Dr. Eugene Mallove, one of the nations most prominent advocates of Cold Fusion because of his ability to let people in high level of government know about the issue was killed one year ago in May, 2004.
This killing was NO ACCIDENT contrary to existing belief. The investigation of his death continues, while one man has been charged. The Norwich PD expects there was other individuals involved. The suspected KILLER of Eugene Mallove also was wearing what appeared to be a military dogtag as seen in the media released photo which I found interesting. If this was a random robbery, why would multiple individuals have been involved in his death over a cellphone and a digital camera and a watch? Norwich PD is still looking for more individuals. Dr. Henry Lee's forensics have indicated multiple individuals at the crime scene.
There is now a full scale governmental battle between the Bush admin who is COMPLICIT IN KEEPING COLD FUSION FROM YOU. Many high level governmental figures in the USA in classified hearings are well aware of what the issues are and thankfully it includes individuals of both political parties.
Even Former President Clinton has said on Larry King live that he wishes he was president against because of the way the Bush admin is running energy policy. There is more involved in this as to classified information that top officials know.
Its amazing how the media really has misinterpreted the Microsoft settlement. If you look at the court of appeals ruling in full, you will note that the appeals court did not strike down the breakup of microsoft because that was the wrong thing to do. It refused, rightfully so because the remedy hearings were not held. Judge Kollar-Kotely made a ruling that was contradictory to the court of appeals. The settling states made sure that the 9 non settling states were not bound by the microsoft settlement. What happened unfortunately is that the Bush administration and/or Judge Kollar-Kotely played politics with the Microsoft case. It felt that because of the acts of Sept 11th, that the economy would be hurt too much by a breakup of Microsoft. If you just look at the reason we had the settlement phase inself, it mentioned the acts of sept 11th in Kollar-Kotely's own legal documents as the reason why the case needed to be resolved quickly. The legal system is not a political system and therefore, this ruling will indeed be overturned on appeal. And yes, it will be appealed by the 9 non settling states, and those states will be lead by California Attorney General Bill Lockyear. As of around November 8th or shortly thereafter, the media will then spin the case back to the way it should be going which is to a microsoft breakup.
Dr. Eugene Mallove, one of the nations most prominent advocates of Cold Fusion because of his ability to let people in high level of government know about the issue was killed one year ago in May, 2004. This killing was NO ACCIDENT contrary to existing belief. The investigation of his death continues, while one man has been charged. The Norwich PD expects there was other individuals involved. The suspected KILLER of Eugene Mallove also was wearing what appeared to be a military dogtag as seen in the media released photo which I found interesting. If this was a random robbery, why would multiple individuals have been involved in his death over a cellphone and a digital camera and a watch? Norwich PD is still looking for more individuals. Dr. Henry Lee's forensics have indicated multiple individuals at the crime scene. There is now a full scale governmental battle between the Bush admin who is COMPLICIT IN KEEPING COLD FUSION FROM YOU. Many high level governmental figures in the USA in classified hearings are well aware of what the issues are and thankfully it includes individuals of both political parties. Even Former President Clinton has said on Larry King live that he wishes he was president against because of the way the Bush admin is running energy policy. There is more involved in this as to classified information that top officials know.
Its amazing how the media really has misinterpreted the Microsoft settlement. If you look at the court of appeals ruling in full, you will note that the appeals court did not strike down the breakup of microsoft because that was the wrong thing to do. It refused, rightfully so because the remedy hearings were not held. Judge Kollar-Kotely made a ruling that was contradictory to the court of appeals. The settling states made sure that the 9 non settling states were not bound by the microsoft settlement. What happened unfortunately is that the Bush administration and/or Judge Kollar-Kotely played politics with the Microsoft case. It felt that because of the acts of Sept 11th, that the economy would be hurt too much by a breakup of Microsoft. If you just look at the reason we had the settlement phase inself, it mentioned the acts of sept 11th in Kollar-Kotely's own legal documents as the reason why the case needed to be resolved quickly. The legal system is not a political system and therefore, this ruling will indeed be overturned on appeal. And yes, it will be appealed by the 9 non settling states, and those states will be lead by California Attorney General Bill Lockyear. As of around November 8th or shortly thereafter, the media will then spin the case back to the way it should be going which is to a microsoft breakup.