I am not sure why, but slashdot puts in spaces in some places. Remove them to get it to work.
Lets try it using tt tags and br's
Windows Registry Editor Version 5.00
This is not a moral issue. They are not morally obligated to employ you. I guess I don't understand some peoples attitude that companies are obligated to give them a job?
Now if you want to argue this from an ethical standpoint you may have an argument. What they are doing may be unethical, in certain circumstances. However, I think it would benefit us all to remember that they are doing us a favor by employing us and if the situation changes, hey, that's hard luck.
Note: I am not even a manager where I work. Just someone with the right attitude.
All this coming from someone that cannot capitalize their "I's".
i didn't get any certs tho, because i refuse to pay money for something i don't need. i can do my job just fine without a piece of paper to help me along, heh.
Your whole argument is a justification for why you think you don't need certs. The fact of the matter is that cert's chow a certain minimum level of understanding - nothing more. They don't show troubleshooting skills or anything else. They are helpful to the employer in hiring as long as the employer understands this.
If you resize the browser to around 800 width in the css version, you notice some display problems with it. The icons for the current articles to the right of the Slashdot logo all pop up on top of the logo. There is also some distortion of the background color on the far left. Either the css needs to be rewritten or it just shows that some browsers still support the old style html better.
Some of what you say is admittidly true. The rest I will concede as true for the sake of argument, except for the statement about us all being guilty.
I, for one, am not guilty of what my anscestors did. This is the same argument used by some current black political activists. *I* did not do these things and *I* would not advocate these things today.
To me it sounds like you are priming an argument you can use to justify your own bad behavior.
Actually, this is not correct. If you read that section it reads:
The following example shows an OBJECT tag that loads a control without a prompt from Internet Explorer because the NOEXTERNALDATA attribute is set to true. The control does not receive the URL property.
When Internet Explorer determines that a control does not access remote data, Internet Explorer loads the control without prompting.
The way I read this, IE will NOT permit the url param to be accessed by the object AND it will only let the object load after it has determined the object will not access remote data.
Seems pretty clear to me.
Slashdot Mirror
I am not sure why, but slashdot puts in spaces in some places. Remove them to get it to work. Lets try it using tt tags and br's Windows Registry Editor Version 5.00
a ndler\ms-its]
a ndler\ms-itss]
a ndler\its]
a ndler\mk]
[-HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Classes\PROTOCOLS\H
@="ms-its: Asychronous Pluggable Protocol Handler"
"CLSID"="{9D148291-B9C8-11D0-A4CC-0000F80149F6}"
[-HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Classes\PROTOCOLS\H
"CLSID"="{0A9007C0-4076-11D3-8789-0000F8105754}"
@="ms-itss: Asynchronous Pluggable Storage Protocol Handler"
[-HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Classes\PROTOCOLS\H
@="its: Asychronous Pluggable Protocol Handler"
"CLSID"="{9D148291-B9C8-11D0-A4CC-0000F80149F6}"
[-HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Classes\PROTOCOLS\H
@="mk: Asychronous Pluggable Protocol Handler"
"CLSID"="{79eac9e6-baf9-11ce-8c82-00aa004ba90b}"
This is not a moral issue. They are not morally obligated to employ you. I guess I don't understand some peoples attitude that companies are obligated to give them a job?
Now if you want to argue this from an ethical standpoint you may have an argument. What they are doing may be unethical, in certain circumstances. However, I think it would benefit us all to remember that they are doing us a favor by employing us and if the situation changes, hey, that's hard luck.
Note: I am not even a manager where I work. Just someone with the right attitude.
i didn't get any certs tho, because i refuse to pay money for something i don't need. i can do my job just fine without a piece of paper to help me along, heh.
Your whole argument is a justification for why you think you don't need certs. The fact of the matter is that cert's chow a certain minimum level of understanding - nothing more. They don't show troubleshooting skills or anything else. They are helpful to the employer in hiring as long as the employer understands this.
I agree 100%. Nothing worse than someone who exaggerates to the point of obsurdity to try and sway the argument.
If you resize the browser to around 800 width in the css version, you notice some display problems with it. The icons for the current articles to the right of the Slashdot logo all pop up on top of the logo. There is also some distortion of the background color on the far left. Either the css needs to be rewritten or it just shows that some browsers still support the old style html better.
I, for one, am not guilty of what my anscestors did. This is the same argument used by some current black political activists. *I* did not do these things and *I* would not advocate these things today.
To me it sounds like you are priming an argument you can use to justify your own bad behavior.
From dictionary.reference.com:
Manged:
adj. Refers to anything that is mangled or damaged, usually beyond repair.
Gotta love a binary shreader...