27. Re:It's Simple Economics by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      Money is not everything, but by God, do the math.

      I could move away to a cheaper area, but pay more in commute and time costs. Or I could make the best of my situation. Either way, I'm still saving 20% of my income.

    28. Re:It's Simple Economics by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      [...] here in South Florida.

      Real estate is cheap because South Florida will be under water by end of century.

      What the hell are you doing there?

      Born and raised here. One of the few natives still left here.

    29. Re:It's Simple Economics by ezelkow1 · · Score: 1

      Have they said if its going to be actual affordable housing? If not I wouldnt count on it. In denver they've been building apartments and condos like gangbusters. However all of them are still priced ridiculously high that Im not sure who all these people are that can afford them. Seems like average rent for a place outside of denver thats nice and about a 10-15 min commute to the tech area runs about 1200-1400/mo, but all these new places start at at least 2000 for a one bed to rent and most are 400k+ to purchase

      More places get built, open up, and everyone's rents keep climbing to match

    30. Re:It's Simple Economics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But do you know which public bathroom you are allowed to use?

    31. Re:It's Simple Economics by crgrace · · Score: 1

      I'm raising my family in SF. It's great. Lots of culture, lots of playgrounds, vibrant public schools, lots of engaged parents. SF has amazing food, interesting places to go for day trips, tons of museums and libraries. It's a great place to raise kids.

    32. Re:It's Simple Economics by lgw · · Score: 2

      Supply and demand will sort it out in the long run. What's terrible is when only new businesses get built, and no new housing - then it goes through the roof. That was happening for a while in Seattle.

      My real hope is that all the new downtown housing drains the suburbs a bit, making the commute easier and suburban rents cheaper as demand declines.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    33. Re:It's Simple Economics by PCM2 · · Score: 1

      I agree with your sentiments on raising a family but since you insist on calling it "SanFran" I, for one, can't wait for you to leave.

      --
      Breakfast served all day!
    34. Re:It's Simple Economics by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 1

      I have a 1500 sq. ft. house that is $800/mo

      You could rent that for $3000/mo in SV. So the difference is $2200/mo or about $28k/yr.

      My salary would probably have to quintuple before I'd even consider going to SV for work.

      If your salary would have to quintuple to get an extra $28k/yr, then you aren't even making minimum wage.

      Other than housing, costs are not particularly high in SV. Gasoline is slightly more than average. Groceries are the same. Utilities tend to be lower since the weather is nearly perfect, so you don't need to heat or cool much. The schools are among the best in America.

    35. Re:It's Simple Economics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, but you get paid less, the taxes are high, you have fewer jobs to choose from, and the weather sucks for large chunks of the year.

      Sortof the main point of TFA is that the vast majority of jobs are not in SV. They're all over the country, wherever large numbers of people live and work.

    36. Re:It's Simple Economics by JoeMerchant · · Score: 1

      I'm absolutely shocked that anyone would make the claim that "10% of all software is written in Silicon Valley" - what utter tripe! Silicon Valley may be tech heavy, but it contains less than 0.001% of the world's population that is technically capable of writing software.

      Two million new Android developers in India next year, are there 200,000 Android developers in the valley?

    37. Re:It's Simple Economics by DigiShaman · · Score: 1

      I've been there, worked there, will never live there.

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
    38. Re:It's Simple Economics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you fucking JOKING? I just did exactly what you suggested, and I can assure you, I would no more follow your advice about housing than I would live in Silicon Valley as an engineer. I sorted by "increasing price" to see all these great bargains. Here's what I found:

      http://sfbay.craigslist.org/sb... - "Hey ladies - the van is where I rape you. Repeatedly."
      http://sfbay.craigslist.org/sb... - "I'm unemployed and you should be as into yoga as I am."
      http://sfbay.craigslist.org/sb... - "Let's share the same bedroom, with bunk beds!"
      http://sfbay.craigslist.org/sb... - "I can't get laid, so I hope I'll be able to fuck my roommate."
      http://sfbay.craigslist.org/sb... - "Are you a recovering alcoholic or narcotics addict? Let's share a room!"

      You've GOT to be kidding me, if you think these are "reasonable" ways to live for any professional making a 6 figure salary. These are, at *best* college dorm-style roommate arrangements: you have zero privacy, next to zero space, and zero quality of living, unless making ramen on a fucking hot plate while playing Xbox is your idea of luxury.

      You're absolutely loony if you think any of this bullshit could be viewed as "reasonable". The more expensive listings in "rooms for rent" run up to 1200-1500 per month, and again, that is *for a room* in a shared home -- i.e., "this is your bedroom, 12 other people share this bathroom and kitchen."

      Now, if I swing over to "apartments", and start looking around - I can find a $900/month 1 bedroom... that's 2.5 hours and 90 miles away from Cupertino. Not bad if I plow all my savings into a helicopter, right? http://sfbay.craigslist.org/sb...

      It rapidly escalates into 1500-2000 per month range, for 1BR *500-600 sq ft* places, in dubious areas for pretty dingy looking apartments, and prices go on up to the stratosphere from there if you want a "nice-ish" place. For $1450 a month, that's at the HIGH end of 1 BR rentals in Austin. For $1100 a month, I rented a 1BR + Den, 900 sqft apartment in NH about 40 minutes from Boston.

      The people who want to live in Silicon Valley under these types of conditions are fucking mad.

    39. Re:It's Simple Economics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I pay $1477 for a 475-sqf studio apartment in San Jose, where I lived there by myself for 10+ years and make only $50K per year in IT support.

      Meanwhile, in Mountain View (what's defined as "the" Silicon Valley area), I pay $1995/month for a 900sqft 1BA/1BD flat that was built in the 40s, has no aircon, no dishwasher, no proper electrical grounding, uses appliances from the late 80s, and up until last year used lead pipes for its plumbing. This is a 6-apartment building next to Castro St.. When I moved in 5 years ago, my rent was $1625/month. Currently the most-recently-rented-out apartment downstairs from me, which has newer appliances and is 800sqft but is the same otherwise, goes for $2800/month. Yes, you read that correctly.

      There's a reason Mountain View as of last month put a Rental Dispute Resolution into place -- but if you read between the lines, it doesn't say that a landlord can't increase rent more than 7.2%, just that if they do, "things might happen" (such as the city paying for arbitration). In other words: there's no rent limit actually imposed, it's more of a "hey you shouldn't do that" guideline.

      In other words: the rent here has skyrocketed massively in the past 8 years or so, and there is no end in sight. I've lived in Mountain View exclusively since 1999. So people working for companies in the Bay Area, but living/residing in another state or somewhere outside of the Bay, makes a lot of sense.

    40. Re:It's Simple Economics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So you spend 34% of your GROSS income on RENTING a room the size of a postage stamp? That sounds like a really stupid way to live, if you ask me.

      First: you could probably get more than 50k per year in IT support in other areas of the country.

      Second: you could definitely get more real estate for $1477 a month.

      Third: If you wanted to save (and, if you only make 50k/year, you should want to - that's not exactly fuck you money), then you could rent a 475 square foot place in a much nicer town than SJ for a LOT less than $1477 a month.

    41. Re:It's Simple Economics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lots of culture, lots of playgrounds, vibrant public schools, lots of engaged parents. SF has amazing food, interesting places to go for day trips, tons of museums and libraries. It's a great place to raise kids.

      There are other places that are just as great - with access to lots of culture, lots of playgrounds, good public schools, amazing food, interesting day trips, and tons of museums and libraries.

      You are attempting to rationalize your choice - you can literally have all of that, with more space and more spending money, anywhere else in the country. This notion that San Francisco is somehow extraordinary is a myth.

    42. Re: It's Simple Economics by kellymcdonald78 · · Score: 1

      And California will have slid into the ocean after the Big One. Seems like asinine stubbornness to ignore opportunities in places where you weren't born. What do you plan to do with your savings? Retire to an old folks home in the same neighborhood?

    43. Re: It's Simple Economics by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      And California will have slid into the ocean after the Big One.

      Still waiting after 30+ years.

      What do you plan to do with your savings? Retire to an old folks home in the same neighborhood?

      Las Vegas. Should be far enough inland to avoid the flooding of the SF Bay Area and Central Valley from rising sea levels.

    44. Re:It's Simple Economics by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      First: you could probably get more than 50k per year in IT support in other areas of the country.

      I work for government IT and $50K is the national average this position. On the bright, I'm two years into a five-year contract that's fully funded. Job security and consistent income is a nice trade off.

      So you spend 34% of your GROSS income on RENTING a room the size of a postage stamp?

      My studio apartment is quite big for my needs. I could probably live in a smaller space, maybe less than 150 square foot. Smaller spaces don't necessarily mean less rent unless I go further out from downtown.

      That sounds like a really stupid way to live, if you ask me.

      No, I didn't. :P

      [...] a much nicer town than SJ [...]

      I'm in the sweet spot for public transit. I'm an hour away from North San Jose (light rail), Mountain View (Caltrain) and Palo Alto (express bus).

    45. Re:It's Simple Economics by bhcompy · · Score: 1

      I wasn't saying they were living areas, more areas to commute to for work(with a generic cheap very close city like Renton as a base living area). Renton is cheap and sub-30min from those areas(where jobs are).

    46. Re:It's Simple Economics by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      It doesn't cost that much. Seriously. Just don't live in San Francisco (which is NOT silicon valley).

      As for software, it's never been the biggest thing in Silicon Valley until the last decade. It's called "silicon" not "software", and was a big engineering hub before the wannabe programmers moved in with their social media.

      The reason the valley is nice is that if you lose your job then there's another one nearby. Employers at the moment do not like you to work from home or telecommute. Even for software the majority of them want you in the office at least once day a week. So that means if you're in Appalachia in an affordable home and lose your job that you may have to move somewhere else. Even if you're not in Silicon Valley you do well being in a hub where there are a lot of companies doing software or engineering.

    47. Re:It's Simple Economics by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      The commute from there is much better than the commute from San Francisco though, and fewer hipsters as neighbors.

    48. Re: It's Simple Economics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      there's a reason this is called "flyover country"

    49. Re: It's Simple Economics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No he's not sure about that. You can't get a house in almost all of California for that. $1000 per month is a mortgage of about $150k. This is no where near the median home value in the bulk of populated California. If you need a mortgage payment around $1000 you're not living in California end of story

    50. Re:It's Simple Economics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The people who want to live in Silicon Valley under these types of conditions are fucking mad.

      They're Progressives living in their utopia.

    51. Re: It's Simple Economics by kellymcdonald78 · · Score: 1

      So you wouldn't move to Southern Florida since you're concerned it might be under water by the end of the century, but you're not concerned about a major earthquake in the Bay Area over the same 85 year period. If your intent is to move to Vegas one day, what's stopping you from doing it today?

    52. Re: It's Simple Economics by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      If your intent is to move to Vegas one day, what's stopping you from doing it today?

      I'm 25 years away from retirement. If I'm going to spend my twilight years at the casinos, I'll need to save up for some gambling money.

    53. Re:It's Simple Economics by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      Yes, you read that correctly.

      When my roommates and I split up after living in the same triplex in Cupertino for six years, the landlord was happy to see us go. We were paying $1,600 per month. After we moved out, he raised the rent to $3,200 as the real estate market sizzled in the run up to the dot com bust. If he still owns the triplex today, the rent should be astronomical now as the triplex is down the street from the new Apple campus and the nearby shopping mall is being rebuilt into a mixed development.

    54. Re:It's Simple Economics by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 1

      About fifteen years ago, I think.

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    55. Re: It's Simple Economics by kellymcdonald78 · · Score: 1

      You don't need to retire. You could move to Vegas today, get a job making the same money, and buy a nice house with the same money you're currently plowing into rent. I don't get this whole mindset of "all the great things I'll do when I'm retired" while ignoring that you could be doing them right now.

  3. Rural Montana ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The problem with living in one of these remote places is that when the company you work for shuts down or lays you off, it's time to move.

    I'm in DC Metro area, and I hate it, but I can get another job in minutes.

    But there's no way I'd go to Silicon Valley. The 1000 sq' house in Sunnyvale that I grew up in is worth millions now. I could never afford to live there again.

  4. xkcd by Austerity+Empowers · · Score: 5, Interesting

    One look at the map in TFA and this came to mind: https://xkcd.com/1138/

    I guess it surprises someone that "software development" includes a whole lot of people all over the country. Databases don't query themselves, and there's always a lot of corporate tools in every line of work. Software developers make them...

    1. Re:xkcd by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      there's always a lot of corporate tools in every line of work. Software developers make them...

      Software developers ARE them.

    2. Re:xkcd by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Large investors prefer to think their pet fortune-500 investment is a good summation of the target market. You see things like this of people being legitimately shocked to discover it isn't the case when something makes them step outside of their bubble. In reality Silicon Valley is more a parasite on the tech industry with the marketing prowess and backward political activism of Commifornia than it is a tech hub.

    3. Re:xkcd by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One look at the map in TFA and this came to mind: https://xkcd.com/1138/

      Neither India nor China are on those maps. Those maps show consumers, not developers.

    4. Re:xkcd by oakgrove · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I guess it surprises someone that "software development" includes a whole lot of people all over the country.

      It actually surprises me that a full 10 percent of software jobs are actually in Silicon Valley. Every major city I've ever lived in across the US has been teeming with job openings in the tech sector. Just seems kind of weird that the headline of the article is going on about 90 percent of software developers working outside the valley. Is this news to anyone?

      --
      The soylentnews experiment has been a dismal failure.
    5. Re:xkcd by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't understand, are you saying there's more than 500 companies in the US? Well, I mean, there's the Fortune 2000 but that's scraping the bottom of the mom and pop barrel there. They don't really count, do they?

    6. Re:xkcd by luis_a_espinal · · Score: 1

      I guess it surprises someone that "software development" includes a whole lot of people all over the country.

      It actually surprises me that a full 10 percent of software jobs are actually in Silicon Valley. Every major city I've ever lived in across the US has been teeming with job openings in the tech sector. Just seems kind of weird that the headline of the article is going on about 90 percent of software developers working outside the valley. Is this news to anyone?

      For the mobile app/unicorn hipsters in the valley, yep.

    7. Re:xkcd by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      Don't be silly. Theoretically it's possible, but it's fundamentally as stupid as saying that if you got enough sengis they'd be heavier than not one - but two - elephants. Which is clearly bollocks, because even a single elephant is bloody huge and I don't even know what a sengi/o/us is.

      LIke if it was the case, you'd have to come up with some retarded name like a power law or or even a made-up word like "zipf" to describe it.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    8. Re:xkcd by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      Every major city I've ever lived in across the US has been teeming with job openings in the tech sector.

      Sometimes it feels like there's nothing but software jobs in Silicon Valley.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
  5. Nothing is stopping Google by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    from opening up shop in Fresno where the jobs are much needed.

    1. Re:Nothing is stopping Google by slew · · Score: 1

      from opening up shop in Fresno where the jobs are much needed.

      I suspect the thing stopping companies (like Google) from opening offices in a particular place (like Fresno) is that whoever proposes that idea in the company probably wants to find some qualified person currently in the company to move there to supervise the buildup of the company at that location to preserve the company culture.

      If you want some BigAssTechCompany to open an office in Fresno, probably the best way to do that is to join said BigAssTechCompany at the headquarters (perhaps in the bay area), work your way up the ladder and become a known leader in the company. Then you can make your case that it would make sense to open an office in Fresno and if the higher-ups agree, then move to Fresno and become a site leader.

      If it actually made sense (not saying Fresno makes sense), but nobody has done it yet, it is probably because the transplant-able person that could make it happen doesn't yet work for BigAssTechCompany, or maybe such a person doesn't actually want to move back to Fresno after working in at headquarters for a while (perhaps enjoys living bay area or has kids in school, etc, etc, or maybe has just grown to hate enduring the summer heat in Fresno)...

    2. Re:Nothing is stopping Google by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      I suspect the thing stopping companies (like Google) from opening offices in a particular place (like Fresno) in [...]

      A lot of people who work in Silicon Valley live in Fresno and commute four hours each way every day. I knew a coworker at eBay who carpooled with four other people, each person driving one day out of the week. If Google opened a satellite campus in Fresno, they will probably have 50+ employees to staff it.

    3. Re:Nothing is stopping Google by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I suspect the thing stopping companies (like Google) from opening offices in a particular place (like Fresno) in [...]

      A lot of people who work in Silicon Valley live in Fresno and commute four hours each way every day. I knew a coworker at eBay who carpooled with four other people, each person driving one day out of the week. If Google opened a satellite campus in Fresno, they will probably have 50+ employees to staff it.

      Someone that insane shouldn't be running an office anyway.

    4. Re:Nothing is stopping Google by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      Someone that insane shouldn't be running an office anyway.

      The person who is willing to commute four hours each way? He bought a five-bedroom ranch house in Fresno. I think he telecommutes in his current job.

    5. Re:Nothing is stopping Google by slew · · Score: 1

      I suspect the thing stopping companies (like Google) from opening offices in a particular place (like Fresno) in [...]

      A lot of people who work in Silicon Valley live in Fresno and commute four hours each way every day. I knew a coworker at eBay who carpooled with four other people, each person driving one day out of the week. If Google opened a satellite campus in Fresno, they will probably have 50+ employees to staff it.

      Given the stereotypical sillyvalley culture (e.g, young, unmarried, saying late at work, etc, etc), I suspect these people do not fit the profile of a company leader that can keep the torch for the company culture for a remote office.

      Having been through these remote office actualities with companies of different size, the empirical evidence is that finding acceptable site leaders is often the biggest obstacles. A warm body (even if a outstanding technical contributor) is insufficient qualifications for being a site leader. You generally need to find someone fully invested in the koolaid, yet still respected many people in the company... Even if you do find one of these people, sometimes they don't have all the skills that are needed and you find that need more than one person to make it work.

      Then you need to keep your fingers crossed that those site leaders you pick don't morph on you (e.g, turn out to be an empire builder, unmanageable remote operator, or zombie worker, other such corporate parasite) when nobody is around watching them....

  6. Rubbish by PmanAce · · Score: 1

    It's pretty much everywhere BECAUSE companies are pretty much everywhere.

    --
    Tired of my customary (Score:1)
    1. Re:Rubbish by jellomizer · · Score: 3, Interesting

      The real question I was wondering why does anyone find that surprising?
      While Silicon Valley is a major technology hub (10% of the software developers is HUGE!) there is need for software development across the globe. Many Major colleges teach Computer Science and Computer Engineering around the world, However there are a lot of Major ones in the North Eastern US. It is insane to think that all these people whose home is spread across the world, will travel away from it to study in colleges in one half of the country, then travel 2000 miles to the other end of the country for work?
      Most of these people tend to stay near their homes or their colleges (Hence why a lot of communities like having colleges in their area, causing a lot of new business around those areas, from young new grads, who have nothing to lose and startup new companies).

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    2. Re:Rubbish by PmanAce · · Score: 1

      Almost every college offers computer science. No need to go study it in the north east US.

      --
      Tired of my customary (Score:1)
  7. yes, because the alternative is frowned upon by nimbius · · Score: 5, Funny

    10-15 years ago i made a vigorous proposal to move all software developers into silicon valley for easier categorization. Cattle ranchers would be moved into cattle valley, and car repairmen would be moved into car valley (this makes indexing and normalization easier.) problems began to mount from the start. Some people complained they "didnt want to leave" their friends and family. others answered back with "sure ill move but i dont have a job" and "when will i see my wife again, you told me she was safe." Whiners.

    Anyhow once id approacher 40% of developers I noticed they didnt stack well, and many of them complained of food shortages and transportation problems. Id instituted a "no family" policy to try and remedy this, and it worked for a while, until people told me that id have to find a way to get new software developers imported. Constructing a giant tube, i used it to hydraulically propel anyone from about age 17 on who tweeted even a cursory interest in software into my silicon valley. things were working well, so long as once weekly I greased all my programmers so they could move freely in the valley and made sure to flood their cubicles with nutrition slurry once or twice a day. Then the real issues started to mount. once id hit 80% of all developers, their combined mass and pressure was enough to begin to elicit a gravitational field. Project managers now had to come with an escape velocity equation in their salary, and pizzas from neighbouring cities were delivered from 3 miles outside the valley by letting go of the pie and hoping for the best. I unfortunately had to give up on my grand vision of a valley of programmers when a rogue sysadmin at a rest stop accidentally flew into the valley and impacted it with enough force to blanket the valley in a dark cloud of coffee beans and office chairs. its now a cold, barren wasteland inhabited by a race of creatures that subsist entirely on fried meat and energy drinks. they communicate in an arcane language of 3 letter abbreviations and social justice causes.

    --
    Good people go to bed earlier.
    1. Re:yes, because the alternative is frowned upon by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

      Others started to think that way and before long they moved all the Jews into a camp.

    2. Re:yes, because the alternative is frowned upon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Where does your plan put the people who design the control software and signal processors for the car's control systems?

  8. Re:Rural Montana ? by ngc3242 · · Score: 1

    This is exactly right.

    It's actually not a bad way to live if you're young. You can live in and get to know many different places, but once you start to get settled with a family, you can't be uprooting them to move somewhere else every time the company you work for gets bought, "changes strategic direction", or whatever.

  9. No Kidding by nitehawk214 · · Score: 1

    It's almost like there are way more people living on the east coast than the west coast.

    --
    I'm a good cook. I'm a fantastic eater. - Steven Brust
  10. How convenient by smooth+wombat · · Score: 4, Insightful

    A trade group for the software industry claiming there are a quarter million software jobs open around the country. Yet oddly, when people with years of experience apply for these positions they are routinely told they don't have the experience the company is looking for.

    Granted, not every candidate has the experience for every position, but it seems quite odd that for all the people who apply for a position, not one is qualified. Ever. Not even remotely close qualified. Even with the thousands of new developers being sent to pasture every month from other companies.

    And here we have a trade group for the software industry essentially claiming the same thing. Coincidence? You decide.

    --
    We will bankrupt ourselves in the vain search for absolute security. -- Dwight D. Eisenhower
    1. Re:How convenient by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

      They like there chained to the job H1B's

    2. Re:How convenient by computational+super · · Score: 1

      You're not the only one who's noticed this. Although I am currently employed, and have actually never been out of work since I started working around '94 or so, I do change jobs every 3-5 years on the average. And I've had some very inexplicable rejections for positions that I was beyond qualified for. On paper, at least, I look good (I like to think I'm pretty good in person, too, but "on paper" is completely objective), yet I've been rejected from way more developer positions that I've had every single qualification they asked for (and most of the nice-to-haves) than I've been hired for. Sometimes I feel like somebody is just yanking my chain.

      --
      Proud neuron in the Slashdot hivemind since 2002.
    3. Re:How convenient by jellomizer · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Being involved in the hiring process, I find that a lot of technology candidates with many years of experience do not have the right experience. Too much focus on New Technology that the organization may not implement. Too much focus on older technology that we are trying to faze out, or had removed a long time ago. Or jobs that require basic human interaction, because no matter how good they are technically, we don't want need a jackass who makes everyone looks bad. Where you are better off with someone with less skillsets, who is better for the job.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    4. Re:How convenient by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Too much focus on New Technology...Too much focus on older technology...

      So, did you put what you wanted in the job posting? Or did you just list a bunch of buzzwords then filter out everyone after the fact?

    5. Re:How convenient by Karl+Cocknozzle · · Score: 2

      A trade group for the software industry claiming there are a quarter million software jobs open around the country. Yet oddly, when people with years of experience apply for these positions they are routinely told they don't have the experience the company is looking for.

      Indeed. This is part of the "have to find a pink unicorn" philosophy of corporate hiring brought about by the disposable worker phenomenon. That is: Companies only want to hire the special snowflake that already has 100% of the skills and knowledge they want because they are willing to invest $0 in training them to do the job. Once upon a time, experience in related (but not identical) skills and tools were considered a good measurement of whether you could learn something and be good at a job involving it. Nowadays, you're totally disqualified if you're not an absolutely exact match.

      Not coincidentally, this same philosophy leads to the endless import of H1-Bs willing to work for 40% less than an American, and is espoused by a very strongly correlated and overlapping group of folks. Most of the people preaching "skill shortage!" also are the ones proposing the solution is to import cheap labor from abroad.

      --
      Who did what now?
    6. Re:How convenient by pr0fessor · · Score: 1

      I have had to deal with plenty of entry level people trying to fill senior level positions either they make it through the trial by fire or they don't. If those people you are hiring for their charisma you find leaving in less than a year chances are you need to rethink that strategy.

    7. Re:How convenient by lgw · · Score: 1

      And here we have a trade group for the software industry essentially claiming the same thing. Coincidence? You decide.

      Every place I've worked on the West Coast has a developer hiring bar that turns away between 60% and 80% of those they interview. "Experience" on the resume doesn't matter once you're that far - it's all about demonstrating coding skills.

      I don't think it's a great system. I see too many candidate rejected who would be perfectly acceptable in the role. The bar is set high enough that normal random performance variation of the candidates mean there's IMO a 50% chance that any given qualified candidate gets hired.

      When these companies complain about "lack of talent", it's nothing to do with H1-Bs, and everything to do with a misplaced drive to hire "only the best". It's good to filter out the losers who just suck up everyone's time on the team, but what I see happening is "only the lucky, among the good", which is just a bad system.

      Still, a remarkable chunk of candidates with great resumes (at least a third) just can't code for shit, so I can't object to the basic idea of demonstrating coding skills in the interview.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    8. Re:How convenient by computational+super · · Score: 1

      Too much focus on New Technology ... Too much focus on older technology

      So... you want somebody who hasn't worked on new technology OR old technology?

      --
      Proud neuron in the Slashdot hivemind since 2002.
    9. Re:How convenient by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      One thing that I can say, is as a business owner ( and software developer e.a the business grew out of my consulting gigs ),
      that i just had to do wade through about 500 applications for one job ( a lead developer position for large scale server software )...

      About 95/100 developers that are out there are next to useless in my experience.

      When hiring i don't care about:

      1.Education ( while having a masters in CS myself, i don't consider it job training, and its just noise, there are good ones with and without degrees )
      2. Age ( who cares if someone is 55, as long as he/she can deliver

      We offer reasonable hours ( 38,5 a week, no overtime required, which is a firm rule i enforce ), and pay almost double the local market rate.

      However about 80/100 candidates that apply cannot solve the simplest coding problems themselves without guidance ( we have a thorough entry test ) and know nothing about proper software development practices.. e.g designing code that it also handles corner cases, has reasonable error handling and so forth.

      E.g understanding what a thread is ( seriously ) and what synchronization is and how it works is beyond even 90 of those 100...

    10. Re:How convenient by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      So... you want somebody who hasn't worked on new technology OR old technology?

      Yeah, my bullshit detector was twitching on this one too.

      Hire a good generalist and TRAIN them.

    11. Re:How convenient by Gavrielkay · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I can understand a personality fit problem, but complaining about 'the right experience' is nonsense. Look for flexible people who can solve problems and they'll pick up whatever your flavor of the month is. Has hiring really come down to stupid HR lists? Must have 3 years of X and 2 years of Y. Please. You should be looking for problem solvers, not people who fit some arbitrary magical list. Yeah, it's harder to evaluate for 'smart, flexible' person than to scan a resume but the result is much better.

    12. Re:How convenient by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or, maybe, you just interview horribly, and come across as an unlikable, off-putting person.

      Here, have an analogy:

      "You just don't have the experience we want" : that company you just interviewed at. :: "I don't want to ruin our friendship" : that cute girl you just asked out who's just not into you.

    13. Re:How convenient by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      Too much focus on New Technology that the organization may not implement. Too much focus on older technology that we are trying to faze out, or had removed a long time ago.

      So no new technology, and no old technology.
      I think I see your problem.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    14. Re:How convenient by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I have never, ever been in a company without open positions. Hell, even in the startups I worked in we'd be hiring until the day we went under. I haven't checked for a long time, but it used to be the case that people stayed in a programming job on average 2 years. So even to fight attrition, in a team of 10 you have to hire 5 people a year. In the companies I work at, we tend to have better attrition rates, but we're still hiring maybe 30% of our entire software team size *every single year*. Even if you only want moderate growth, what it means is that you have to hire 60% of your team every single year.

      So there are *lots* of jobs. The problem is the high attrition rate. 50% of the industry is looking for work. Let me say that again so it sinks in. If you are unemployed, you are not competing against other unemployed people. You are competing against 50% of the industry which is looking to jump to a new job. If I'm hiring 6 people, it's not unreasonable to expect that I'll receive 6000 CVs. At best, I'm going to pick 60 (1%) of those CVs to interview.

      When you apply for a job, you are competing against half the industry and your CV needs to be in the top 1% just to get an interview. It doesn't matter what ridiculous niche experience set you are looking for, with half the industry to pick from and only wanting the top 1%, it's *easy* to pare it down to people with "3 years of R and OCaml". Haven't been working for a long time? You're going to get bumped unless you have something compelling to sway the decision. Applying cold to a large company without *exactly* the requirements they want? Forget about it. You won't make it past HR.

      And the thing is that even once you pare it down to the 1%, most of the time you *still* don't find good enough candidates and you end up under head count.

      So your strategy if you are looking for a job is simple: 1. Send out a *lot* of CVs. 100 is not to much. 2. Make your story compelling. If you are out of work, then start a project and write shit loads of code. Show it to people. I can't stress this enough. 3. Don't rely on cold calls. You must insert yourself into the industry. Go to conferences. Go to meetups. Go to coding dojos. There aren't any of the above where you live? Start them, even if you are the only person who shows up at first. You have to get around HR and the only way to do that is to meet people.

      And last (because it is depressing) software development is a difficult job. It's not for everyone. If you *really* can't make a go of it despite the fact that there are lots of jobs and despite doing all of the above, it's time to be realistic and look at other career options. Even if you have worked as a developer for a long time, it might be time for a career change.

    15. Re:How convenient by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I really wonder what that is. It's definitely not a thing in the uk. I've been called to interview for every single dev position I've applied for and my CV isn't even particularly great. Generally here if you see a job, that job exists and they want good people.

    16. Re:How convenient by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You should be looking for problem solvers, not people who fit some arbitrary magical list. Yeah, it's harder to evaluate for 'smart, flexible' person than to scan a resume but the result is much better.

      Mod parent up. Our best engineers - at ANY experience level - are not the ones with skillset X, Y or Z - they the ones that can do creative problem solving. When I interview you I am looking to see how you solve the problem and talk it out - NOT whether you got it right or not.

      To those struggling to fill a position - first, why do and your coworkers you not have a network of contacts available to help fill that position? That aside - talk to your HR folks. Ask them to send the submitted resumes+cover letters directly to one designated management focal and one designated senior engineer in your department. If your team is serious about filling the position with the right candidate you will take the time to do the filtering yourself rather than having HR do it for you.

    17. Re:How convenient by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The "new" technology is the same "old" technology only with a different name.

    18. Re:How convenient by majid_aldo · · Score: 1

      mod up. i don't have points. but people should just reply to this comment just to emphasize how important this is.

      --
      --- widget evolution: enhanced, plus, super, ultra, extreme, exxxtreme, ultra-extreme, ..etc.
  11. makes sense. by wierd_w · · Score: 2

    You dont have to be from silicon valley to be interested in software, and the best developers are the ones who learned out of personal self interest. such people will be all over the place.

    It makes sense that employers who need and value them will accept telecommuting in exchange for securing that talent, given the so called scarcity. (sweetening the deal, rural US wages are much lower than on the coasts.)

    I really dont see what is so unusual about this statistic.

  12. News flash: People live and work elsewhere by OzPeter · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Film at 11.

    Why do people think that Silcon valley is the be all and end all of software development?

    --
    I am Slashdot. Are you Slashdot as well?
    1. Re:News flash: People live and work elsewhere by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Film at 11.

      Why do people think that Silcon valley is the be all and end all of software development?

      Because SV and the other tech hubs are where a good chunk of the software that the people outside of SV use is made.

      Outside of SV, most software jobs are just crappy web monkey and IT drone jobs. Booo-ring.

    2. Re:News flash: People live and work elsewhere by sjames · · Score: 1

      I'm fairly sure the "Valley People" think the rest of us are living in caves grunting at each other around the fire.

    3. Re:News flash: People live and work elsewhere by ItsJustAPseudonym · · Score: 2

      You have fire? Ug, I'll be right there.

    4. Re:News flash: People live and work elsewhere by bozzy · · Score: 1

      From my experience, people think it's actually in India.

    5. Re:News flash: People live and work elsewhere by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wanna borrow my wheel ...

    6. Re:News flash: People live and work elsewhere by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      Why do people think that Silcon valley is the be all and end all of software development?

      It pays better. That's why for me.
      Yeah, it's true that housing costs are expensive, but where else can you get $170k-$200k? That's more than enough to make up for the increased expenses.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    7. Re:News flash: People live and work elsewhere by Morpeth · · Score: 1

      Wish I had some mod points... +1 Funny

      --

      'The unexamined life is not worth living' - Socrates
  13. No shit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    you mean a small area that has about 0.001% of the worlds population only represents 10% of a specific industry?

    shit that's not fair

  14. Just In... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Breaking News!

    The world doesn't revolve around California.

    In related news, New York and London are also not the center of the universe. This news may come to a shock to just under 0.5% of the world's population that live in these locations.

    1. Re:Just In... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >>The world doesn't revolve around California

      Just ask any of the snobs in SF, they will argue different

    2. Re:Just In... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Would you keep quiet!?

      We're trying to ENJOY the rest of the world quietly. Don't let everyone else know it's here!

  15. From the No Shit Sherlock Instution by Snotnose · · Score: 1

    Is anybody really surprised at this?

  16. 10 percent! by invid · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I'm actually surprised that as many as 10 percent work inside Silicon Valley.

    --
    The Moore-Murphy Law: The number of things that will go wrong will double every 2 years.
    1. Re:10 percent! by jetkust · · Score: 1

      You're surprised because it's absurd. There is no way 10% of all developers are in Silicon Valley. It doesn't even say that anywhere in the article. I don't even know where the number comes from.

  17. Shocked in a different way by ranton · · Score: 1

    I am more shocked that 10% of all developers in the US work in the Silicon Valley area. I would have guessed a sub-5% figure.

    --
    -- All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing. -- Edmund Burke
    1. Re:Shocked in a different way by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah but if you asked any of these developers, they would believe that 90% of the development originates from Silicon Valley and is completed by Silicon Valley. The reality would probably be more in line with the number of developers who exist outside of Silicon Valley though.

  18. This just in! by Opportunist · · Score: 1

    People whose "product" is independent of where they produce it don't want to live in areas where it's insanely expensive to rent a cardboard box, let alone an apartment.

    Who would have thought?

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  19. Silicon Valley isn't the center of the universe?!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Shocked and amazed.

  20. Confused! by magarity · · Score: 1

    Seriously, I don't get it. On alternating weeks there are stories of how there is a shortage of qualified IT people in the US labor market or stories of how qualified IT people are training their H1-B replacements. WHICH IS IT???

    1. Re:Confused! by wierd_w · · Score: 5, Insightful

      there is a shortage of "qualified applicants".

      There is not a shortage of talent.

      qualified applicant == a person with the skillset we want that will also work at well below median pay, work much more than median hours without overtime, and is beholden to the company and cannot leave easily. They also have to be local, so they can attend those all important meetings.

      I hope that helps.

    2. Re:Confused! by computational+super · · Score: 1

      You don't honestly think that any of those developers that TFA refers to are US citizens, do you?

      --
      Proud neuron in the Slashdot hivemind since 2002.
    3. Re:Confused! by wierd_w · · Score: 3, Interesting

      of course not, but they still need to be local to have their daily browbeatings in person, and attend all those critically important meetings.

      H1Bs are perfect fits.

    4. Re:Confused! by Gavrielkay · · Score: 1

      So sadly true. H1B is such a crock of shit it's a wonder that anyone in the process can stomach the stench. I guess the piles of money made from the indentured servitude of others must mask the smell.

    5. Re:Confused! by TheSunborn · · Score: 1

      There is a real shortage of qualified software developers, but there is far less of a shortage of the rest of it, such as support and system installation(Linux/Windows sysadmins).
       

  21. Thanks Captain Obvious! by in10se · · Score: 1

    Gee, you can't fit all 100% of programmers into a small geographic area? Some of them don't want to live there? What a crazy world we live in!

    I'd bet 90% is a bit low for an estimate. Probably more like 99% of software developers work outside of Silicon Valley.

    --
    Popisms.com - Connecting pop culture
  22. Yes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Some of us like to have lives too!

  23. There isn't a talent shortage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There is a 'willing to pay for talent' shortage.

  24. No shit, sherlock by Sneeka2 · · Score: 1

    The ratio of Silicone Valley's population to the rest of the world is
    2.63x10^-4. Most developers live outside of that tiny area?! I'd have been amazed if it was any other way...!

    --
    Bitten Apples are still better than dirty Windows...
  25. Stop repeating that myth. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The chronic talent shortage afflicting Silicon Valley is now all over the US—and the developers are too.

    There is no chronic shortage. It is a myth invented by tech companies to get the H1-b quota boosted.

    And if any company is having a hard time recruiting people, they are doing something very wrong. My company hasn't had to use a recruiter or job board in over 8 years. HR just sends out an email to everyone saying they're looking for someone and in about two weeks, the new person starts. Somebody on the team knows someone with the skills who's looking for a new job.

    Also, don't immediately discount unemployed folks. Just because they're out of work doesn't mean they're no good - especially in this day and age of people being replaced by H1-bs and offshoring.

    And as far as new grads are concerned, "elite" schools don't have a monopoly on hard working smart kids.

    And maybe your system isn't as cutting edge as you think it is. I've seen too many jobs where at most a BS CIS is all that's needs and many times a 2 year tech grad would be able to do a wonderful job. But they want the MIT grad to do their web page.

    1. Re:Stop repeating that myth. by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      Also, don't immediately discount unemployed folks. Just because they're out of work doesn't mean they're no good - especially in this day and age of people being replaced by H1-bs and offshoring.

      I was out of work for two years (2009-10), underemployed for six months (working 20 hours per month), and filed for chapter seven bankruptcy in 2011. During that time I was told by hiring managers that I was overqualified for minimum wage jobs and recruiters that I was unemployable for anything else. Funny how that attitude changed all the sudden when they needed bodies to fill out the headcount as the economy turned around. I spent the next two years working seven days a week.

    2. Re: Stop repeating that myth. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A lot of truth here. I was poached away from one employer to a second. Then a recruiter from a well known company wanted me to apply. So I went through the process, it was very high level and not difficult at all, at the end the recruiter told me I had no skills. Um wat!?

    3. Re:Stop repeating that myth. by vux984 · · Score: 1

      and many times a 2 year tech grad would be able to do a wonderful job. But they want the MIT grad to do their web page.

      ... and they want to pay him less than the even the 2 year college grad would accept.

  26. Rural by jdavidb · · Score: 1

    I've lived in a rural part of Texas for almost ten years. I left a programming job at a telecommunications company and joined a software outfit that had been out here for 25 years. I'm much happier here.

  27. It's simple geography. by mcmonkey · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Most of _everything_ is outside Silicon Valley.

    Is this news to anyone?

    1. Re:It's simple geography. by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 3

      Most of _everything_ is outside Silicon Valley.

      Including San Francisco, which is 50 miles down the road.

    2. Re:It's simple geography. by fahrbot-bot · · Score: 2

      Most of _everything_ is outside Silicon Valley.

      Is this news to anyone?

      Apparently it is to those living/working in Silicon Valley.

      I've been a software engineer / system administrator since 1987. I and 100% of my co-workers have never worked in Silicon Valley.

      --
      It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
    3. Re:It's simple geography. by OrangeTide · · Score: 1

      sick burn!

      suck it San Francisco!

      --
      “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
    4. Re:It's simple geography. by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 1

      Well, certainly not to cosmologists!

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    5. Re: It's simple geography. by WarJolt · · Score: 1

      Silicon Valley still has high rental prices. A bargain 1 bedroom apartment is still going to cost you at least 2x more. Probably not $3k, but still pricey.

    6. Re:It's simple geography. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >suck it San Francisco!

      Umm, phrasing!

    7. Re:It's simple geography. by mcl630 · · Score: 1

      Most of _everything_ is outside Silicon Valley.

      Is this news to anyone?

      It is to many inside the Valley.

    8. Re:It's simple geography. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ex: IBM and Microsoft: both pretty damn large companies not centred in Silicon Valley. I think anyone surprised by this article doesn't know tech. They assume software engineer = FB/Twitter and the like.Pretty much every company bigger than 50 people has a need for developers. Sure they aren't hiring us by the 10k's but a few here, a dozen there it quickly adds up.

    9. Re: It's simple geography. by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      Shop around. Get roommates and that $3000/mo gets more affordable. Commute from further away instead of living in the priciest places.

    10. Re: It's simple geography. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are we still doing phrasing?

  28. But 10% Do by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Isn't the real story that 10% of the worlds supply of an entire world wide industry's talent resides in an area of a few hundred square miles?

  29. Was it ever been a big deal? by fubarrr · · Score: 1

    Most of programmers live on this side of Urals. China+India+Eastern Europe=~90% of global tech work force

  30. outside the plastic citadel and the greenish city by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well, I can vouch for Houston and Dallas,Texas, and Huntsville, Alabama. LOTS of programmers.
    Also - lots of high-tech ( Space, Missles, Rockets, Astronauts, Banks, Research, and more...)
    And lots of jobs, that just happen to require security clearances.

  31. I'm conflicted... by OakDragon · · Score: 1

    Should I say "duh", or should I say "so?"

    1. Re:I'm conflicted... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Say "duh," - it's Silicon Valley, not Software Valley.

    2. Re:I'm conflicted... by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      If Silicon Valley didn't have software fairies, none of the hardware could have worked.

    3. Re:I'm conflicted... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can make things other than computers out of silicon, you know.

    4. Re:I'm conflicted... by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      You can make things other than computers out of silicon, you know.

      You're correct. Can't have software fairies without having sand castles.

  32. Re:Rural Montana ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I worked in a small college town in a rural western state and it had plenty of jobs. In addition to the Uni, there were a number of software, engineering, and extractive companies in the area so when I did get laid off I had a job in a couple of weeks.

  33. Hey by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't give a fuck about working at Silicon Valley, I just want to smoke a better weed living in California, dude.

  34. And over 90% suck by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    At least in my experience I've rarely met software engineers who actually know what they were doing, versus living on stackoverflow every day.

  35. Links to Tech CEOs' demand for $250M from Feds by theodp · · Score: 1
  36. Re:outside the plastic citadel and the greenish ci by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well, I can vouch for Houston and Dallas,Texas, and Huntsville, Alabama. LOTS of programmers. Also - lots of high-tech ( Space, Missles, Rockets, Astronauts, Banks, Research, and more...) And lots of jobs, that just happen to require security clearances.

    San Antonio also actually has a good number of programmers.
    Military & Bigger City -> More IT demand.
    Lots of jobs - some with security clearances and some without.

  37. Well.. yeah? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I mean, did anyone think a huge majority of devs were located in Silicon Valley? Like, really?

  38. In other breaking news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    90% of mechanics live outside Detroit.

  39. no surprise by Gravis+Zero · · Score: 1

    after all, "computer software developer" is the most popular job in CO, UT, VA and WA.

    --
    Anons need not reply. Questions end with a question mark.
  40. The valley is naked by Master5000 · · Score: 1

    Innovation no longer happens in The Valley. It's dead put it in bed.

  41. Indian body shops post jobs in weird places by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    over the past few years, I've noticed the big Indian body shops post jobs in weird places where no one would look for a computer job - how many of these jobs are real? - I think the Indian body shops (Indian firms which post jobs by recruiters with Indian names) are "accidentally" filing jobs under the wrong city so no one will find them and apply, proving there's a "shortage" so they can boat people in - this is one of the few times job data has been sifted through in aggregate - but are these jobs real?

  42. "The chronic talent shortage" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "The chronic talent shortage"

    There is no shortage of talented developers, just recruiting practices that don't work.

    These companies don't want talent, they want sheep

  43. The Silicon Valley is nice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    However, in order to have a decent standard of living, a four-member family would need two 100K+/yr salaries.

  44. That doesn't mean what you think it means by genfail · · Score: 1

    It's still pretty absurd when you think about it since this could just as easily read, "10% of All Software Developers in the World, Concentrated in 10 Mile Radius."

  45. It's more about cheap labor. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's more about cheap labor.

  46. Re:Rural Montana ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Similar with Austin. A house that was worth $150k in 2000 will be selling over $450-500k, just for the land alone. To boot, there is a big difference between living in the city proper than one of the outlying cities. I go to Round Rock and wait for a friend to show up, in less than 10 minutes, neighbors will be showing up and asking what I am doing there, and if they don't like the answer, the police will be there soon after. Austin, I have to chase people off who are trying to bump locks or try car door handles almost weekly. I am a native Austinite and hate living in town, but the pay is decent, and IT jobs abound, especially if you can do basic automation with Puppet, Ansible, or other cmtools, and can keep up with the times.

  47. Well no shit, Sherlock! by tehlinux · · Score: 1

    TIL India is outside of Silicon Valley

    --
    Most linux users don't know this, but the man pages were named after Chuck Norris. Chuck Norris fsck'ing hates noobs!
    1. Re:Well no shit, Sherlock! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      India is the new silicon valley. Thats the truth

  48. joke went over your head, didn't it? by luis_a_espinal · · Score: 1

    wooosh?

  49. Corner of CO/UT/WY? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why is there a medium-size blob of programmers exactly on the corner of Colorado/Utah/Wyoming? There is nothing located there, not even an NSA data center.

  50. Great. Soon you can pay them in seashells and by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    arrowheads.

    Better pay attention to shit that matters, not where software developers live.

  51. OMG 10% of developers are in Silicone valley by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    whats more shocking ? stupid article

  52. Silicon Valley is overrated by MoarSauce123 · · Score: 1

    I never understood what the big deal is with Silicon Valley. That region is filled with companies that have inept management. Why put HQ where 2342423424 other companies jockey for the scarce talent in the area? The US is a big place, they can put their offices in many other places...where realty prices are much lower, the weather is less hot, labor costs are lower, talent is plentiful, excellent colleges exist...the list goes on.

  53. Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I thought it was pretty impressive that 10% of the world's software developers work in Silicon Valley, but turned out it was just 10% of software developers in the USA. Would it be too much to ask to include such little details in the title?

  54. Who the *hell* thought we all worked there? by whitroth · · Score: 1

    Oh, duh, you all live in Silicon Valley, and *everything* comes from there... Jezuz H. Christ on a crutch! Every big and most medium sized companies have teams ranging from small to huge, ON SITE. Mid-nineties, when I worked for Ameritech (former Baby Bell swallowed by SBC), we had hundreds of us, just on one big startup subdivision. And when I had a short contract with Lowe's (not Home Despot) in Nowhere, NC, they'd taken over, literally, and entire *mall*, and there might have been a thousand cubes, and dozens at least, more, in the main office. And then there's government.

    Talk about a complete media illusion, mostly by "journalists" who don't know a phone from a server....

                mark