Slashdot Mirror


Energy From Vibrations

JN writes "Now here's a nifty invention. What started off as a Small Business Innovation Research grant from the Navy to a MIT professor has turned out to become a great mechanism that harnesses running machines' minute vibrations into energy. The possibilities are limitless. Aside from the obvious, imagine the ultimate cellphone - one that charges the battery every time it rings/vibrates, hence promising extended talktimes, and giving operators all the more reasons to get their customers to use their devices. How cool is that? Do I see 3G applications with a vibrate() call mandatory every couple minutes? "

520 comments

  1. This could be sweet. by OwnerOfWhinyCat · · Score: 5, Funny

    On a Harley block these could power my Microwave!

    1. Re:This could be sweet. by DoctorPepper · · Score: 2, Funny

      Shit, on a Harley block it could power ALL of our microwaves!

      --

      No matter where you go... there you are.
    2. Re:This could be sweet. by robslimo · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I know you're joking, but mechanical vibrations that you can't do anything to prevent are probably the best application of this technology.

      Remember conservation of energy and thermodynamics... you're not going to get 'free' energy by strapping this to a buzzing, vibrating machine. You might regain a tiny fraction of the energy which the machine is losing (wasting) through its inefficiency, but in that case, you'd probably be better off replacing or repairing the machine to be more efficient.

      The applications for this technology are narrow, like powering (small) things in inaccessible areas, like ventilation systems. You're not going to power your factory lights from the vibrations from your machining centers, but you could probably pay your light bill (in the long term) from the savings from replacing or upgrading old, worn out, inefficient machines.

    3. Re:This could be sweet. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

      I've often pulled up in traffic next to a large bore diesel or a group of Harleys and thought, gosh, that engine is shaking the hell out of my car. They should have figured out a way to more efficiently harness that loss of energy, or designed the engine with parts that better transfer kenetic energy when, say the piston changes directions. The same when cruising on a large boat and the very large bore engines vibrate the entire boat...

    4. Re:This could be sweet. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      Hint: Seek a female perspective.

      The vibration is, most decidedly, a feature, not a bug.

    5. Re:This could be sweet. by Tiro · · Score: 1

      Or you could pay your light bill [in the long term] by using power efficient LEDs.

    6. Re:This could be sweet. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Some recent Harley's have balanced engines.

      http://www.hdcycles.com/twin88b.htm

    7. Re:This could be sweet. by GRH · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I'm in the HVAC controls industry. Many sensors are required in ventilation systems (primarily air handlers) to control them properly. This is costly, not because of the cost of the sensor, but because of the wiring and conduit required to reach the sensor. We have little choice about the location of the sensor (it has to be able to do its job).

      There has been talk of trying to build wireless sensors (some do exist) and actuators, but the killer is the power. It either needs to be brought in on wires or battery powered. Batteries are not very good because they don't last that long (these systems are designed to run for over 10 years) and some sensors are difficult to access.

      So, this could be looked at as an enabling technology, in that it could allow wireless sensors to become practical (by running off the ductwork vibration).

      In a mid-sized office building, the installation savings from this would be around $100k. Look around at how many buildings there are...

      GRH

    8. Re:This could be sweet. by CmdrWass · · Score: 5, Insightful

      To paraphrase the parent post's comments:

      A cell phone will use more energy to create the vibration than it will be able to regain from that vibration.

      Due to the laws of thermodynamics and energy,(particularly the law that energy can neither be created nor destroyed), the device that generates energy from vibration would then (by definition) have to absorb some of the vibration's energy. Therefore, in order for this mechanism to "produce" any amount of valuable energy, the source (the cell phone) would have to increase its vibration. However, it will always be the case that the cell phone uses more energy than it gains back (otherwise the phone wouldn't vibrate). Therefore, it would be more condusive of the cell phone to focus its energy on notifying its owner of an incoming call, and do so in the most efficient way.

      Basically, (as stated in the parent post) this invention at MIT doesn't do much for the cell phone industry. Cell phones would be better off being more efficient with the energy they have rather than trying to regain some of the energy expelled while producing environmental feedback.

    9. Re:This could be sweet. by mr_z_beeblebrox · · Score: 1

      Remember conservation of energy and thermodynamics... you're not going to get 'free' energy by strapping this to a buzzing, vibrating machine. You might regain a tiny fraction of the energy which the machine is losing (wasting) through its inefficiency, but in that case, you'd probably be better off replacing or repairing the machine to be more efficient.

      Absolutely, I could see perhaps a trunk mounted cell phone charger running off the vibration of the car itself. Though a better application would be small "beacons" on unattended machines. The beacon is powered by the machines vibrations and a central server would monitor for lack of signal to indicate fault. I am sure better uses will be seen soon.

    10. Re:This could be sweet. by h4x0r-3l337 · · Score: 1
      Absolutely, I could see perhaps a trunk mounted cell phone charger running off the vibration of the car itself.

      So let's see, not only do you want to put your cellphone in the trunk (great way to prevent driving-while-yakking, I'll give you that), but you want to charge it using something that converts car-vibration back into electricity, as opposed to just plugging it into the cigarette-lighter?

    11. Re:This could be sweet. by jasno · · Score: 1

      So why not use something more reliable, like a little windmill powered generator? Heck, you could even use photocell powered devices that used a laser....

      --

      http://www.masturbateforpeace.com/
    12. Re:This could be sweet. by Capt.+DrunkenBum · · Score: 3, Funny
      Take the device you hint at, attach these things to it... Instant perpetuial motion machine.


      Take that law of thermodynamics! :)

      --

      Not everyone deserves a 320i

    13. Re:This could be sweet. by moncyb · · Score: 1

      There has been talk of trying to build wireless sensors (some do exist) and actuators, but the killer is the power. It either needs to be brought in on wires or battery powered.

      You may want to consult Tesla. He made a wireless system for distributing power, but the FCC probably wouldn't let you run it. The system broadcasts huge amounts of electromagnetic energy. I wonder if a directional sort of system may work without screwing up the radio freqency spectrum...

    14. Re:This could be sweet. by Eraser_ · · Score: 1

      Maybe I'm a bit short sited here, however while the vibration thingy is cool, in HVAC, isn't the idea that you are blowing air around? Why not harness some of the air via, say, a small fan hooked to a generator? You stick the fan inside, poke an insulated hole in the ductwork, and run the sensor off a battery + wirelss. I imagine using some ultra-low energy wireless combined with some form of low energy sensor you could pull this off. Possibly coupled with the vibration-engine?

    15. Re:This could be sweet. by hazem · · Score: 1

      I wonder, though... the cellphone will encounter many vibrations throughout the day, and most of them don't come from it's own ringing. If I carry it around, every step I take will cause some vibration. If it's sitting in my car as I drive, there are vibrations there too.

      I imagine, though, that the problem is that cellphones can suck up a lot of energy when you're talking that these transducers wouldn't really add much talk time. But they might help improve the idle time.

      You're probably better off just using that space and weight to make bigger batteries.

    16. Re:This could be sweet. by slyxter · · Score: 2, Interesting

      If you use a battery to make a device vibrate, then harness that vibration to charge the battery, you will lose some charge. You won't lose as much as if you didn't have anything recharging the battery, but you will still lose power everytime. Otherwise, you would have a perpetual motion machine.

    17. Re:This could be sweet. by Wannabe+Code+Monkey · · Score: 1

      On a Harley block these could power my Microwave!

      And what better place for a microwave than right between your legs?

      --
      We always knew Comcast was corrupt, here's the proof: http://tech.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1909890&cid=34545432
    18. Re:This could be sweet. by cyber0ne · · Score: 1

      Why does everything have to be designed for cell phones? Just freaking buy an extra battery and stop talking while you drive and you'll be fine, rather than trying to figure out some way to cheat thermodynamics and create a perpetual motion phone.

      I can imagine some more industrial applications for such a technology. For example, a car will always vibrate when it's moving. The engine vibrates (some parts more than others), and the motion along the ground causes vibration. It occurs to me that a device in the car's mechanics that harnesses such vibration and does nothing more than help keep the battery charged would have, at the very least, made it less likely for my battery to have died at work last week.

      Larger vehicles with more vibrations would benefit as well. I imagine putting many, many such devices along the hull and engine room(s) of naval vessels for the sole purpose of helping to keep those backup batteries charged would be nice. Not much energy is yielded, but every little bit helps when the going gets rough. This isn't what the article said the Navy meant by funding such technology, but I'd imagine that, as it improves and yields more energy, they wouldn't mind such an application.

      Also, to continue along the Navy path, does the conversion of vibrations into electrical energy reduce the effect of the vibrations? I would imagine so, though I'm no physicist. Lining submarines with next-generation versions of such devices would not only harness a little bit more electrical power, but would make it quieter to the surrounding water while in operation.


      -cyber0ne


      "A machine that doesn't require fuel, electrical wires, sunlight, or batteries can be embedded deep inside a structure, never to be touched again."
      Never to be touched again? Who's he kidding? Reliable equipment is usually reliable because of good ongoing (preventative) maintenance and support, not because it was designed to be perfect.

      --
      http://publicvoidlife.blogspot.com
    19. Re:This could be sweet. by josephpate · · Score: 1

      Any links to places that sell these LED's?

      I've been googling, but haven't found anything yet (other than case-mod LED's).

      Also, do you just take these LED's and stick em in your light socket? Is it that easy?

    20. Re:This could be sweet. by mr_z_beeblebrox · · Score: 1

      So let's see, not only do you want to put your cellphone in the trunk (great way to prevent driving-while-yakking, I'll give you that), but you want to charge it using something that converts car-vibration back into electricity, as opposed to just plugging it into the cigarette-lighter?

      Thanks for pointing that out, mr elite hacker. I drive in Chicago rush hour traffic, I would Gladly advocate something which involves putting the cell phone in the trunk. I hate people that yak and drive.

    21. Re:This could be sweet. by dasmegabyte · · Score: 3, Interesting

      More importantly...since energy can neither be created nor destroyed, doesn't this effectively reduce the vibrations themselves as well?

      Which means other great things besides generating "free" energy...basically, it reduces the need for vibrational dampening systems, and reduces the overall wear and tear on a machine. Even if it's only a minute difference, it could have a profound effect on the reliability of machines from combustion engines to eletrical transformers, and possibly a reduction in transient EMF (due to induction in steel casings vibrating near a magenetic field) as well!

      All these cool things actually lead me to believe that the idea doesn't work. It seems too good to be true...a little extra power, less maintenance and maybe even cleaner signals? Like Stewie said, "This is so good it HAS to be fattening."

      --
      Hey freaks: now you're ju
    22. Re:This could be sweet. by row314 · · Score: 4, Informative

      Any links to places that sell these LED's?

      I've been googling, but haven't found anything yet (other than case-mod LED's).

      One place to start: The LED Light.com. Fair warning: swallow that mouthful of {beverage} before reading the prices for the 120/240 volt "bulbs", unless you want to review input.

      It will be interesting to see how long it takes 'em to start building units using Luxeons.

      Also, do you just take these LED's and stick em in your light socket? Is it that easy?

      Er, no, unless you count that brief glow as it becomes a friode. Normally you want to supply just enough power to do the job, which means you have to modify that 120/240V feed down to something the diodes can handle without smoking.

    23. Re:This could be sweet. by ebyrob · · Score: 1

      Another alternative might be simply using a very low voltage DC(AC?) power source on the ducts themselves. After all, what is a metal air conditioning vent if not a giant con*duct*or?

    24. Re:This could be sweet. by dougmc · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Or you could pay your light bill [in the long term] by using power efficient LEDs.
      Or you could just replace your incadescent bulbs with the replacement mini-flourescent bulbs, which can now be had for under $2 each.

      They use about 1/4th as much power (they're still pretty inefficient as far as flourescent bulbs go) and last much longer.

      And best of all, they're available NOW! (go get a 4 pack at Home Depot for $7.99.)

    25. Re:This could be sweet. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You mean like a transformer?

    26. Re:This could be sweet. by hesiod · · Score: 1

      Been said before, but air ducts usually have a good bit of dust flying through them that can clog the motor, which is difficult to get to, making it cost-ineffective to replace/fix.

    27. Re:This could be sweet. by hesiod · · Score: 1

      > wouldn't really add much talk time

      Unless you use the whole battery during 1 call, I would think that it would add talk time, since the power used during a call would be recharged to full strength while being carried.

      Unfortunately though, the constant charging and discharging would probably make battery die (I mean dead as in "will not work", not dead as in "run out of power") a lot faster.

      Granted, I don't know much about recent rechargable battery Tech.

    28. Re:This could be sweet. by hesiod · · Score: 1

      > Why does everything have to be designed for cell phones?

      It's not necessarily that it has to be used on phones, it's just that they are so common that it is easier to imagine it there instead of something like industrial air conditioning.

    29. Re:This could be sweet. by Matthaeus · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Getting OT, I know...

      Those bulbs have a very discernable flicker (on the order of 60 Hz, I think) that gives me a blinding headache. So, even though they would save us electricity, I'm going to be running something with a little bit longer glow time... i.e. regular, glass-blown incandescent bulbs.

    30. Re:This could be sweet. by smokin_juan · · Score: 1

      Harley my ass... Strap it to the earth - remember Tesla and his earth harmonic studies? yeah, you were probably too young, but according to him (and he sits right next to god, ya know) the whole earth shimmies and shakes and, according to me, all you gotta do is create the machine to catch it. someone beat me to it... always seems to work that way. the only problem is that a beowoulf cluster of these would probably stop the rotation of the earth. that would certainly end any energy crisis, but i'm not sure if stopping the earths rotation is the best way to do that. bah, fuckit... we'll try it first and worry about consequences later.

    31. Re:This could be sweet. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative
      You are talking about fluorescent lights with magnetic ballasts. Try some of the newer ones with electronic ballasts - they have a much higher frequency of operation (sometimes up in the VHF part of the electromagnetic spectrum) and no discernable flicker.

      CF lamps are also more efficient than LEDs.

    32. Re:This could be sweet. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One possibility: A laser and a solar panel.

    33. Re:This could be sweet. by GospelHead821 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Not only the vibrations that are caused when you're walking around with the phone in your pocket, but the vibrations that you cause when you're speaking into the phone. Not all of the energy of your voice is being converted to electrical signal. If some of that could be recaptured and used to power the phone, that would be a good use for this technology. I can also see this sort of thing being popular in the novelty industry. Little devices that stick on top of your speakers that light up or spin or dance when the speaker's vibrating. And instead of requiring batteries, like early incarnations of such novelty devices, these power themselves.

      --
      Virtue finds and chooses the mean.
      Aristotle, Ethica Nichomachea
    34. Re:This could be sweet. by shadowbearer · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Well, yes, it would reduce the vibrations - you are stealing kinetic energy from the system.

      Your post made me wonder; take a finely engineered and balanced system like large turbines are; if we attach one of these devices and change the vibrations within the system, wouldn't there be a danger creating new harmonics not allowed for in the engineering design that could damage components? AFAIK most vibrations in mechnical systems are either modeled out or dealt with after the system is introduced. Wouldn't the addition of these devices on some systems require a thorough engineering remodeling?
      I would imagine there would be limits to how much one could change the vibrational harmonics of an already developed system.

      Be interesting to hear a mech. engr. view on this.

      SB

      --
      It's old. The more humans I meet, the more I like my cats. At least they are honest.
    35. Re:This could be sweet. by carlos_benj · · Score: 1

      Some recent Harley's have balanced engines.

      Heresy! I'll bet these things don't even leak oil either! What's this world coming to?

      --

      --

      As a matter of fact, I am a lawyer. But I play an actor on TV.

    36. Re:This could be sweet. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why add an extra load on the air mover motor by putting obstruc-sorry, fans, in the ductwork when you can get the same local-power-gen effect without any extra motor load via the vibration tappers?

    37. Re:This could be sweet. by gmby · · Score: 1

      Why not just run them off the wind currents comming out of the ducks end?

      --
      I don't want a pickle; I just want a Motor-Cycle! A four foot cop arrived with a five foot gun!
    38. Re:This could be sweet. by autopr0n · · Score: 1

      Not all of the energy of your voice is being converted to electrical signal.

      okay

      If some of that could be recaptured and used to power the phone, that would be a good use for this technology.

      You mean, by converting it into an electrical signal?

      --
      autopr0n is like, down and stuff.
    39. Re:This could be sweet. by Lectrik · · Score: 1
      Why not just run them off the wind currents comming out of the ducks end?


      Errr, I'd rather have as little to to with wind coming out of a duck's end as possible.
      --
      --- As to make my comment seem, by comparison, more intelegent... doodie doodie doodie poop poop poop!
    40. Re:This could be sweet. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Also, do you just take these LED's and stick em in your light socket? Is it that easy?

      Er, no, unless you count that brief glow as it becomes a friode [catb.org]. Normally you want to supply just enough power to do the job, which means you have to modify that 120/240V feed down to something the diodes can handle without smoking.


      Then how come I can stick both a 60 watt and 100 watt bulb in the same socket without the 60 watt one exploding?

      is 40 watts not enought to fry a lightbulb?

  2. Indeed by inertia187 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Reminds me of this article. But seriously, wouldn't the daily movement of the cell phone user also be useful? Granted, it's not as vigorous as the vibrate feature, but it has to account for something.

    "Crud, I dropped my cell phone. But now I have ten more minutes of talk time! Gotta love solid state!"

    --
    A programmer is a machine for converting coffee into code.
    1. Re:Indeed by ghoting · · Score: 2, Informative

      But seriously, wouldn't the daily movement of the cell phone user also be useful?

      That was my thinking, too. That sort of "recharge" has been available in wrist watches for some time (no winding necessary, your wrist movements do it). For a cell phone with small power needs, it would seem a simple thing to accomplish.

      --
      Let's show this prehistoric bitch how we do things downtown.
    2. Re:Indeed by agentkhaki · · Score: 5, Informative

      Unless the phone happens to be one of those nifty wrist-based one, the answer is no, this won't work. The kinetic watches work on the theory that you a) swing your arms, however so slightly or greatly, when you walk b) you tend to walk around quite a bit (even if it's just going to the fridge to grab another barrel of soda) and c) even when you're not walking around, your arms are moving.

      Contrast that with a cell phone, which is either a) attached to your hip or b) sitting on your desk. When you're walking around, you might be able to harness some energy, the amount of which would increase the farther down your leg you carried it, but when you're just sitting around, or when you're doing your filing, or whatever, you wouldn't be doing anything for the phone.

      Furthermore, any gain would quickly be balanced out by the fact that, just like the watches, you would need an electric device that constantly moves the phone around when you're not going to be using it for a certain period of time (longer than overnight, I believe).

      --
      Ack!
    3. Re:Indeed by dev_sda · · Score: 5, Interesting

      That was my thinking, too. That sort of "recharge" has been available in wrist watches for some time (no winding necessary, your wrist movements do it). For a cell phone with small power needs, it would seem a simple thing to accomplish.

      Its the same basic concept but the degree of difference between the levels of energy generated by the daily movements of a person compared to the power required by a cellphone is huge. The amount of 'vibration energy' you release on a daily basis would probably add 10 minutes of talk time to a low powered cell phone a day. I also like the submitter's misconception of general physics:

      How cool is that? Do I see 3G applications with a vibrate() call mandatory every couple minutes?

      Right. Energy for free! Unfortunately the mythical +100% efficiency machine has yet to be built (and never will). This technology only recovers percentages of energy lost due to machine inefficiency and friction. The day x amount of energy generates y amount of energy where y > x is the day the universe implodes.

    4. Re:Indeed by Torqued · · Score: 5, Funny

      "Unless the phone happens to be one of those nifty wrist-based one, the answer is no, this won't work."

      1: Momentum powered wrist cell phone
      2: Porn
      3: !!!!!!!!!
      4: Profit! (or at least unlimited power!) :)

    5. Re:Indeed by jdavidb · · Score: 1

      My grandfather had one of those kinetic watches, but he moved around so little it never stayed charged. He used to swing it from side to side in front of himself while watching TV.

      Now, he's old. The rest of us have no excuse. ;)

    6. Re:Indeed by Slime-dogg · · Score: 1

      There's no reason why you can't attach a charger ankle-band or wrist-band and have that connected to your cell phone by a wire. I've got an in-car cell charger, but I sure don't plug the physical cell phone into the cigarette lighter socket.

      --
      You need to restart your computer. Hold down the Power button for several seconds or press the Restart button.
    7. Re:Indeed by moonbender · · Score: 3, Interesting
      I don't think this will work, either, but I think your reasoning is a bit off. Obviously powering a cell phone won't work in the same way as those wrist watches work, but that's kind of the point: there's a new technology converting vibration into electrical energy. Those wrist watches do something similar, but in a different way (I'm studying CS not EE, I don't know any specifics).

      There are vibrations to convert, not the ones the article refers to (which is fairly ridiculous) but rather the ones generated by carrying around your cell phone with you. The traditional, "wrist" way might not be able to tap that "source" of energy, but this new tech might.

      Finally, this obviously could be used as an additional source of energy. There would still need to be a battery, and there could still be a charger to recharge the battery from mains power. So no constant moving required.

      However, at least judging by the article, this still wouldn't work. Cell phones are designed to work with hardly any energy, but it does seem that this technology can only generate very minute amounts of energy, too - enough to power a sensor or an LED, but probably not enough to considerably prolongue a cell phones battery life. Certainly not enough to justify the added technology this would require.

      --
      Switch back to Slashdot's D1 system.
    8. Re:Indeed by Rolo+Tomasi · · Score: 2, Funny

      Slightly OT, there are actually watch stands made specifically for these kinds of watches. You put your watch on it, and there's a motor inside that swings the whole thing from side to side. How do I know this? I saw such a contraption on eBay once. It sold for about $300. It's really one of those "WTF LOL" things.

      --
      Did you know you can fertilize your lawn with used motor oil?
    9. Re:Indeed by cygnus · · Score: 4, Funny
      1: Momentum powered wrist cell phone
      2: Porn
      3: !!!!!!!!!
      4: Profit! (or at least unlimited power!) :)
      ...i hear that's the plot of The Matrix: Reloaded.
      --
      Just raise the taxes on crack.
    10. Re:Indeed by battjt · · Score: 1

      Connect the wrist strap to the phone via blue tooth! :-)

      --
      Joe Batt Solid Design
    11. Re:Indeed by Raskolnk · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Based on my experience, I have a theory that the kinetic watch thing is an evil conspiracy. My wife bought me an expensive Citizen Eco-Drive watch. Ran great for a while, but eventually stopped. The guy from the store told me to put it under a lamp for the night to "recharge" WTF? So, I bring the watch back in to the shop, and they tell me they need to send it to Citizen to be serviced. Worked again, but a year later, same situation. It almost made me wonder if their Eco-Drive device (or whatever it was called) is actually a marketing term for "hidden watch battery that can only be replaced by the company."

      --
      Don't blame me, I get all my opinions from my Ouija board.
    12. Re:Indeed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      makes me think of a movie...

      A: This is my new invention. It's a flashlight that doesn't need batteries. When there's light, it'll shine.

      B: What if there's no light.

      A: Good question. When there's no light, it won't shine. But, if you shine another flashlight on it, it'll shine.

      B: ...

    13. Re:Indeed by TopShelf · · Score: 1

      That would work just fine, as long as you ride a bike down a cobblestone road...

      --
      Stop by my site where I write about ERP systems & more
    14. Re:Indeed by Rick.C · · Score: 1
      The old self-winding wrist watches operate via a weighted arm that rotates around a pivot at the center of the watch. It's sort of like the Tilt-A-Whirl at the amusement park.

      When it turns one direction, it winds the mainspring. When it turns in the other direction it just freewheels.

      Obviously this is designed for non-electronic watches. Is there an electronic counterpart for this, where the swinging weight generates electricity?
      --
      You were 80% angel, 10% demon. The rest was hard to explain. - Over The Rhine
      "Math in a song is good."-Linford
    15. Re:Indeed by VisorGuy · · Score: 1

      So then it should provide enough power to run the display's white LED backlight(s) for the few seconds that it's on each time, right?

      --
      This user account is inactive account replaced by the PDA
    16. Re:Indeed by Jasin+Natael · · Score: 1

      Heh, I'll never need a car charger again, I'll just throw the phone into the backseat in front of my 15" subwoofer :)

      --
      True science means that when you re-evaluate the evidence, you re-evaluate your faith.
    17. Re:Indeed by hackstraw · · Score: 1

      Righto. My father had a watch from the
      '70s that was "wrist powered" (sounds bad:)

      Also, I've seen recently where there are flashlights that are powered by shaking them.

      One thing that noone has mentioned is that a side
      benefit besides "stealing" power from these vibrations would be the dampening of the vibrations which would also reduce noise.

    18. Re:Indeed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      4: Profit! (or at least unlimited power!) :)

      Nah. Probably a couple of minutes of power at most.

    19. Re:Indeed by CvD · · Score: 1

      So how about providing a cell phone with a generator from one of these forever flashlights? Just shake your phone a couple times and it's recharged.

      Okay, I realize you'd need quite a bit of shaking, since a LED uses a lot less power than the transmitter of your mobile phone, but still... maybe in the future, phones get smaller, need less power because cells get smaller maybe. Ah well, wishfull thinking...

      Cheers!

      Costyn.

    20. Re:Indeed by moonbender · · Score: 1

      It should, yes, but that alone probably would not be worth the effort involved in integrating this into cell phones.

      --
      Switch back to Slashdot's D1 system.
    21. Re:Indeed by juhaz · · Score: 1

      Yeah, makes everybody very convinced that kinetic energy watches are an evil conspiracy if your solar powered Eco-Drive doesn't work.

      Maybe NOW that "put it under a lamp" rings some bells? Solar power == light, and all that, you know?

    22. Re:Indeed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Right. The older watches that did this were mechanical in nature with a ratcheting mechanism. A piezo is different.

      If piezos become cost and size effective enough to put in phones that would be great. Stick in a kinetic to electric one and a thermal to electric one. That way that as it sits in your pocket your stanby time will be increased.

      The real problem right now is really the efficiency. A lot of mechanical or thermal energy is needed to make a very small amount of electrical energy and I don't see people going "hold on my battery is dying I need to shake my phone". Also, after you get the energy into an electric form, it has to be added to the system. Any time you try to parallel power sources you have losses, almost negating any power made. Now if we had ideal barriers (diodes) and super conductors we would be set.

      You can get tennis raquets and water skis with these things in them that will turn the vibration into heat or light or something. It is nice to see people actually using them for something besides a sales gimic.

    23. Re:Indeed by Pasc · · Score: 1

      Thank you... that "free energy" >100% efficiency crap always pisses me off.

    24. Re:Indeed by Liquor · · Score: 1
      Right. Energy for free! Unfortunately the mythical +100% efficiency machine has yet to be built (and never will). This technology only recovers percentages of energy lost due to machine inefficiency and friction.
      Well, in theory at least, it could recover almost (though not quite)100% of the energy output as a ringtone or vibration, at the expense of no longer radiating any of that energy as an audible ring or vibe.

      While it would be a generally useless misfeature, there are many times when I (and probably many others) wish that all the cell phones in the room (or on the road) were configured that way. :)
      --

      Liquor
      Sanity is a highly overrated commodity.
    25. Re:Indeed by juhaz · · Score: 1

      Yeah, there's an electric counterpart, Seiko's Kinetic line for example are Quartz watches without mainspring and yet, like their name implies, powered by kinetic energy.

      Spinning weight turns some kind of microgenerator that loads capacitor (or maybe a battery in some models), and I'd assume it can be done whichever way it's turning, unlike those old devices.

    26. Re:Indeed by slamb · · Score: 1
      That was my thinking, too. That sort of "recharge" has been available in wrist watches for some time (no winding necessary, your wrist movements do it). For a cell phone with small power needs, it would seem a simple thing to accomplish.

      Cell phones use dramatically more energy than wrist watches. While on standby, power (energy use / time) should probably be comparable to a watch's[*]. But the transmitter uses much more power than a small processor and LCD. That's why cell phone battery capacity is often measured in N hours/days of standby or N minutes/hours of talk time.

      I think neither method would gather enough energy to justify additional complexity in the cell phone.

      [*] but it clearly isn't, as a tiny watch battery can power a watch for years, and a much larger cell phone battery can power one for a couple days at best. Anyone know what else the cell phone is doing while on standby? Does it transmit occasionally to ping the tower or something?

    27. Re:Indeed by Dread_ed · · Score: 1

      This probably could not generate enough energy to power your phone, but I bet the vibrations from your heart beating could power implanted cardiac telemetry devices.

      Couple that with a wireless system that broadcasts to a monitoring device worn on the waist and you have a nifty little package. It would simplify the jobs of cardiac physicians and would also simplify the lives of those patients who used it, ie. they would not have to rely on an outside powering device, and the devices would not need invasive surgery to replace batteries etc.

      Only problem is that the myocardial infarction that the implanted devices are monitoring for will kill the power to the sensors as well as the patient. Hmmmmm...back to the drawing board.

      This might be a help to those who fear being buried alive. Just put a reciever for your cardiac telemetry in the headstone, coupled to a siren. If your heart starts beating after you have been "laid to rest" EVERYONE will know it. Of course you ex-wife could just cut the wires to the siren. Hmmmmm...back to the drawing board.

      --
      When the only tool you have is a claw hammer every problem starts to look like the back of someone's skull.
    28. Re:Indeed by Raskolnk · · Score: 1

      Ouch... -1 dumbass. But I guess when she bought it for me and told me it was kinetic powered it was before I realized I shouldn't believe anything she said.

      Oh well. I guess I'll have to buy a real kinetic powered watch and deduct it from her alimony.

      --
      Don't blame me, I get all my opinions from my Ouija board.
    29. Re:Indeed by stevenp · · Score: 1

      >> Based on my experience, I have a theory that the kinetic watch thing is an evil conspiracy. My wife bought me an expensive Citizen Eco-Drive watch. Ran great for a while, but eventually stopped. The guy from the store told me to put it under a lamp for the night to "recharge" WTF?

      The Citizen Eco-drive uses solar power to work, it is not kinetic in any way. The name "kinetic" comes from "movement" (greek). Bay the way, a friend of mine also had a negative experiences with an Eco-drive watch. In other words, it stopped very often - it was working only under the lamp :-)
      Seiko and some other (Festina) make kinetic watches that are rewinded or recharged (there are both) only from the movement of the hand. And they are extremely reliable from my experience - Seiko automatic 10 yrs and kinetic 1yr.

    30. Re:Indeed by eugene+ts+wong · · Score: 1

      "Eugene! Did you fart?!?"
      "Well, yeah. I had to recharge my phone."

    31. Re:Indeed by Burpmaster · · Score: 1
      The day x amount of energy generates y amount of energy where y > x is the day the universe implodes.
      I don't mean to nitpick, but isn't that the day the universe explodes?
  3. nothing new here by kin_korn_karn · · Score: 5, Funny

    I know plenty of women that get energy from vibrating objects.

    1. Re:nothing new here by Xzisted · · Score: 4, Funny

      If us men scientists aren't careful...they wont have much of a use for us anymore. Imagine the self-recharging vibrator that never dies.

      --

      Honesty may be the best policy, but apparently by elimination, dishonesty is the second best policy.
    2. Re:nothing new here by NanoGator · · Score: 1

      "I know plenty of women that get energy from vibrating objects."

      Is that why you have so much credit card debt?

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    3. Re:nothing new here by Call+Me+Black+Cloud · · Score: 1

      Self recharging? Better than that! If you factor in the vibrations of the women themselves you could theoretically power a small city.

      Don't know why parent was modded as troll, though. Offtopic maybe, but really not trolling. Chicks dig vibrators...ever see that Sex in the City episode about the rabbit vibrator one of the women gets addicted to? Funnily enough, drugstore.com sells it. I like the admonition, "Do not use on unexplained calf pain". Yeah, I don't think that's where it's going to be used...

    4. Re:nothing new here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Us" men scientists?

      Well, I guess you must be a scientist. Only a scientist would write that badly.

    5. Re:nothing new here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They give the calf warning on all vibrators because you can dislodge small blood clots in your calf and give yourself a stroke.

    6. Re:nothing new here by Call+Me+Black+Cloud · · Score: 1

      That's what I suspected. Interesting. Different strokes for different folks, or something like that.

    7. Re:nothing new here by Blue+Stone · · Score: 1
      "Do not use on unexplained calf pain."

      Because, as we all know, the rabbit is the natural enemy of the cow.

      --
      Corporation, n. An ingenious device for obtaining individual profit without individual responsibility. - Ambrose Bierce
    8. Re:nothing new here by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      If us men scientists aren't careful...they wont have much of a use for us anymore. Imagine the self-recharging vibrator that never dies.

      Damn, first it's H-1B's, and now perpetual vibrators! Combine the two and just get it all overwith dammit!

    9. Re:nothing new here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      On topic for vibrating cell phones, if not for this specific discussion:
      http://www.wired.com/news/business/0% 2C1367%2C5844 2%2C00.html

      Story posted on Wired on April 12 about a Nokia application "Purring Kitty" that makes the phone vibrate.

    10. Re:nothing new here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > give yourself a stroke

      isn't that the point?

    11. Re:nothing new here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Only the pathetic masturbators, though.

    12. Re:nothing new here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you really think that a woman can get as much fulfilment (let alone more) out of a vibrator as being with a man?

      I guess you've never *really* made love before...

  4. Perpetual Motion? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    So now calling your phone charges it, huh?

    ought to patent that.

    1. Re:Perpetual Motion? by Randolpho · · Score: 1

      Ebay already has it. ;)

      --
      "Times have not become more violent. They have just become more televised."
      -Marilyn Manson
    2. Re:Perpetual Motion? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So now calling your phone charges it, huh?

      It's perfectly possible, since the radio waves being sent to your phone carry energy.

      Of course the energy would be nowhere near enough to run a phone.

  5. Dildos by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

    Insert tasteless joke about Dildos here.

  6. Someone's got to say it... by Rorschach1 · · Score: 1

    Perpetual motion vibrators!

    1. Re:Someone's got to say it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      While scavenging a little lost vibration could be cool - you're headed way down the path of perpetual motion here.

      How about a really cool idea. Let's attach big windmills to the roofs of our cars, then when we drive we can charge up the ....

    2. Re:Someone's got to say it... by Rorschach1 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I'm just trying to point out that the statement in the original post about a cell phone charging itself through the ringer/vibrator is absurd. Any such device would have to effectively dampen vibrations, so you'd just be reducing the output of the vibrator and wasting energy in conversion.

    3. Re:Someone's got to say it... by thynk · · Score: 1

      Everyone is talking like this is something new. My ex-g/f get's a huge *charge* out of a thing that vibrates.

      --

      Good judgment comes from experience, and a lot of that comes from bad judgment.
  7. Well, 'vibrate'.. by E_elven · · Score: 1

    I've had more experiences physically relocating the phones than them vibrating..(usually by hand and as far as my muscles carried it.)

    --
    Marxist evolution is just N generations away!
    1. Re:Well, 'vibrate'.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      maybe you should stop shoving the phone up your ass then?

  8. "Young lady, in this house we obey the laws... by nweaver · · Score: 2, Insightful

    "Young lady, in this house we obey the laws of thermodynamics"

    The article is (I assume) about energy recovery/scavenging, but the article poster just invented perpetual motion, arguing that the vibrator from the ringer could power the cellphone.

    HA.

    --
    Test your net with Netalyzr
    1. Re:"Young lady, in this house we obey the laws... by A+Bugg · · Score: 1, Insightful

      no he didn't he just said it would give EXTENDED talk time which would be true. he said nothing of limitless energy from it.
      a bugg

    2. Re:"Young lady, in this house we obey the laws... by agentkhaki · · Score: 0, Funny

      I suppose it's all in how you read it... Note the word 'extended' though. In my dictionary, 'extended' does not equate to 'infinite.'

      Slashdot laziness takes an all time low - now people aren't even bothering to read the post itself. What next, just read the headline? The first word of the headline? The first letter?

      --
      Ack!
    3. Re:"Young lady, in this house we obey the laws... by M-G · · Score: 2, Insightful

      no he didn't he just said it would give EXTENDED talk time which would be true

      Yes, the submitter did say that, but went on to speculate that you'd be wanting to get more calls in order to keep your battery charged, so the overall tone was that as long as you kept getting calls, you'd keep your battery charged.

    4. Re:"Young lady, in this house we obey the laws... by nweaver · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yeup. " Do I see 3G applications with a vibrate() call mandatory every couple minutes? "

      You're lazy, all right.

      --
      Test your net with Netalyzr
    5. Re:"Young lady, in this house we obey the laws... by kisrael · · Score: 1

      Slashdot laziness takes an all time low - now people aren't even bothering to read the post itself. What next, just read the headline? The first word of the headline? The first letter?

      E! I know some folks who took that stuff. They were really into textures, and kissing.

      --
      SO YOU'RE GOING TO DIE: The Comic for Dealing with Death
    6. Re:"Young lady, in this house we obey the laws... by ADRA · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "Do I see 3G applications with a vibrate() call mandatory every couple minutes?"

      Nah, they were clearly delusional.

      --
      Bye!
    7. Re:"Young lady, in this house we obey the laws... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cool your jets. He did say "extended" but then he suggested additional calls to charge it up. If he believes an additional call would create a net positive energy balance within the phone then he believes in perpetual motion. Think harder, criticize less.

    8. Re:"Young lady, in this house we obey the laws... by StevenMaurer · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The patent is certainly intended to cover large scale industrial equipment, not mobile phones. In that case, not only would you get excess electricity, but the very act of harnessing that power would also serve to quiet them -- a double bonus.

      Hemos is like a lot of sci-fi fans: he thinks technology is cool, but he hasn't bothered to understand the science it's based on.

    9. Re:"Young lady, in this house we obey the laws... by NewbieProgrammerMan · · Score: 3, Funny

      Hemos is like a lot of sci-fi fans: he thinks technology is cool, but he hasn't bothered to understand the science it's based on.

      That's the most concise description of many sci-fi fans I think I've ever seen. I think I'll have to file that one away for future use. :)

      --
      [b.belong('us') for b in bases if b.owner() == 'you']
    10. Re:"Young lady, in this house we obey the laws... by doozer · · Score: 1

      So, the battery powers the vibrator, which charges the battery, which leads to longer talk time?

      I would think it leads to infinite talk time

    11. Re:"Young lady, in this house we obey the laws... by DrinkDr.Pepper · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The poster could better extend their battery usage by turning the phone off altogether.

      --
      0xfeedface
    12. Re:"Young lady, in this house we obey the laws... by Narchie+Troll · · Score: 1, Insightful

      What does Hemos have to do with anything? He didn't even comment on this article.

    13. Re:"Young lady, in this house we obey the laws... by chrisseaton · · Score: 1

      Hemos posted it. We assume he also looked at it and thought "yeah, nothing wrong with that", but like the moron he is, he probably just posted it.

    14. Re:"Young lady, in this house we obey the laws... by ashshy · · Score: 2, Insightful

      On the other hand, cell phones get jostled about quite a bit while we're walking around with the phone in our hand/pocket/belt clip/whatever. Capturing that energy might be worthwhile.

      --
      #o#
      O Moo.
    15. Re:"Young lady, in this house we obey the laws... by swordboy · · Score: 1

      recursive
      Pronunciation: ri-'k&r-siv
      Function: adjective
      Date: 1934
      1: See recursive.

      --

      Life is the leading cause of death in America.
    16. Re:"Young lady, in this house we obey the laws... by NetCurl · · Score: 1

      That is wholely incorrect:

      The energy you expend to create the vibration can never be wholely reclaimed, not even in this fashion. Therefore, you'd lose energy with every call to vibrate() you made.

      This technology is great for increasing your overall battery life by reclaiming a small portion of the energy expended to make your phone ring/vibrate, but periodic calls to vibrate() would be, well, stupid.

      I see this as having the greatest impact in home appliances, and their relation to your gigantic electric bill.

      Conservation of energy is really what we are talking about here, and the submitter doesn't seem to have a grasp on that...

      --

      It's only when we've lost everything, that we are free to do anything...

    17. Re:"Young lady, in this house we obey the laws... by Alan+Hicks · · Score: 1
      the article poster just invented perpetual motion, arguing that the vibrator from the ringer could power the cellphone

      See I don't have this problem. i realized a long time ago that if I sucked power from the vibrations of my cell-phone, that the vibrations would decrease. I also understand that vibration is in effect sound, so that this harnessing of vibration would silence the phone. I considered implementing this, but soon realized there was a much more efficient way to accomplish the same performance from my cell-phone, and retain battery life greater than this vibration harnessing technology can. I keep my cell phone turned off.

      --
      Slackware, what else when it must be secure, stable, and easy?
    18. Re:"Young lady, in this house we obey the laws... by Dunkalis · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Thermodynamics states that it is impossible. A quick summary: There is a constant amount of energy in the universe, and energy cannot be created or destroyed. Now, if we had this mythical cell phone, and it rings, the phone is using the battery to make the ringer ring. Energy is always lost in a reaction (well, not exactly lost, since energy cannot be created or destroyed, but it is unrecoverable by the phone), and the conversion of the vibration of the ring to energy storable by the battery also "costs" energy. The energy used in the reaction is lost (converted to heat), and only a small bit is returned to the battery. It may extend battery life, but not lead to infinite talk time.

      If I'm wrong, feel free to correct/flame/mod down.

      --
      Slashdot is a waste of time. I enjoy wasting time.
    19. Re:"Young lady, in this house we obey the laws... by LilGuy · · Score: 1

      I fail to see how that extends the usage... at best it will delay having to recharge it until it's being used again...

      --

      You're nothing; like me.
    20. Re:"Young lady, in this house we obey the laws... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      "The patent is certainly intended to cover large scale industrial equipment, not mobile phones."

      What patent? There's no mention of a patent in the article and apparently no patent application published for this technology or patent issued. Are you patent examiner with insider information? If not, how do you know what "the patent" is intended to cover"?

    21. Re:"Young lady, in this house we obey the laws... by anticypher · · Score: 1

      That's the most concise description of many sci-fi fans I think I've ever seen. I think I'll have to file that one away for future use. :)

      Signature? What signature?


      With slight editing, it fits my new signature. Can't fit in the attribute, though.

      the AC

      --
      Hemos is like...sci-fi fans;he thinks technology is cool, but he hasn't bothered to understand the science it's based on
    22. Re:"Young lady, in this house we obey the laws... by doozer · · Score: 2, Insightful

      No, you're most definetely not wrong.

      I wasn't trying to disagree with thermodynamics: I understand it quite well.

      Trying to use the vibrations generated by the phone, to recharge the battery that
      was drained to create the motions is a losing battle.

      It's much easier to turn of the vibrator and not worry about it.

    23. Re:"Young lady, in this house we obey the laws... by harlows_monkeys · · Score: 1
      This technology is great for increasing your overall battery life by reclaiming a small portion of the energy expended to make your phone ring/vibrate

      Except it would be easier and more effective to simply vibrate less vibrantly.

      What would make sense (in theory...not necessarily in practice!) would be if you had two battery powered devices with this technology, each recoverying some energy from the other's vibration. That would be energy that otherwise went to waste, by transmitting vibration to the other device rather than the user.

      Basically, what makes sense is to recover misdirected vibration, not excees vibration.

    24. Re:"Young lady, in this house we obey the laws... by t · · Score: 1

      I think an easier solution would be to build a device that accumulates high voltage static charges. That way when a phone call came in, the device could discharge this energy into your leg. This would of course give a whole new meaning to vibrating ringer. But on the plus side you wouldn't miss any calls. Nor sleep through them. Quite the feature.

    25. Re:"Young lady, in this house we obey the laws... by thx2001r · · Score: 1

      In that case, not only would you get excess electricity...

      Well, not exactly, you would recover SOME of the wasted energy of the inefficiencies of the equipment originating the vibrations. As a poster said a few threads up, you'd do better by using more efficient machines that waste less energy and save the money of all that excess wasted energy.

      --

      -Joe
      If we're all god's children, what's so special about Jesus? - Jimmy Carr

    26. Re:"Young lady, in this house we obey the laws... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Homos like sci-fi?

  9. Just riding around to charge. by immortal · · Score: 1

    If ringing vibration will recharge, what about just driving around in the car, or walking. Hmmm, I wonder what an earthquake would do that recharger?

    --
    "Your having a bad day when the voices in your head put you on hold"
    1. Re:Just riding around to charge. by pclminion · · Score: 1
      Hmmm, I wonder what an earthquake would do that recharger?

      Interesting idea. What if you covered a large field with tall towers, with ten-ton steel weights hanging from large springs from the tops of the towers. When an earthquake strikes, a huge amount of energy will be transferred into the spring/weight systems. Then you use some kind of linear generator to extract this energy from the vibrating weights.

    2. Re:Just riding around to charge. by azzy · · Score: 1

      Anyone actually implementing this idea /deserves/ to be standing next to a freeswinging ten-ton steel weight hanging from a tall tower when an earthquake hits. I want to be on another continent watching live video feed as it all starts going wrong.

      Of course I am assuming for the sake of maximum scorn, that the construction is located at the earthquake epicentre ;)

    3. Re:Just riding around to charge. by TheAlmightyQ · · Score: 1

      Excellent, and once we have those devices in place we'll just need some kind of device that can trigger earthquakes on demand....

      Oh wait, that wouldn't get us free energy, just another bad movie.

      --
      I hope you're not pretending to be evil while secretly being good. That would be dishonest.
    4. Re:Just riding around to charge. by pclminion · · Score: 1
      Oh wait, that wouldn't get us free energy, just another bad movie.

      I didn't say we'd trigger the earthquakes ourselves, and besides, I was only being half serious. But if nature is gonna deal us some bad hands sometimes, why not try to extract what we can from it?

    5. Re:Just riding around to charge. by immortal · · Score: 1

      Hmm. Well ten-ton steel weights swinging around sounds a lot more dangerous, but fun. Actualy if this technology can generate power from vibration, this could solve much of the energy needs in California. Living in the midwest, I understand CA has earthquakes every day, almost. Many are too small to be felt by the individuals living there. They are detected by sensitive devices. Given they have many micro-earthquake, they could use that vibration to produce electrical power for many communities. Similar to how hydropower provided electrical generation for communities around the country many decades ago.

      --
      "Your having a bad day when the voices in your head put you on hold"
    6. Re:Just riding around to charge. by t · · Score: 1

      You jest but this is actually a method used to dampen oscillations in tall buildings from wind effects. Not a very good method since an active control system is much more efficient with much less weight.

  10. 2nd Law of Thermodynamics by Anonymous+Coed · · Score: 1
    imagine the ultimate cellphone - one that charges the battery every time it rings/vibrates


    Have you ever heard of the Second Law? How do you think you would get the energy to vibrate the phone in the first place? Do you think you could possibly recover MORE energy from this than you put in in the first place?

    1. Re:2nd Law of Thermodynamics by dunedan · · Score: 2, Funny

      I thought the Second Law said something about Robots being forced to obey humans except if it would harm humans :)

    2. Re:2nd Law of Thermodynamics by grEchelonSurge · · Score: 5, Informative

      Of course, one can't get any more energy. Duh.

      But exactly how much energy could one get out of a vibration? Are we talking powering an LED by the San Andreas fault? Or are we talking powering San Francisco from the vibrations on an air conditioning shaft?

      Let's see:
      We'll consider the vibrations to be simple harmonic motion (because it is relatively accurate, and anything else is near impossible to calculate without a beowolf cluster).

      Let's look at the vibration when your car goes over a speed bump. This should have a relatively large energy associated with it, since the energy in a object due to vibration is:

      E = 0.5 K A^2

      Where k is the spring constant (in metric, it would be N / m ).

      K can be determined by calculating how far your car is lowered when you get in (your weight, in newtons, divided by how far your car is lowered, in meters).

      Let's assume that you weigh 150 lbs. This is about 70 kilos, or 670 Newtons. Let's also assume that your car is lowered by about an inch when you get in (0.0254 m).

      This makes the spring constant for your car's suspension:

      670 N / 0.0254 m = 26,378 N / m

      This is to say that if one were to depress your car's suspension by one meter, you would be exerting a force of 26,378 Newtons.

      Let's also assume that, when going over the speed bump, your car bounces 10 inches. Thus, the amplitude of your car's motion is 5 inches, or 0.127 meters. Putting this information, and the spring constant into the first equation for energy:

      E = 0.5 ( 26,378 N ) ( 0.0127 M ) ^ 2

      E = 213 Joules.

      Great. How does this relate to power needed for powering some electronic device?

      Power = Energy / Time.

      Let's assume that this vibrations to energy device in the article can absorb your car's vibrational energy in 10 seconds. Thus, the power going into the device is:

      213 J / 10 s = 21.3 J /s = 21.3 W.

      That's right. 21 watts. Barely enough to power a small lightbulb. And that is coming from a whole car!

      Thus, I think that we can safely say that we're not going to be replacing our power plants any time soon. But for, say, a low-powered electronic sensor, which wirelessly broadcasts it's data in bursts every ten seconds, it would be fine.

    3. Re:2nd Law of Thermodynamics by corsec67 · · Score: 1

      And, that is just when you are going over a bump.

      If you mounted such a sensor directly to the wheels, where there is a more constant vibration, then you may be able to power that sensor.

      --
      If I have nothing to hide, don't search me
    4. Re:2nd Law of Thermodynamics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The spring rates in cars are not linear moron.

    5. Re:2nd Law of Thermodynamics by mrjah · · Score: 1

      Good point. So do us a favor: get the more realistic function for automotive suspension springs, integrate it appropriately across the distance traveled, and come back to us with the result when you're through.

      'Kay? Thanks.

    6. Re:2nd Law of Thermodynamics by Technician · · Score: 1

      Wow, what an elaborate solution to a simple speed bumb problem. How about Mass of car & contents * speed^2 minus Mass of car & contents * speed^2 after the speed bump. In other words, how much energy have you lost because of going over the speed bump?
      I don't care how long it takes to asorb the vertical vibrations. It doesn't matter. The vibrations are converted into heat in the shocks. Better shocks take less time to dampen the vertical vibration. The energy of the vertical vibration came from a loss of forward motion or a conversion of forward kinetic energy into vertical vibrational energy which is lost to heat.

      --
      The truth shall set you free!
    7. Re:2nd Law of Thermodynamics by Ashtray_Waterloo · · Score: 1
      QUOTE:
      We'll consider the vibrations to be simple harmonic motion (because it is relatively accurate, and anything else is near impossible to calculate without a beowolf cluster).

      Damn, I left my beowolf cluster in my other pair of pants....

  11. Remember Friction? by FortKnox · · Score: 2, Informative

    imagine the ultimate cellphone - one that charges the battery every time it rings/vibrates

    You'll still need to recharge the phone (maybe not as much, but I'm pretty sure that you won't find that significant of a different from regular phone), otherwise you are talking perpetual motion machines.

    --
    Good quote, too many chars. Seriously, the slashdot 120 char limit sucks!
    1. Re:Remember Friction? by jeffy124 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      what about the simple vibrations a phone endures just sitting on someone's belt? would simply walking around create enough vibration on the phone?

      --
      The One Rule Of Chess You'll Ever Need: Don't play someone who carries a kit in their bookbag.
    2. Re:Remember Friction? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well that depends. If the scavenging device is 100% effective it will absorb 100% of the vibration. Then you won't even know you got the call!

    3. Re:Remember Friction? by tsetem · · Score: 1

      Well, maybe you almost have it. If you keep talking into the phone, your vocal vibrations will continually recharge the phone.

      But you figure that you would be talking, and perpetually recharging the motion machine... :)

    4. Re:Remember Friction? by GigsVT · · Score: 1

      There are watches that use this to wind themselves.

      The energy from it is miniscule in terms of something like a cell phone though.

      --
      I've had enough abrasive sigs. Kittens are cute and fuzzy.
    5. Re:Remember Friction? by jeffy124 · · Score: 1

      that's the kind of thing I was expecting, but I dont think a phone goes through enough vibes to generate the amount of power needed.

      A watch on a wrist moves much more than a phone on a person's belt or in a bag. Compare the amount of movement there would while the person is sitting down of the watch with a phone, and the amount of energy needed for each device. Watch wins both in terms of amount of movement and that it needs far less power.

      Besides - the poster was "imagining" - the article itself was about small sensors that need to be placed in odd spots. Their power requirements are small - they only need to transmit data a short distance and need just enough juice to do their analysis. The raw data would probably be the only thing transmitted and the processing be done on a more full-powered computer.

      --
      The One Rule Of Chess You'll Ever Need: Don't play someone who carries a kit in their bookbag.
    6. Re:Remember Friction? by radd0 · · Score: 1

      This is a good idea. It would be nice to see some handheld electronic devices such as cell phones, pagers, or slim PDAs built with integrated battery chargers that harness kinetic energy.
      Granted not everyone is in "perpetual motion" but many professions require people to be constantly walking around from place to place with these sort of devices in hand or on a belt clip.

      -r

    7. Re:Remember Friction? by budgenator · · Score: 1

      I used sound-powered telephones 30 yrs ago in the army, designated TA1's. The joke was to send the newbie to get batteries for the thing. The navy called them sound powered telephone so the joke lost a lot in the translation.

      --
      Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
  12. The following equation lists my thoughts. by Renraku · · Score: 2, Funny

    Since the posts thus far are mostly about cell phones regaining power by ringing.. Step 1: Vibrate. Step 2: Violate laws of thermodynamics. Step 3: ? Step 4: Profit!

    --
    Job? I don't have time to get a job! Who will sit around and bitch about being broke and unemployed then?
    1. Re:The following equation lists my thoughts. by roman_mir · · Score: 1

      If you show me how to implement your step 2, I'll tell you what your step 3 is.

    2. Re:The following equation lists my thoughts. by doorbot.com · · Score: 2, Funny

      Step 1: Vibrate.
      Step 2: Violate laws of thermodynamics.
      Step 3: ?
      Step 4: Profit!


      Step 3 is "Post on Slashdot."

      You down with entropy? Yeah, you know me.

    3. Re:The following equation lists my thoughts. by Renraku · · Score: 1

      The question mark was a form of encryptation, you insensitive clod! DMCA violation! DMCA violation!

      --
      Job? I don't have time to get a job! Who will sit around and bitch about being broke and unemployed then?
  13. Obvious Application by The_Rippa · · Score: 1, Funny

    Perpetual Dildo

    1. Re:Obvious Application by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      Dildo's don't vibrate

  14. in related news by larry+bagina · · Score: 0, Troll

    I hear Kathleen Fent-Malda gets energy from vibrators. I guess CmdrTaco can't satisfy her.

    --
    Do you even lift?

    These aren't the 'roids you're looking for.

  15. Wow! by philovivero · · Score: 4, Funny

    Yes! A phone that charges itself when it rings or vibrates.

    And next, we can build a machine that, when slowing down from drag, uses that potential energy to cause another part of itself to move faster. Then, it would never stop. We could task it to make electricity to power... everything!

    From cars that have more electricity at the end of the trip than when they started, to bicycles that coast faster when going uphill, the possibilities are... perpetual!

    1. Re:Wow! by pcol · · Score: 5, Informative

      Actually there is a way to store the energy when a vehicle brakes into a flywheel and then use it to re-acelerate the vehicle after the stop. It's called a regenerative braking system.

      No violation of conservation of energy. You are simply storing part of the energy that would have gone into heat and re-using it later.

      Take a look at: Urenco Power Technologies - they've been doing this for years.

    2. Re:Wow! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      OK. But I get to keep the drinking bird.

    3. Re:Wow! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How about a device that converts heat (not just heat differentials) into power! Free power and free air conditioning! Turn the Sahara into a winter wonderland! So much free energy we'll have to make hydrogen out of it and launch it into space to get rid of it!

    4. Re:Wow! by GreyyGuy · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Big difference between getting some energy back during the braking process and getting back 100% or more then 100% of the original energy expended to get it up to speed.

    5. Re:Wow! by marauder404 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Right, and that's a good point, but the purpose of the regenerative braking system is to recover some of the losses associated with braking, not to recharge the car's fuel supply so that it can continue to go. The submitter makes the mistake of thinking that the cell phone could vibrate and allow it to keep going for another hour. That's akin to getting low on fuel, applying the brakes, storing the scrubbed kinetic energy, and then using it to start accelerating again. Even with 100% efficiency, you're no better than where you were before.

      Plus, if you're collecting energy from the phone's vibration, you're going to make it vibrate less. The value of the system is to collect energy from unwanted or wasted movement. The vibration of a cell phone is a desired use of energy.

  16. There are a lot of *unsatisfied* women out there.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... looks like we now have the techonology to build the 'perpetual motion vibrator' for them :)

    woo hoo!

  17. This has been around by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Everyone know vibrations create orgasmic energy

  18. Thermodynamics... by CommieLib · · Score: 1

    Good catch with "extended lifetimes". But consider that the only energy that can be recaptured is the energy expended ringing the phone, and only that portion that doesn't need to connect with the user's ear. Probably not significant, unfortunately.

    Car engines. Enough said.

    --
    If your bitterest enemies are people who hack the heads off civilians, then I would say you're doing something right.
  19. you wont get out by m1chael · · Score: 0

    what you put in so you still need to feed it extra power. i wonder the details as i havent bothered to read the article.

    --
    I know you are psychotic, but please make an effort.
  20. Thermodynamics by Psion · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Any energy captured from a vibration recovery system will unavoidably be less than the energy required to make the mechanism vibrate. Now capture of energy from externally generated vibrations would be useful...recharge your phone by placing it on top of a tower with a noisy fan.

    1. Re:Thermodynamics by agentkhaki · · Score: 2, Insightful

      That gets me thinking - I remember reading about some sort of mouse-pad looking thing that was supposed to recharge all of your partable devices when you placed them on it, eliminating the need for all those different chargers.

      Seems you could use the same theory, have the pad vibrate ever so slightly, and capture that energy (much in the way the kinetic wrist-watches mentioned elsewhere do) to charge the devices.

      Then again, maybe it would just vibrate everything onto the floor.

      --
      Ack!
    2. Re:Thermodynamics by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 1

      Well, apparently Hemos and JN didn't get too far in their science classes.

      I can imagine that this system can be used to adapt motion, such as recharging when attached to someone's body. The thing is, that concept is not new as there have long been watches that use body movement to rewind itself, and even some in recent times that derive electrical energy from that body motion. I don't know how much energy a decent cell phone takes though, my phone seems to easily operate for as much as a week on a charge. I really don't see this system or any like it worth the hassle and expense of designing into products unless they can practically eliminate the need for charging.

    3. Re:Thermodynamics by Fishstick · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I'm not sure where the submitter came up with that example, certainly not from the article.

      My first thought was tapping into energy that is a by-product of something else very large. The vibrations from a ringing phone isn't a very good application for this as the phone does this on purpose to get your attention - the energy is short-lived and infrequent compared to any potential use (recarging the battery).

      A huge motor somewhere spinning away generates continuous vibrations in the course of its main function (converting electricity into motion). The idea here is to capture small amounts of energy to power small defives where it may otherwise be impractical to run wires or have to change a battery:

      The Navy, Kevin says, wants to use this technology with wireless sensors, which are expensive -- or just plain difficult -- to power. For instance, adding a sensor to a pump in a nuclear reactor means you have to either run an electrical cable into the reactor (expensive) or send a technician in to replace the battery from time to time (very dangerous).

      Interesting story -- misleading summary by the submitter.

      --

      There is much cruelty in the universe, John.
      Yeah, we seem to have the tour map.

    4. Re:Thermodynamics by praedor · · Score: 1

      Harness it for electric/hybrid cars. They already harness the energy of braking, so add a vibration harnessing mechanism too.


      But then again, if this became widely available, counties/states could use it as an excuse NOT to fix potholes and cracks in the roads and highways. Doing so would reduce the energy-efficiency of cars.


      We could go back to cobblestones and brick roads. Retro-classic, esthetically pleasing roads with energy production for cars as a side effect.

      --
      In Bushworld, they struggle to keep church and state separate in Iraq as they increasingly merge the two in America.
    5. Re:Thermodynamics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      RTFA; sensors

    6. Re:Thermodynamics by Unkle · · Score: 1

      For that matter, just have something that vibrates already (like most PCs). Place your phone/PDA on your PC, and the energy lost to vibration in your PC (from fans, hard disks, CDROM, etc) charges your small devices. The only question would be if the vibration creates a significant amount of energy to charge your phone in a reasonable amount of time.

      --
      Against stupidity, the gods themselves contend in vain.
    7. Re:Thermodynamics by ralico · · Score: 1

      Even giving that, if the energy reclamation mechanism was hooked up to phone microphones, then we would have an almost limitless energy supplied by teenagers!

      --

      SCO to Hell
    8. Re:Thermodynamics by juhaz · · Score: 1

      Read the parent post again.

      Energy harnessed will ALWAYS be lesser than energy required to make the thing vibrate in the first place.

      Potholes and cracks do not, by merely existing, make a car vibrate, vibrations come from a fact that the car must spend energy to overdo them, and as neither mechanism is 100% efficient, energy gathered from vibrations is lesser than energy lost in them, smooth road is always more energy efficient with or without vibration harnessing mechanisms in cars.

    9. Re:Thermodynamics by praedor · · Score: 1

      What the fu..?? It doesn't HAVE to be 100% efficient. It doesn't HAVE to recover all the energy. Only a fraction is good enough. Does tapping the power of braking come off as 100% efficient? No. It HELPS. You tap this source and that source and in the end, you need less plugin power OR in a hybrid you can get by with a smaller engine/generator because it doesn't have to carry quite the same electrical load to replenish the batteries.


      Sheesh. Infernal combustion engines are FAR from efficient, yet we still find them useful. Solar power is FAR from 100% efficient, yet it is still useful. It is even useful if you only use a small panel or two to reduce your dependency on the grid by a fraction of a percent.


      Efficiency needing to be 100%, or close to it, is NOT a reason to reject anything that doesn't reach that unobtainable goal. Every little bit helps.

      --
      In Bushworld, they struggle to keep church and state separate in Iraq as they increasingly merge the two in America.
    10. Re:Thermodynamics by juhaz · · Score: 1

      Doh. I know all that.

      I was talking about the inherently STUPID "fixing potholes will cause energy efficiency of cars to decrease" -part.

      If moving over a meter of cracked road requires 10 kN energy to overcome and half of that is converted to vibrations that this technology can recover let's say, 50% of (total of 7500 N spent), versus scenario where traversing same amount of good road would take only 5 kN, then it's blazingly obvious that fixing the roads will INCREASE energy efficiency of cars with or without vibration recovery tech.

      Example overly simplified and units totally invented but it should get the point across.

    11. Re:Thermodynamics by praedor · · Score: 1

      Yeah, it is STUPID (potholes) but I was referring to politicians trying to avoid spending money fixing/maintaining something they are supposed to fix/maintain (roads). I was merely producing an excuse a politician might use to try to avoid doing something, while at the same time using it as an excuse to cut taxes some more because "we no longer need that service".

      --
      In Bushworld, they struggle to keep church and state separate in Iraq as they increasingly merge the two in America.
  21. Perpetual motion machine? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    If you recover energy from a vibrating cellphone, it will damp the vibration. Assuming that the vibration recovery method is not 100% efficent, you would have been better off just vibrating the phone that much less ans saving the battery for other things.

    Unless of course it has MORE than 100% efficiency, in which case our energy problems as a nation are solved!

  22. Not perpetual motion by Plastik · · Score: 5, Interesting

    This is a way to power small, low-power devices parasitically from the vibrations of a much larger engine. Actually very interesting.

    1. Re:Not perpetual motion by jafiwam · · Score: 1

      Yeah. I would think that practical efficiency of the device will make a large machine to application ratio necessary. For example, imagine a row of low power LED lights that might be mounted on the side of a fraight train (for safety) and a box at one end with the vibration using device attached inside. The train will get vibrations dampened ever so slightly and the car gets free lighting during movement due to vibrations on the track. Add a little battery and it would not need to be moving for the lighting.

      Similar things could be used on a bicycle on a smaller scale for a rear light...

      If they can make these things cheap enough, I bet all sorts of uses for them can be found.

    2. Re:Not perpetual motion by budgenator · · Score: 1

      actualy I've read about placing vanes in the exhaust pipe of engines to recover waisted acoustic energy (exhaust noise) to add to the elctrical system and charge the battery while mufffling the sound. I expect that the cost to benefit ratio is pretty low because it was long enough ago that we'd see it being used if it had any efficency.

      --
      Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
    3. Re:Not perpetual motion by Plastik · · Score: 1

      It's called a turbocharger. :) Well, that's not exactly what you described, but it's close.

  23. We obey the laws of thermodynamics in this house!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The battery is expending the energy to make the phone vibrate/ring. It may be possible to harness SOME of the energy from the vibrate/ring but enough to keep the battery fully charged.

  24. Thermodynamics not withstanding ... by joab_son_of_zeruiah · · Score: 1
    imagine the ultimate cellphone - one that charges the battery every time it rings/vibrates

    I love perpetual motion machines.

  25. No energy gain by bballad · · Score: 1

    I have a feeling that more energy is used in makeing the phone viberate, and turneing that vibration into electricity then would be generated. By doing this you would lose battery life.

  26. Damping, and Entropy by blair1q · · Score: 1

    This should be an excellent way to damp noise from vibrating machinery, but you need somewhere to dump the electricity, e.g. a light bulb. So "loud" would become "bright".

    P.S. You can't recharge the battery fully from a vibrating phone, because some of the vibration has to exit the phone to tell you it's ringing, and because of the 2d law of Thermodynamics and the fact that it's your battery that's causing the vibration in the first place.

    1. Re:Damping, and Entropy by Hormonal · · Score: 1
      ...So "loud" would become "bright".

      That sentence reminds me of a coworker of mine, and his choices of attire. I actually once asked him to turn down his shirt so I could hear what he was saying.

      All I got was *blink* *blink*, and he was back at full speed. What a waste.

    2. Re:Damping, and Entropy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He was probably blinded by your complete lack of humor.

  27. TANSTAAFL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You can't get something for nothing. You might be able to recover some of the energy spent vibrating something like a pager or cell phone, but the battery's draining either way. You're not going to get back as much as you put in.
    Now, if you can get your phone to generate power when you shiver, now you're talking! You, the biological engine, supply the input!

    1. Re:TANSTAAFL by DrinkDr.Pepper · · Score: 2, Informative

      Kinetic powered watches already exist. They have a pendulum that winds by you moving. Probably wouldn't work too well with keyboard/desk bound programmers.

      --
      0xfeedface
    2. Re:TANSTAAFL by pi_rules · · Score: 1
      Kinetic powered watches already exist. They have a pendulum that winds by you moving. Probably wouldn't work too well with keyboard/desk bound programmers.


      I've always wondered how much energy I loose to my keyboard every week actually. I grew up on the old IBM Model-M keyboards with the heavy duty springs, so I tend to type rather hard. I've actually had people think I was hitting something just from my prissy little Dell QuietKey keyboard bouncing up and down on the desk as I hack away at something.

      So, if we took the pressure required to do a keypress on a Model-M, add 25% to that for good measure (gotta make sure that key is down) then sustract the pressure required for a new QuietKey keyboard, multiply that by 115,200 times in a day (4 hours at 80wpm, 5 chars per word and one space/return after it)... what would we get? Probably nothing useful, but it could perhaps power a tiny little fan on my monitor just for the geek factor. Maybe re-charge a couple sets of AA batteries over a week?
    3. Re:TANSTAAFL by DrinkDr.Pepper · · Score: 1

      lol

      You would never need to replace the batteries in a cordless keyboard again. Recharge them by typing!

      Same goes for cordless mice! Recharge by scrolling!

      --
      0xfeedface
  28. I am no scientist... by DrWhizBang · · Score: 2, Interesting

    but even I can figure out that cell phones are _not_ an application for this technology. This is talking about machines that vibrate anyways, and using the vibration as a means of reclaiming some of the energy expended throught the vibration. Cell/pager vibration will always require more energy to vibrate than they can reclaim unless the efficiency of this mechanism is greater than 100% (and unless my understanding of high school physics is wrong that is not possible.)

    Can people read and understand articles before posting once in a while? Pretty please?

    --
    Schrodinger's cat is either dead or really pissed off...
    1. Re:I am no scientist... by B3ryllium · · Score: 1
      Yeah ... this sounds like a perfect technology to put in a car with a misfiring cylinder. Wee, "good" vibrations!

      Can people read and understand articles before posting once in a while? Pretty please?

      Need I remind you that this is *SLASHDOT*?
    2. Re:I am no scientist... by DrWhizBang · · Score: 1

      Can people read and understand articles before posting once in a while? Pretty please?

      Need I remind you that this is *SLASHDOT*?

      touche.

      --
      Schrodinger's cat is either dead or really pissed off...
  29. very funny by joss · · Score: 4, Funny

    > one that charges the battery every time it rings/vibrates

    I sure hope you are just making a joke. If you're not being deliberately stupid, I impressed by your natural talent.

    Anything that obtains energy from vibrations or sound is going to dampen those vibrations or muffle the sound [same thing really]. If phones can save energy like this, maybe you can levitate by pulling your own hair up. In fact, I recommend you try this.

    --
    http://rareformnewmedia.com/
    1. Re:very funny by throbbingbrain.com · · Score: 1

      The idea *will* go into production once the marketing department hears about it.

      Don't you read Dilbert?

  30. Pamela! by biz0r · · Score: 0

    The solution to the world energy crisis! Just slap one of these babies on Pamela Anderson, it would work, really.

    --
    /* sig */
  31. Conservation of energy by Da+Fokka · · Score: 3, Informative

    If vibration is used to gain energy from it, the vibration will be damped accordingly following the law of conservation of energy.
    A phone charging when it vibrates is therefore pointless.
    Nevertheless this invention could have a host of useful appliances.

    1. Re:Conservation of energy by biz0r · · Score: 0

      It could be used to help keep a charge on a device, thus causing the device to last longer. No one said it would keep your phone charged indefinitely. I personally, am all for it. My cell phone gets the crappiest standby time with its color screen.

      --
      /* sig */
    2. Re:Conservation of energy by Jace+of+Fuse! · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You are missing the point. If you are going to vibrate the phone, you use stored energy. If you want to "Capture" some of that vibration and turn it back into energy, then you DAPEND that energy, thus meaning that 1> Some of the Energy you used to vibrate the phone is lost and 2> some of the vibration is lost, and 3> some of the energy is lost again trying to store the vibration.

      So, if you want to make you vibrating phone last longer, spend less energy making vibrations. The gains from this are far greater than any attempt (no matter how you do it) to recapture the energy.

      As another poster said, one useful application would be making the phone capable of charging itself if placed on an external source of energy (such as some loud or vibrating surface).

      --

      "Everything you know is wrong. (And stupid.)"

      Moderation Totals: Wrong=2, Stupid=3, Total=5.
    3. Re:Conservation of energy by Fapestniegd · · Score: 2, Funny

      It would help keep the device charged. Because to capture the energy, the vibrations would be dampened such that the phone *wouldn't* vibrate and then you wouldn't answer it. And as everyone knows, If you don't use the phone, The battery won't run down as fast. Of course, it would cease to be useful as a phone. But that's usually what you get when you try to get something for nothing.

    4. Re:Conservation of energy by schon · · Score: 1

      it would cease to be useful as a phone.

      No, you just have to pick it up every few minutes to see if someone's calling you!

      (insert joke about interrupts/polling here :o)

    5. Re:Conservation of energy by Fishstick · · Score: 1

      >Nevertheless this invention could have a host of useful appliances.

      Yeah, like the ones actually mentioned in the article. ;-)

      The cellphone thing is not mentioned in the story at all and is almost certainly not an intended application of this technology.

      The article does talk about things like wireless sensors deep inside a nuclear submarine charging themselves off the vibrations of a nearby pump. You don't have to run wires to the sensor or use batteries that someone has to replace.

      --

      There is much cruelty in the universe, John.
      Yeah, we seem to have the tour map.

    6. Re:Conservation of energy by budgenator · · Score: 1

      If you added a coil to absorb the RF from the transmitter, rectified it you could use that to charge the battery too! after all any RF that's not going to the tower is being wasted so recovering any energy going to the ground or sky and any direction other than straight at the tower is just recycling waste.

      Seriously you probably could actualy get some net gain by just setting the above on top of the computer monitor if your phone was just idling and not being talked on.

      --
      Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
  32. Ever heard of conversation of energy? by Jack+Porter · · Score: 3, Informative

    Where do you think the energy to make the phone vibrate comes from?

    Getting energy from the vibrations from the environment around a device is a great idea, but the submitter is on crack about getting more cell phone battery life.

    Any extra juice you got would reduce the amount of virbation aparent to the user, so you'd have to spend at least that amount of energy extra to still have a working virate feature. You could have even longer talk time by not vibrating at all.

    1. Re:Ever heard of conversation of energy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm due for an energetic conversation with my boss in about an hour...

  33. Perpetual Motion by RockyMountain · · Score: 1

    I'm sure (well, I hope anyway) JN had his tongue in his cheek when he proposed a perpetual motion application for this technology.

    Remember, they're not just the "good ideas" of thermodynamics, they're the law.

  34. We will still use those double As... by Blaine+Hilton · · Score: 1
    This type of technology could have some interesting applications. What I see though is having this thing take a lot of the "dirty work" away from regular workers. If devices such as electric meters could power themselves they could power a transmitter/cell phone device that can eliminate the need for meter readers to physically come out to each meter and record the readings. Also many places where people would prefer not to go, such as sewers and duct systems.

    However I do not see this as replacing the AA battery any time soon.

    Go calculate something

    1. Re:We will still use those double As... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Electric meters? That is as moronic an application as self-recharging perpetual cell phones.

      It would be much more simple to tap a small amount of power from the line-side of the meter socket to drive some sort of cellular modem which connects to the electric company. The customer would not be paying for the electricity to run the phone, and it would use a ridiculously small amount of average current if it recharged all month and made a 20 second phone call 12 times a year.

      You could probably wrap a turn of wire around one of the input cables, use one diode and a capacitor, and you would draw on average *femtoamps* of power.

      DJ

    2. Re:We will still use those double As... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      What about tampering?



      I would think that a meter-reader checks for evidence of meter/device tampering in addition to simply reading the usage.

    3. Re:We will still use those double As... by budgenator · · Score: 1

      gas meter maybe, but kind of reduntant for an electric meter. They'd still have to communicate with the central office so you'd have to run a communications line, but concidering the cost of labor for meter readers it would probaby be worth it in the long run.
      I Don't think it's much more expensive to run a fiber as compared to a copper pair so why not run a fiber instead. Of course you'd have a lot of excess bandwidth so why not let the cable tv provider, piggyback with the gas and electric company? and of course the copper line to the telephone would be kind of silly with all of that bandwidth available, as would a DSL/Cable modem line when we all get a gigabit to the door! At that point who'd compalin about giving a little dab of electricity to the gas meter

      --
      Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
    4. Re:We will still use those double As... by Blaine+Hilton · · Score: 1
      Interesting points!

      After thinking of it some more it seems the most feasible option would be to connect to the standard POTS line such as a Tivo unit does.

    5. Re:We will still use those double As... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They already do this for electricity in (some parts of) Connecticut. It seems to be a short range RFID-style system; the meter reader pulls along the road/up the driveway, but doesn't have to hop out of his truck except for the occasional fraud check (confirming the wireless and electromechanical readings match up).

      Interestingly, they conducted the retrofit by replacing the entire electromechanical assemblies with... new electromechanical assemblies, the only major difference being holes drilled in the 'spinny thing' for a photointerrupter to read- and somewhat oddly again, it's a radial pattern of holes, rather than a single index one. The radio electronics themselves just sit in the front of the glass bubble, and look like they could've easily been retrofitted to existing hardware.

      Makes me wonder what they did with all the old meters- that's a lot of glass and metal, and they were working fine, so one would hope my town was one of the first to be upgraded, and the recovered meters could then be refitted for other towns. It doesn't make much sense, though, as a single index hole would mean one second of work with a drill, while a radial arrangement would require total disassembly of the mechanics. I'm surprised they didn't use the 'glue-on' reed switch? tech you often see on the bottom flywheels of floppy drives; maybe the way they went is supposed to be more tamper-resistant.

  35. On a vibrating cell phone would that not by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    suck up all the energy so you would not feel
    the vibrations?

    I drop mine all the time. It would be better to
    absorb the energy of impact on the concrete floor.

  36. Bridge for ya... by T3kno · · Score: 1

    I'm pretty sure that it would take infinitely more energy to do the vibrate() call than you would generate by the phone actually vibrating. The net effect would be an energy loss. Making the phone more effecient by collecting back some of the energy when the phone rings is a good idea, but just vibrating the phone every so often to create energy won't work.

    If you've heard that you can charge a phone by calling it's vibrate() function then I have a bridge and some ocean front property in Arizona to sell you.

    --
    (B) + (D) + (B) + (D) = (K) + (&)
  37. A Watch by deanj · · Score: 1

    They've been able to do this with watches for years. I had a Seiko when I was a kid that did this.

    I would think that it would take a heckuva lot of moving around to charge a cellphone, but I would imagine that there are other parts of a phone that could take that energy and use it. Not everything would have to run off the battery you have now.

    1. Re:A Watch by ch-chuck · · Score: 2, Informative

      I was about to post this about 'self winding watches' but that would hardly be called 'vibrations'. Anyway, recovering energy, however miniscule, that would otherwise be waste heat is always good.

      --
      try { do() || do_not(); } catch (JediException err) { yoda(err); }
    2. Re:A Watch by kcelery · · Score: 1
      They've been able to do this with the stock market for years.

      Sending shock waves to the market and harnessing the ups and downs.


      My job is to destablize the market

  38. Wasted Energy by 3DKnight · · Score: 2, Funny

    No only if they could harness the wasted energy that sites writers use by making all the "high-tech" terms in their articles clickable to websearchs of the said terms to try and make it seem "cutting edge" internet reporting.

    1. Re:Wasted Energy by B3ryllium · · Score: 1

      Hypertext exists specifically for the use they've implemented it. While I'll admit that the terms they underlined were ... stupid ... at least they had the decency to try. Static pages with no links defeat the purpose of the World Wide Web, as they choose to disconnect themselves from it.

      THIS POST ISN'T DISCONWEBULATED

  39. Light of my life... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Aside from the obvious, imagine the ultimate cellphone - one that charges the battery every time it rings/vibrates, hence promising extended talktimes, and giving operators all the more reasons to get their customers to use their devices. How cool is that?

    Not as cool as my solar-powered flashlight! You just shine it on itself and it runs forever!

  40. Seriously though by dlakelan · · Score: 1

    The really great thing about this concept would be if you could charge your cell phone while driving in the car, carrying it around in your pocket, and soforth.

    There are seiko watches that do a similar thing (and there were mechanical watches that did it for years before quartz became the norm) but I am afraid it would be hard to extract enough power from these small movements to make much difference in a cell phone.

    --
    ((lambda (x) (x x)) (lambda (x) (x x))) http://www.endpointcomputing.com a scientific approach to custom computing.
  41. Perpetuum mobile by photonic · · Score: 1
    The possibilities are limitless. Aside from the obvious, imagine the ultimate cellphone - one that charges the battery every time it rings/vibrates, hence promising extended talktimes, and giving operators all the more reasons to get their customers to use their devices. How cool is that?
    Sure, hook the vibrating device of your cellphone (vibrator?) to the battery and have this new generator recharge the battery again. With the right settings you could have infinite power supply!!
    --
    karma police: arrest this man, he talks in maths; he buzzes like a fridge, he's like a detuned radio. [radiohead]
  42. I am not a physicist, but... by nicholasharbour · · Score: 2, Insightful

    If you harnessed (sp?) the energy from the vibrating cell phone, wouldent it cease to vibrate, and thus be quite lame? The original article is ok, but this poster hasn't really thought this stuff through. Nick Harbour

    --

    Nearly half of all people are below average
    1. Re:I am not a physicist, but... by Bill,+Shooter+of+Bul · · Score: 1

      I am a physicist. You are correct sir. it would be quite lame.

      --
      Well.. maybe. Or Maybe not. But Definitely not sort of.
  43. Don't be silly. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The poster's assumption that the battery can be recharged by making it vibrate itself is completely silly. Making the phone vibrate uses energy. No matter how efficient the "energy from vibrations" system is - you will never manage to regain more energy than you've making the phone vibrate in the first place.

    You can't create energy from thin air. Quit humping the perpetual motion / free energy fantasy - it's quack science. And to think that people subscribe to this site to see articles like this one?

    Aside from being critical of the poster, it's an interesting technology. It recalls the days of "self-winding" mechanical watches that used the body's motion to stay keep wound up. I can already think of one possible killer application of this new idea - remote controls that don't need batteries.

  44. Watches by derfel · · Score: 1

    I've always thought this is a pretty cool feature of some watches. The perpetual rotor in a Rolex seems like about the same thing. It would be nice if the same concept could be used to create electrical energy for a mobile phone/pda or other computing device.

  45. Wowsers!! by El_Smack · · Score: 0

    If this is true, the girls dorm at (insert university here) could power the whole campus!

    --


    There are 01 kinds of cars in the world. The General Lee, and everything else.
  46. no good for phones by forgetmenot · · Score: 1

    No. No. No. While it's sensible that the technology could recharge a submarines batteries (for example) by harnessing engine vibration, both the engine and ultimately the battery are still getting their fuel from diesel, exploding atoms, or whatever.

    You could not effectively use a vibrating phone's vibrations to charge itself. If you could, you would have a perpetual motion machine which is impossible. No explanation necessary. If you don't understand why, then go back to your physics 101 notes.

    However, it IS feasible that the vibrations from the human body could be harnessed to power gadgets hanging off of said body. In fact, this is nothing really new here. There are wristwatches, for instance, that use the body's minute vibrations to drive their time-keeping mechanisms.

    1. Re:no good for phones by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Submarines, at least in the US, are nuclear powered. There's probably not much vibration coming off those.

  47. cold fusion by lesburn1 · · Score: 1, Funny

    now if I could hook up my Utah Cold Fusion Battery
    I could sell back power to the power Co. every night when I plug in my c-phone.

  48. Laws of Physics by chhamilton · · Score: 2, Informative

    I'm pretty sure that a call to vibrate() every few minutes will do nothing but drain the battery quicker. Obviously, the conversion from vibration back to stored electricity can't be 100% efficient, so vibrating the phone will always cause a net loss.

    As somebody else mentioned, would this be able to harness motion of the phone? Most people lug their cell phones around in a pocket/bag/purse, and they go through a lot of motion in your average day. Given that this technology is purpose-built to extract energy from engine vibrations (thousands of RPMs) it seems unlikely that it could efficiently harness day-to-day jarring of a cell phone. Perhaps a mechanism like that found in self-winding watches (a simple unbalanced wheel and some gearing) might be better suited to the task... anybody know if this would be practical, or if it has been done before?

  49. More useful idea for a cell phone by roman_mir · · Score: 1

    would be a winding mechanism and possibly a self winding mechanism. Self winding could really be excellent source of alternative energy for such things as cell phones and PDAs, but they would not provide enough energy if the item lies there motionless for a long time.

  50. Well, that depends... by metlin · · Score: 3, Funny

    Do I see 3G applications with a vibrate() call mandatory every couple minutes?

    And I thought there was just *one* of them G thingys that needed vibration.

    And now its gonna be mandatory?! Every 2 mins?

    ahem ;-)

    1. Re:Well, that depends... by unicron · · Score: 2, Funny

      Heh-heh, and you thought you had trouble finding your phone...

      --
      Finally, math books without any of that base 6 crap in them.
    2. Re:Well, that depends... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'll bet you think Carmen's a total hottie, don't you? Perv.

  51. Finally! by Spackler · · Score: 4, Funny

    This is one slashdot story I'll need to read at -1, just for the vibrator trolls

  52. Inept article selection, again by Animats · · Score: 3, Informative
    How did this get past the Slashdot editors? Or did they put the random number program in charge of story selection again?

    The actual invention is interesting, but only marginally useful. The idea is to power various low-power sensors using airflow or duct vibration in HVAC systems. This makes possible wireless sensors in some specialized applications. There might be applications in medical devices. But it's not a general purpose energy source.

    1. Re:Inept article selection, again by citog · · Score: 1


      I read the article and I don't see any suggestion on the part of the inventors that they have produced a 'general purpose energy source'.
      </sarcasm>
      You have incorrectly attributed trivial value to this invention because you simply don't understand the significance or broad applications of such wireless devices. Just because you do not understand does not mean the article selection is inept!

    2. Re:Inept article selection, again by R.Caley · · Score: 1
      But it's not a general purpose energy source.

      How does `general purpose' engergy differ from plain old vanilla engergy? Does each electron come stamped with a special legal release authorising it's use for any purpose?

      I'm woried now in case I have been using restriucted purpose energy to run my computers and can expect a visit by th heavies of the electricity company!

      --
      _O_
      .|<
      The named which can be named is not the true named
  53. To all naysayers by A+nonymous+Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The vibration of a cell phone is not wasted. It is intentional. To pick up energy from the vibration would be to damp it, then you'd have to vibrate more to get the same alerting effect.

    Even if you could get power from the vibration, it would mean that the vibration (which is intentionally selected) is unwanted, or that you would have to crank up the power going into the vibration to compensate.

    This supposed energy collector is meant to pick up wasted, unwanted vibrations from engines, ventilation ducts, etc. Not from intentional vibrations.

    1. Re:To all naysayers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      so does that mean it could give me back some of that energy i wasted trying to pleasure women?

    2. Re:To all naysayers by SouperDouper · · Score: 1

      Only if you use a vibrator to pleasure women...

    3. Re:To all naysayers by fishybell · · Score: 1
      Not only that but the idea of "a vibrate() call mandatory every couple minutes" would result in loss of battery life rather quickly. You don't get free energy here. You'd need 100% effeciency (impossible) to not lose energy. You'd need more than 100% effeciency (even more impossible) to gain energy by using the phones vibrator.

      The poster needs to go back to Junior High and relearn basic physics.

      --
      ><));>
    4. Re:To all naysayers by iraqiinfominister · · Score: 1

      (even more impossible)
      Dude, that's funny. No, I'm not dissing you, I just thought that was snort-out-loud funny. Impossibler. Mostest Impossiblest. I already use un-possible in conversation. I'll have to see about working this one in sometime.
      --

      --
      "They do not even have control over themselves! Do not believe them!" This is my response to all posts here!
  54. Keep on BUZZING by djblair · · Score: 1

    Imagine this technology in the adult toy indusrty. Doc Johnson introduces the "Perpetual Viberator!!" It's a fantastic investment opprotunity!!

  55. Goddamn, what shit... by Henry+V+.009 · · Score: 1

    I will now attempt to give some of the lesser intelligences on slashdot (ie. the editors) a clue.

    You CAN get energy from harnessing vibrations. That dampens the vibrations. Therefore, if you wanted to use the vibration from a pager or cell phone to charge the battery, you would have to use even more power from the battery to make it vibrate at normal levels. The energy you would get from dampening the vibration would not be enough to make up from the energy you would have to use to make up for the dampening. The only use of the idea presented by JN (and vetted by Hemos) would be to send it to Congress and hope for some Congressmen to include a million dollars of new perpetual motion research in the next farm appropriations bill.

    On the other hand, large motors and such do generate large amounts of vibration (and heat) as a necessary byproduct. There is nothing fundamentally impossible with harnessing this. It is almost certainly completely impractical, so you may just want to hook up an electrical generator to the swirlee-wheel on your hat instead.

  56. good vibrations by poot_rootbeer · · Score: 4, Funny


    I dunno about this -- my girlfriend seems to have no energy whatsoever left after I apply vibrations to her for 10-15 minutes straight...

    1. Re:good vibrations by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of course not. Why would an inflatable doll vibrate on its own?

    2. Re:good vibrations by DASHSL0T · · Score: 4, Funny

      I dunno about this -- my girlfriend seems to have no energy whatsoever left after I apply vibrations to her for 10-15 minutes straight... That's odd, she usually tuckers out at the 8 minute mark for the rest of us.

      --
      Freedom Is Universal
      Linux-Universe
    3. Re:good vibrations by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mod parent up! +1 FUNNY!

    4. Re:good vibrations by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You need to run her with the AC adapter.

    5. Re:good vibrations by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mod parent up! +1 RETARDED

    6. Re:good vibrations by mblase · · Score: 1

      I dunno about this -- my girlfriend seems to have no energy whatsoever left after I apply vibrations to her for 10-15 minutes straight...

      I can understand your confusion. My suggestion, then, is to throw the vibrator away and do the job yourself next time. She'll have more energy and you won't have to go to sleep quite so frustrated.

    7. Re:good vibrations by poot_rootbeer · · Score: 2, Funny

      I can understand your confusion. My suggestion, then, is to throw the vibrator away and do the job yourself next time. She'll have more energy and you won't have to go to sleep quite so frustrated.

      I thought Slashdotters were supposed to EMBRACE technologies that make our lives easier...?

    8. Re:good vibrations by Magius_AR · · Score: 1
      I dunno about this -- my girlfriend seems to have no energy whatsoever left after I apply vibrations to her for 10-15 minutes straight...

      A statement based on a false premise...that a Slashdotter could actually have a girlfriend. Nice try troll!

  57. self recharging key fob by LuxFX · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I had an idea kind of like this a while back, when I had to replace the little watch battery in the key fob for my car (the little remote-control that unlocks my doors). So instead of having to replace this battery, I thought it would be a good idea to make it a small rechargable battery. It would utilize the kinetic vibrations of the car, which would be transfered into electricity. Or to be more precise, inside the keyfob would be a tiny magnet on the end of a tiny spring. The vibrations would cause the spring to wave the magnet around, and the moving electromagnetic field would be transferred into electricity.

    This would be especially efficient for the keyfobs that are part of the key structure themselves, so that they are directly connected to the steering column (as opposed to the ones that are simple part of the keychain and just dangle under the steering column)

    And it's not like I'm claiming originality on this -- I got the idea from a tiny cell phone a friend brought back from Japan. It had no connectors on it to recharge the battery, but the recharger base would vibrate when the phone was set on it, and passed the electicity via electromagnetic fields.

    --
    Punctanym: alternate spelling of words using punctuation or numerals in place of some or all of its letters; see 'leet'
    1. Re:self recharging key fob by platypus · · Score: 1

      This would be especially efficient for the keyfobs that are part of the key structure themselves, so that they are directly connected to the steering column (as opposed to the ones that are simple part of the keychain and just dangle under the steering column)

      Or you could just recharge the rechargeble battery through the contact at the key when it's plugged in?
      Actually, that is how it is done.

    2. Re:self recharging key fob by alange+lurk · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I suspect that the "vibration" of the phone/base was a side effect ot the recharging process, rather than the actual manner of recharging. "Inductive" chargers (and connections) already exist and are widely used - my Braun electric toothbrush has one; many electric vehicles have them (don't want exposed 220V contacts that might hurt people). These work on the same principles as transformers that get power from one wire to another even though there is no direct flow of electrons.

    3. Re:self recharging key fob by LuxFX · · Score: 1

      unfortunately I don't know any more specifics on the phone -- it was the owner that told me of the vibrations, so I don't have first hand experience on the matter. But I've got a Philips Sonicare toothbrush myself that has the same thing you're talking about with your Braun, so I know exactly what you mean there. I wasn't aware that it was the same principle as a transformer though (that was the section in physics class where my mind really started to wonder!)

      --
      Punctanym: alternate spelling of words using punctuation or numerals in place of some or all of its letters; see 'leet'
    4. Re:self recharging key fob by budgenator · · Score: 1

      Hey moderators, if only 3 people actualy post on topic like this guy, are they realy offtopic becuase everybody else in the thread is post stupid shit on purpose and he isn't?

      --
      Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
    5. Re:self recharging key fob by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or the fob could be recharged from the car's electrical system, just like the dozend of vehicles that have the remote entry built into the key.

  58. BEST TROLL EVER by Elwood+P+Dowd · · Score: 4, Funny

    Please. Everyone should make basic errors in logical reasoning in their submissions, that way, we'll never talk about anything else. Slashdot will be ruined. My evil plans will come to fruition! Ah ha ha ha ha HA HA HA!

    --

    There are no trails. There are no trees out here.
    1. Re:BEST TROLL EVER by Drakonian · · Score: 2, Funny
      Haha. I wonder what Hemos was thinking when he posted this. Either:

      Wow neato! This will revolutionize the world. Our cell phones can power everything in life by just vibrating more.

      or...

      Oh man, this JN character is gonna get it. Let the flames commence!

      or...

      The inevitable vibrator jokes are too good to pass up. I must post it.

      --
      Random is the New Order.
  59. Recharge by vibrate? by tokki · · Score: 1

    If you reclaimed all the energy it took to vibrate a cell phone, it wouldn't vibrate. That's like an electric motor reclaiming it's power by running it through a generator.

    1. Re:Recharge by vibrate? by schon · · Score: 1

      That's like an electric motor reclaiming it's power by running it through a generator.

      I actually tried to build one of those when I was 8... I was pretty disappointed when it didn't work.

      Amusingly enough though, my teacher couldn't explain why it didn't work..

      It was a couple of years before I found out about the laws of thermodynamics :o)

    2. Re:Recharge by vibrate? by odyrithm · · Score: 1

      the simple principle of energy transfer is enough to figure that out...

      --
      moo
  60. Heavy toys by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Every device that uses one of these energy
    absorbers will "seem" heavier, as the user's
    normal day-to-day vibration is captured as
    energy rather than being returned to the user
    in pendulum motion. The effect may not be very
    great, but it may be significant.

    Designers of portable gear spend a lot of
    effort designing weight and "bulk" (user-
    perceived weight) out of their systems these
    days.

  61. Reduce the vibrate mode of the phone by sabernar · · Score: 1

    If you just reduce the vibrate mode of the phone, you'll conserve power, then you'll be able to talk longer. Why bother trying to recover the vibration when you can just conserve power by REDUCING it in the first place?

  62. In other news .... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ppl are now buying 2 cellphones ... cell A rings up cell B, whose vibration causes energy which is again used by cell B to ring up cell A .. :P

  63. Energy from vibrations by supergiovane · · Score: 1

    Does it mean California has finally solved its power supply problems?

    --
    Signatures are for stupids.
    1. Re:Energy from vibrations by Robotz · · Score: 1

      Yes - The're just waiting for the 'big one'

  64. aw crap... by aarondsouza · · Score: 3, Funny
    I can just see the spam hitting my mailbox...


    12 inch vibrator! Save the environment while you pleasure yourself!

    --
    "In mathematics, it's not enough to read the words -- you have to hear the music"
  65. Many applications by Rinisari · · Score: 2, Funny

    Those squiggly pens could be perpetual motion generators!
    Pam and Tommy Lee could have powered the United States while they were together..
    The San Andreas Power Plant..
    The London Philharmonic Orchestral Power Plant..
    Unrepaired PowerMac G4's could power themselves :-)

  66. more important by ih8apple · · Score: 1

    More important than turning the minute vibrations of the device itself into energy would be to turn the vibrations of the wearer in motion into energy... Just like those little devices that measure calories burned or distance jogged based on the bouncing effect of the person running or walking.

    This is a good example of such a device.

    Turning the device's vibrations into energy is kind of stupid because you'll always run out of juice eventually...

  67. Uhh.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    one that charges the battery every time it rings/vibrates

    Can anyone say "perpetual motion machine" ??

  68. I am not going to comment on perpetual motion. . . by akvalentine · · Score: 1

    because about 30 people beat me to it.

    So just ignore this comment. . . Nothing to see here. . Move along. . .

  69. Yup, just toss in 3G and cellphone... by cybermace5 · · Score: 1

    ...and you get front page.

    But honestly, the best application of this is powering inaccessible sensors; in fact, reading the article would reveal just that use.

    You're not going to get a significant amount of power out of this, but enough to power a little wireless sensor embedded in a piece of machinery, which you could never possibly run wires to or replace the batteries.

    BETTER EXAMPLE: Simplified, low-cost tire pressure sensors.

    --
    ...
  70. Oh good.... by MoeMoe · · Score: 1

    Now men can enjoy the benefits of vibration too!

    Oh wait...

    --
    Business \Busi"ness\, n.;
    A scam in which all people involved perceive as beneficial...
  71. the 3g phone won't work by Archfeld · · Score: 1

    the laws of conservation are going to ensure you can't spend 10 calories vibrating to generate more than that, so taking advantage of the already operating equipment seems very feasible but generating new vibrations to power existing devices seems silly. The a mandatory vibrate() every 3 minutes probably is a power waster, while harvesting from the already vibrating ring could gain some energy back. I wonder if it could get so sensitive to derive energy from the rumbling of your HEART :)

    --
    errr....umm...*whooosh* *whoosh* Is this thing on ?
  72. Accoustic dampening and energy conversion: by Hungus · · Score: 1

    Everybody keeps harping on about thermodynamics, and transfer efficiency (ok i havent seen any harping about transfer efficiency but its related after all). It would be silly to use such a device to recharge a phone from its vibrations and more efficient just to turn down teh amplitude of said vibrations

    Now for a novel implementation:
    The harnessing of waste sound. There are many applications where waste sound id generated the first that come to mind are airports and rail stations.
    Using a vibration dampening evergy converter would do 2 things:

    Reduce noise polution

    Generate some small amount of energy

    Just my 2 yen

    --
    Bad Panda! No Bamboo for you! In matters of importance ACs will not be responded to. Want to say something critical,OK
  73. Endless Source of Energy by tsetem · · Score: 2, Funny

    Hate to reply to myself, but....

    What about hooking your sister/daughter/wife up with a phone that generates electricity when she's talking. That could really answer the worlds energy needs...

    At least pay for the phone calls themselves...

    "Hon, time to call your mother again, the lights are getting dim."

    1. Re:Endless Source of Energy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or, how about hooking your daughter up to a vibrator and generating electricity that way!

    2. Re:Endless Source of Energy by Tailhook · · Score: 1

      What about hooking your sister/daughter/wife up with a phone that generates electricity when she's talking. That could really answer the worlds energy needs...

      Another potential benefit here is that by converting the sound waves into energy you also reduce the amplitude.

      --
      Maw! Fire up the karma burner!
    3. Re:Endless Source of Energy by corsec67 · · Score: 1

      Oh, wow. you had better patent that, since I know that there is a large market out for something that would convert sound into energy, with a corresponding loss in amplitude of the sound.

      And, not just for the family of a teenage girl, how about on noisy machinery, or the neighbors of someone who likes to play their music too loud.

      --
      If I have nothing to hide, don't search me
  74. And next... by sleight · · Score: 1

    ... they'll be telling us that we don't need the airline industry anymore because of the newly invented Heisenburg Compensator.

  75. Unless... by nochops · · Score: 1

    ...and giving operators all the more reasons toget their customers to use their devices.

    Unless it prompts the annoying customers to let their phones ring and ring and ring and ring and ring....

    --
    "A terrorist is someone who has a bomb but doesn't have an air force." -William Blum
  76. Since we're talking about vibrations... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Maybe they could retrofit this technology to work with these.
    Not a goatse link

    1. Re:Since we're talking about vibrations... by Trolling4Dollars · · Score: 1

      Oh great... We'll be in the Matrix sooner than you think. But the machines won't be using our body heat for energy, they'll be using the vibrations from our bodies as we screw like crazed animals.

      Moderators: -1 Sleazy

  77. Interesting by Daimaou · · Score: 1

    So, if I understand this correctly, I can power my cell phone via surrounding vibrations. So there is a benefit to tossing on the small boss after all.

  78. Perpetual Motion Machines... by Cranx · · Score: 1

    ...are long since debunked, and a vibrating phone that recharges itself falls prey to the same principles. Any vibration you absorbed *could* be converted back into energy, but you would regain MUCH less energy than it took to generate the vibrations because you could only trap energy that was transmitted to certain points on the machine where you planned to transmit the vibration into your "generator." The more vibration you absorb, the less the phone owner would feel. Any amount of vibration you absorbed would be better converted into energy by simply reducing the amount that the phone vibrates and conserving the energy in the first place.

    Even with machines for which vibration is a side-effect, sure you could generate energy from the vibrations. However, vibration causes machines to waste energy as the vibrations are transmitted into all sorts of directions and objects nearby, and while converting the vibration back into energy is plausible, you would gain more energy if you simply braced the machine against vibration and prevented it in the first place.

    The only way generating energy from the vibration of a machine is the best idea is when the vibration CANNOT be reduced or eliminated. However, logic says that if you can absorb the vibration and convert it into energy, you can absorb the vibration and hold the machine steady, causing it to operate more efficiently.

    I'm sure there will be some instances where you cannot eliminate vibration and you stand to gain back a tiny fraction of the energy put into the vibration, but it won't come NEAR to the amounts needed to allow a vibrating cell-phone to recharge itself; that's ludicrous.

  79. Other Applications by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Maybe Norelco would love to get their blades on this! I could probably get my lawn cut with one of those cheap shavers for next to nothing!

  80. Okay cellphone-recharge-freaks. Listen up. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Morons.

    You would "charge" the phone more by REDUCING THE PERIOD OR AMPLITUDE OF THE RING/VIBRATION than the tiny amount of energy you would recover by the unbelievably inefficient vibration-recovery method.

    PLUS, any energy you recover would come out of--where?--THE ENERGY OF THE RING/VIBRATION. So you'd have to use MORE energy from the battery to get the ring/vibration to be as loud/hard as it was when you weren't sucking energy out!

    Morons.

    Jim

  81. Wider Applications...think big by Mr.Sharpy · · Score: 1

    The article doesn't say how efficient this device is or how much energy it can capture, but if it is able to generate very much at all...why limit it to use in small time devices. If these could be made be made to work on a large scale, just think of all the things that vibrate all the time. Bridges, for example, vibrate everytime you drive over them, they even vibrate when no one is on them because of the wind passing over their surfaces. Imagine turning the golden gate bridge into a huge wind generator.

    Powerlines, too, vibrate whenever wind blows. Imagine a self powering electric grid. Who needs wind farms? And if you do, just stretch some cables across a windy canyon and attach these vibration reclamation devices.

    If these things work very well at all, I think it would be shortsighted to limit their use to small scale applications.

  82. This is cool but... by duncf · · Score: 1

    While the technology mentioned in the article is quite cool, it has relatively no application for cell phones. It is ridiculous to think that these sensors could harness enough energy from a ringing cell phone to power it (not to mention the whole laws of thermodynamics problem).

    What the article is about is using power from vibrating pipes, engines or whatever, to power sensors or other things in places that simply can't be reached by wire, or where batteries are simply impractical. (This also implies that it is really expensive!)

    I think the technology presented in the article is similar in function but totally different from the technology used in kinetic watches. The technology in kinetic watches could be really cool if it could be applied to cell phones. A detailed explanation of how this works is available on page 2 of this PDF.

    Imagine cell phones powered as you move... That'd be cool. Cell phones powered when you attach them to vibrating pipes or engines? Not quite as cool -- unless you're a robot!

  83. Why oh why... by Gehenna_Gehenna · · Score: 1

    I can't help but let my imagination run wild with the though of a car that never runs out of fuel but has a *really* rough ride...

    --

  84. I hope that this technology works . . . by Eric+Damron · · Score: 1

    With the way my car rattles I could convert it to a hybrid gas/electrical vehicle and get about 1000 miles to the gallon!

    --
    The race isn't always to the swift... but that's the way to bet!
  85. sounds like you have a perpetual motion wet dream by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It would be more effecient for your phone to just vibrate less intensly than use a device like this to absorb some of the vibration and recharge the battery with the energy it collected. If anyone thinks you won't have to charge you cell phone as long as you hae your phone is on vibrate and you get enough calls should revisit their elemetry school physics class.
    A better application would be something where the vibration is an unwanted side effect....like road vibration in a car, build these things into shock absorbers and if the road is noisy enough you could swith off your alternator and improve the gas millage a bit.

  86. Porn: An Alternate, Renewable Resource by humpTdance · · Score: 1

    Entrepreneurial webcam actresses will finally give something back to the environment

  87. No free lunch by Tailhook · · Score: 2, Insightful

    While there are many potential applications for scavenging vibration, the specific example cited in the post is poor. If you scavenge the energy expended to make a phone vibrate it will, of course, no longer vibrate. Sort of self defeating.

    The trick is to identify sources of vibration that inherently useful. Could you, for instance, harness vibration from an internal combustion engine? If so, you would improve the entire system dramatically by eliminating the need for an alternator and reducing unwanted vibration with something more productive than pneumatics, hydraulics, rubber bumpers and foam.

    Vibration is a profoundly complex matter. People devote entire careers to understanding and mitigating vibration. I have an engine in my car that has two "balance shafts". One of these shafts spins at 2x the speed of the crankshaft. I believe this is because a 90 deg V6 is an inherently unbalanced design. Yet engineers go to extraordinary lengths to mitigate this because the net benefits of the complete package outweigh the cost of creating a lot of additional rotating mass.

    --
    Maw! Fire up the karma burner!
  88. Sensors in impossible to reach places? NO! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ok, so the poster forgot about conservation of energy with the phone, so what.
    What's really scary about this whole deal is that they want to use this technology to put MORE sensors in HARDER to reach places. Just what we need; more devices failing because a 3 cent sensor went bad, and it's impossible to replace.
    I don't think this technology is going to be generating significant amounts of power, but the potential of encouraging an increase in sensor use (more importantly BAD sensor use) makes my blood boil.
    Don't put more sensors in it, write a better control algorithim!

  89. This would be usefull in California... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The next time they have a big earthquake they could harvest enough energy to run the state for decades! Or perhaps they could make these mandatory for use in the p0rn industry, surely they could generate plenty of um, power, there. And having to add additional "energy" to compensate for what these devices are harvesting wouldn't be a big problem eh? Mmmm, thermodynamics!

  90. Car engine by ncoder · · Score: 2, Insightful
    No more need for an alternator!

    Now we can tap in a car engine's vibrations to recharge the battery...

    Make it more efficient, and it can dampen the vibrations enough to even replace the muffler!

  91. What I don't understand... by ArhcAngel · · Score: 1

    is why we do not see more of this. We have so many devices that completely waste energy. The combustion engine is one of the greatest wasters of energy but it's only recently someone came up with regenerative breaking err braking. The way I see it energy is never actually spent. Energy simply is changed from one form to another as it is used. The reason your CPU gets so hot is because wasted electrical energy is released as heat energy. If they could come up with a more efficient way to transfer heat energy to electrical energy other than a steam turbine then we would have an almost unlimited resource in the suns radiation. Thus far somewhat efficient solar cells are still dissapointing. As far as turning vibrations into energy, it just seems lie a no brainer to me...but I would like to see how they implemented it.

    --
    "A person is smart. People are dumb, panicky dangerous animals and you know it." - K
    1. Re:What I don't understand... by panurge · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Recently? Some Swiss railways have had regenerative braking for many years. Even had 3-phase overhead and track supply so that the energy could be fed straight back. Unfortunately you can't regenerative brake a pure combustion engine, unless you have a clever way of converting CO2 + water -> gas plus oxygen.

      --
      Panurge has posted for the last time. Thanks for the positive moderations.
    2. Re:What I don't understand... by budgenator · · Score: 1

      If they could come up with a more efficient way to transfer heat energy to electrical energy other than a steam turbine then we would have an almost unlimited resource in the suns radiation
      Turning heat into electricity isn't hard the thing is called a thermo-couple, doing it effiencently is more difficult. thermo-couple take two sets of two dis-simmular metal connected together place one set in a heat source and one set in a heat sink and electricty flows. hook it to a battery and you move heat, it's then called a peltier device. I don't know about effiency compared to a steam engine or a sterling engine, but i expect that the capital expense is greater with thermocouples than with steam or sterling engines.

      --
      Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
  92. Are you completely stupid? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    imagine the ultimate cellphone - one that charges the battery every time it rings/vibrates

    Are you completely stupid? This amounts to saying "imagine an electric car that charges its betteries every time it spins the wheels". If the enery is used to charge battery, then it's not being used to move the car. Likewise, any system that "stores" energy from vibrations cancels (or at least greatly reduces) those vibrations. In other words, a cell phone that charged its battery with its own vibrations wouldn't vibrate enough to be noticeable, defeating the whole point of vibrating in the first place.

    If you want to save the energy used in those vibrations, simply disable the vibrations. DUH!

    Can't believe that in Slashdot, and in the 21st century, some people still think you can get "free energy"... sigh...

    1. Re:Are you completely stupid? by schon · · Score: 2, Funny

      Can't believe that in Slashdot, and in the 21st century, some people still think you can get "free energy"... sigh...

      Hey, you can!

      Just run an extension cord over to your neighbor's house when he's sleeping :o)

    2. Re:Are you completely stupid? by pair-a-noyd · · Score: 1

      yes, that works.

      (:)-P

    3. Re:Are you completely stupid? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Till he comes over and punches you in the face... See, it's not really free after all.

    4. Re:Are you completely stupid? by pair-a-noyd · · Score: 1

      A punch in the face is the new currency?
      Ok, so you do pay after all..

  93. Awww Man by StrandedOrg · · Score: 1

    As if I didn't feel inferior to my girlfriends "toys" before...this is gonna be bad.

  94. Application in submarines by FreshMeat-BWG · · Score: 2, Interesting

    So the Navy initially funded this research? Hmmm... So the tiny vibrations normally transmitted through the hull of the submarine as noise now gets converted into electrical energy with a by-product of dampening the vibrations? Very interesting. Not that they need the energy on a nuclear sub, but they definitely don't need the vibrations causing noise.

    1. Re:Application in submarines by Bahumat · · Score: 1

      Handy for powering limpet-radio beacons for stealthily tracking other subs.

      --
      "To pass through the jungle; silence, courtesy, ferocity, as the occasion demands." -- Kamau, "Proper Passage"
  95. Seismic power.... by supabeast! · · Score: 1

    How about giant seismic vibration grabbing machines built around fault lines? They might not be efficient, but they would be cool!

  96. Gas-Electric Automobiles by humpTdance · · Score: 1

    I could see this technology being useful for future Gas-Electric automobiles.

    Then again, I could put a windmill on top of my car and foot-peddle my way to work like Fred Flinstone.

  97. Perpetual Motion aside... by Qzukk · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Obviously the idea of the cellphone charging itself by using its battery power to vibrate to recharge the battery is bunk, but that aside, there are plenty of other vibration sources. Your cellphone could just clip onto your dashboard and charge with every little bump you drive over (of course, newer suspensions would make that a little harder to do ;). There are a lot of other vibration sources out there as well.

    Vibration can also easily be produced from renewable resources, or as a byproduct of other processes. Imagine on the street above a subway, having a "charging table" which vibrated every few minutes as the train passed under it. Or a wind-powered system to do the same thing.

    --
    If I have been able to see further than others, it is because I bought a pair of binoculars.
    1. Re:Perpetual Motion aside... by moncyb · · Score: 1

      Outright shaking it would give more power. This flashlight works that way.

    2. Re:Perpetual Motion aside... by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      A new sticker: "Perpetual Motion Inside!"

  98. You're an idiot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    They should have figured out a way to more efficiently harness that loss of energy, or designed the engine with parts that better transfer kenetic energy

    It's not a matter of not being able to reduce the vibration. It is the vibration of the V-twins that make people want to buy them.

    Take away the vibration an no one will want to buy them.

    1. Re:You're an idiot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is the vibration of the V-twins that make people want to buy them. Take away the vibration an no one will want to buy them.

      I've always wondered about that.. god knows they're not sold because of their performance..

    2. Re:You're an idiot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you read what you replied to, he specifically said "harness the energy," not get rid of the vibrations.

      WHO is the idiot?? Sheesh....some people's kids!

    3. Re:You're an idiot by schmink182 · · Score: 1

      To harness the energy one must stop the vibration from occuring. Therefore, you are the idiot.

    4. Re:You're an idiot by heh2k · · Score: 1
      It's not a matter of not being able to reduce the vibration. It is the vibration of the V-twins that make people want to buy them. Take away the vibration an no one will want to buy them.

      not completely. there are plenty of v-twin sportbikes, 60 degree from aprillia, 90 degrees from ducati, honda, suzuki, etc. though, most sportbikes are i4. many people *love* v-twin sportbikes.

      however, it is true that people will pay rediculous amounts of money for low-tech, air cooled, heavy, and underpowered paint mixers.

    5. Re:You're an idiot by hesiod · · Score: 1

      I don't think either of you are idiots, you are just looking at it in a different way. One of you is talking about harnessing the physical vibrations of the hardware, the other is considering picking up energy as compression waves off of the vibrating object...

      I don't know which, if either, is correct.

    6. Re:You're an idiot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because it's all image. I just find it ironic that the same people who buy Harleys are often the first to call the rest of us sheep and slaves to the system, when they are the ones basing a whole lifestyle around some fancy advertising.

    7. Re:You're an idiot by Lectrik · · Score: 2, Funny
      They should have figured out a way to more efficiently harness that loss of energy, or designed the engine with parts that better transfer kenetic energy

      It's not a matter of not being able to reduce the vibration. It is the vibration of the V-twins that make people want to buy them.

      Take away the vibration an no one will want to buy them.


      Solution:

      1- Buy cheap, efficient, quiet motorcycle
      2- take motorcycle to local adult store
      3- buy the largest vibrator they have, tell them it's for your girlfriend (it's not like they know you're a geek) make up some story about you having to go away for a week and her needs needing to be filled or some junk.
      4- Utilize your mad case-modding skillz to make a recess for the vibrator and connect it to the bike's electrics.

      5- Profit
      6- ???
      --
      --- As to make my comment seem, by comparison, more intelegent... doodie doodie doodie poop poop poop!
  99. I See A Lot Of G-Spot Applications... by saudadelinux · · Score: 1

    ...so I guess a Beowolf cluster of this would look a lot like a laundromat ;-)

    --
    I didn't think the house band in Hell would play this badly.
  100. For powering active RFID tags? by Idou · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Subject title sums up my knowledge in these fields, so I will do everyone a favor and shut-up at this point.

    --
    Sdelat' Ameriku velikoy Snova!
  101. What women want... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    > imagine the ultimate cellphone - one that charges the battery
    > every time it rings/vibrates

    That's nothing, you just know the women will be clamouring for the perpetual vibrator.

  102. moron creates negative energIE based on by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    being graNTdead a shipload of funnIE monIE.

    lookout bullow. we'll grant you that won.

    you can almost hear your hair grow around here at gov.va.msn.?net? (VAST). what style of vibrantshuns is that?

    consult yOUR creator frequently regarding matters of the heart/mind/wallet.

  103. News flash: pr0n reading slashdotters power LA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    With the advent of technologies to turn vibrations into energy, we have a new abundant energy source available:
    slashdotters reading pr0n

    Using the sheet power of slashdot, a city the size of Los Angeles can be powered for one year.

    Slashdotters are proud to solve this countries energy needs.

  104. I've got it! by stinkydog · · Score: 1

    It is the missing step from the Underpants Gnomes bussiness plan!

    1. Steal underpants
    2. Install vibration recovery device, microwave energy transmitter and Taco Bell gift certificate and return.
    3. Profit!?!

    --
    âoeWho knew something as harmless as willful ignorance could end up having real consequences?â
  105. Wiring = expensive by humpTdance · · Score: 1

    The last line of the article reads:

    [Ferro's vibration harvesters] are low-power, inaccessible, and expensive to run wires to.

    These devices should only be used in close proximity to their power-stores or whatever will be utilzing their energy. Running wires over long distances to harvest energy just isn't practical.

    1. Re:Wiring = expensive by Uzziel · · Score: 1
      No, you read that backwards. The vibration harvesters aren't expensive to run wires to, the sensors that they would power are. Here are the actual lines:
      Ferro will be targeting its sales efforts at companies like Honeywell (HON) and Johnson Controls (JCI). It seems like a good strategy, as these companies make sensors and devices that fit the sweet spots for Ferro's vibration harvesters -- they are low-power, inaccessible, and expensive to run wires to.
  106. That's nothing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have a solar powered clothes dryer!

  107. RTFA!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    RTFA!!!

    thankyou.

  108. A song comes to mind by IWantMoreSpamPlease · · Score: 1

    Good good good good vibrations...

    Sorry, I'll stop now.

    --
    So rise up, all ye lost ones, as one, we'll claw the clouds.
  109. conservation of engergy? by angst911 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    haven't you ever heard of conservation of energy or entropy? Everytime the phone rings, some energy would be used and some of the might be regained, but not all of it, so rining the phone occaisonally would just be a waste because you wouldn't get all of the energy from each ring back.

    Now go sit in the corner and think about what you are about to say before it comes out of your mouth.

    --
    Taking over one bit at a time...
    1. Re:conservation of engergy? by Rich0 · · Score: 1

      haven't you ever heard of conservation of energy or entropy

      If you have a machine which conserves entropy and yet still does something that would be something to see. Entropy is NEVER conserved - the entropy of a closed system must always increase.

      If entropy did not need to increase a perpetual motion machine could be built.

      In reality, the maximum efficiency of a machine is the efficiency of a reversible heat engine (carnot cycle) operating between the same hot and cold temperatures. This is the 3rd law of thermodynamics.

      It is common believe that you can approach 100% efficiency asymptotically, but never quite reach it. This is not practically true - unless you have part of the machine chilled down to near absolute zero. The best theoretical efficiency varies according to the temperature of the heat sink, but it is generally WELL below 100%

    2. Re:conservation of engergy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You read it wrong, bone head.

      Read it like this:
      haven't you ever heard of conservation of energy OR entropy?

      Pull your head out of your ass-and look around-before you go on a physics rampage.

    3. Re:conservation of engergy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      really -- if the ringer can recharge the battery, then why not just hook it up to your home electrical system and charge that up too??

      why? because it wont work due to energy lost due to friction and heat

    4. Re:conservation of engergy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Haven't you ever heard of reading something before you post?

      Moderation :
      -1000000 Most Redundant Post EVER.

      Now go sit in the corner and think about what you are about to say before it comes out of your mouth.

  110. Consider scale...and how about earthquakes? by Mr.+Underbridge · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The article is (I assume) about energy recovery/scavenging

    Classic slashdot. You know, you could actually read the article and find out. You do go to berkeley.

    the article poster just invented perpetual motion, arguing that the vibrator from the ringer could power the cellphone.

    Well, he didn't imply "power," he stated "recover." As others have mentioned, any vibration recovered isn't giving you that tingly feeling that says your phone is going off. So nothing doing there, but Hemos isn't quite as daft as you think. (Insert ./ editor joke here)

    What this article is really about (I feel like I'm making Cliff's Notes here for the science-deprived) is not recovering a significant proportion of power from a low-power device like a cell phone. It's about powering a milliwatt-draining device like a sensor off of, say, a megawatt-producing device like a nuclear reactor. This is actually kind of cool, since as the article states (for the literate among you), there are places with no light, no wiring, and a lot of vibrations where you might need power. So this has the chance to do some cool things - just don't expect it to actually extend the life of your cell phone or be a perpetual-motion machine.

    On the interesting side, this would make a cool way to create non-powered earthquake sensors. When it gets a quake, it transmits its position and maybe have the power out proportional to power in. You could distribute hundreds of them and have a real-time quake sensor that might be better than triangulating.

    Also, could be useful to track vehicles if you slap it on the chassis. Again, deploy once, no worries about going dead.

  111. The truth about perpetual motion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    the fact is, perpetual motion is possible! It's just we are all too dumb to find a way to make it happen.

    Proof? Earth's revolution around the sun, the moon's revolution around the earth etc.

    So it is possible. We just need to think harder.

    Artaxerxes

    1. Re:The truth about perpetual motion by schon · · Score: 4, Insightful

      perpetual motion is possible! ... Proof? Earth's revolution around the sun, the moon's revolution around the earth etc.

      Suggesting that the movement of celestial bodies is "perpetual motion" is ludicrous.

      "Perpetual motion" (in the context used here) means that you can extract more energy from a device than you put in - which is clearly impossible.

      Even taken literally (ie. that something will continue to move forever), it's still not possible - your examples just show that you don't have a very firm grasp of physics, or knowledge of astronomy or geology.

      The earth will not continue revolving around the sun indefinitely. It's gradually slowing down, and will probably be consumed by the sun before it comes to a complete halt.

    2. Re:The truth about perpetual motion by Bill,+Shooter+of+Bul · · Score: 1

      Actually, when the sun enters its red giant phase it will envelop the earth. Seriously, if the Sun and the earth were the only two objects (no third body problems, PLEASE!!!) and they were point masses then it should from a newtonian perspective always revolve with the same speed for all time. If only Newton was completely correct...

      --
      Well.. maybe. Or Maybe not. But Definitely not sort of.
    3. Re:The truth about perpetual motion by schon · · Score: 2, Funny

      Seriously, if the Sun and the earth were the only two objects (no third body problems, PLEASE!!!) and they were point masses then it should from a newtonian perspective always revolve with the same speed for all time.

      If there were no third bodies (as you said), and the sun and earth were in a closed, complete vaccuum with no other matter (which they're not), and the radiant energy from the sun didn't have any effect on the earth's movement (which it does - albeit very, very slight) then yeah, they should always rotate the same speed for all time..

      But to paraphrase Suzie Derkins, "as long as you're wishing, you should ask for a pony."

  112. vibrations for energy by tfcdesign · · Score: 1

    I don't see why they can't just put a crank on the cell phone like those flashlights designed for Africa. The only place I think vibration generators would be good is near subways/trains etc and they can add to the city's power supplies.

  113. Charges the battery as it vibrates? by mnmn · · Score: 1


    What have you been smoking? If the energy comes out of the battery to run the vibration motor?? How can that save energy by using a generator to recharge??

    The only way this can be used is to have the motor used also as a generator when its NOT vibrating.. maybe on an untuned car or a jogging user.

    I wonder if a resonating spring and a weight can be attached to the generator inside the cell phone. The user could then whack the phone a few times on concrete for several seconds of talk time... would work best on titanium/carbon fibre phones... with absolutely no warranties.

    --
    "Give orange me give eat orange me eat orange give me eat orange give me you." -Nim Chimpsky
  114. Never replace in Batteries in Your Vibrator!!! by Gambit-x7x · · Score: 1

    That should be companies slogan... at least they got some dissent (or indecent ) exposure ...

    --
    Who controls the information, controls the world...
  115. rist watches do this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    isn't there a rist watch out there that power's itself off teh movement of the wearer's wrist/arm?

  116. Technology Review article by pz · · Score: 1

    Technology Review published an article on related vibrationally-driven sensors which are intended to be used to instrument a building, powered by the small-scale vibrations present in nearly every human-built structure. Cool stuff indeed, made possible because our micromachined silicon technology has advanced to the point where under 100 microwatts is enough to do interesting things.

    --

    Put my fist through my alarm clock with its ding-dong death inside my ear. - The Blackjacks.
    1. Re:Technology Review article by alange+lurk · · Score: 1

      The link points out the real reason this will never be a source of power for anything beyond tiny sensors - 78-80 microwatts is what the article says. Looking at my cellphone battery (about 2 days on standby), I see that it is rated 1100 mAH. Since one watt is one volt-amp (DC only for this analysis, AC is approximately the same), that battery can produce about 1.1 watt-hours. If the phone used only 100 microwatts (.1 milliwatt), then the battery could run it for about 10000 hours, or more than a year. So a basic order-of-magnitute calculation shows that getting any sort of consumer-level power from "background" vibration is some time off.

    2. Re:Technology Review article by pz · · Score: 1

      On the other hand, self-winding watches have been available for, oh, some decades now. They also exploit ambient vibrations, in this case movements of a human arm, as a power source (albeit with a comparitively large-scale mechanism). Furthermore, ambient office lighting levels have proved adequate to run reasonably powerful hand-held calculators for some time, and that has to be in the sub-milliwatt range (anybody know for sure?). So while in principle I agree, much of what we normally consider consumer-grade product is too power-hungry to run at ambient body or building vibration, there are some useful things that can be done quite well.

      --

      Put my fist through my alarm clock with its ding-dong death inside my ear. - The Blackjacks.
  117. New Failure Modes by philovivero · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Remember conservation of energy and thermodynamics... you're not going to get 'free' energy by strapping this to a buzzing, vibrating machine.

    Imagine. Your systems are running fine, and suddenly half of your sensors stop working. Two days later you find out it's because the HVAC man came around and upgraded all the old compressors' parts to run with no vibration ('cuz it increases the life of those machines, you see), and now all your little micropowered machines have stopped working.

    It would seem to me depending on a machine to be inefficient (and thus stealing some of its wasted energy) has this equivalent in the software world: depending on a bug or deficiency in the OS to make your application work. Someone's gonna finally think to fix that bug or deficiency.
    1. Re:New Failure Modes by No+Such+Agency · · Score: 1

      Obviously, you'd feed the energy recovered into your supply in such a way that nothing would be solely dependant on it - and it could still lower your overall electric bill. Makes sense to me, especially since in some cases, the "HVAC man" can't do anything about the vibration. If you really want to power small devices solely off the vibration, plan ahead before any upgrades. Not hard.

      --
      Freedom: "I won't!"
    2. Re:New Failure Modes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Imagine. Your systems are running fine, and suddenly half of your sensors stop working. Two days later you find out it's because the HVAC man came around and upgraded all the old compressors' parts to run with no vibration ('cuz it increases the life of those machines, you see), and now all your little micropowered machines have stopped working.

      Imagine that those replacement parts would logically need sensors, just like the originals, and would come with the appropriate more-sensitive vibration-powered ones, just like the originals.

  118. Keyboard vibrations by Mundocani · · Score: 1

    If only we had these little converters on everybody's keyboards, then all the messages protesting the poor quality of this post could power Slashdot's servers until the next ill-conceived post comes along.

    1. Re:Keyboard vibrations by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      LOL ^ infinity.

  119. Better use than going to OpenBSD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Energy source or a firewall OS?

  120. Perpetual Motion !!!!! by bozojoe · · Score: 2, Funny

    They cant do THAT!

    I have a patent on perpetual motion engines!!!!!!

    I'm gonna sue

    --
    lick the cancle button (at least thats what our Chinese QA says)
  121. Almost perfect.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    If you're not being deliberately stupid, I impressed by your natural talent.

    And I'm impressed by your grammar.

    Really, you could have done a little better. If you're going to insult someone, try not to make yourself look stupid in the process.

    1. Re:Almost perfect.. by alienmole · · Score: 1
      If you're not being deliberately stupid, I impressed by your natural talent.

      And I'm impressed by your grammar.

      You not with it, d00d.

  122. Already been done! by psyconaut · · Score: 1, Funny

    My girlfriend certianly seems to get a lot of energy whenever anything vibrates near her....can I claim patent infringement?! ;-)

    -psy

    1. Re:Already been done! by FroMan · · Score: 1

      What is it with slashdotters...?

      Wouldn't you rather pleasure your wife/gf? Instead you are too lazy to spend the time to do the job right? Maybe that is why slashdotters never have women, they don't do the job right and would rather rely on tech to please their women.

      Also explain all the porn posts too.

      --
      Norris/Palin 2012
      Fact: We deserve leaders who can kick your ass and field dress your carcass.
  123. Very innovative by Glyndwr · · Score: 2, Funny

    How marvellously novel. I'm sure no-one has ever found a way to absorb energy from movement and store it for later use before, or turn that stored energy into electricity.

    And on the subject of using the phone's own vibrating alert to recharge the battery: "Lisa! In this house we obey the laws of thermodynamics!".

    --
    You win again, gravity!
    1. Re:Very innovative by Glyndwr · · Score: 1

      I should point out I'm cussing the poster, not the article. The article and the technology themselves are pretty nifty. But 3G apps calling vibrate()? Come on!

      --
      You win again, gravity!
    2. Re:Very innovative by MeerCat · · Score: 1

      But 3G apps calling vibrate()? Come on!

      OK, but how about if it detects no jiggles for a while (ie you're not walking etc and generating energy for it that way) and it's running a bit low on juice, it vibrates briefly to tell you "hey, jump up and down or shake me a bit - I'm getting running down".

      Not perpetual motion, but a way to tell you "if you're there, I'll be turning off pretty soon unless you do something". And before you say "That's dumb, to use up power when you're running low", all my phones beep to tell me they're running low in battery.

      --
      I spent a lot of money on booze, birds and fast cars. The rest I just squandered. - George Best
    3. Re:Very innovative by Glyndwr · · Score: 1

      No, that's not dumb -- seems pretty sensible, actually.

      --
      You win again, gravity!
  124. What about walking around? by tacokill · · Score: 1

    Ok, so given we can't violate the laws of thermodynamics, what if the phone charged itself while in your pocket - due to you moving around?

    While most have pooh-pooh'ed this story due to the stupid vibration comment, I'm thinking of something similar to a Rolex watch. You walk and "vibrate" the phone with your kinetic energy. That moves a mechanism (presumably what this story is about) and your phone charges. Kinda like Rolex watches...

    Disclaimer: IANAE - I am not an engineer.

  125. Grr by Greyfox · · Score: 4, Funny

    Damn thermodynamics... always holding us back.

    --

    I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?

    1. Re:Grr by machine+of+god · · Score: 2, Funny
      In this house we OBEY THE ...

      Oh wait, nevermind.

    2. Re:Grr by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      Damn thermodynamics... always holding us back.

      It is theorized that in other universes the laws of nature could be vastly different. Perhaps perpetual motion machines work somewhere far far away.

      Then again, nothing may form beyond temporary clumps of quarks there.

      Perhaps we should generalize your saying: "Damn tradeoffs... always holding us back."

    3. Re:Grr by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You just read that Scientific American article, didn't you? :-D

    4. Re:Grr by sfjoe · · Score: 1



      In Texas, we did away with the Laws of Thermodynamics and everyone's been a LOT happier.
      Yeee-haw!

      --
      It's simple: I demand prosecution for torture.
  126. brings whole new meaning to 'phone sex' by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    doesn't it?

  127. you could power a city by pair-a-noyd · · Score: 1

    from the ahole punks that cruise the road in front of my house with that 400db thump-thump crap playing. It splits my skull all the way into my house.

    They put a ban on it but the kids ignore it. I would like to put bricks through their windsheilds.
    They are invading my privacy with that crap.

    If you can get free energy from that though, I'm in the green for sure.

  128. Not just 3G by Glyndwr · · Score: 1

    3G apps aren't the only things using the vibrate() syscall.

    --
    You win again, gravity!
  129. Now all we need... by craenor · · Score: 0

    Are solar vibrators!!

    Then we could have them power up everything...

  130. Physics, Shmizicks... by Quixadhal · · Score: 0

    The pr0n industry is above the laws of physics! If you don't believe me, go to your local video store and note the DVDA section.

  131. Perpetual motion by ecloud · · Score: 1

    Extracting energy from unavoidable vibrations is cool. You're harnessing an energy source external to the process, which would otherwise be wasted. But trying to harness power from vibrating cellphones is just another variation on all the other perpetual motion schemes... the phone's battery runs a motor to make it vibrate, and then you try to absorb some of that energy and use it to charge the battery? So, for each quantity of energy that you absorb, the phone is vibrating that much less strongly, which defeats the purpose of turning on the vibrator in the first place. And you will lose energy in the various conversion processes, so you will have a net loss. If you don't want to waste the energy to vibrate the phone, then just don't do it. Or, run the motor with less power; this will accomplish the same thing as re-absorbing some of the power of the vibration, but more efficiently.

  132. Power Out Power In by oaf357 · · Score: 1

    The power gained by harnessing vibrations must exceed the power used to cause the vibrations. If it doesn't this is worthless in most respects.

  133. This is awesome! by eskwayrd · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Aside from all the comments regarding the lack of logic in the story submission, and all the sex-related gibes, I think this technology will prove itself immensely useful.

    Since it is sensitive enough to generate power from the normal activity of ventilation systems, the advent of wearable computing devices will have a source of power that is relavent to when the devices are being used. This could be a real boon for animal biologists, since current tracking collars have fairly limited lifespans. But it's going to be a revolution for areas where power is hard to provide power, and you have irregular activity you want to measure/record.

    Anywhere that is seismically active, either naturally, or in close proximity to rail lines, highways, etc. will be able to power gear to help make sense of activity in these regions: better earthquake predictions from sensors that communicate when activity occurs, but that are essentially 'distribute and forget'; orders of magnitude better targeting of activity because you can readily cover large amounts of geography via airdrop instead of sending crews into the field to install powered sites. Traffic sensors/guidance equipment that is embeddded into to the road surface.

    If the hardware to capture power can readily be built into infrastructure, this could be highly benficial, for example, in oil drilling; you'd get data from the entire length of the bore. Or the space shuttle could harness many more sensors to measure strucural integrity because they wouldn't need to be wired. Or even smart tools that know when their working parts are experiencing significant stresses.

    Very cool.

    --
    eskwayrd = m^2c^4
  134. 2nd Law of thermodynamics by Bill,+Shooter+of+Bul · · Score: 2, Informative

    First of all you cannot continually recharge a cellphone by using its battery to vibrate and use the vibration to recharge it. You can recapture some of the energy, but you will lose more than is gained. So you wouldn't want to vibrate it uneccisarily.

    --
    Well.. maybe. Or Maybe not. But Definitely not sort of.
  135. This example makes no sense by Edmund+Blackadder · · Score: 1

    If your cellphone's vibration and ring sound are turned into energy then its vibrations and ring sound will naturally decrease and thus defeat their initial purpose.

    If you want lower vibration and sound you can set the cellphone so it vibrates less, and it will save much more power than any other energy recapture-battery recharging scheme.

    There is no free lunch. Especially in thermodynamics.

  136. Charger Pants by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Pants with a built-in battery charger/leg toner.

  137. Ctrl-Alt-Del as a power source by jcwren · · Score: 4, Funny

    Imagine an energy scavenger like this inside a standard PC keyboard. You could power Intels hungriest processors using Windows and Ctrl-Alt-Del...

  138. Pants that improve your walk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They have a built in battery charger that runs a set of electrical stimulators for improving the efficiency and power of the walking muscles. Also charges your cell phone, and warms an optional thermos. Nobody sells them.

  139. Kinetic Auto Relay by Exploded+Fiber · · Score: 1

    I think this sounds similar to the Kinetic Auto Relay which Seiko offers in the watches......

  140. It's too easy... by Drakonian · · Score: 2, Funny

    In this house, we OBEY the laws of thermodynamics!

    --
    Random is the New Order.
  141. Obligatory Quote by jpetts · · Score: 1, Funny

    Lisa! In this house we obey the Laws of Thermodynamics!

    --Homer Simpson

    --
    Call me old fashioned, but I like a dump to be as memorable as it is devastating - Bender
    1. Re:Obligatory Quote by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Stupid mods. How many fucking times will people be modded up for repeating the same 15 or so Simpsons quotes that are often relevant to stories on Slashdot?

      Idiots.

    2. Re:Obligatory Quote by hesiod · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Always, as long as there is a remote possibility of it applying to the subject. Sometimes even that isn't a necessity.

    3. Re:Obligatory Quote by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This whole article is nothing but a big thermodynamics education clusterfuck.

  142. In related news... by dfn5 · · Score: 4, Funny
    Scientists have learned to use Solar cells to harness the power of the light bulb. This energy, in turn, can be used to power more light bulbs of which can be harnessed by more cells.

    "I don't know why we didn't see it before", stated a young lab assistant at the M.I.T center for alternative energy. "I wonder if Thomas Edison truely realized the potential in his invention."

    --
    -- Thou hast strayed far from the path of the Avatar.
  143. 2LoT by seebs · · Score: 0

    "Do I see 3G applications with a vibrate() call mandatory every couple minutes?"

    No, but you see a great opportunity to show massive ignorance of thermodynamics in front of millions of people.

    --
    My blog: http://www.seebs.net/log/ --- My iPhone/iPad app: http://www.seebs.net/seebsfrac/
  144. Nothing new. Ever heard of Vibranium? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Perhaps they should have done some research on Vibranium and Wakanda, a technologically advanced country the size of New Jersey which is the main source of Vibranium.

    Vibranium can " absorb and re-channel various
    types of energy, particularly sound."

    http://groups.google.com/groups?q=Vibranium+ener gy &start=10&hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&oe=utf-8&selm=1999051 3144504.09311.00000096%40ng-ck1.aol.com&rnum=1 4

  145. That explains The Matrix !! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    That explains it !!

    It's not their body heat - it's the cell phones of all those sleeping people that power The Matrix.

    Now I understand.

  146. Windmills in the ducts by swb · · Score: 3, Insightful

    What about small windmills in the ducts?

    Wouldn't generate much power, but it might be enough to keep a battery-powered sensor charged.

    It'd create some drag in the duct, but a lot of ducts are large enough that it might not matter.

    It's too bad that you couldn't electrically charge the duct and get power from the differential between the duct and ground.

    1. Re:Windmills in the ducts by deanpole · · Score: 0, Troll
      More importantly, let's hope for commercial windmill farms that don't kill birds.

      Improvements in efficiency are also welcome.

    2. Re:Windmills in the ducts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd imagine that a windmill in a duct would have the same problem as a battery-- maintenance.

      The windmill will eventually be covered in dust and scum. Then you either have a fire hazrd, or a biohazard, so you'll need to send someone in to clean it off. And it would problably be easier to replace a little tiny windmill then to clean it thoroughly.

    3. Re:Windmills in the ducts by outsider007 · · Score: 4, Funny

      More importantly, let's hope for commercial windmill farms that don't kill birds.

      better yet, a windmill farm that converts the birds it kills into energy.

      --
      If you mod me down the terrorists will have won
    4. Re:Windmills in the ducts by Dastardly · · Score: 1

      better yet, a windmill farm that converts the birds it kills into energy.

      So, combine a wind farm with a Changing World Tech plant to convert organic material into oil.

    5. Re:Windmills in the ducts by Herkum01 · · Score: 1

      At least it is converting the birds it kills into fertilizer so it not complete loss.

    6. Re:Windmills in the ducts by Cybrr · · Score: 1

      I suggest you read this.

      --
      Why did GEAR crush RDP?
    7. Re:Windmills in the ducts by Headius · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Any amount of drag created would outweigh the power generated. You're still converting mechanical energy into electrical, which nobody can do without loss. I thought about something similar way back when: attaching windmills to cars, so that when driving you generate your own electricity. Duh...windmills create drag and reduce the efficiency of the machine causing the wind, i.e. the car or the central air system, more than the amount of energy you could generate.

      Now with that said, here's another one for you: Windmills changing the course of the planet. The energy generated from windmills has to come from somewhere. To say it's free energy ignores the fact that if the windmills weren't there, the energy would go to some other use, be it cooling the earth's surface, spreading pollen, mitigating weather differences. Enough windmills could conceivably remove enough energy from the weather system to have an effect, even if it was a small effect over a long time. Case in point: weather systems can vary drastically around large metropolitan areas that create wind tunnel and dead zone effects as opposed to forests that might stand very nearby.

      Some people advocate wave-based power generation. The basic idea is that a floating series of rafts, connected by generators, would produce electrical power as waves caused them to flex. Another source of free power? No. Waves aren't simply there to be harnessed...they do a lot to keep the seas well mixed, and are one of the most powerful factors in our weather system. Every generator set placed on the ocean would effect wave formation, and ultimately, the rest of the world.

      Even solar power doesn't produce magical free energy...more solar energy absorbed and used on the surface of the earth means less radiated back into space. The net energy content of the Earth increases as a result of solar power. The best solar panels get damned hot, and that heat has to go somewhere. Normally, a large potion of it is sent back into space. Covering the surface of the Earth with a blanket of black solar panels would create one hell of a heating problem. Yes, I know that more efficient solar panels would create electricity more efficiently, heating up less, but the end result is the same...that efficiently-generated energy has two side effects: less sunlight is reflected back at the sky, to either proceed on into space or come back down in another location, and that electricity ultimately is used to power inefficient electronics and machinery, producing heat that would not have otherwise been produced.

      The greenhouse effect would have nothing on the effect of capturing 100% of the sun's radiation to run a bunch of noisy, heat-producing machines. Energy is never destroyed or created...merely transformed.

      So, in the end, we're just doomed! Hurrah!

      Or perhaps we could stop turning so damned much energy into heat and noise.

      Food for thought!

    8. Re:Windmills in the ducts by swb · · Score: 1

      Any amount of drag created would outweigh the power generated.

      I realize that, but IIRC the original poster said that they wanted to have wireless sensors and actuators but the limitation was piping power to the places they needed to have them. My suggestion was a way to power (recharge) a wireless sensor without having to run power to it.

      Say a building needs N horsepower to drive its ventilation system. The drag from a bunch of windmill-powered sensors requires 5 more HP from the system. If, over the next 20 years, it costs less money to buy and operate an N+5 HP motor than it does to buy and operate the N HP motor and pipe the power to all the sensors, then the drag is worth it.

      I would even bet that you could get away in many cases without having to increase the power since the drag would be so distributed it wouldn't be measurable.

      Sure, it's not free power, it just using a more efficient central power source.

    9. Re:Windmills in the ducts by Pig+Hogger · · Score: 1
      better yet, a windmill farm that converts the birds it kills into energy.
      Not energy, but bachelor chow!!!
    10. Re:Windmills in the ducts by Suidae · · Score: 1

      I would even bet that you could get away in many cases without having to increase the power since the drag would be so distributed it wouldn't be measurable.

      Or, if it does cause a problem, and the temperature in the building is always 5-10 degrees too high where the programmers cubicles are, you can just do what our building manager does... Nothing.

  147. The earth naturally vibrates, right? by Dossy · · Score: 1


    The earth naturally vibrates, right? Why can't we create something that harnesses the power of the earth's natural vibration to power small devices with low-energy consumption requirements?

    As devices require less and less energy, this concept becomes more and more useful ...

    -- Dossy

  148. Don't worry... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Our main man Newton's got ya covered like a jimmy hat!

  149. I knew a girl... by Shamanin · · Score: 1

    well, you know where I'm going with this one.

    --
    come on fhqwhgads
  150. RF Thingies? by Grendel+Drago · · Score: 1

    Could something be done like in RF tags, where the power source is the radio signal used to find the item as well? It'd work if the sensors didn't need much power, and only had to be read at intervals, right?

    --grendel drago

    --
    Laws do not persuade just because they threaten. --Seneca
    1. Re:RF Thingies? by default+luser · · Score: 1

      inverse square law.

      These devices are going to be more than a few meters away from the transmitter. They will need a very powerful signal if you use the traditional RF tag setup, since the brodcast is omni-directional ( multiple sensor locations ).

      Perhaps you could do it with a tight-beam antenna. Have it cycle through all sensors, angling the antenna toward it. But thats a helluva complex setup for something as simple as monitoring.

      If the sensors can power themselves, you don't even have to transmit to them. Just have them dumbfire information to the central receiver. Much less power consumed, much simpler receiver. Worred about collisions caused by dumb transmitters timing it wrong? Use CDMA or similar concepts to allow multiple simultaneous transmissions.

      --

      Man is the animal that laughs.
      And occasionally whores for Karma.

    2. Re:RF Thingies? by Ashtead · · Score: 1
      I guess the duct itself could be used as a waveguide; after all, waveguides resemble ducts somewhat.

      The problems might be with the sizes of the ducts, that they won't pass all wavelengths very well, so each size duct would need a different frequency... The smaller the duct, the higher the minimum frequency would be; with a free-space wavelength on the order of the longer edge length of a rectangular duct and the diameter of a cylindrical one. On the other hand, something like a 2.45 GHz signal could probably work in most sizes, since the wavelength is sufficiently small.

      I guess there would need to be some considerations at tee-junctions and plenums ...

      --
      SIGBUS @ NO-07.308
  151. ob. Simpsons Quote by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Homer: In this house, we obey the laws of thermodynamics!

  152. I've also heard about this other design by ktorn · · Score: 1

    Already some people gave examples of existing vibration -> recharging designs.

    I remember watching a program in the BBC about some young engineer's competition. One of the guys (from South Bank University - London?) came up with this doughnut shaped tube, inside which a small iron(?) sphere would roll as you produced a vibration. You know the drill, strap the right kind of metal around one of the sides of the tube... produce magnetic fields... This thing would produce enough energy to recharge your mobile phone, using your body ondulation as you walk. I think that bloke won the competition BTW. Pretty cool. Even though as someone mentioned before, the concept of using a small spring is quite good, if not better.

  153. Here's your power supply by Spamalamadingdong · · Score: 1

    I recalled something about a piezo generator for underwater use, which relied on the flapping motion of a flag-like object to drive it from a current of water. I couldn't find it, but I did discover this. It would let you power things even if the ductwork wasn't vibrating.

  154. Next: a DSL modem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... that powers my whole home network based on the energy of the incoming packets.

    As soon as I get me one of those babies, I'll be ready for slashdotting!

  155. Err, you aint gonna get no free energy. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    If the vibrate call, made the cell phone vibrate, the energy the cell phone would use in order to make itself vibrate would be quite a bit more than the energy it would recieve back.

    If anybody has found a way to gain more energy
    back from an action than what you put in, Id love to hear about it.

    (Outside of thermonuclear reactions and the harvesting of potential energy)

    1. Re:Err, you aint gonna get no free energy. by Vegeta99 · · Score: 1

      i walked to the store, turned on a gas pump, and set the autopump on. I lit a match and threw it in the puddle of gas. I think the resulting explosion released a few more Calories than my walking to the store.

  156. I wish... by clambake · · Score: 1

    one that charges the battery every time it rings/vibrates, hence promising extended talktimes

    If this were really possible then it would also be possible to charge the phone by talking to it (producing acoustic vibrations). Wouldn't that be cool? The more you talk the longer your battery life gets!

  157. Geeks by Eraser_ · · Score: 1

    You have never been in a room full of geeks. My leg bounces all day long. I'm sure if there were some form of generator hooked up to my leg I could power a PDA with a full colour screen. Seriously. Ask my girlfriend, my leg bounces almost all day long, some say it could be nervous energy. I blame it on sleep deprivation. You don't drink... DECAF do you?

    1. Re:Geeks by dev_sda · · Score: 1

      I'm sure if there were some form of generator hooked up to my leg I could power a PDA with a full colour screen.

      Give it a shot. Get or build yourself a Faraday generator (copper coil and magnet), rig it to your leg, and wire it to a battery. Then see how long a color screen PDA runs off of it.

    2. Re:Geeks by dev_sda · · Score: 1

      I should elaborate that you need to build a Farady Unipolar induction generator. Copper coil with a slide through magnet. The "Faraday-Tesla-Clark High Current D.C. Generator" that I linked doesn't work well with the up and down motion of a leg. heh.

    3. Re:Geeks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can't ba a "True Geek"....you have a girlfriend!

    4. Re:Geeks by Eraser_ · · Score: 1

      You know, I was thinking of the farday generator from thinkgeeks website. I told my dad about it the other day. He said to me "yeah, they use what, a generator based on faradays principle?" Bah! How are us geeks supposed to stay ahead of good old fashioned laws and principles!

  158. In this house... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    we obey the laws of thermodynamics!

  159. Cell phone is not a closed system! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    You engineer the phone to extract energy from the energy-rich device nearby. Namely, that six foort tall thing in the trenchcoat -- there is your battery.

    Everybody knows that.

    Woah.

  160. Harnessed energy from sex... by alchemist68 · · Score: 1

    So this is the secret to "recharging human batteries" (those tiny little mitochondria in our cells). Somehow, I'll bet they are able to reclaim some of that back and forth motion, i.e. low frequency vibration (1 - 5 Hertz), to give people a little extra "zip" for a day or two.

  161. Motes, WMD, etc. by deanpole · · Score: 1
    Motes (mentioned in the article) are way cooler than vibrational energy. Check out smart dust or some test results or these electron micrographs.

    Already robotic warfare is emerging. I wonder if WMD will include robots soon.

  162. Infinitely charging cellphone? by Arthur+Dent · · Score: 1

    I know some people who would want one.

  163. Laws of Physics say, "Try something else" by Spamalamadingdong · · Score: 1
    (About time we had a competitor to Confucius.)

    The problem with trying to recover energy from vibrations of things like cell phones is that

    1. they don't get bounced around too much,
    2. if they soaked up too much energy from the bouncing around, they'd feel like lead on your waist, and
    3. there are mechanical problems with making a significant weight which can be moved back and forth far enough to recover much of the available energy.
    Other avenues appear to be much more fruitful, such as making the soles of shoes (which dissipate energy of flexure) into generators. If you take 2000 steps around the office each day, and with each step you capture 5 inch-pounds of work with each of two shoes, that's 20,000 inch-pounds a day (1667 foot-pounds, about 0.6 watt-hour). Using your shoes, you are the moving mass and the power capabilities are scaled up correspondingly.

    Plus, it gives you a reason to pace while you talk.

  164. The possibilities are limitless. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Really? Can it put peanut butter on my sandwich?

    Methinks the person does not know what limitless means.

  165. Cool - NOT! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah this is so cool and new innovation. I've been using Seiko Kinetic wristwatch for last 15 years. No batteries as it get's necessary charge from movement when you walk etc.

  166. Quartz vibrates, doesn't it? by Slur · · Score: 1

    As I understand it quartz and other crystals have a periodic vibration. (So accurate you could set your watch by it!) Once nanotechnology reaches a certain level I could see harnessing this minute vibration to produce an almost unlimited energy supply.

    Recent experiments by Japanese scientists working with extremely thin (a few atoms wide) strands of nickel have seen inexplicable "amplification" effects on the signals that run along these filaments. I wouldn't be surprised if microscopic filaments of nickel or other exotic materials could be coupled with quartz or diamond to produce devices that generate their own energy - albeit on a very minute scale.

    --
    -- thinkyhead software and media
    1. Re:Quartz vibrates, doesn't it? by schon · · Score: 1

      As I understand it quartz and other crystals have a periodic vibration

      it's been awhile, but my understanding is that they only have a periodic vibration if you run a current through them

      By the same token, tapping a crystal to make it vibrate will produce a (brief) electrical current.

    2. Re:Quartz vibrates, doesn't it? by Slur · · Score: 1
      --
      -- thinkyhead software and media
  167. The pitiful state of science education... by raytracer · · Score: 1

    Can it really be possible that science education standards have fallen this low?

    Let's begin slowly:

    • Phones generate noise by vibrating. This vibration moves air back and forth and generates sound waves.
    • If you harnessed the energy from these vibrations, the phone wouldn't make any noise. The energy that would have gone to creating acoustic energy is no diverted to restoring the batteries charge.
    • Of course, there are losses in any system, so the energy rechannelled back to recharging the battery is some fraction of the energy output. Since that charge originally came from the battery, this means that the battery loses charge just the same, even while it is not providing the audio cue that sort of makes the whole thing worthwhile.

    The proper use of this idea would be to use the normal motion (such as bouncing around in your purse or bouncing around the front seat of your car) to recharge the battery.

  168. this is sorta like that Matrix discussion earlier by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    I am assuming this is a joke...
    imagine the ultimate cellphone - one that charges the battery every time it rings/vibrates, hence promising extended talktimes, and giving operators all the more reasons to get their customers to use their devices. How cool is that? Do I see 3G applications with a vibrate() call mandatory every couple minutes?
    Seems to me someone does not realize that even at its best you cannot get more energy out than you put in... and as good as this vibration harnassing generator is, I doubt it will not somehow actually reduce the vibrations itself. That in itself is impressive and can help in balancing harmonics of various devices that by normal operations reach a limit by its own devices (like CD's and HDD). This method could be employed if granular enough to increase the capacity or high velocity spinning devices.

    Additionally this could be refined perhaps to be even better than the existing motion recharging devices like watches.

  169. How much power? by toybuilder · · Score: 1

    The article didn't address the power output of such vibration-based generators. I suspect the output to be very weak -- on the order of a milliamp or so. Not good enough for any continuously operating device; but good enough for "chirping" devices that occasional report sensor readings.

  170. i guess rules of physics still don't apply here... by edrugtrader · · Score: 2, Insightful

    i would think it would be obvious to this crowd, but it was mentioned twice in the summary alone.

    the energy required to make the cell phone vibrate would be more than it could recoup from charging from vibrations. there is no perpetual cellphone.

    --
    MARIJUANA, SHROOMS, X: ONLINE?! - E
  171. great..... by crhylove · · Score: 1

    great.... One stupid post about a technology that's been around for a while, and i'm stuck in rudimentary physics lessons all day on /. pfft.

    rhy

    --
    I hold very few opinions. I hold information based on observation and fact. If you wish to disagree, please use facts.
  172. now flatulence is even BETTER by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    now with one device in my pants I can gather up natural gas and electrical charges. How convenient for road trips as you can then just hit every road side dinner and load up on beans, cabbage and turnips.

  173. Seiko Kinetic watch by rexguo · · Score: 1

    http://www.seikowatches.com/customer_service/corp_ info/history/history03.html http://www.seiko-kinetic-watches.com Same technology has been used by watch-maker Seiko for at least 6 years (I still remember their TV advertisement). The latest is its Seiko Thermic watch which uses human's body heat as power.

    --
    www.rexguo.com - Technologist + Designer
  174. The World can be saved by STEAM! by billstewart · · Score: 1
    Heat.... plus water .... gives steam. Steam! The world can be saved by STEAM!!

    Sorry. It seems to be one of those anime-otaku in-jokes, like CowboyNeal or NataliePortman poll options.... But it was the right thing to say here....

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
  175. Nokia phones as vibrators by Comrade+Pikachu · · Score: 1

    Well, if sexual energy counts as energy, Nokia already has got it covered.

  176. California's new marketing campaign by dsmoses · · Score: 1

    "That's not an earthquake, we eliminated those years ago... That's a _pick_any_device_ recharging cycle."

    And, as a bonus, if they could figure out how to bill people for these charging cycles they could have a new 'free' revenue source to help balance the state budget.

  177. One more excuse not to retire a movie cliche' by second+class+skygod · · Score: 1

    A sub is trying to evade an enemy warship
    overhead. On board the sub, everyone is looking
    up and wondering when the next depth charge
    will drop. In the engine room, the crew is
    desparately trying to get the engine working...

    Rookie Ensign: "It's quiet."
    Seasoned Petty Officer: "Yeah. Too Quiet."

  178. The obligatory geek relationship by qaffle · · Score: 1

    How many other people's first thought on this was powerball, I don't have one but the little motions this talks about makes me think up the same thing.

  179. REALLY stupid post! by showmeshowyoukikoman · · Score: 0

    Ok, the article was interesting, but seriously -- how could one of the editors read that submission and think "Gee, yeah! If someone calls my phone and makes it vibrate, my phone battery will charge!!!"

    LAME!

  180. Small Business Innovation Research grant? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I didn't realize MIT was classified as a small business. Does this mean that they are subject to the same taxes as any other business? Or have they managed to get a loophole added for them like so many other large corporations have?

  181. take a physics class. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The possibilities are limitless. Aside from the obvious, imagine the ultimate cellphone - one that charges the battery every time it rings/vibrates, hence promising extended talktimes, and giving operators all the more reasons to get their customers to use their devices. How cool is that? Do I see 3G applications with a vibrate() call mandatory every couple minutes?

    not quite... it uses energy to vibrate... you can't get back more energy than you give.

  182. please mod thread overrated by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It is redundant and the joke malformed.

  183. What about people who live by rail-road track by Hao+Wu · · Score: 1

    Vibration from trains is emmense. I know, I lived on a darn rail-road for one time, and the stupid train shook the whole hose to its foundation.

    Free energy from a passing train would have made up for the loss of sleep and dignity.

    --
    I suggest you read Slashdot
  184. Better Bicycle Lights by Uzziel · · Score: 2, Interesting

    It would be so sweet to have a system of ultrabright LEDs powered by, or at least recharged by, a vibration-absorbing power supply. All the benefits of a bike magneto, none of the drag.

  185. Nanotechnology by xRelisH · · Score: 1

    I think this would be an interesting application for nanotechology.
    I'm not entirely sure about the receiver's physical properties, but I think it would be in interesting idea to have one large vibrating machine (20 inch dildo? =P), and then have thousands of tinly little robots that have receivers, and you wouldn't have package in a battery.
    In an environment where things can float along (ie. space, underwater), you could have larger receivers that are like perhaps made like sales or fins so you can gather even more power.

  186. Haven't you ever heard of entropy? by matt-fu · · Score: 2, Funny

    Do I see 3G applications with a vibrate() call mandatory every couple minutes?

    You do not. MC Hawking wrote an excellent article on why this wouldn't work:

    Entropy, how can I explain it? I'll take it frame by frame it,
    to have you all jumping, shouting saying it.
    Let's just say that it's a measure of disorder,
    in a system that is closed, like with a border.
    It's sorta, like a, well a measurement of randomness,
    proposed in 1850 by a German, but wait I digress.
    "What the fuck is entropy?", I here the people still exclaiming,
    it seems I gotta start the explaining.

    You ever drop an egg and on the floor you see it break?
    You go and get a mop so you can clean up your mistake.
    But did you ever stop to ponder why we know it's true,
    if you drop a broken egg you will not get an egg that's new.

    That's entropy or E-N-T-R-O to the P to the Y,
    the reason why the sun will one day all burn out and die.
    Order from disorder is a scientific rarity,
    allow me to explain it with a little bit more clarity.
    Did I say rarity? I meant impossibility,
    at least in a closed system there will always be more entropy.
    That's entropy and I hope that you're all down with it,
    if you are here's your membership.

    Chorus
    You down with entropy?
    Yeah, you know me! (x3)
    Who's down with entropy?
    Every last homey!

    Defining entropy as disorder's not complete,
    'cause disorder as a definition doesn't cover heat.
    So my first definition I would now like to withdraw,
    and offer one that fits thermodynamics second law.
    First we need to understand that entropy is energy,
    energy that can't be used to state it more specifically.
    In a closed system entropy always goes up,
    that's the second law, now you know what's up.

    You can't win, you can't break even, you can't leave the game,
    'cause entropy will take it all 'though it seems a shame.
    The second law, as we now know, is quite clear to state,
    that entropy must increase and not dissipate.

    Creationists always try to use the second law,
    to disprove evolution, but their theory has a flaw.
    The second law is quite precise about where it applies,
    only in a closed system must the entropy count rise.
    The earth's not a closed system' it's powered by the sun,
    so fuck the damn creationists, Doomsday get my gun!
    That, in a nutshell, is what entropy's about,
    you're now down with a discount.

  187. +5 Funny, this should be +5 Informative by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    silly moderators.

    1. Re:+5 Funny, this should be +5 Informative by Bahumat · · Score: 1

      Too bad we can't mod up moderators. Whoever listed it as Informative deserves a point of karma too. :D

      --
      "To pass through the jungle; silence, courtesy, ferocity, as the occasion demands." -- Kamau, "Proper Passage"
  188. Shut up. by Lord+Bitman · · Score: 1

    You are a moron. Don't submit stories anymore. Don't post anymore. Don't talk anymore. Don't let your presence be known, YOU ARE AN IDIOT. Other posts have already expressed the why & how you are an idiot quite clearly, and I don't wish to be redundant. However, I just wish to make it quite clear to you that you are a complete fucking moron. If anything you said was not idiotic, you would STILL be an idiot, because you would be saying that someone figured out a trick to free energy and all you could come up with as a use was vibrating cell-phones(LOLOMG!!!!!!!!SHUTUP)

    --
    -- 'The' Lord and Master Bitman On High, Master Of All
  189. Hip Works by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It can charge when on the hip.

    You simply don't put the generator on the phone -- you put it on the clip. Convert the stresses on the clip to energy. The clip normally deals with shaking with each step, forces from turning, bending away from belt when body positions push against phone...and if phone mounted as a pendulum, there will be amplification of forward-back shaking because we don't walk perfectly smoothly.

  190. Obvious use ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    1. Pave the streets of San Francisco with this thins
    2. Wait for the big one.
    3. FREE Megawatts

    P.S As a bonus, the energy absorption is going to dampen the effects of the earthquake (according to the scientists here anyways...)

  191. My office needs this... by Exantrius · · Score: 1

    we're right next to a big street, which is currently half torn up-- The whole building vibrates all day long due to the damn tractors...

    Oh, well. At least they stopped bashing the sidewalk with the dozer's boom... *THAT* was annoying.

  192. possible related story? by Cheapoboy · · Score: 1

    http://www.funreports.com/2003/04/21/46163.html

  193. Perpetual motion by EelBait · · Score: 2, Informative

    Since it took energy from your battery to vibrate the phone in the first place, you will lose more than you gain if you try to use that energy to recharge them.

    This is basic law of thermodynamics. Did the collective intelligence of slash-dot just drop recently while I was asleep?

  194. Well done. by Zone-MR · · Score: 1

    Vibrations into energy?

    You've just invented the 'microphone' ;)

  195. Good for vibration damping by bburdette · · Score: 1

    I demoed a pair of skis a few years ago that had some LEDs in the tips, which were powered by vibrations in the skis. The idea was that converting the vibrations to electricity would dampen the vibrations, allowing the ski to hold its edge better.

  196. Hybrid Cars by Dark+Bard · · Score: 1

    An interesting application would be a trickle charger for hybrid cars. If they are inexpesive enough clustering them about the engine could provide a little extra mileage. Every mpg is less oil we have to import and fewer countries the government feels they have to invade. On a related issue I'm curious why there has been no effort to incorporate solar cells into hybrid or pure electric cars? The solar cells could act as a trickle charger. You may not ever be able to run a car with them but on hybrids and pure electric vehicles they could add more mileage. Most electrics fall a bit short of being worth the trouble but if they were able to recharge from daylight while you were at work the range could effectly double. If their range was 100 miles as opposed to less than 50 I think most people would be able to commute without worrying about them running dry. Even on a straight trip you might be able to extend the range by providing a percentage of power from the cells. The range might be extended from less than fifty miles to more than sixty. Nother side benefit would be charging while stuck in traffic. It's a serious worry in areas like LA. When stuck in stop start traffic regenerative braking would be fairly useless at recovering the losses.

  197. slashdot makes me cringe these days by sstory · · Score: 1

    Aside from the obvious, imagine the ultimate cellphone - one that charges the battery every time it rings/vibrates What is this, a creationist website? It seems like Slashdot's letting me down every day with just lack of understanding.

  198. Another great way to power remote machines by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Don't forget the TESLA coil!!! Wow! Fun, fairly inexpensive to build, and heaps of electricity for the whole neighborhood. I really think we should use more of them...just think...wireless lights all over the building...everything just glowing and buzzing...ahh....

  199. subwoofeh by Cyfun · · Score: 1

    Heh, I can think of a great way to power a vibration-collector: sitting at a stoplight with some punk next to you with his subwoofer all the way up. :)

    --
    In Soviet Russia, dot slashes YOU!
  200. Self-powering machines by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Aside from the obvious, imagine the ultimate cellphone - one that charges the battery every time it rings/vibrates, hence promising extended talktimes, and giving operators all the more reasons to get their customers to use their devices. How cool is that?



    Wow! Great idea! It's like a machine that never requires any energy input! It's like a perpetual motion machine, except it can actually work since it doesn't turn the motion into motion, it turns the motion into energy!

    1. Re:Self-powering machines by zejackal · · Score: 1

      Um... yeah, I think they said "extended talktimes" not "perpetual talktimes". If you could recover some of your wasted energy, you could extend battery life. How much, well that depends on the efficiency with which you can recover energy and the threshold below which the system cannot perform. I have my doubts about the system being able to recover enough energy from say a phones vibe mode to power anything for very long, however, just the motion generated by the user's walking could be recovered over time, it would be like a kinetic quartz watch, only it's a cell phone.

  201. Unlimited Power Source by uxo · · Score: 0

    Too bad we can't harness the energy wasted by everyone replying to this article with the same point about the Second Law of Thermodynamics...

  202. Re:Ducks in the Windmill by shadowbearer · · Score: 1

    You are sick.

    What we really want is a Smart Windmill that drops the "scruff" birds straight into the mulcher, where
    they are converted to compost and go directly to the compost pile without passing go.
    The "good" birds (pheasants, quail, ducks) go directly to an automated processing machine and are
    inserted directly into the freezer for later use.

    Now THAT'S a windmill :-) Maybe a little expensive, but Hey! I can install Linux on it too!

    SB

    --
    It's old. The more humans I meet, the more I like my cats. At least they are honest.
  203. L A M E ! ! ! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    I've read many, many Slashdot discussions, and this is by far the lamest I've ever seen. All you dumb fuckers could be replaced by the following Perl script:

    use LWP::Simple;

    while (1) {
    slashpost "perpetual motion!!!\nyuk yuk yuk!!!";
    slashpost "sex toys are funny!!!\nyuk yuk yuk!!!";
    }

    sub slashpost {
    my $text = shift;
    #bunch of crap goes here to actually post to Slashdot; I'm not going to bother.
    }


    READ THE PREVIOUS LAME-ASS COMMENTS YOU MORONS!!!
  204. I wonder by anthony_dipierro · · Score: 1

    If the poster had heard about the nifty invention used to harness power from light, if he would have suggested the solar powered flashlight.

    Aside from the obvious, imagine the ultimate flashlight - one that charges the battery every time you turn it on. How cool is that?

  205. Vibrating Cell Phones by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So if i get alot of calls on my phone when in vibrate mode, the cell if equiped with this technology would charge itself? i wish

  206. IN THIS HOUSE WE OBEY THE LAWS OF THERMODYNAMICS by someguy · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It's sad to see articles from people that don't understand conservation of energy. The only thing that would happen with a "mandatory vibration" is a loss of total energy. You can't get free energy from the system. Either the poster got trolled or is just talking out of his ass.

    --
    A planet where apes evolved from men? Long live the apes.
  207. Breeze from machine noise by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My dad did this in 1960 in the plant where he worked. He put a 18 inch Woofer on the wall of the machine room and converted the A/C to D/C and powered a fan for YEARS! No breeze during "shut down" maint. but HEY, you can't have everything!

  208. Bugs by orthogonal · · Score: 1

    Bugs -- wireless eveasdropping devices -- that never need their batteries replaced.

    Make them voiced activated. Put one every x meters. Have each "chain" the data it picks up, encrypted in a low-power radio burst, to the previous one in the chain, until the data reaches back to your recorder or cell phone or higher-powered transmitter.

    Now say hi to Big Brother, or Industrial Spy, or Suspicious Husband.

  209. Apropos by tfoss · · Score: 1

    I'm just sure this is related.

    -Ted

    --
    -=-=- Quantum physics - the dreams stuff are made of.
  210. When the battery on your phone runs out... by utd-blaze · · Score: 1

    shake the shit out of it.

    --
    Do me a favor and double it!
  211. I know.. by MongooseCN · · Score: 1

    She won't need you to change the batteries anymore.

  212. Actually by miyako · · Score: 1

    I once saw something like this, it was a small hand crank generator that you could use to give your cell phone a 1 or 2 minute charge in case of emergencies, I'm too lazy to find a link right now but i'm sure with some googling you could find it.

    --
    Famous Last Words: "hmm...wikipedia says it's edible"
  213. Put this to good use! by MoreDruid · · Score: 1

    This here app for your GFs phone
    Just don't forget to give her your phone as well, to charge the batteries :P

    --
    The best weapon of a dictatorship is secrecy, but the best weapon of a democracy should be the weapon of openness.
  214. It's true by gallir · · Score: 1
    My wife allway tell me she feels energized after using her dildo.

    It's also confirmed by that vibrating rabbit in the TV ads...

    --
    sgis ddo ekil t'nod i
  215. Obligatory Princess Bride Reference... by Dr.+Photo · · Score: 1

    Please. Everyone should make basic errors in logical reasoning in their submissions, that way, we'll never talk about anything else. Slashdot will be ruined. My evil plans will come to fruition! Ah ha ha ha ha HA HA HA!

    [thud]

  216. great....keep them out of the way... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And things will go back to the 1940s when the US was a better place and women stayed at home and did nothing like they were designed by God to do. And the world would be again run by men, who would revert to a feudal system of government and play war games with innocent peasants for fun. More please.

  217. food by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    you still have to feed her...

  218. Looks like you are by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    His quote: "They should have figured out a way to more efficiently harness that loss of energy"

    He is confusing an engineering problem with actually giving people what they want.

    Asswipe.

  219. Re:IN THIS HOUSE WE OBEY THE LAWS OF THERMODYNAMIC by Garridan · · Score: 1

    But, what about Browning Motion? We could get endless energy out of the phone because nothing ever stops vibrating!

    *ducks the pie*
    *and the fist*

  220. those vibrations aren't all going to waste... by solferino · · Score: 1


    imagine the ultimate cellphone - one that charges the battery every time it rings/vibrates, hence promising extended talktimes, and giving operators all the more reasons to get their customers to use their devices.


    what an orgy of double-entendres! - for those who can think of other ways to make use of vibrating cellphones, you might like to read about purring kitty, recently developed software to make your cellphone vibrate at length and at call
  221. Another vibrator joke by be-fan · · Score: 1

    I haven't even read the thread yet. But I assume there are the obligatory vibrator jokes. I've done a search, and this one doesn't appear to be in the database.

    Cool use for this technology: prepetual motion vibrator!

    --
    A deep unwavering belief is a sure sign you're missing something...
    1. Re:Another vibrator joke by be-fan · · Score: 1

      Shit! This has got to be the most humiliating thing I've ever posted! Not only was my original post apparently a dupe, but it was caused by my inability to spell "perpetual" properly. I thought this whole "online community" thing was supposed to get rid of the "humiliation in front of strangers" thing but nooooo!

      --
      A deep unwavering belief is a sure sign you're missing something...
  222. Wow by autopr0n · · Score: 1

    Aside from the obvious, imagine the ultimate cellphone - one that charges the battery every time it rings/vibrates, hence promising extended talktimes, and giving operators all the more reasons to get their customers to use their devices. How cool is that? Do I see 3G applications with a vibrate() call mandatory every couple minutes? "

    The poster really doesn't understand thermodynamics.

    Just to make it clear, you will never be able to get back as much energy from the phone as you use to vibrate it. You certainly wouldn't get more energy.

    In fact, the more energy you take out of the vibration, the less sound (including infrasonic vibrations that you would feel in your pocket) generated. If you took out all the energy you wouldn't feel anything. even if you could have an 'ideal' vibration->energy converter you would never have anything more then the effect of reducing the input vibrations. In other words, if you vibrated the phone using 10j of energy, and could perfectly extract 5j of energy, the effect would be the same as using 5j of energy to vibrate the phone in the first. Place.

    On the other hand, what you can do is grab some of the vibration from the person walking, but I doubt you would ever get enough to use a phone that way.

    --
    autopr0n is like, down and stuff.
  223. Nu-uh by autopr0n · · Score: 1

    Most of the bulbs you stick in regular incandesant sockets change the frequency they flicker at to the khz range. The old-style tubes do not.

    --
    autopr0n is like, down and stuff.
  224. The obvious solution! by autopr0n · · Score: 1

    Tiny robots that go around and change the battires!

    --
    autopr0n is like, down and stuff.
  225. Harley-Davidson could use this by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

    To recoup the amount of its power which is wasted simply shaking the bike into its component parts.

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  226. As with any brand new technology... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As with any brand new technology... it will first be employed to help people get their rocks off. ;-)

    I don't think it takes a genius to put the pieces together in this case. ;-)

  227. Re:You can buy it today. by Technician · · Score: 1

    No connection with the product, just information. Check out the Toyota Prius. By using regenerative braking, it gets by with a much smaller engine while having all the zip of a larger engine. My dad has one. Don't let the 1.5L engine fool you. It's assisted by a 25 KW electric. No problem getting on the freeway onramp with it.

    --
    The truth shall set you free!
  228. Star Trek has *ruined* science fiction by Art+Tatum · · Score: 1
    This is half of what infuriates me so much about Star Trek, with all its silly pseudo-science and inane attempts to sound technological.

    The other half is the lousy writing and complete absence of plot. :-)

  229. just think. . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    with these new-fangled devices, your significant other would have no use for you anymore; she could have a "friend" that powered itself. You'd be replaced by an "Energizer." It keeps going, and going, and going. . .

  230. Ohmygod - the perpetuum mobile! by haraldm · · Score: 1
    imagine the ultimate cellphone - one that charges the battery every time it rings/vibrates,

    Charging the battery from vibration energy powered by the very same battery? Get a life, dude.

    --
    open (SIG, "</dev/zero"); $sig = <SIG>; close SIG;
  231. *cough*peizo*cough* by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Anyone?

  232. renewable energy sources by AssFace · · Score: 1

    I figure that we could set this up on the epileptics of the world and pretty much solve that whole energy crisis thing.

    --

    There are some odd things afoot now, in the Villa Straylight.
  233. Chickens! by turgid · · Score: 1

    What we really need is a windmill farm that only kills birds that are chickens, de-feathers them and packs them ready for the supermarket, oh and keeps them refridgerated while they are waiting to be collected.

  234. lol by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "The possibilities are limitless. Aside from the obvious, imagine the ultimate cellphone - one that charges the battery every time it rings/vibrates"

    Trying to charge the batteries when it vibrates would need mechanisms that drew even more energy from the battery, even when you recharge it a bit the net loss would still be larger than without the stupid recharger.

  235. Other benefits from this technology by srussell · · Score: 1
    Yowsa. It is fascinating that 99% of the posts on this message were about some silly comment the reviewer made, rather than the technology itself. Amazing.

    In any case, am I mistaken in assuming that this technology would, of necessity, cause a dampening effect, essentially reducing the vibration of the system? This would be a useful side effect in a number of applications.