We all have been repeatedly reminded in the books that Harry owes a lot of his talent to voldermot, his failed killing curse and more importantly the horcrux he is.
Now that the horcrux is gone, I think Harry should loose most of his special talents.
Given that she has failed to mention what harry does in the epilogue, the following two threads of sequels come to mind:
A comedy novel about a dumb harry
An action novel about what harry does after school
Try attaching a 1M file to a gmail send... Its quite slow. Often I have to try several times before a successful send. Further, I have never ever been able to send an attachment of size around 10M.
They dont have any limit on the attachment size by policy. You can try to send any size... they just timeout.
First, if this method has to work (even remotely), then (a) the number of choices have to be large or (b) the choices have to be a bit similar so that only a well trained eye could tell them apart.
Problems:
(a) I dont have the f***ing time to scroll down a huge list of choices to look for my numbers
(b) IMHO, a good number of people will have trouble with telling apart numbers that look fairly similar to your own writing.
Results:
(a) anyone can get thru with a couple of guesses
or (b) I need to spend a good 30 minutes searching for my numbers or retrying
---
Too much research can be injurious to common sense. (I have my up-side-down writing pen to prove it)
Scenario:
I buy a CD to play on my CD player in my living room and any one who visits my living room can listen to it.
Later I play these (not allow download but just stream) on my web-page and anyone visiting can listen.
I see a very fine line here. And in this case I definitely sympathize with the photographer. His work is now at a higher risk of unauthorized copying and distribution which ofcourse he was not compensated for in the intial royalty offer.
While its important to follow liberal policies as far as possible, it is also extremely important to adhere to the rules of countries with responsible regiemes. Any other approach will lead to a very fragmented and chaotic internet. Keep in mind that if on company refuses to cooperate with some china (or some other country), they will develop their own online technologies. Ofcourse some of us might have a difference of opinion on what a good regieme is.
Seems like a global body like the UN might help governing and policing a common set of agreed policies among all countries, but by experience we know such a body will be rendered useless in no time.:(
This looks like another attempt scare people. In effect he is saying that people are not going to notice any major security problems but they will still be ripped off. "So have AV products installed on your system". Yea right!!
I am not very sure he is raising this issue just to justify his AV product's position in the current turmoil due to the new M$ policy.
Half of all these libraries will be filled with the the legal documents of these subpoenas and related paper work of this law-suit. I am not sure if this is worth the effort. hmph...
I am OK with others looking at content that I have put up online. However, if a company starts to make money off my work by bypassing my web-site (storing the content in a data-base) then they better value my IP rights and pay up.
The anology should be "if you have the choice between going to the neighbors house and eating crap or not going to their house, some people may choose eating crap rather than not going to the neighbors house"
Along the lines, if there is money in "crap", public companies (google, m$, yahoo, etc.) will always go for it.
And in a latest proposal, the lawmakers are planning to criminalize car manufacturers b'cos these automobiles are being used by criminals to commit crimes.....
Slashdot Mirror
Now that the horcrux is gone, I think Harry should loose most of his special talents.
Given that she has failed to mention what harry does in the epilogue, the following two threads of sequels come to mind:
Let the voting begin!!
Try attaching a 1M file to a gmail send... Its quite slow. Often I have to try several times before a successful send. Further, I have never ever been able to send an attachment of size around 10M.
They dont have any limit on the attachment size by policy. You can try to send any size... they just timeout.
Who is liable?
First, if this method has to work (even remotely), then (a) the number of choices have to be large or (b) the choices have to be a bit similar so that only a well trained eye could tell them apart. Problems: (a) I dont have the f***ing time to scroll down a huge list of choices to look for my numbers (b) IMHO, a good number of people will have trouble with telling apart numbers that look fairly similar to your own writing. Results: (a) anyone can get thru with a couple of guesses or (b) I need to spend a good 30 minutes searching for my numbers or retrying --- Too much research can be injurious to common sense. (I have my up-side-down writing pen to prove it)
Scenario:
I buy a CD to play on my CD player in my living room and any one who visits my living room can listen to it.
Later I play these (not allow download but just stream) on my web-page and anyone visiting can listen.
I see a very fine line here. And in this case I definitely sympathize with the photographer. His work is now at a higher risk of unauthorized copying and distribution which ofcourse he was not compensated for in the intial royalty offer.
While its important to follow liberal policies as far as possible, it is also extremely important to adhere to the rules of countries with responsible regiemes. Any other approach will lead to a very fragmented and chaotic internet. Keep in mind that if on company refuses to cooperate with some china (or some other country), they will develop their own online technologies. Ofcourse some of us might have a difference of opinion on what a good regieme is.
:(
Seems like a global body like the UN might help governing and policing a common set of agreed policies among all countries, but by experience we know such a body will be rendered useless in no time.
I am not very sure he is raising this issue just to justify his AV product's position in the current turmoil due to the new M$ policy.
Half of all these libraries will be filled with the the legal documents of these subpoenas and related paper work of this law-suit. I am not sure if this is worth the effort. hmph...
I am OK with others looking at content that I have put up online. However, if a company starts to make money off my work by bypassing my web-site (storing the content in a data-base) then they better value my IP rights and pay up.
The anology should be "if you have the choice between going to the neighbors house and eating crap or not going to their house, some people may choose eating crap rather than not going to the neighbors house"
Along the lines, if there is money in "crap", public companies (google, m$, yahoo, etc.) will always go for it.
And in a latest proposal, the lawmakers are planning to criminalize car manufacturers b'cos these automobiles are being used by criminals to commit crimes.....
------
What else is left??
I already wear special glasses!! When is the screening?? :)