Maybe I should've finished reading it but after two or three paragraphs I just couldn't take it anymore.
How is the ability to send images to television anything new? Or do you mean technology from 50 years ago is continuing to overwhelm journalism?
Grief is ritualized and globalized? Don't you think this is a little vague and unsubstantiated?
I think comparing JFK Jr. to Diana is a leap. I think that a lot of the grief is people reliving the death of a president and the realization of what that family has been through. Which is different than grieving for the death of a media figure.
Does techno-tragedy mean anything or are you actually trying to create new phrases?
No middle ground for civilized discourse. Has technology changed this somehow?
In a nutshell I disagree. The thing that is magnified most by technology is glamorization of technology.
I've recently switched to debian after only running linux on redhat since 4.2. It's taken me a bit of time to get up to speed. I'd hoped the biggest difference would be that I'd type dpkg instead of rpm but...:)
This isn't a testament for or against redhat but one does begin to see that things that begin to seem intuitive adfasdf (- my cat says hi) on redhat are learned.
I set up are rh 6.0 box at the office with all of my personal tricks in an hour. While my debian box at home took me substantially longer (felt like a newbie again).
It would certainly be nice if learning linux didn't mean learning redhat linux or debian linux or suse linux or etc....
Of course the Mozilla people are writing open source code for a company. And companies are constantly in a race with other companies for a money grab.
I don't understand their business model. But they must make money from it some how. It seems to me that this open source model works nicely because there is a trade of getting coders from the "open source" community and for an open source style license. It still costs them money for the time the Mozilla staff spends supporting and training coders outside the company.
They aren't altruistic. Open Source get's something, Netscape/AOL get's something.
Slashdot Mirror
Actually it proves the opposite.
Besides that really doesn't tie in to the 'American Dream'.
Unless you can be adopted by the royal family...
Past few decades? Go back farther...
//
//Sure, she was trying to fight for human rights and all that other stuff, but what did she *really* do for the world?
So what exactly are you *really* doing for the world? We want our oxygen back troll.
Maybe I should've finished reading it but after two or three paragraphs I just couldn't take it anymore.
How is the ability to send images to television anything new? Or do you mean technology from 50 years ago is continuing to overwhelm journalism?
Grief is ritualized and globalized? Don't you think this is a little vague and unsubstantiated?
I think comparing JFK Jr. to Diana is a leap. I think that a lot of the grief is people reliving the death of a president and the realization of what that family has been through. Which is different than grieving for the death of a media figure.
Does techno-tragedy mean anything or are you actually trying to create new phrases?
No middle ground for civilized discourse. Has technology changed this somehow?
In a nutshell I disagree. The thing that is magnified most by technology is glamorization of technology.
So I can start to tie one of these in with the X10 stuff I just recieved. Hmmm that infrared camera might make a nice security sensor.
I can see it now. Neighbors dog in trash - fire the water cannon.
I've never used any CCD stuff before. I wonder if this stuff is straight forward? I guess I'll go a searching....
My girlfriend moved out and took the TV two months ago.
I might be driving down the average.
Perhaps this is because Ozone if ignited will detonate.
It turns out that the concetration in the atmosphere is not sufficient to do this.
I was talking with my sys admin (an HP fan). I mentioned getting an alpha for some number crunching which I need to do. Take a look at this
0 0/tech_specs/index.html
http://www.hp.com/visualize/products/cclass/c30
I'm not sure where the alpha is not but this thing is turning out some impressive numbers.
This has been a difficult issue for me.
:)
I've recently switched to debian after only running linux on redhat since 4.2. It's taken me a bit of time to get up to speed. I'd hoped the biggest difference would be that I'd type dpkg instead of rpm but...
This isn't a testament for or against redhat but one does begin to see that things that begin to seem intuitive adfasdf (- my cat says hi) on redhat are learned.
I set up are rh 6.0 box at the office with all of my personal tricks in an hour. While my debian box at home took me substantially longer (felt like a newbie again).
It would certainly be nice if learning linux didn't mean learning redhat linux or debian linux or suse linux or etc....
I feel inadequate - my paranoia glands just aren't functioning to your level (need more peguin mints)
I recently diverged into debian after being introduced to linux from rh 4.2->5.2. rh is like an entry level drug.
they are trying to control free software in the sence of making it easy to use.
oh nevermind (i'm going to bed)
There are a lot of smart people that work there. Maybe they are just seeing how to tune their home Linux box on company time.
Of course the Mozilla people are writing open source code for a company. And companies are constantly in a race with other companies for a money grab.
I don't understand their business model. But they must make money from it some how. It seems to me that this open source model works nicely because there is a trade of getting coders from the "open source" community and for an open source style license. It still costs them money for the time the Mozilla staff spends supporting and training coders outside the company.
They aren't altruistic. Open Source get's something, Netscape/AOL get's something.