Slashdot Mirror


User: Franklin+Pierce

Franklin+Pierce's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
4
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 4

  1. Re:I question the motive behind "User Friendly" on PC-BSD 0.5a Beta: BSD For Dummies · · Score: 1

    Actually, being what thems be, I don't think the BSDs are meant to be anything but operating systems. People for whom BSD (*BSD? DILLIGAF?) is intended: Computer owners, computer users, homosexuals, fat guys with beards. People for whom it (they) is (are) not intended: Luddites, Amish, gays, fat guys without beards.

  2. Metadata metadata on Desktop Search Engines Compared · · Score: 1

    So I indexed all my files and filed the indexes, I updated my indexes and indexed those updates, and now I need another tool to index all those indexes, and a metadata storage manager cos my database of indexed metadata just outgrew my filesystem.

  3. Re:Wrong Direction? on Reinventing the Wheel · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Other negatives:

    Uses a small percentage of the total volume of the tyre to support and cushion.

    I mean, seriously, solid tyre hoo-ha surfaces every decade or two with the regularity of a herpes outbreak only to fade into the obscurity it deserves. Pneumatic tyres are that way for a reason, and it's called a compromise between simplicity, light-weight, and performance. You can only sacrifice so much in one direction before it becomes simply unacceptable.

  4. Who and why: on What Makes Great Science Fiction? · · Score: 1

    Philip K. Dick: his characters are so real you want to yell at them, his plots are so bizarre you MUST keep reading.

    Stanislaw Lem: absolutely brilliant and nearly perfectly thought out machinations whose characters don't get in the way of a good story.

    Frank Herbert: pretty little psychological japes.

    Edmund Spenser: iron robot kills amazons and one communist giant (plus followers), 1590's. Heavens!

    Edgar Rice Burroughs (also Leigh Brackett): pfiffle, if you don't know why this is great, you watch too much TV.

    Jules Verne: he has to be in here.

    M. P. Shiel: brilliant exposition of the madness underlying us all in "The Purple Cloud". cf "The Quiet Earth"(1985, NZ "talkie"), which I would suspect the screenwriter(s) had read, hopefully.

    What makes these great is not their characters, per se. You want a good character in a watery, unreadable plot, Kate Wilhelm and "James Tiptree Junior" (Alice Sheldon) are perfectly adept at that. Even Gardiner Dozios at his best was but a slightly more tightly written Steinbeck. And that just doesn't cut it for Sci-Fi. It's the imagination, it's the literary control. The great author can keep you reading, keep you from thinking about lunch or that nasty big credit card bill for a few hours and, if they're truly masters, they will ask the questions no-one else has thought to ask, or no-one else has asked so pointedly.

    Take my colleague William Henry Harrison. There was a fellow who could outshoot any Kentuckian alive, kick a filthy southern secessionist in the balls, and still take time out for his daily prayers and nightly rounds of "Stuff this where the Nabokov don't shine, Whig!".

    Anyway, I liked "Dark Star".