Slashdot Mirror


Wal-Mart Sells Home Spy Gear

Anonymous Coward writes "Always wanted to play with the toys James Bond, the CIA and Dateline get to use every day? Now you can surf over to your friendly neighborhood Wal-Mart Online and pick up a spy-cam (complete with audio) disguised as a Smoke Detector at everyday low prices. Or pick from a variety of pinhole and infrared CCD cameras. Walton, Sam Walton... " Amazing! Wal-Mart seems to have a wide selection of video security gear. I think I'll get one of these for my limousine. Hmmm...

144 comments

  1. Re:If they had this in Porky's by pb · · Score: 1

    Ah, but they did have this in Revenge of the Nerds, and that made it that much funnier...

    ...now I need to get one of these for my own *ahem* recreational use... :)

    --
    pb Reply or e-mail; don't vaguely moderate.
  2. Re:"I found my thrill. . ." by Speed+Racer · · Score: 1

    That was Fats Domino (the singer of the subject song, not the pervert).

    --
    Free Mac Mini. Yes, I'm
  3. Cool, but. . . by Betelgeuse · · Score: 1

    All electronics has something like this for a bunch cheaper (the sony camera) . . .

    --
    I couldn't tell if you were experimenting with poor-man's cryogenics or looking for the orange sherbet.
  4. Fat is the cure. by toenail · · Score: 1

    I have been working steadily for the last several years, covering my body with an extra several layers of fat and hair. This is my camo; it hides what I don't want seen. If anything embarrassing ever DID come to light, I have the advantage of being able to run away, either hibernating or floating somewhere.

    Hair recession roundabouts the top of my head distorts and scatters light rays, further confounding any video devices.

    Keep your newfangled electro-magneto whiz-bang gizmo's -- give me Cookies & Cream ice cream.

    Pardon me, I must go comb my ears.



  5. Re:Paranoid? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Neato.

    (the paranoid coward)

  6. Re:The erotic possibilities are endless! by Billy+Donahue · · Score: 1

    Hmm... Sliver....

    --
    -- The Funk, The Whole Funk, And Nothing But The Funk
  7. Re:Infrared Cameras? by cryptwhomp · · Score: 1

    A friend has a fisher-price child monitor w/an IR camera so he can see his daughter in her dark bedroom ... it cost him ~$200 U.S. It works real well, and it also works in the daytime ... Although i also know that the US-CDN exchange rate is pretty high ... ;-)

    --
    "Those who would give up essential liberty for temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety" - Benjamin Franklin,
  8. Re:Disclaimers? by MindStalker · · Score: 2

    umm "Contents" not recorded. Meaning you can't record the surveillance. In other words if you have camera going to a bunch of tv's with some guy watching them, but those signals are not recorded its perfectly legal (which makes sense as such would only be a space shifting device so that the guards don't have to be everywhere). So no we don't need to assume we are being recorded unless stated in friendly letters on the door that for our safty and security we are being watched!

  9. Re: It's true by Magus311X · · Score: 1
    I worked there last summer and yep, it's true. Actually, we're supposedta be devious about confronting shoplifters. You try to sneak something by, by say, putting it in those opaque storage bins? We just open it up and start ringing everything up. : ^)


    Forget what orange is though... Blue is bomb scare, brown is hostage situation, red is fire, Adam is missing child, green was injury, and black was severe weather. Actually, come to think of it, I don't think there was an orange.


    And god forbid you tried to steal something and run. Sure we smile, wear the smiley pins, and greet ya at the door, but we'll also break your legs. =)



    --Your former friendly neighborhood Wal-Mart employee, now your friendly neighborhood MIS Manager.
    -------------------------------------------------- ------------------------
    50 carraiges at 40 pounds each up a 5 degree grade. F sub N equals that of a compact car. Push, boy!
  10. Real geek toys. by Dast · · Score: 1

    *grin* I like this place. More things on the list to buy.

    --

    This sig is false.

  11. Re:Disclaimers? by Signal+11 · · Score: 2

    Usually those places have stickers somewhere near the entrance saying "Smile! You're on hidden camera", or a legal warning saying the same thing.

    I do know that video survellance is inadmissable as evidence in any federal court unless the subject knew of it beforehand.

    --

  12. Re:some thoughs about the camera by db · · Score: 1

    db wonders why daveo always refers to himself in the third person in all his posts...

    --
    Dave Brooks (db@amorphous.org)
    http://www.amorphous.org

  13. X10 Cameras by Roast+Beef · · Score: 1

    I've seen these little buggers advertised all over the place recently. $150 for a wireless color camera... interesting.

  14. New theme song by Nose · · Score: 1

    Heh, they could change their add up a bit:

    *ad music*
    ...Spying on you everyday
    That's the WalMart way!

    --
    Nose -Common Sense isn't.
  15. why wal-mart is the devil by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This, along with their decision not to sell preven, the morning after pill, although selling viagra is fine. Also wal-mart is a massive megaconglomerate that thrives on moving into towns, creating massive lakes of blacktop for parking, and crushing helpless mom-n-pop stores (and the occasional sucky k-mart). And almost everything they sell is crap, although they have good deals on oreo cookies.
    I believe it was jon stewart who said wal-mart was a "solid investment in your portfolio of evil." Personally I'm inclined to agree. If possible avoid wal-mart and go to your corner mom-n-pop shoppe or something, and help keep the economy free of monopolies (and I know /. loves monopolies :) )

    not anonymous, just lazy, Asterix (mhess@email.unc.edu, don't spam me)

    1. Re:why wal-mart is the devil by Microlith · · Score: 0

      They are the devil because I live in arkansas (mere miles from Wal-Mart HQ), and they insisted on building "Arkansas Largest Supercenter" right outside the LRAFB. To say the least, most residents said NO. But this one dipshit down the street took up a petition, and got a tiny part of the city to sign it, and got the damn Wal-Mart thru anyways. I mean, all that was there before were these useless trees! Now we have a Wal-Mart Supercenter! (Wal-Mart is cheap. To save money, all of the lights in their HQ are spaced a little farther apart than normal, to cut down on electrical costs...)

    2. Re:why wal-mart is the devil by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You have some good points here, but comparing selling preven to selling viagra is not one of them. As far as I know, viagra doesn't kill the child of the person who uses it.

    3. Re:why wal-mart is the devil by Mr+T · · Score: 1

      I heard they have some sort of routine that all the employees go through before work everyday, it includes all singing some sort of song... Not sure if it's true but I wouldn't be surprised. Can you imagine them asking some gen-Xer to sing a song before work? I'd slap that silly smile off my boss' face and go get a different job. I don't recall seeing any young people helping consumers select a cart at the door either, are they agist or something?

      --
      This is my signature. There are many signatures like it but this one is mine..
    4. Re:why wal-mart is the devil by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm sorry you don't like Walmart. Personally, I have found their prices excellent. If I feel I need more than the minumum service when buying a product (ie. I'm not buying batteries/candy) I go to a "real" store (Mom-n-pop maybe, or a big store with good service, I don't care much.). They seem like quite a fine company to me, and I have yet to find a single company go out of business because of them. If they do, I'd bet their service was lousy (I can't stand an expensive store where the people there can't spend even a minute explaining something about a product to you).

      I've been very happy with my purchases from them. Basically, I figure if I pay $5 for a pair of headphones, and they break after 2 months worth of use, I got what I paid for. I bought a $40 pair of headphones there, was very happy with them, and they lasted a year (I accidentally crushed 'em when I forced a metal drawer shut. Oh well.).

      I've bought recordable-CDs there, no problems. Candy & food items are about as "fresh" as can be expected for items with such a long shelf life... And, as far as superstores go, their batteries don't suck either... Much better than radio shack batteries! :-)

      Bottom line in this Capitolist economy: If you can make the best product and sell it at the best price with the best service, you win.

    5. Re:why wal-mart is the devil by apathetic · · Score: 1

      sorry to be off topic BUT preven prevents ovulation preventing pregnency (note the name) unlike RU486 witch kills the fetus

  16. WM will pull cams after 1st report of evil use! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    These spy cams will get pulled from the shelves as soon as a story appears about how they were used to spy on women/kids/etc. There was a local story in the paper about this guy who would videotape little (preteen) kids in their swimming outfits at waterparks and public pools and then sell the tapes. Police could do nothing since it was not illegal to videotape clothed kids in a public location. Well, as soon as word got out, the cries of "Something must be done" began and not we have a new law that ends this practice in the city. I expect the same will happen with these spy cams at walmart.

    1. Re:WM will pull cams after 1st report of evil use! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I may be a pervert, but I am *NOT* a pedophile. I only spy on WOMEN, and I actually have a little bit of a fetish for older women.

  17. Re:some thoughs about the camera by dattaway · · Score: 2

    db wonders why daveo always refers to himself in the third person in all his posts...

    Perhaps he has been looking at himself through a pinhole camera all this time?

  18. The irony is WalMart uses fake cameras in stores by Kurt+Gray · · Score: 3

    I had a friend who worked at WalMart who told me
    that the most of the ceiling cameras in the
    store are fake (complete with blinking LED and
    occaional movement) and occasionally floor
    personal will call for a security gaurd over the
    PA system "Security: code orange, section 3"
    for no reason other than to keep potential
    shoplifters paranoid.

  19. Unimpressive by Zappy · · Score: 0

    Look at this or for more choice here.
    Text is in Dutch but i'm sure you will get the picture :-)

  20. All-in-wonder-cam by MrEd · · Score: 2
    Take a small solar cell, add a Wal-Mart(tm) pinhole camera. Connect a TCP/IP stack the size of a dime, do a little custom soldering with some PROMs, get yourself a case (the size of a tennis ball, you reckon?), run a little cable to a home router... Whee!

    You'd have a self-contained webcam. With a little ingenuity, and some more power, maybe a wireless solution could be cooked up? Like a car-top webcam. Wouldn't that be nice. (My car is parked at 42nd and Vine. My car keys are on the roof in plain view of the camera)

    --

    Wah!

    1. Re:All-in-wonder-cam by HeghmoH · · Score: 1

      I have what you describe, though not wireless. It's a Connectix QuickCam, it's about the size of a tennis ball, connects to my serial port, and is dirt easy to set up. The original, black and white, 320x240 version cost me $26 including shipping.

      --
      Mod down posts with a "Free Mac Mini/iPod" sig, they're spam!
    2. Re:All-in-wonder-cam by MrEd · · Score: 1

      I was thinking of using the "webserver-on-a-chip" (that was slashdotted a week or so ago) to make a webcam with its own webserver included! No computer required! It could look a helluva lot like the old tennis-ball-webcams, though.

      --

      Wah!

  21. Audio Illegal? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I thought it was a federal crime (in the US) to record audio without permission, but video is fine.

    1. Re:Audio Illegal? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      only if neither participating party is aware of the recording. it's ok for you to record a conversation that you have with someone, even if you don't tell them you're recording it. but recording two (or more) unsuspecting parties is illegal.

      note that police do need a warrent to use any surveilled information in a court of law, but this limitation does not apply to ordinary citizens.

    2. Re:Audio Illegal? by Microlith · · Score: 1

      Depends. If someone calls you, you can tape them without their consent (catching harrasing calls?). If you call someone, you have to get consent to record something.

    3. Re:Audio Illegal? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, no offense to anyone, but all the responses so far have been a little off base.

      It is legal to record audio, as long as one person knows about it (2 in some states), but we must keep in mind, that there is video being recorded at the same time.

      Now, the recording of audio AND video is strictly prohibited. Unless the audio recorder is a separate device, it is totally illegal for walmart to even be selling these things.

      (i only know cause i overheard my boss when i worked at a spy store www.spysite.com)

      -TOmaj

    4. Re:Audio Illegal? by Uart · · Score: 0

      not true, vut the recording can't be used in a court.

      --

      Opinionated Law Student Strikes Again!
    5. Re:Audio Illegal? by Adm · · Score: 1

      Not on your own property. You can record anything you want within the bounds of your personal domain(home). The only exception is recording phone conversations simply because this can violate wiretap laws as the person that is being recorded is not within the bounds of the persons property and it uses "public" lines.

    6. Re:Audio Illegal? by Mr.+Slippery · · Score: 1

      Note that state law may vary. I believe it is illegal in Maryland to tape a convesation without both party's knowledge. (Remember Linda Tripp?)

      --
      Tom Swiss | the infamous tms | my blog
      You cannot wash away blood with blood
    7. Re:Audio Illegal? by Jimhotep · · Score: 1

      Isn't she the one that made
      interstate telephone recordings?

      Or was that Nixon?

    8. Re:Audio Illegal? by gavinhall · · Score: 1

      Posted by Lord Kano-The Gangst:

      Tripp nearly ran afoul of the law because it was telephone conversations that she taped.

      I think that it would have been legal if they had been in Tripp's house or car.

      Also it is one of the FEW cases where ignorance of the law is a VALID excuse.

      Wierd stuff anyway.

      LK

  22. Disclaimers? by Signal+11 · · Score: 2

    I wonder if they also tell their would-be spies that using such equipment in some states is illegal (without telling the party being spied on).



    --

    1. Re:Disclaimers? by Uart · · Score: 1

      I do know that video survellance is inadmissable as evidence in any federal court unless the subject knew of it beforehand.


      Also known as "the sleazy politician law"!

      Pres: I did not have sex with that woman!
      Starr: But we have your encounter on video tape!
      Pres: Nope, doesn't count
      Starr: What?!?!
      Pres: Yup. Thanks to my fellow sleazy politicians, your tapes are inadmissable, because i didn't know you were taping me!
      Star: But thats ludicris! if you had known you were being taped, you wouldn't have done it, or at least not where the camera could see it!
      Pres: I know, thats the point.

      Stupid law, if they can make that law,, they should also let you know when you are close to a police speed trap, so you can slow down, otherwise the radar reading should be inadmissable in court...

      --

      Opinionated Law Student Strikes Again!
    2. Re:Disclaimers? by peter+hoffman · · Score: 1

      I was researching this a little and, so far, the clearest thing I have found is at Fairfield and Woods, P.C. where they say that video surveillance is probably legal without notifying the observed so long as the "contents" of any communication are not recorded. This is talked about in a section called Video surveillance about half way down the page.

      This is quite an interesting subject. I suspect that in the near future (20 minutes from now?) people will have to assume that they are being recorded most of the time.

    3. Re:Disclaimers? by GwaiJai · · Score: 1

      How does this apply to monitoring private property tho'? Of course you could be using this as some sleazy spy thing, but what if you suspect someone's routinely going into your office/house/whatever, and you want proof?

      You catch them on video, but they get off, cuz they didn't know they were being taped?

      --

      I only take a drink on two occasions - when I'm thirsty and when I'm not.

      Brendan Behan
    4. Re:Disclaimers? by peter+hoffman · · Score: 1

      I wonder how such laws apply to "conventional" security monitoring? Very often those cameras are positioned so as to not be obtrusive and as a result, the observed might claim to be unaware.

  23. some thoughs about the camera by DAVEO · · Score: 0

    daveo looked on the page but their seems to be a lack or infomation reguarding wheather it uses a tape, or passes the vidio receptions to a monitor. $243 seems a little sttep. now how could those 2 wires, both black and white, be properly concealed with out any notice? that seems too be impossible, it could'nt blend in with any thing.

    --
    -DAVEO
    1. Re:some thoughs about the camera by DAVEO · · Score: 0

      this was at first, and if you will have noticed many people others have too, many of daveo's posts are moderated down unfairly, and it is hard... but if you will read his posts lately they are mostley the same, some down, some up.

      --
      -DAVEO
    2. Re:some thoughs about the camera by mvw · · Score: 1

      Me Tarzan, you daveo! (ugh, ugh :)

    3. Re:some thoughs about the camera by shadrack · · Score: 1

      What you use is up to you. You can hook up a VCR to record, or buy an ATI TV Wonder to caputure to your hard disk. Anything that can be used to capture and store video (analog that is).

    4. Re:some thoughs about the camera by DAVEO · · Score: 0

      daveo has an all in wonder, in fact, he is watching comeedy central right behind this comment box! just wondering if it was a vidio output wire (beacuse it looks a bit small) or of it was to record in a tape. still it is thought to be a bad spy device, becuase of the colored big wires, and in most likelihood is of rather fake textures.

      --
      -DAVEO
    5. Re:some thoughs about the camera by jkovach · · Score: 1

      The wires can be concealed by mounting the "smoke detector" to an electrical box in the ceiling, like you would with a smoke detector that runs off of line voltage. You then run the wire above the ceiling to your monitor.

  24. How do they attach the video ball camera? by georgeha · · Score: 1

    With duct tape?

    And do you have to carry around a 12v power supply?

    Oh well, at least the video output's female.

    George

    1. Re:How do they attach the video ball camera? by bliss · · Score: 1

      I have heard of technology (military) that allows a person to fire a electromagnetic pulse to knock out all electronic devices within a given area could that be applied to this type of spying.

      --
      The death of one man is a tragedy; the death of a million is a statistic --Joseph Stalin
    2. Re:How do they attach the video ball camera? by Kintanon · · Score: 1

      It's called an Electromagnetic Pulse, or EMP.
      It's most commonly produced by detonating nuclear weapons in the atmosphere... I'm sure there are other ways to do so but I don't know of any.

      Kintanon

      --
      Check out JoshJitsu.info for Brazilian Ji
    3. Re:How do they attach the video ball camera? by Signal+11 · · Score: 2

      EMPs can be created by using a tesla coil. Basically just step the voltage up to the desired level, and then put an RF component (ie: a coil) into the circuit, and you have yourself a portable EMP.

      In short, just ionize the shit out of an area, and then zap it with about 50mA and a few thousand volts, and you'll kill anything with an IC on it.

      Try microwaving your walkman to get a good idea of how this works.

      --

    4. Re:How do they attach the video ball camera? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're thinking of EMP devices?

      You do get a fairly *wide-area* _momentary_ EMP effect from the high-altitude detonation of a nuclear weapon, if memory serves. Using nukes is generally not considered a reasonable anti-bug technique, although it would make it very expensive to build a bug that could remain functioning during the blast.

      See

      Crypt Newsletter

      to deflate hype. You might instead attempt to use a high-energy radio frequency (HERF), but for a fairly simple device, the potential damage might be quite limited.

      Short of physically securing the area, and frequent searches, it can be far more difficult to bypass video surveillance than audio (which, say, you might be able to potentially counter w/ some form of noise generator) if it's not required to be broadcasting (detectably/trackably...) continuously (so either burst mode or via wire, perhaps to your phone jack.).

  25. Hmmmmmmmm!!! by KrAphtd1nN3r · · Score: 1

    They should have more choice. I'd definitely go for some plastic explosive inside toothpaste tubes, or small rocket launchers!!

    --
    "Code free or die!"
    1. Re:Hmmmmmmmm!!! by bliss · · Score: 1

      I just might publish the top 100 most interesting posts (anonymized) to slashdot sometime. I get such interesting ideas from this site. *Insane laughter*

      --
      The death of one man is a tragedy; the death of a million is a statistic --Joseph Stalin
    2. Re:Hmmmmmmmm!!! by Cybervoid · · Score: 1

      You forgot the dental floss garrat wire :)

      You gotta love Austin Powers.

  26. saw these a year ago... by Mr.+Slippery · · Score: 2
    smarthome.com has had a wide selection of covert video cameras for a while - they have ones built into clocks, telephones, picture frames, et cetera.

    --
    Tom Swiss | the infamous tms | my blog
    You cannot wash away blood with blood
    1. Re:saw these a year ago... by dattaway · · Score: 2

      I'm not sure of current prices, but I looked around and got a Panasonic egg cam kit with the Brooktree chip set (works great with Linux!) for $75 from 10 refurbished models in stock. Pricewatch has similar deals. Anyhow, without the case, this camera makes a fine minature pinhole unit that can hide behind a speck in the wall (see my webcam.) Its video output is the usual ntsc through a RCA jack that can also fit a video recorder. The Brooktree video card will do full motion video up to 30fps in both overlay and screengrab to a file. The driver is built into the recent Linux kernels.

  27. nifty by Pierre · · Score: 1

    So I can start to tie one of these in with the X10 stuff I just recieved. Hmmm that infrared camera might make a nice security sensor.

    I can see it now. Neighbors dog in trash - fire the water cannon.

    I've never used any CCD stuff before. I wonder if this stuff is straight forward? I guess I'll go a searching....

    1. Re:nifty by Mr.+Slippery · · Score: 1
      I can see it now. Neighbors dog in trash - fire the water cannon.
      You can buy a system to do this ready-made. See http://smarthome.com/6120.html.

      Smarthome's catalog is full of neat stuff like this. I've never actually bought any of it, but it makes for nifty browsing.

      --
      Tom Swiss | the infamous tms | my blog
      You cannot wash away blood with blood
    2. Re:nifty by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It would also work (maybe not for long) with some 20M HCl in it, too.



      BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH!!

  28. Re: Silly children type in all caps. by Syslevel · · Score: 0

    Almost everything I can find for sale in Target appears to be made in China . . .

  29. Webserver by MrEd · · Score: 1
    --

    Wah!

  30. Hm. For parental snooping? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    At least, that's the first legal usage for this that came into my mind -- planting cameras in, say, dependents' rooms and so forth. Doesn't seem quite the moral thang to do...

    That, and monitoring the staff for those who resort to maid services, nannies and other hired help, for when they do things like swipe a check off the bottom of your checkbook or otherwise go treasure-hunting.

    1. Re:Hm. For parental snooping? by bliss · · Score: 1

      I really don't like the thought of never having a private moment to do anything in my life with cameras like these

      --
      The death of one man is a tragedy; the death of a million is a statistic --Joseph Stalin
  31. cool, limo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    woo, i think roblimo is so much more cooler now that i've seen his limo page.

    1. Re:cool, limo by bliss · · Score: 0

      Wow he really is concerned with limos? Cool.

      --
      The death of one man is a tragedy; the death of a million is a statistic --Joseph Stalin
  32. LOL by gonzocanuck · · Score: 1

    Lots of stores do. I don't know if they do it in the US, but at the nearest Wal-Mart, they'll tape your other shopping bags, purses even, with their green Wal-Mart stickers. I'm surprised people haven't stood up to this - I mean, god, treat me like a F*n criminal or what? I haven't been there in a year. I'm not that desperate to save a few cents. My dad worked there once as a dock loader. It was the most hellish job he ever had.

    --

  33. Re:X10 Cameras =>I bought one by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I bought one of those, and it is surprisingly good. The camera is color, and fairly high-resolution. Since the wireless doodad is high-frequency (2.4 Ghz, I believe), it gets a really clean signal (as long as you aren't trying to use two transmitters too close to each other, even when you switch their frequencies). The only problem with the wireless sender is that it is rather bulky (definitely not designed to hook to a camera).

    It has already been useful; we leave it pointed at my two-year-old while she's playing to make it easier to monitor her, and she's yet to have any idea it's a camera (it doesn't look like a camera at all). With the camcorder she's much more likely to try to do something to it. We have one of those black-and-white baby monitors, and it's a piece of crap in comparison (though we'll still use it for night surveillance when my second daughter is born in a few days). Color cameras typically stink at night.

    Smarthome.com sells infrared lights to use with cameras; does anybody know if those are useful with a color camera which isn't designed for night?

  34. Unimpressive by Zappy · · Score: 0

    Well I tried to post these URL's http://www.conrad.nl/cgi-bin/ConShop.pl?TK_PAR[USE R_ID]=0207083800932589618&TK_EV[SHOWPAGE ]=&TK_PAR[PAGEID]=14284&TK_PAR[MEDIUM]=89 and for more choice http://www.conrad.nl/cgi-bin/ConShop.pl?TK_PAR%5BS UCHTEXT%5D=ccd&TK_PAR%5BUSER_ID%5D=02070 83800932589618&TK_EV%5BTEXTSEARCH%5D=1
    Text is in Dutch but i'm sure you will get the picture :-)

  35. Amen, brother! by Booker · · Score: 1

    You forgot to mention keeping all employees under 40 hours so they don't have to pay 'em any benefits (or so I've heard... I could be completely wrong.)

    I can't stand those damn ads with the happy smiling face knocking down numbers. I always envision that happy smiling face shutting down local stores and cracking the whip in a sweatshop.

  36. Re:The irony is WalMart uses fake cameras in store by Ben+Smith · · Score: 1

    This is absolutely true, 3 years ago I was a cashier at a walmart, I dunno if the cameras were fake, but I never found the security room in the building, and coulden't think of a place they could stick one. I was told by my superviser that if we see someone we think is shoplifting, we should get on the PA and say some crap like "Security, camera scan cosmetics" or some BS like that. Pretty funny stuff.

    So yeah, i guess if yer gunna shoplift, do it at a walmart, just obey the eternal law of capitalistic justice, "Don't get caught!".

    --
    -Ben
    bensmith@biz1.net
  37. A better idea ... by timur · · Score: 2

    All you need is a video capture card ($40 from eBay), a composite video camera, a cable modem or DSL connection, a web server, a device driver, and a few lines of code. Program the driver to take a snapshot every second, and dump the image to a JPG on the web server. Write an HTML page that does an auto-refresh on the JPG, and Presto! instant remote monitoring of your home. Then, if you have the time, you can write an image processing app that compares two successive frames. If there's enough of a difference, it saves the frame to disk. So if someone actually does break into your house, it will record it.
    Timur Tabi
    Remove "nospam_" from email address

    1. Re:A better idea ... by Zurk · · Score: 1

      err..theres always a difference between 2 frames. they arent exactly alike due to variances in light, cars passing and throwing shadows, dust settling, random static from the camera itself (its not perfect, yknow)..thats why most ppl attach a motion detector (PIR usually) to the camera..if it detects motion, start recording at full speed + capture 1 frame every minute for safety..

    2. Re:A better idea ... by dalke · · Score: 1
      theres always a difference between 2 frames. they arent exactly alike due to variances in light ...

      Story time.

      About 8 years ago I was doing some lab work with a frame grapper. We used it to find if, at a given voltage, the sample had undergone a phase change or not. As you approach the critical voltage, the time to phase change takes longer and longer.

      So we automated it by comparing frames over time with the intial frame. Problem was, the grabber would get one of the two interleaves, so we had to take three snapshots and use the smallest of the differences |2-1|, |3-1| and |3-2|.

      In other words, even if the scene doesn't change you could still get some differences between the images.

    3. Re:A better idea ... by Erich · · Score: 1
      Take a few LED's, amplify changes in voltages they produce (LED's will make voltage from light). Significant change implies movement in the area.

      My friend used this setup to make an auto-cat-squirter for his garden. It was cool... anything tried to go in the garden and the sprinkler turned on...

      --

      -- Erich

      Slashdot reader since 1997

  38. My Birdhouse Cam by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    I mounted a camera in a bird house on the front of my house.

    It takes a picture every 10 seconds and I store the footage.

    I can view it on one of my six televisions that are all mounted on my living room wall.

    1. Re:My Birdhouse Cam by bliss · · Score: 1

      I sincerely hope your joking? Are you? Well I had a rather insane thought. Get a movie any/every movie you can find and then grab the frames with bttv use the support for aalib or just dump them to files and convert them to ascii and presto you have an entire version of say the original star wars in ascii.

      --
      The death of one man is a tragedy; the death of a million is a statistic --Joseph Stalin
    2. Re:My Birdhouse Cam by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My god your life if boring.

  39. _could_ also be used for security by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You know, these could be used for home security.

    You perverts...

    1. Re:_could_ also be used for security by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Right, "home security". Uh huh. Liar!

  40. *ahem* by MenTaLguY · · Score: 0

    Dear fellow, I feel rather obligated to point out to you that if you continue with such posts, our moderator friends are quite liable to ensure that you start with a default score of -1, rather than your current default of 0. Just keep that in mind. Good night.
    ---

    --

    DNA just wants to be free...
  41. Re:The irony is WalMart uses fake cameras in store by Nate237 · · Score: 2

    I used to be a support mgr at a smaller WM. The security room was in the same room that the accounting people were in (and the safe).

    I put a few of the cameras in the store.

    The problem areas usually have them installed. Also, almost every cash register overhead is real. But for the most part, many are fake.

    The store tended to play it safe rather than risk being sued.

  42. infrared camera by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The infrared camera is cooler! I think $200 is the cheapest I have seen them (course haven't been looking very hard.) Wonder if you can hook it up to a computer? Anyway, $200 and you can see when there is no light! I wonder what type of sensors they use? Probably not very sensitive but still cool -- and at Wal Mart of all places!

    1. Re:infrared camera by Zurk · · Score: 1

      most infrared cams are not *true* infrared..they cant do much in terms of differentiating thermal spots and give temperature readings..They use the property of CCDs to see in the near infrared range (most CCDs can do this anyway) and record that (its roughly a simulation of night vision goggles)...true infrared cams cost $$$ (well over $10,000 in some cases)

  43. Target (pronounced 'tar-zshay') by The+Queen · · Score: 0

    Yes, not as much american-made merchandise but they do have that 'giving back to the community' policy, donating stuff to local schools, etc.

    Where I live there is a Target right next to a Super-WalMart. I go to the WalMart for groceries and pharmacy, but try to go to Target for most other stuff. (They have a better selection of incense and cd's.) :-)

    The Divine Creatrix in a Mortal Shell that stays Crunchy in Milk

    --

    The House Between - Original Sci-Fi Series
  44. Paranoid? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Maybe I am, but let me ask you this:

    What if corporations with cash had the idea of buying the best adspace on the net (also known as Slashdot articles)? I know Mr. Malda has the moral integrity to umm, not do that, but what about Andover? Maybe I'm paranoid. But there are loads of better places to get 'spy gear' and supposedly Wal-Mart has had this stuff for a while. You decide :P

    1. Re:Paranoid? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As a representative of Wal Mart, I have to say that this is absolutely false. We do not have any shady dealings with Mr. Taco. In fact we don't have any shady dealings with ANYONE, ANYWHERE.

      Did I mention that we also never lie?

    2. Re:Paranoid? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As a representative of Wal Mart, I have to say that this is absolutely false. We do not have any shady dealings with Mr. Taco. In fact we don't have any shady dealings with ANYONE, ANYWHERE.

      I beleive you. Mostly because I said that Wal-Mart may have paid Andover.net, not Mr. Taco :P Or perhaps they paid Roblimo...

    3. Re:Paranoid? by Roblimo · · Score: 1

      Naah. No pay. A reader sent in the item, and I posted it, because the idea of super-staid Wal-Mart selling "spy stuff" is kind of funny. And note that a whole bunch of people immediately posted URLs for places that sell similar items for less.

      I wouldn't let any Andover sales person *ever* plant a story in Slashdot. In fact, part of my job is here to keep them from even thinking about it. I'll play around, sure, but when it comes to maintaining editorial integrity, I do not joke. Ever.

  45. Re:"I found my thrill. . ." by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I hope you've got the wrong person. I actually kind of like Blueberry Hill (I live right off the loop), although I've never used the bathroom there, now that I think of it.

  46. Half the fun is the anticipation when posting. by bugbear3000 · · Score: 0

    The other half is when I read the (much anticipated) comments. It's been fun! :-D

    1. Re:Half the fun is the anticipation when posting. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're welcome.... ;-)

  47. Re:Infrared Cameras? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    >the CCD property of being able to see in the near infrared range

    This would be good enough if I could find a (bright) floodlight that emits only near-IR or longer light, but the light's output must be 100% outside the visible range.

  48. Is the record Slashdot lowest score below -21? by bugbear3000 · · Score: 0

    I wonder how many Slashdot posters are AIs..? Does anyone admit to writing an Eliza-like posting script? :-D

    1. Re:Is the record Slashdot lowest score below -21? by mvw · · Score: 1
      I wonder how many Slashdot posters are AIs..?

      Could the creator of this SlashBot please step forward?

      Is the record Slashdot lowest score below -21?

      Visit http://slashdot.org/users.pl?op=preview&bid=bottom 10comments for a recent listing of state-of-the-low comments.

  49. Infrared Cameras? by GRH · · Score: 1

    Anybody know if these infrared cameras actually work? Last time I priced true infrared cameras they were about $80,000 CDN.

    Still pretty neat gadgets though.

    1. Re:Infrared Cameras? by Zurk · · Score: 1

      these arent true infrared. they use the CCD property of being able to see in the near infrared range...hence their cheap cost.

    2. Re:Infrared Cameras? by dattaway · · Score: 2

      There are places selling infrared cameras. I have seen some in industrial catalogs starting at $5000 that will show electrical lines behind walls in computer enhanced color. They also require big batteries, so I'm sure they have some kind of cooling on the imaging sensor. They are useful for finding bad joints in overhead wiring, substations, electrical boxes, and places where the voltages are undesirable to trace by hand. Most industrial engineering supply catalogs should have them.

    3. Re:Infrared Cameras? by shogun · · Score: 1

      I've seen some bare CCD's cameras mounted on circuit boards that also have an array of infra-red LED's (same as the ones in tv remote controles) mounted around them. This provides enough illumination so that the camera can see in what you perceive as darkness. If you want to see this work yourself, if you have any kind of digicam, take a photo of a remote control with a button pressed in the dark.

    4. Re:Infrared Cameras? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you've got a remote control at home, then you already own a IR floodlight. Works great!

  50. Possible counter reactions by mvw · · Score: 1
    The cameras and microphonese are here and won't go away so easy.

    As defence against this intrusion into privacy is at least very expensive, if not impossible, I am quite sure that we all will develop a kind of exhibitionistic don't-care-if-you-tape attitude. That's the cheapes solution for some aspects.

    And I wouldn't be surprised if rooms with granted privacy become the exception instead of the normal in the future.

    A great occasion for companies or unused temples by the way. Who knows what crazy offerings will result. Take the oxygene bar as a response to air pollution. Maybe one has to shell out some bucks in the future to have a nice private talk.

  51. Re:Redneck Spy Supplies by dattaway · · Score: 3

    Hey, I'm gonna run out and buy two of them thangs. One to monitor the bug zapper, and the other to watch...

    Beat you to it. The Redneck Bugzappercam , so grab a six pack, sit back, and watch bugs die a spectacular death in a shocking display. Should I provide a streaming mp3 of them getting nuked?

    I need a switch from my parallel port and a perl script so the pinhole cam I was showing off earlier in the day can be seen.

  52. Cancer? by crispy · · Score: 1

    I thought that strong EM fields had been linked to cancer... (You know all the power line stories) I guess you could die a slow agonizing death in peace with the knowledge that no one is watching you.

    And since we're not dealing with reality: you should try making yourself invisible. Then you don't have to worry about any one spying on you and you can spy on all the girls lockerrooms that you want.
    -----

    --
    My sig has a broken link in it.
    1. Re:Cancer? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, but the invisible man was still "there". ie. One day in the lockerroom you'll literally bump into someone, or someone will accidentally bust open their box of talcum powder... :-)

    2. Re:Cancer? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of course, if you were invisible, you'd also have to be blind...light would pass right through your retina and you wouldn't see a thing.

      Sorry

  53. Do not confuse 'legal' with 'admissible in court' by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Due to the problem of determining consent given, taped phone conversations are nearly useless in court.

    This has no bearing on wheather or not recording is permitted at all. Remember the Pamela whatever sex video. She tried to prevent its dissemmination and failed. Nor could Laura Schleischenger(sp? aka Dr. Laura) block the dissemination of nude pictures over the web.

    So if you tape an insurance company telling you lies and illegal stuff, don't threaten to go to court... threaten to release it to the web! Bad word of mouth is far more harmful than bad court decisions to big companies.

  54. this has got to be part of a bigger plan... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ultra-conservative wall-mart has probably installed transmitters in these devices so it can monitor people's homes. whenever they see/hear people doing something "unamerican" like listening to un-censored copies of CDs purchased at stores other than wall-mart, they'll trigger the poisonous-gas releasing mechanism also encased in the smoke detector shell. i can't wait to get mine!

  55. Where to get a b&w pinhole cam for $50? by torment · · Score: 1

    ???

    1. Re:Where to get a b&w pinhole cam for $50? by starman97 · · Score: 1

      www.supercircuits.com

      --
      Starman97@Gmail.com (bring it on spammers)
  56. Redneck Spy Supplies by Bolen · · Score: 2

    Hey, I'm gonna run out and buy two of them thangs.

    One to monitor the bug zapper, and the other to watch for any varmits tryin' to steal the wheels off my house.

  57. Sounds like you've been reading Cryptonomicon by grappler · · Score: 2

    This is basically the kind of script Randy wrote in Cryptonomicon (Neal Stephenson).

    This would work if you have a kind of image encoding where the magnitude of the difference (from subtraction) accurately reflects the magnitude of the difference we would percieve by looking at the two shots. For instance, if each image is encoded as a big long number, and the two numbers subtracted, you would get a very big result if the only pixel changed is the one in the upper left. This is an example of a scheme that wouldn't work.

    With a good encoding scheme, this would work very well.

    --
    Vidi, Vici, Veni
  58. "reasonable expectation of privacy" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Depends on the state, and on the situation. Generally when you are in a public place or on heavily-travelled private grounds (e.g. a convenience store) you can't reasonably expect there to be privacy, and therefore covert surveillance is perfectly legal.

    In some states, you can covertly record a conversation even if it's not on your property, provided there are at least three people present (including yourself). Same general idea. No reasonable expectation of privacy.

    I am not a lawyer, etc, etc. If you get your legal advice from Anonymous Cowards, you're a moron.

  59. Re:X10 Cameras =>I bought one by dattaway · · Score: 2

    Most modern black and white cameras are very sensitive to the red/infra red range. A lit cigarette looks like a spotlight at the camera in the dark. If your company has a no smoking policy and you have cameras, watch out.

    Color cameras do not seem to benefit from infrared. I have a ccd b/w and it responds in a most excellent way from infrared led's. The b/w also does a pretty good job under moon light. The color does not see this spectrum and is miserable for night viewing.

    I also have a image multiplier (got this one at walmart in the hunting department!) that multiplies light 15,000 times. Its great for scoping wildlife out in the woods and other telephoto lenses will fit it. Just don't use it to try finding your way out of the woods in the dark. I tried and discovered the field of vision was narrow and I tripped over every damn thing in the way!

  60. Re:The irony is WalMart uses fake cameras in store by gdbear · · Score: 1

    every major retail outlet uses tactics such as this to try to deter the a$$hole shoplifters.
    having spent all my pre-tech job years in retail i saw the lengths that establishments went to to halt what some think of as a victimless crime, and at least some of them were just as concerned with internal theft as theft from "customers"
    just my piece of life-experience

  61. Note to Self by alkali · · Score: 3

    Remember to suggest to CmdrTaco that he add a "Too Much Information" moderation category. Also, buy milk.

  62. Re:X10 Cameras =>I bought one by aonaran · · Score: 1

    I remember seeing a site a few months ago where someone was using an older quickcam (the B&W model) with the infared filter taken out of it. That camera coupled with an ordinary remote control for lighting gives surprising results. The remote actually throws an IR beam similar to a flashlight when viewed through the camera.

  63. Do it cheaper this way... by IGnatius+T+Foobar · · Score: 1

    Any electronics surplus catalog will have a wide selection of video camera parts. You can get 'em cheap and mount 'em in any housing you want.

    --
    Tired of FB/Google censorship? Visit UNCENSORED!
  64. coming soon... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Coming soon to a Wal-Mart near you...
    part # TP-101 TEMPEST(r) kit for home computers
    part # ED-273 ECHELON brand Dictionary(tm) software.. just install it and help the NSA read everyone's mail!! only $29.95!
    hehehe

  65. The erotic possibilities are endless! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I run a new england B&B....

    Let's see, a camera-enabled smoke detector for each bedroom. A pinhole camera for each washroom, and another for the shower!

    Mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm....... gotta go polish my sausage now. Be back in 10 minutes.

    1. Re:The erotic possibilities are endless! by shadrack · · Score: 1

      Lets hope Wal-Mart will sell counter survellance gear real soon. Damn, I'm gonna have to check everything in my hotel room from now on. hehehe

    2. Re:The erotic possibilities are endless! by Stavr0 · · Score: 1

      "Today in the news : 20 people killed in a Bed & Breakfast fire"
      ... apparently was equipped with fake smoke detectors. The owner's charred remains were found sitting in a la-z-boy where he was apparently wanking off in front of surveilance monitors ...

      - - -

  66. New motto by FascDot+Killed+My+Pr · · Score: 1

    Walmart: Where Echelon does its shopping.

    ---
    Put Hemos through English 101!

    --
    Linux MAPI Server!
    http://www.openone.com/software/MailOne/
    (Exchange Migration HOWTO coming soon)
  67. Taping phone conversations by FascDot+Killed+My+Pr · · Score: 1

    I've always been given to believe that it was legal to tape a phone conversation as long as one involved party was aware of that fact.
    ---
    Put Hemos through English 101!

    --
    Linux MAPI Server!
    http://www.openone.com/software/MailOne/
    (Exchange Migration HOWTO coming soon)
    1. Re:Taping phone conversations by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I worked for a company that made voice logging recorders ( glorified answering machines ) and we tested them with our phone lines. I had this discussion more than twice:

      NJ state law: one person must be aware
      Phone Company reg: both must be aware, by notice or that annoying beep.( refer to phone book for details )

      failure to notify means you could, theoretically, be denied use of telephone company service, but not arrested by the cops.

      if you had the beep, which we did, it was both ok by the phone company and admissable in court.

    2. Re:Taping phone conversations by fizbin · · Score: 1

      Depends on the state. Federal law says that at least one party must be aware - some states add the restriction that both people must be aware.

      This became an issue recently as Linda Tripp was taping those phone conversations with a certain white house intern while she (Tripp) was in Maryland, which is one of those states that requires both parties to be aware of the recording. Maryland prosecuters went after her for that, but in Maryland it is a valid defense (for this law) to claim ignorance of the fact that both people have to know. Of course, they had the Radio Shack salesperson who had sold Tripp the recording device testify that he had read her the standard "these are the laws in Maryland..." disclaimer that they're required to read to each customer who buys one of these, and I don't know what happened after that.

  68. WALMART NAZIS USE WEATHER-CONTROL DEVICES!!!!!!!!! by bugbear3000 · · Score: 0

    They are destroying our American freedoms with their Frankenstein weather-control devices, be-OTCH! They sell merchandise at-cost because they do not care about American capitalism. Walmart stores are just fronts for the weather-control devices in the back storeroom. Target is a true American company and proud of it.

  69. Re:*ahem* Please God, not more DAMN CENSORDOT CRAP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hmmm... What about BugBear3001, 3002, etc...

    Your censors & freinds will never be able to shut up people like him by lowering the score. They usually shut up on their own if they don't get the response they want (ie. If they don't get any response at all, rather than the one you game him).

  70. Only six? by Skip666Kent · · Score: 1

    I say head back to Wall Mount for more!

    --
    **>>BELCH
  71. Re:Counter Measures by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    With a spark gap radio disruptor, sure. EZ to build too. *VERY* illegal if it is too strong (It'll ruin ALL radio/TV signals for MILES). You _WILL_ be fined for using one, and you could go to jail (in very extreme cases). Buuuut, if you're serious, talk to any (older) war vet. with electronics experience. They used to use these devices to ruin enemy radio transmissions. [Note: I might not be 100% correct about this. I read about it in Pop. Electronics a while ago... Although I do know ruining people's TV/radio will get the FCC after you.].

    Anyways, if the signal is going through a good quality cable, and not being broadcast through the air, you probably don't have much chance.

    I'm not sure about this, but I think the only thing a magnet is going to do is ruin any TVs nearby (I don't think they affect CCDs. After all, AFAIK they are just LED/LDR combos...).

  72. Bottom of the /. pool by mvw · · Score: 1
    Your -excuse me being explicit- idiotic CVS post has already been moderated down to an amazing -21:

    Moderation Totals:Offtopic=2, Flamebait=7, Troll=12, Total=21.

    Are you for real or a failed attempt to create an AI?

  73. Yours is more boring by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    Actually my life is quite exciting. Your image of it is simply limited by your small mind.

    Granted if all I did was technical stuff like mount cameras around my house then yes it would be boring. I do alot more in life than geek-out. You on the other hand probably won't do anything interesting because you are either (a) too stupid, or (b) are worried about looking boring or geeky.

  74. Radio Shack by Space · · Score: 1

    Order em through Radio Shack.
    Small cameras start at $79.

    --
    I Don't Work Here
  75. Re:The irony is WalMart uses fake cameras in store by apathetic · · Score: 1

    where i work (at a grocery store) we have a bunch of fake cameras but then there is atleast one real pinhole camera that we have found that is constantly watching one of he drawers

  76. Wal-Mart has been selling these for quite some by PurdueBUZZ · · Score: 1

    Wal-Mart has been selling these for quite some time now. I noticed them probably about a year ago when I bought my 35" TV on-line with satellite speakers and subwoofer for ...$450!!!!!!

    --
    Go Purdue!
  77. "I found my thrill. . ." by Ben+Smith · · Score: 1

    I can almost hear Chuck Berry singing now. If you'll remember, he installed hidden cameras in the womens bathrooms of some restaurant he owned (incidentally, he owns a nice one here in my home town of St. Louis, but I'm always afraid to go in the bathroom). He may be an old pervert, but he's (still) one talented man.

    --
    -Ben
    bensmith@biz1.net
  78. You get to pay $200 for a smoke alarm case. by Restil · · Score: 3

    Black and white pinhole cameras sell for about $50 apiece. All you need to supply then is an RCA cable, a microphone, and a power supply, then take ANY smoke alarm (they're not very expensive), remove the cover, then secure the camera inside of it and VOILA, instant spy camera. Now, if you want to get more fancy, for an extra $100, I can integrate a video/audio transmitter into the case as well, then have a reciever anywhere within 300 meters. So for about $180 this could be assembled by anyone with enough electronics knowledge to successfully hook up your average stereo system.

    Of course, this is Walmart we're talking about. This is a CONSUMER product, and of course, there is a high consumer demand for surveillence equipment in the home. After all, this is about the extent that it could be used legally. Nobody will likely use these in a commercial environment when there are better choices available and its illegal to use them in almost any other circumstance. So if you're going to break the law anyways, why rely on a consumer product that would probably be easy to identify.

    -Restil

    --
    Play with my webcams and lights here
  79. If they had this in Porky's by Sloppy · · Score: 1

    It would have made the movie less funny. There are certain things you can do with a hole in the girls' shower wall that just don't work with cameras.

    --
    As copyright owner of this comment, I authorize everyone to defeat any technological measure which limits access to it.
    1. Re:If they had this in Porky's by red_dragon · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately, they can hurt you thru that hole, which is one of the reasons hidden cameras are used instead. Of course you remember the part when the girls see that thing sticking out of the hole... :p

      --
      In Soviet Russia, Jesus asks: "What Would You Do?"
  80. Wide Load Web Cam by Namaste · · Score: 1

    Great, now we can look forward to webcams and hidden cam sites dedicated to women who have exceeded the tensile strength of their spandex.

  81. Re:Do not confuse 'legal' with 'admissible in cour by SamIIs · · Score: 1

    Why was this marked OffTopic? Seems like a pretty linear conversation, and privacy law seems pretty in-line with spy equipment.

  82. Ironic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think Walmart selling surveillance equipment is ironic, considering the fact that they don't permit you to take photos or even notes inside the store for price comparisons...

  83. What's happening to SlashDot?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Am I the only one who's noticed that SlashDot is completely dominated by corporate news these days? Look at the articles posted here today, for example:

    1) QNX
    2) NSI
    3) AOL/Sun/Netscape
    4) Game Consoles (Sony/Nintendo,...)
    5) AOL
    6) Telstra
    7) Westwood
    8) USPS
    9) Perl (finally!)
    10) WalMart

    Boring.

    One, or arguably 2 articles out of 10 dealing with something *other* than what the corporations are up to. What I want to know about is what *we* up to -- where are the stories about the latest developments in free software projects like GNOME or KDE, etc. I'm sick of seeing stories about the latest IPO from some tech-related corporation. I want "News for Nerds. Stuff that Matters", not news for businessmen.

    A disgruntled long-time fan of Slashdot.

  84. Counter Measures by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I wonder if it would be possible to create a distortion field that would make any audio sound like garbage [you know what i mean] and video look like snow.

    How about generating a massive electromagnetic field? Something similar to a continuous electromagnetic bomb detonation. Of course you wouldn't want the distortion field to be so strong as to format any HD sitting around.

    Figure that if you got some massively polarized magnets (like the ones at auto junk yards) and then minuturized the whole deal so it would fit in your pocket . . .

    It could happen! Maybe . . .