If the black, tar-like substance provides chemical energy, then it burns. I mean, it's certainly not providing a matter/antimatter, fission, or fusion reaction. So flamethrowers and napalm would be the best weapons.
Maybe there is something about the Australian digital standard which makes this true. But in the US, it simply is not. Right now, there are thousands of low-income working people in the NY metropolitan area who cannot watch TV. The WTC hosted antennas for the major networks. After 9/11, these networks had to go to inferior backups, making thousands either lose signal or have a marginal signal. The digital transition exacerbated this, such that those fringe people who were happy to have something snowy to watch now got nothing. So if you don't have cable (or Vudu) in NYC or northern NJ, you don't watch TV. Ironically, most of the people who have enough to afford cable in these areas STILL aren't seeing any of the digital benefits, because cable companies charge extra for the privilege of viewing shows that are supposed to be broadcast for free in HD.
Facts like the Carrera GT not having stability control (like MOST CARS on the road) are also irrelevant in context, because the car in question was a 2005 model when ESC was rare.
I didn't know that doctors, nurses, administrators, etc. all worked for free in the rest of the world.
I didn't know pharmaceutical companies were all non-profit, and researchers worked for room and board.
Everyone makes money off of health care; the only question is whether the profit goes to the hard working people or if the government bureaucrat gets the biggest slice.
Red herring, but I'll answer your implied argument by saying that the death penalty is supposed to be 1) a deterrent and 2) a way of removing extremely dangerous people from society. If revenge is a part of it, it's not not codified in law and only a side effect of the existence of capital punishment.
Scott Adams is just now "breaking up" with the government? Well, there's your problem. You're a little late in getting over your Stockholm Syndrome. We need many more people to leave this abusive relationship, and realize that keeping government power in check doesn't mean you hate poor people, don't want infrastructure, or are a terrorist.
I'll have consumer electronics that have ROHS certification with the Crazyfornia label on it. It's ROHS, so I know the solder is lead-free. This makes me wonder what other horrible substances could possibly be in there. Are copper or gold now carcinogens in CA? Maybe if I grind down the plastic casing and snort it, I'll get cancer?
Is that why you have warning labels on everything that has food coloring? Excuse me... COLOURING. Oh yeah, you also have warning labels on cigarettes... obviously, in Europe it's news that smoking can cause cancer.
Or, the film could otherwise be garbage. I mean, would many of us, if given a choice, choose "The Day After Tomorrow" to introduce climate change to kids? Or "The Land Before Time" to teach them about dinosaurs?
Suppose I started marketing an HIV test, or a Hepatitis C test, or a tuberculosis test without demonstrating the test was effective? The FDA would be on me like shit on stink, and rightly so
Please cite me the part of the federal food, drug, and cosmetic act which says they have the authority. They have jurisdiction over the following: food, drugs, medical devices, food additives, and dietary supplements.
Naturally, the kneejerk progressives already modded down my post... so thanks for responding, instead.
The FDA decided in 2010 that services claiming to evaluate a customer's risk of disease must be cleared by regulators if the companies sell directly to consumers
So a bunch of un-elected bureaucrats decided whether same un-elected bureaucrats had the power to regulate a product or service? Mind you, I'm not questioning whether this is a good product or not-- just whether the FDA should be deciding what's in its jurisdiction. Where are the progressives clamoring for "checks and balances"?
Slashdot Mirror
CAT-5 has already been outgrown. It cannot handle gigabit. No one should be using this stuff for new installations.
Besides it being difficult to engulf INTO something, most folks do their holiday shopping at places like Macy's and Target, not Acme and A&P.
If the black, tar-like substance provides chemical energy, then it burns. I mean, it's certainly not providing a matter/antimatter, fission, or fusion reaction. So flamethrowers and napalm would be the best weapons.
Fail.
Maybe there is something about the Australian digital standard which makes this true. But in the US, it simply is not. Right now, there are thousands of low-income working people in the NY metropolitan area who cannot watch TV. The WTC hosted antennas for the major networks. After 9/11, these networks had to go to inferior backups, making thousands either lose signal or have a marginal signal. The digital transition exacerbated this, such that those fringe people who were happy to have something snowy to watch now got nothing. So if you don't have cable (or Vudu) in NYC or northern NJ, you don't watch TV. Ironically, most of the people who have enough to afford cable in these areas STILL aren't seeing any of the digital benefits, because cable companies charge extra for the privilege of viewing shows that are supposed to be broadcast for free in HD.
How about, "because this car was built in 2005, when ESC was new and didn't make sense on a sports car"?
Facts like the Carrera GT not having stability control (like MOST CARS on the road) are also irrelevant in context, because the car in question was a 2005 model when ESC was rare.
Hire Allyson Hannigan to choose your passwords. PROBLEM SOLVED in sexiest way possible.
And apparently, this money comes out of thin air and doesn't hurt the benefactor-- like maybe making their health care worse.
I guess we just fire up the printing press.
I didn't know that doctors, nurses, administrators, etc. all worked for free in the rest of the world.
I didn't know pharmaceutical companies were all non-profit, and researchers worked for room and board.
Everyone makes money off of health care; the only question is whether the profit goes to the hard working people or if the government bureaucrat gets the biggest slice.
Be... without internet? *screams*
It's not all "religious" people, and they're certainly not all "nutters", for as bad as things might be, "nutters" aren't in the majority.
Red herring, but I'll answer your implied argument by saying that the death penalty is supposed to be 1) a deterrent and 2) a way of removing extremely dangerous people from society. If revenge is a part of it, it's not not codified in law and only a side effect of the existence of capital punishment.
1% of Americans, of course. The 1% of the world make about US $35,000/year. That's why class warfare is stupid.
Nope, that's clearly not what he meant.
Apparently your mother never told you that two wrongs don't make a right.
Agreed. The title of this article should have been, "Why Scott Adams Wants a Bunch of People Who Disagree With Him to Die".
Scott Adams is just now "breaking up" with the government? Well, there's your problem. You're a little late in getting over your Stockholm Syndrome. We need many more people to leave this abusive relationship, and realize that keeping government power in check doesn't mean you hate poor people, don't want infrastructure, or are a terrorist.
High-tech suspensions require electronics.
I'll have consumer electronics that have ROHS certification with the Crazyfornia label on it. It's ROHS, so I know the solder is lead-free. This makes me wonder what other horrible substances could possibly be in there. Are copper or gold now carcinogens in CA? Maybe if I grind down the plastic casing and snort it, I'll get cancer?
Is that why you have warning labels on everything that has food coloring? Excuse me... COLOURING. Oh yeah, you also have warning labels on cigarettes... obviously, in Europe it's news that smoking can cause cancer.
Or, the film could otherwise be garbage. I mean, would many of us, if given a choice, choose "The Day After Tomorrow" to introduce climate change to kids? Or "The Land Before Time" to teach them about dinosaurs?
Nope, the FDA banned them this morning.
Please cite me the part of the federal food, drug, and cosmetic act which says they have the authority. They have jurisdiction over the following: food, drugs, medical devices, food additives, and dietary supplements.
Naturally, the kneejerk progressives already modded down my post... so thanks for responding, instead.
How is this a medical device? Answer: because they say so.
So a bunch of un-elected bureaucrats decided whether same un-elected bureaucrats had the power to regulate a product or service? Mind you, I'm not questioning whether this is a good product or not-- just whether the FDA should be deciding what's in its jurisdiction. Where are the progressives clamoring for "checks and balances"?