Well, in this case, it's livers. And livers have a very stunning capacity of self-replication. It's quite fortunate that such a vital organ to life is so robust - it has extensive self-repair capabilities, it can regenerate missing parts, etc. That capability is often used to turn one liver into multiple (if the patients don't need full functionality immediately), or to remove cirrhosis in its early stages. (Heck, it takes a LOT to get liver cirrhosis)
In that case, I almost think I'd like Keith Richard's liver...I mean, if it is STILL working to this day, it has to be superhuman.
God I hope he donates his body to science when he does someday, finally go. Whatever genes he has for survival need to be studied and learned from.
Lord, if we started a stem cell line from him now, we could likely have almost immortality for most of the earth!!
The kids that can advance faster should be allowed to advance faster.
But, but....won't doing that hurt little Johnny/Suzie's self esteem if they see little Nyguen getting promoted ahead of them based on nothing more than sheer ability?!??
[rolls eyes]
It makes sense, but in the US for years now, we seem to be more interested in catering to the lowest common denominator, than trying to promote true talent.
I think for those on the lower end, we should make vocational education something easier for those kids with that type of proficiency to find their way into...
It requires a quite a bit of time in the spring, while preparing the ground and planting, but not much during the rest of the year. But all this work does not have to be your labor. There is an exemption to the 13th Amendment, which outlawed slavery and indentured servitude: You can still coerce unpaid labor from other people, provided they are your direct descendents, and under the age of 18. You can even use extremely cruel and unusual methods to extract this labor, including turning off the TV, and even unplugging the router, until the tomatoes are picked, sliced, and in the mason jars.
LOL, thank you!!
That, I think, is the best post on Slashdot for the year, the rest of us all might as well pack it up till next year, this one wins hands down!!
To each their own, and it's your money, but it seems steep to me. Then again, ordering something on amazon every 2-3 days already seems borderline compulsive behaviour to me too.
I find that more and more, I buy virtually everything on Amazon. I'm starting to even by food/dry goods.
I find the price is usually cheaper than local, no sales tax...and the 2x day shipping is nice.
I also think it is worth it for the free streaming AND the free ebook a month for my kindle. Not many have mentioned that aspect too yet.
I don't order 2-3 times a week (generally), but I probably come close to averaging over 1 purchase a week with them annually I"m thinking.
You don't know that they're poor. There are a lot of middle-class projects, where people have good jobs and pay market-rate rents.
Trust me on this one, I am VERY familiar with the projects here in New Orleans.
These I'm speak of, have NO middle class occupants, they'd be scared stiff to live in these places.
That being said, thankfully, post Katrina, we're slowly tearing these down...making some into mixed income areas, but it takes time to flush these bastions of poverty cycle and crime generators out of our city after being here for so long.
I am also in the Bible belt, and the condoms are out there for anyone to pick up. I believe the biggest issue with contraception is people are embarrassed to buy it because they don't want people to know about their sex life. This leads to either theft, no sex, or pregnancy depending on the individual.
But that's not the same as the OP and other posters saying that contraception isnt' available unless ACA or the like is in place.
It's out there always has been, just a matter of people getting it. I think they mean to say, it only matters if someone else is PAYING for it.
Conflating availability with who is footing the bill.
Are you sure you paid into the unemployment fund? Most self employed do not, even though they think they do.
If you did, then you should be eligible for unemployment.
I am 100% positive.
I have an "S" corp, I paid myself salary with the taxes and I paid the employer side of all those taxes too. I filled out the parts for unemployment, state and fed taxes.
I was told all the way through my appeals that sure I'd paid it, but the law said I couldn't get it in the state of LA.
People who are poor don't have the same choices you do.
They're not buying 60" televisions.
I guess you aren't driving by the same projects I am, seeing said 60" TVs through the open doors of the apartments, while they're sitting on the porch.
Were it local-governor-care instead, would that really make you substantially happier? How so?
Because, you could have more of a say in how your state enacts or doesn't enact it.
If you didn't like that state's solution, you could move to one that more closely shares your views on life and how much they want to make you pay for someone else's life.
You are missing the other really important bit, namely that your insurance is no longer tied to your employer. No one should lose health insurance simply because they lost their job.
I don't get this.
I've lost jobs, but never lost insurance. I'd pay COBRA till I either:
1. Found another job with insurance
or
2. Bought a private policy, generally when working through my own company consulting, etc.
There has always been a way to get insurance that wasn't tied to a job.
Socialism is paying for health care even for people who couldn't afford insurance. We do that too. But I happen to think its a good thing, and think healthcare SHOULD be socialized in a civilized society.
I'm still searching the US Constitution where it says that the feds can force me to be my brothers keeper by force.
The biggest problem is that once people have to pay for "routine" visits, they don't go on routine visits.
Well, people have to pay for transportation to get to work, fi they don't, they don't work. That's my problem too? I mean, if they don't try to take responsibility for themselves and their health, that's their problem. People need to save for what they need, rather than sacrifice health and buy 60" televisions.
What happened to people taking responsibility for their lives and answering to the consequences of their actions/inactions?
Where in the US constitution is it mandated that I be my brothers keeper....by force?
Definitely. I mostly agree with the THEORY of insurance not covering your routine visits (other than the part where the doctors overcharge and you don't have the benefit of insurance negotiated prices, so you pay $600 for a $100 visit).
I found the opposite to be true. When I had my high deductible account and paid myself, I told the Doctors that, and they often knocked money off the bill.
I paid for an MRI I had and when I told them I was paying for it, they said, OH wait...and knocked off 15% off the bill.
Depending on where you go, a "routine" doctor's visit can range from $50 to $200.
I have no problem saving and budgeting for that, especially if I can save my medical bucks in a pre-tax HSA. Why shouldn't everyone budget routine medical needs (dr visits, routine meds) into their monthly budget just like other necessities such as utilities, food and gas?
You know, I think what got me was finding out that we actually have a federal position of: " U.S. government office that monitors scientific misconduct in biomedical research"
Seriously, we have a paid staff looking into this?? WTF business is that of the federal govt?
Seems like that should be something policed by the biomedical community, no?
Is biomedical misconduct in research against the law or something???
If not, what is the govt doing spending tax money on this?
In the U.S., if you're working independently, or even trying to, you're not eligible for unemployment.
I ran into this myself and was shocked.
I paid quite a lot into the unemployment system while working through my own company, but when I lost contracts and was in between job, I could not collect unemployment, even though I'd paid into the system.
Honestly, if I ever win the powerball, I'd take the money to hire legal guns and fight shit like this just on principal.
Around these parts, which I like to refer to as the Buckle of the Bible Belt, they lock the "generic" contraceptives (condoms, spermicide, etc.) up in a glass cabinet (because of theft), and I'm pretty sure you have to be at least 16 to buy them. For the "strong stuff," i.e. birth control or Plan B, you've got to go talk to either your doctor, or the nice folks down at Planned Parenthood.
Your part of the bible belt sounds much different than my notch in the bible belt I've lived in and grew up in.
It was Church of Christ country where I grew up, where we thought the Baptists were too liberal and no contraception was under lock and key (that didn't require a prescription that is).
I live in these areas and you can easily see the condoms, etc on display at most any grocery store, drug store or hell, even the fucking 7-11 has them out for easy pickings.
The deductible in an ACA plan does not apply to a large number of routine procedures. Those are covered with a co-pay instead. For example, instead of paying full price for a check-up because you haven't hit the deductible, you pay around $10-40 depending on plan.
This does not seem to be the case for any of the plans I looked at. And even when I hit deductible, the insurance on most of these plans seem to only pay about 70% tops of the bills.
Compare that to an area where schools have someone on staff who can prescribe pills, or doctors will insist you consider it...
Where in the word do you live at, where anyone at a school can fucking prescribe medication?!?!??!
Availability is a loaded word in this case. Go buy condoms as a 14 years old in an area where religious people want to burn people who use contraceptive on a stake....good luck (of course IMO they shouldn't need it at that age but the reality is different). You may also be in an area where your doctor will try to convince you not to get contraception. They'll prescribe it if you INSIST....
I have lived in some VERY religious communities in the deep south, like only eclipsed by somewhere like Utah with the Mormons, I can't speak for them.
But no one has a problem buying condoms at the local store. No one ever flinches or bats an eye. I'm guessing you're saying all of this, without first hand informatiion what it is actually like in areas like this. I grew up in the states with many areas that were dry, and where the Sunday blue laws still survive today. There is no problem.
And what Dr. should be insisting one way or the other that someone should used contraception? That is a personal choice....things don't get much more personal than that.
You seem to be conflating something being available, and that thing being promoted and PAID for by everyone else.
Two different issues here. No one is, nor should they be...holding a gun to your head to go down either path.
In many cases, practice makes perfect.
In that case, I almost think I'd like Keith Richard's liver...I mean, if it is STILL working to this day, it has to be superhuman.
God I hope he donates his body to science when he does someday, finally go. Whatever genes he has for survival need to be studied and learned from.
Lord, if we started a stem cell line from him now, we could likely have almost immortality for most of the earth!!
Maybe they're making it free, to get some recognition?
But, but....won't doing that hurt little Johnny/Suzie's self esteem if they see little Nyguen getting promoted ahead of them based on nothing more than sheer ability?!??
[rolls eyes]
It makes sense, but in the US for years now, we seem to be more interested in catering to the lowest common denominator, than trying to promote true talent.
I think for those on the lower end, we should make vocational education something easier for those kids with that type of proficiency to find their way into...
LOL, thank you!!
That, I think, is the best post on Slashdot for the year, the rest of us all might as well pack it up till next year, this one wins hands down!!
Hmm...when did they change the free shipping from $25 and over to $35?
I find that more and more, I buy virtually everything on Amazon. I'm starting to even by food/dry goods.
I find the price is usually cheaper than local, no sales tax...and the 2x day shipping is nice.
I also think it is worth it for the free streaming AND the free ebook a month for my kindle. Not many have mentioned that aspect too yet.
I don't order 2-3 times a week (generally), but I probably come close to averaging over 1 purchase a week with them annually I"m thinking.
You should be free to fuck up, but also free to suffer the extreme consequences for it too.
Trust me on this one, I am VERY familiar with the projects here in New Orleans.
These I'm speak of, have NO middle class occupants, they'd be scared stiff to live in these places.
That being said, thankfully, post Katrina, we're slowly tearing these down...making some into mixed income areas, but it takes time to flush these bastions of poverty cycle and crime generators out of our city after being here for so long.
But that's not the same as the OP and other posters saying that contraception isnt' available unless ACA or the like is in place.
It's out there always has been, just a matter of people getting it. I think they mean to say, it only matters if someone else is PAYING for it.
Conflating availability with who is footing the bill.
I am 100% positive.
I have an "S" corp, I paid myself salary with the taxes and I paid the employer side of all those taxes too. I filled out the parts for unemployment, state and fed taxes.
I was told all the way through my appeals that sure I'd paid it, but the law said I couldn't get it in the state of LA.
I guess you aren't driving by the same projects I am, seeing said 60" TVs through the open doors of the apartments, while they're sitting on the porch.
And as for the rest of it...hey, life is tough.
Because, you could have more of a say in how your state enacts or doesn't enact it.
If you didn't like that state's solution, you could move to one that more closely shares your views on life and how much they want to make you pay for someone else's life.
I did/still do.
I don't get this.
I've lost jobs, but never lost insurance. I'd pay COBRA till I either :
1. Found another job with insurance
or
2. Bought a private policy, generally when working through my own company consulting, etc.
There has always been a way to get insurance that wasn't tied to a job.
I'm still searching the US Constitution where it says that the feds can force me to be my brothers keeper by force.
Well, people have to pay for transportation to get to work, fi they don't, they don't work. That's my problem too? I mean, if they don't try to take responsibility for themselves and their health, that's their problem. People need to save for what they need, rather than sacrifice health and buy 60" televisions.
What happened to people taking responsibility for their lives and answering to the consequences of their actions/inactions?
Where in the US constitution is it mandated that I be my brothers keeper....by force?
Well, if those people are that fucking stupid, then that's their problem, is it not?
I mean, what's next, if people don't want to save for food, and they start to starve, that's my problem too?
What happened to personal responsibility, and suffering the consequences of your actions (good or bad)?
I found the opposite to be true. When I had my high deductible account and paid myself, I told the Doctors that, and they often knocked money off the bill.
I paid for an MRI I had and when I told them I was paying for it, they said, OH wait...and knocked off 15% off the bill.
I have no problem saving and budgeting for that, especially if I can save my medical bucks in a pre-tax HSA. Why shouldn't everyone budget routine medical needs (dr visits, routine meds) into their monthly budget just like other necessities such as utilities, food and gas?
Seriously, we have a paid staff looking into this?? WTF business is that of the federal govt?
Seems like that should be something policed by the biomedical community, no?
Is biomedical misconduct in research against the law or something???
If not, what is the govt doing spending tax money on this?
I ran into this myself and was shocked.
I paid quite a lot into the unemployment system while working through my own company, but when I lost contracts and was in between job, I could not collect unemployment, even though I'd paid into the system.
Honestly, if I ever win the powerball, I'd take the money to hire legal guns and fight shit like this just on principal.
Your part of the bible belt sounds much different than my notch in the bible belt I've lived in and grew up in.
It was Church of Christ country where I grew up, where we thought the Baptists were too liberal and no contraception was under lock and key (that didn't require a prescription that is).
I live in these areas and you can easily see the condoms, etc on display at most any grocery store, drug store or hell, even the fucking 7-11 has them out for easy pickings.
This does not seem to be the case for any of the plans I looked at. And even when I hit deductible, the insurance on most of these plans seem to only pay about 70% tops of the bills.
Where in the word do you live at, where anyone at a school can fucking prescribe medication?!?!??!
I have lived in some VERY religious communities in the deep south, like only eclipsed by somewhere like Utah with the Mormons, I can't speak for them.
But no one has a problem buying condoms at the local store. No one ever flinches or bats an eye. I'm guessing you're saying all of this, without first hand informatiion what it is actually like in areas like this. I grew up in the states with many areas that were dry, and where the Sunday blue laws still survive today. There is no problem.
And what Dr. should be insisting one way or the other that someone should used contraception? That is a personal choice....things don't get much more personal than that.
You seem to be conflating something being available, and that thing being promoted and PAID for by everyone else.
Two different issues here. No one is, nor should they be...holding a gun to your head to go down either path.