> I hope this link [googlefight.com] is enough to convince them. > I also hope that page ends the debates once and for all!
Actually, this link inly proves, that emacs needs much less explaining than vi to be able to work with it. The usual scenario would run somewhat like this:
Mr X. User is typing a text of some sort into vi, then he notices a couple of mistakes he made, tries to make the appropriate changes, gets completely lost, cannot find the key he needs to pressm then fires up his Mozilla and types something like "vi in human terms" or "how do i use vi with only 10 fingers?" into Google.
Slashdot Mirror
> I hope this link [googlefight.com] is enough to convince them.
> I also hope that page ends the debates once and for all!
Actually, this link inly proves, that emacs needs much less explaining than vi to be able to work with it. The usual scenario would run somewhat like this:
Mr X. User is typing a text of some sort into vi, then he notices a couple of mistakes he made, tries to make the appropriate changes, gets completely lost, cannot find the key he needs to pressm then fires up his Mozilla and types something like "vi in human terms" or "how do i use vi with only 10 fingers?" into Google.
The rest is silence.