The ones that do the same thing, only poorly, will fail.
Like linux on the desktop?
The ones that end up costing more to implement than the commercial application, even if they do it better, will fail.
According to some sources this is true of Linux.
I don't have any answers, just obvious statements to debunk idialogs.
Actually, when the sun enters its red giant phase it will envelop the earth.
Seriously, if the Sun and the earth were the only two objects (no third body problems, PLEASE!!!) and they were point masses then it should from a newtonian perspective always revolve with the same speed for all time. If only Newton was completely correct...
First of all you cannot continually recharge a cellphone by using its battery to vibrate and use the vibration to recharge it. You can recapture some of the energy, but you will lose more than is gained. So you wouldn't want to vibrate it uneccisarily.
Sure it is... Sorta like it was too late for Internet explorer in 95 when everybody had and loved netscape. Or when AOL was synonimous with the internet. When the internet first started to gain popularity in 96- 97 people would be at my house and ask if I had aol. I would have to explain that i did not, but I did have internet access. They were thought that the internet was owned by aol. But look at aol now.. losing money and subscribers at an acclerating pace.
Proof does not exist in science, only evidence. No credible scientist with a command of the english language would claim to have proof of anything. Remeber, there are not any "Truths" in science, only theories which are simply the best current explanation.
Apple's new music service works with the major labels. They are trying to reserect the very same beast that you want to kill.
The ones that do the same thing, only poorly, will fail. Like linux on the desktop? The ones that end up costing more to implement than the commercial application, even if they do it better, will fail. According to some sources this is true of Linux. I don't have any answers, just obvious statements to debunk idialogs.
I am a physicist. You are correct sir. it would be quite lame.
Actually, when the sun enters its red giant phase it will envelop the earth. Seriously, if the Sun and the earth were the only two objects (no third body problems, PLEASE!!!) and they were point masses then it should from a newtonian perspective always revolve with the same speed for all time. If only Newton was completely correct...
First of all you cannot continually recharge a cellphone by using its battery to vibrate and use the vibration to recharge it. You can recapture some of the energy, but you will lose more than is gained. So you wouldn't want to vibrate it uneccisarily.
Sure it is... Sorta like it was too late for Internet explorer in 95 when everybody had and loved netscape. Or when AOL was synonimous with the internet. When the internet first started to gain popularity in 96- 97 people would be at my house and ask if I had aol. I would have to explain that i did not, but I did have internet access. They were thought that the internet was owned by aol. But look at aol now.. losing money and subscribers at an acclerating pace.
This was predicted in 1964 using our accepted theories of optics. IT IS NOT NEW.
WTF? They do not deserve either?! I think I remeber Chairman MAO say the same thing a while back. Or was that stalin? Hitler perhaps?
Should I buy an apple or an orange for lunch?
This is why Physics Majors will always make fun of computer science majors. Heaven forbid, any of you think.
Proof does not exist in science, only evidence. No credible scientist with a command of the english language would claim to have proof of anything. Remeber, there are not any "Truths" in science, only theories which are simply the best current explanation.
Did he think of that all by himself?!? Perhaps he can solve the mysteries of the donut!
What... is the air-speed velocity of an unladen swallow?
WOW. Thanks for reinforcing the steriotype of Scifi fans as pathetic loners. I hope you and your cats are very happy together.