None is coming to your house and getting your children to make them the next super hero of that sport, it's always parents who are obsessed about making their children famous and don't care if they're ruining his life or not.
And when the athlete has grown up he can always decide to give up and do less training or if there's a big pressure he can quit and go do something else.
Not really. Science can suggest alternatives but it cannot prove it. The age of the world is only longer then 6000 years because we want to understand it that way, not because any proof that exists.
so fossils older than 6000 years aren't good enough as proofs ?
it's not about choices or having faith, the problem behind this is that evolution is a theory that comes from scientific studies. behind creationism there's just a pedantic reading of a book made
2000 years ago by people who weren't scientist.
So Gnome vs Kde or VI vs Emacs is just a personal choice, something debatable; creationism vs evolutionism is not a personal choice, is not someting debatable: one is an idea that come from ignorant people, the other is supported by ton of book and experiments.
If you want to debate then you can go with neodarwin vs lamark (and even in this case there are proofs against lamark tough some ideas are good), but not creationism.
The world must go on accepting theories from science not fairy tales, unless you want to go back to middle ages hunt witches and die for a flu.
Scientific world keeps going with the idea that if a theory is wrong you must show what it's lacking, if you propose a new one you must provide proofs other than "because i said so".
It's time to put a bound, a big "STOP" sign on religion on this matters because it's causing only confusion and ignorance. Because today it's C vs E but tomorrow, what about a flat world vs round world ? what about a geocentric vs heliocentic ss ?
Do you want to see newers Giordano Bruno on flames because they were questioning religion ?
Sometimes having a car it's just a habit, because you could live well without it or by just renting it during week ends.
Of course not every place is the same and not everyone live in the same condition, there are a lot of people for who having a car is a need because there isn't a public transportation system, work is too far from home etc. etc. but there are a lot of people too who are just too damn lazy or too damn stubborn to get rid of their car while in fact they could ease a lot their life by just using public transportation.
Do not forget also that for many people having a car is a status symbol.
where the good guy find proofs an imminent disaster but nobody listen to him.
That area was under an "earthquake storm" since december.
http://tinyurl.com/cn47cf
so putting him in the right context you can see he's predictions were quite inaccurate.
Also, did he used official channels to publish his data? no, he just phoned sulmona mayor and told him his city would have been erased on 29th march which... didn't happen.
let me add
according to http://www.earthquake.it/ultimi-terremoti.php
it's since december that small earthquake are occurring in that zone, and they are still going, so it wasn't a single strike but rather the big one .
giuliani predicted a devastating earthquake on 29 th of march in sulmona.
the earthquake was yesterday in l'aquila, so one week later and 70 km far away from where giuliani predicted.
Also he's not a scientist but a guy who work for infn which is nuclear physic and he's not even graduated.
Civil Protection Agency looked to their data and with a pool of geophysics decided that there was not enough evidence to know if a big earthquake would strike and where would strike.
they can't evacuate people just on assumptions of someone who already failed to predict that earthquake.
however they were on "defcon 1" so when the earthquake striked they were ready to go for help as soon as possible.
Yes building were inadequate because people tends to ignore that they live over seismic terrain and they prefer to look for a cheaper house without antiseismic structure so they have some money to enjoy their favourite soccer team on a big plasma screen.
guess what they are enjoying now... but this is their faul or rather a big darwing award for the whole zone.
it's better a young coder than
a older one
who is better than a female coder
who is better that a black coder....
the problem is not about age, sex or color of the skin.
The problem is about the missing brain inside
the head of our chief
Slashdot Mirror
None is coming to your house and getting your children to make them the next super hero of that sport, it's always parents who are obsessed about making their children famous and don't care if they're ruining his life or not. And when the athlete has grown up he can always decide to give up and do less training or if there's a big pressure he can quit and go do something else.
Not really. Science can suggest alternatives but it cannot prove it. The age of the world is only longer then 6000 years because we want to understand it that way, not because any proof that exists.
so fossils older than 6000 years aren't good enough as proofs ?
it's not about choices or having faith, the problem behind this is that evolution is a theory that comes from scientific studies. behind creationism there's just a pedantic reading of a book made 2000 years ago by people who weren't scientist. So Gnome vs Kde or VI vs Emacs is just a personal choice, something debatable; creationism vs evolutionism is not a personal choice, is not someting debatable: one is an idea that come from ignorant people, the other is supported by ton of book and experiments. If you want to debate then you can go with neodarwin vs lamark (and even in this case there are proofs against lamark tough some ideas are good), but not creationism. The world must go on accepting theories from science not fairy tales, unless you want to go back to middle ages hunt witches and die for a flu. Scientific world keeps going with the idea that if a theory is wrong you must show what it's lacking, if you propose a new one you must provide proofs other than "because i said so". It's time to put a bound, a big "STOP" sign on religion on this matters because it's causing only confusion and ignorance. Because today it's C vs E but tomorrow, what about a flat world vs round world ? what about a geocentric vs heliocentic ss ? Do you want to see newers Giordano Bruno on flames because they were questioning religion ?
Sometimes having a car it's just a habit, because you could live well without it or by just renting it during week ends. Of course not every place is the same and not everyone live in the same condition, there are a lot of people for who having a car is a need because there isn't a public transportation system, work is too far from home etc. etc. but there are a lot of people too who are just too damn lazy or too damn stubborn to get rid of their car while in fact they could ease a lot their life by just using public transportation. Do not forget also that for many people having a car is a status symbol.
Nice interface, but how do you select stuff? I mean you can highlight whatever you want, but where's the push/click/activate?
you just slap or double slap your a** to click or double click :-)
where the good guy find proofs an imminent disaster but nobody listen to him. That area was under an "earthquake storm" since december. http://tinyurl.com/cn47cf so putting him in the right context you can see he's predictions were quite inaccurate. Also, did he used official channels to publish his data? no, he just phoned sulmona mayor and told him his city would have been erased on 29th march which... didn't happen.
let me add according to http://www.earthquake.it/ultimi-terremoti.php it's since december that small earthquake are occurring in that zone, and they are still going, so it wasn't a single strike but rather the big one . giuliani predicted a devastating earthquake on 29 th of march in sulmona. the earthquake was yesterday in l'aquila, so one week later and 70 km far away from where giuliani predicted. Also he's not a scientist but a guy who work for infn which is nuclear physic and he's not even graduated. Civil Protection Agency looked to their data and with a pool of geophysics decided that there was not enough evidence to know if a big earthquake would strike and where would strike. they can't evacuate people just on assumptions of someone who already failed to predict that earthquake. however they were on "defcon 1" so when the earthquake striked they were ready to go for help as soon as possible. Yes building were inadequate because people tends to ignore that they live over seismic terrain and they prefer to look for a cheaper house without antiseismic structure so they have some money to enjoy their favourite soccer team on a big plasma screen. guess what they are enjoying now ... but this is their faul or rather a big darwing award for the whole zone.
it's better a young coder than a older one ....
who is better than a female coder
who is better that a black coder
the problem is not about age, sex or color of the skin.
The problem is about the missing brain inside the head of our chief