Look bro, I wasn't making a legal argument. I was giving you examples to help you understand the situation.
But instead of understanding, you did the stupid thing and started arguing with me. As a result, you still don't understand the situation.
If you want to argue, you need to understand the full legal argument first, but you don't. Put some effort into it.
You don't have to be a witness against yourself, but you do have to provide physical evidence. For example, if a fingerprint or blood was found at the crime scene, you can be compelled to give your fingerprint or blood to test for a match.
The purpose of the 5th amendment is to prevent situations where police can torture you, or harass you until you confess. That isn't really an issue in the case of DNA or a fingerprint, because the police can't harass your fingers or blood into confessing.
Even so, the courts are conservative, and won't force you to give evidence if it can be found some other way. For example, they can't force you to open a combination lock on a safe, because the police have the capability to crack the safe. So the court won't force you to do that.
In the case of an encrypted hard drive, there may be no other way to get the evidence other than the owner decrypting it. So how will the courts rule? I have no idea, it's a complicated case, and the use of the "all writs act" makes it even more complicated. As likely as not, the court will rule based on a strange technicality in order to avoid the heart of the problem.
(A person can be held indefinitely if they defy a court order, they will be in contempt of court. I think that is true in basically every jurisdiction in the world. The power of the law is heavy).
FYI that is absolutely the wrong reason to mod someone down.
Mod them down if they are spam, or their tone is flamebait or trollish.
If you merely disagree, write a well-reasoned post explaining why you disagree. Which you did, but you shouldn't have down-modded, that's abuse.
All you have to say is: "There is no applicant that fulfills my requirements, I promise" and for good measure you make up a job posting with requirements such as 10 years of experience with Exchange 2016 and a minor in archeology
You also need to interview people who apply and find a way to disqualify every single one of them.
Cruz is one of those people who will say/do whatever it takes to get elected. Tea partier? Sure, why not. Establishment pet? He will obey for votes. H1-B visas? What difference does it make, as long as it gets him votes? He'll flip-flop on anything you pay him to do, and then bore you to death with a long, legalistic, and incorrect explanation of why he is not actually flip-flopping.
Hillary is leading because the media, owned by that same insider group, plays her constant lip service and has for well over a year leading up to this election.
This is exactly why I cheer for the demise of traditional media.
These numbers are deceiving, chosen for propaganda rather than enlightenment. For example, if this number makes you feel poor: "'Half the world' wealth is held by the top 1% of individuals PBS", then check out how you stack up. If you're a programmer in the US and you contribute regularly to your 401k, then you are in the top 1%. Rich hypocrite.
Secondly, it's easy to make these wealth numbers deceptive (we're not talking about income here). For example, if you have $1 saved in assets, you are richer than 20% of the population below age 65. Source Again, you rich hypocrite.
So stop looking at crap numbers you get from people who are trying to deceive you.
Add to that, people don't even know what 'capitalism' or 'communism' means. It has a different meaning for every person.
If you ask kids, "Do you think the free market is a good idea?" or
"Do you think businesses should be able to get loans to start new ideas?" they'll probably give you a different answer.
big huge restaurant chain by making good or even average burgers. It got there making passible (D-) burgers that were completely consistent from New York to Los Angeles.
When considering McDonald's I think it's important to consider their core competencies: fast, and cheap. They deliver on those, and deliver very well.
Kanji (the vast majority of them) aren't pictograms, and beyond that, they're a pain to learn. And even after you learn them, sometimes you forget them.
Read.....is it past or present tense?
What does this spell: ghoti (answer at the bottom)?
Knight.......wtf
Night........almost as bad The great vowel shift kind of messed things up.
ghost....why is there a silent h there?
In fact, why is there a silent h anywhere?
For that matter, silent letters in general are problematic in any language.
C and K and S are one letter too many to make two sounds. One of those letters can be easily removed from the language.
Ph - why does it say 'f'?
Except when it doesn't, like in shepherd.
Q......really?
L - it makes three different sounds
In fact, why does any letter make more than one sound?
The list goes on.
Spanish spelling is much nicer, actually, although it still has problems (ghoti spells fish. "gh" like in enough, "o" like in women, "ti" like in function).
Slashdot Mirror
Look bro, I wasn't making a legal argument. I was giving you examples to help you understand the situation.
But instead of understanding, you did the stupid thing and started arguing with me. As a result, you still don't understand the situation.
If you want to argue, you need to understand the full legal argument first, but you don't. Put some effort into it.
What a great quote.
You don't have to be a witness against yourself, but you do have to provide physical evidence. For example, if a fingerprint or blood was found at the crime scene, you can be compelled to give your fingerprint or blood to test for a match.
The purpose of the 5th amendment is to prevent situations where police can torture you, or harass you until you confess. That isn't really an issue in the case of DNA or a fingerprint, because the police can't harass your fingers or blood into confessing.
Even so, the courts are conservative, and won't force you to give evidence if it can be found some other way. For example, they can't force you to open a combination lock on a safe, because the police have the capability to crack the safe. So the court won't force you to do that.
In the case of an encrypted hard drive, there may be no other way to get the evidence other than the owner decrypting it. So how will the courts rule? I have no idea, it's a complicated case, and the use of the "all writs act" makes it even more complicated. As likely as not, the court will rule based on a strange technicality in order to avoid the heart of the problem.
(A person can be held indefinitely if they defy a court order, they will be in contempt of court. I think that is true in basically every jurisdiction in the world. The power of the law is heavy).
Here is an analysis of the topic. So far, the question has not been addressed by the supreme court, and other courts have issued mixed decisions.
Which fundamental human right?
Trump is a cad: almost to the point that the word was defined for him.
The only risk with the Donald is that he picks a V-P like the big dick Cheney.
Even odds Trump chooses Ben Carson as VP. Flip flop.
don't require holders to remain at the same company.
That would help.
Yeap. It happens all the time, maybe for every single H1 application.
I modded you down because I disagree with you.
FYI that is absolutely the wrong reason to mod someone down.
Mod them down if they are spam, or their tone is flamebait or trollish.
If you merely disagree, write a well-reasoned post explaining why you disagree. Which you did, but you shouldn't have down-modded, that's abuse.
All you have to say is: "There is no applicant that fulfills my requirements, I promise" and for good measure you make up a job posting with requirements such as 10 years of experience with Exchange 2016 and a minor in archeology
You also need to interview people who apply and find a way to disqualify every single one of them.
Like many other CEOs, she thought short-term without considering the long-term implications of her actions.
That might have been forgivable if she'd had any success at all with the short-term results of her actions.
Look at the bright side, when Trump is president, he'll.......
I don't know what, I'm still trying to figure out a bright side.
Cruz is one of those people who will say/do whatever it takes to get elected. Tea partier? Sure, why not. Establishment pet? He will obey for votes. H1-B visas? What difference does it make, as long as it gets him votes? He'll flip-flop on anything you pay him to do, and then bore you to death with a long, legalistic, and incorrect explanation of why he is not actually flip-flopping.
If anyone votes for a candidate without a (D) or (R) after their name they're just "throwing their vote away"
The way I look at it, if anyone is voting for a candidate with a (D) or (R) after their name, they're throwing their vote away.
It is true that Superdelegates were included to give a sort of veto over the nominee - back in the aftermath of 1972 and the McGovern debacle.
This is what I was going to mention: it's not necessarily bad to require a higher bar for an outsider. It prevents something like that from repeating.
Hillary is leading because the media, owned by that same insider group, plays her constant lip service and has for well over a year leading up to this election.
This is exactly why I cheer for the demise of traditional media.
These numbers are deceiving, chosen for propaganda rather than enlightenment. For example, if this number makes you feel poor: "'Half the world' wealth is held by the top 1% of individuals PBS", then check out how you stack up. If you're a programmer in the US and you contribute regularly to your 401k, then you are in the top 1%. Rich hypocrite.
Secondly, it's easy to make these wealth numbers deceptive (we're not talking about income here). For example, if you have $1 saved in assets, you are richer than 20% of the population below age 65. Source Again, you rich hypocrite.
So stop looking at crap numbers you get from people who are trying to deceive you.
Add to that, people don't even know what 'capitalism' or 'communism' means. It has a different meaning for every person.
If you ask kids, "Do you think the free market is a good idea?" or
"Do you think businesses should be able to get loans to start new ideas?" they'll probably give you a different answer.
big huge restaurant chain by making good or even average burgers. It got there making passible (D-) burgers that were completely consistent from New York to Los Angeles.
When considering McDonald's I think it's important to consider their core competencies: fast, and cheap. They deliver on those, and deliver very well.
Kanji (the vast majority of them) aren't pictograms, and beyond that, they're a pain to learn. And even after you learn them, sometimes you forget them.
Fascinating thing about Latin: veni vidi vici was probably originally pronounced with a w (weni widi, wici) which made ceasar sound like a wuss.
After that, all of the moderation data should be released publicly. We should know who modded each comment, and what modding they gave.
Says the anonymous coward.
Many of the examples you have written are down to backwards compatibility.
An explanation why something sucks means that it still sucks.
Read.....is it past or present tense?
What does this spell: ghoti (answer at the bottom)?
Knight.......wtf
Night........almost as bad
The great vowel shift kind of messed things up.
ghost....why is there a silent h there?
In fact, why is there a silent h anywhere?
For that matter, silent letters in general are problematic in any language.
C and K and S are one letter too many to make two sounds. One of those letters can be easily removed from the language.
Ph - why does it say 'f'?
Except when it doesn't, like in shepherd.
Q......really?
L - it makes three different sounds
In fact, why does any letter make more than one sound?
The list goes on.
Spanish spelling is much nicer, actually, although it still has problems (ghoti spells fish. "gh" like in enough, "o" like in women, "ti" like in function).