I'm sure the bombs can be armed so that they would detonate if the plane broke up mid-air and dropped them. But for the most part you'd want them to survive the crash. Those bombs are crazy expensive, it would be silly to waste them. Not to mention that damaged planes try to limp back to friendly territory and crash, not foreign territory.
lol, pretty much. I explore public spaces a lot but respect any "do not enter" type of signs. I also routinely use the ladies latrine if the guys is full. The Guy/Girl signs seem more like directions than rules : )
Now it goes out the door without throwing exceptions every time someone looks at it wrong. That's way better than the normal two week death-march before releasing a barely QA'd product.
I use almost all public wifi i can find. If i see an open SSID in my phone, then it is okay to connect and use it. It's also fine for whoever owns the network to peek at the data i'm sending over it : ) If either party puts up encryption then that is where the privacy line was drawn.
I don't need a silly sign posted anywhere about free wifi. My phone/tablet/laptop will let me know when it's free.
And your reasoning is exactly the kind that politicians and high-level employees use to remain safe from illegal activities that they themselves prompted. If you accepted money to teach someone how to do something illegal then you accepted some level of responsibility as well. I would agree with you if it was knowledge presented in a format to be used legally and was perverted by being used illegally. However that is not the case in this story.
I get what you are saying but i'd like your take on this hypothetical. You teach some guys how to defeat a bank's security system and provide them with the knowledge they need to rob it. They pay you for your service. Are you in any way responsible for the robbery they are about to commit? All you did was talk (and get paid), right?
The US does, you just don't know s/he is there. They call them "Federal Air Marshals". They've been around for a long time too (since 1969). Though i should also say that there isn't a guarantee you have one. You can't know for sure.
Will it be cutting edge when the first rocket stage returns to the earth by landing vertically instead of an uncontrolled fall into the ocean? Or do you mean frontier as in doing something in space that no one has done before? Because i think that's the point of the argument that Neil is making. That SpaceX will never land a human on Mars. That only a Government can do that. But the creator/owner of SpaceX has said that landing humans on Mars is something they ARE pursuing. The company has so far has been delivering tangible and functional products in that direction. Not many Governments can say the same. Am i arguing in the right direction?
I'd say it gives you an estimate about how seriously they are pursuing something. Is the program a joke or something that we need to put resources into countering?
Yes, i was simplifying. But i'm glad to hear that you can see positive effects from helping someone : ) You are certainly right though that what can appear to be help will ultimately harm.
Most of the attacks on coalition troops in Iraq were not by random citizens. They came from militant groups that existing during Saddam's reign. The Mahdi Army being a huge exception to that. But they were crushed quickly and ceased to exist as a military organization and converted into a political one. I think that kind of thing was repeated by many groups. You can form peacefully and argue all day long and the coalition will let you do as you wish. If you shoot someone you will get stepped on, hard. Also a lot of violence was simply the coalition standing between Shia and Sunni. Don't get me wrong, Iraq was fucked up pretty bad. But their memories are long and the gist of it was the occupation produced something better. That is my first-hand experience anyways. Internet consensus and historians may disagree.
Look at it like this. If war planners only ever planned a war when they had to go to war, they would be terrible planners. You have to practice your craft or you will be terrible at it.
Slashdot Mirror
He uses a different finger. He teaches the phone his index finger and tricks it with his middle finger.
I'm sure the bombs can be armed so that they would detonate if the plane broke up mid-air and dropped them. But for the most part you'd want them to survive the crash. Those bombs are crazy expensive, it would be silly to waste them. Not to mention that damaged planes try to limp back to friendly territory and crash, not foreign territory.
I recommend not using teeth (with or without cavities) during oral sex.
lol, pretty much. I explore public spaces a lot but respect any "do not enter" type of signs. I also routinely use the ladies latrine if the guys is full. The Guy/Girl signs seem more like directions than rules : )
Now it goes out the door without throwing exceptions every time someone looks at it wrong. That's way better than the normal two week death-march before releasing a barely QA'd product.
I use almost all public wifi i can find. If i see an open SSID in my phone, then it is okay to connect and use it. It's also fine for whoever owns the network to peek at the data i'm sending over it : ) If either party puts up encryption then that is where the privacy line was drawn.
I don't need a silly sign posted anywhere about free wifi. My phone/tablet/laptop will let me know when it's free.
And your reasoning is exactly the kind that politicians and high-level employees use to remain safe from illegal activities that they themselves prompted. If you accepted money to teach someone how to do something illegal then you accepted some level of responsibility as well. I would agree with you if it was knowledge presented in a format to be used legally and was perverted by being used illegally. However that is not the case in this story.
I get what you are saying but i'd like your take on this hypothetical. You teach some guys how to defeat a bank's security system and provide them with the knowledge they need to rob it. They pay you for your service. Are you in any way responsible for the robbery they are about to commit? All you did was talk (and get paid), right?
Never had a shitty land-lord, eh?
You get more pages in the DLC (or if you have a season pass).
You are forgetting that how a law is written is not how a law is enforced. They are different branches.
The US does, you just don't know s/he is there. They call them "Federal Air Marshals". They've been around for a long time too (since 1969). Though i should also say that there isn't a guarantee you have one. You can't know for sure.
Will it be cutting edge when the first rocket stage returns to the earth by landing vertically instead of an uncontrolled fall into the ocean? Or do you mean frontier as in doing something in space that no one has done before? Because i think that's the point of the argument that Neil is making. That SpaceX will never land a human on Mars. That only a Government can do that. But the creator/owner of SpaceX has said that landing humans on Mars is something they ARE pursuing. The company has so far has been delivering tangible and functional products in that direction. Not many Governments can say the same. Am i arguing in the right direction?
AFAIK, SpaceX is privately owned.
I'd say it gives you an estimate about how seriously they are pursuing something. Is the program a joke or something that we need to put resources into countering?
Yes, i was simplifying. But i'm glad to hear that you can see positive effects from helping someone : ) You are certainly right though that what can appear to be help will ultimately harm.
In your military experience did you ever see a WP weapon? I doubt it. You probably have seen smoke grenades/shells that contain WP. To create smoke.
Most of the attacks on coalition troops in Iraq were not by random citizens. They came from militant groups that existing during Saddam's reign. The Mahdi Army being a huge exception to that. But they were crushed quickly and ceased to exist as a military organization and converted into a political one. I think that kind of thing was repeated by many groups. You can form peacefully and argue all day long and the coalition will let you do as you wish. If you shoot someone you will get stepped on, hard. Also a lot of violence was simply the coalition standing between Shia and Sunni. Don't get me wrong, Iraq was fucked up pretty bad. But their memories are long and the gist of it was the occupation produced something better. That is my first-hand experience anyways. Internet consensus and historians may disagree.
You make it sound like helping someone will always result in more harm.
Look at it like this. If war planners only ever planned a war when they had to go to war, they would be terrible planners. You have to practice your craft or you will be terrible at it.
lol, on its deathbed? That makes the argument that the country is weak. It is corrupted but still very strong.
This really shouldn't have been modded troll. He brought up a good point and should be argued with, not buried.
Intellectual Property is something that doesn't actually exist. The copyright to the source code can be considered IP but the source code is not. You can read up on it here: http://www.wipo.int/about-ip/en/index.html and here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intellectual_property
It's not intellectual property. He's auctioning actual source code and gerber files.
Glass is a product. Google did engineer that product. Nobody is saying that glass is the first or best HMD.