Are you saying that because people don't always have 100% perfect knowledge of what other people are doing, they shouldn't be allowed to share information with each other?
You know it doesn't work like that. The list doesn't display probabilities.
Of course people should be allowed to spread imperfect information. And they should be fully answerable for it if it unfairly damages someone's reputation.
If cows have different brain architecture to bulls, then this research should be suppressed and the perpetrators hounded out of their jobs in case it discourages heifers from embarking on STEM careers.
So the guy who has the job of running the country didn't have time to participate in some stupid dog-and-pony farce because he was too busy running the country? And that was two years ago?
Cheaper still to do it in Arizona. If you don't believe me, ask NASA.
Is that the origin of the Monty Python sketch where they keep shouting "No poofters"?
If anyone made a threat, it was the asshat who reported him.
You know it doesn't work like that. The list doesn't display probabilities.
Of course people should be allowed to spread imperfect information. And they should be fully answerable for it if it unfairly damages someone's reputation.
Fair point, but economists don't tend to fuss over the magical/mystical aspects much. Cr butter is all they see.
They're a dour bunch. Some might even call them dismal.
So you don't think it's possible for an innocent person to be put on the list (or any list) either through accident, incompetence or malice?
Muslims ain't no race, bro.
Very interesting.
Now, about those fries...
Of course you can. It's called trade.
You can't threaten planets - they aren't sentient.
As for intimidation, turning the surface (and everything on it) to lava or turning its atmosphere to smoke would have the same effect.
If cows have different brain architecture to bulls, then this research should be suppressed and the perpetrators hounded out of their jobs in case it discourages heifers from embarking on STEM careers.
Well if it makes sense for sports stadiums, then it stands to reason it must work for datacenters.
The problem isn't the negotiating, it's the unilateral modifications afterwards.
"Republic credits are no good here". "I always knew there was more to you than money".
That's without even looking it up, scholar.
You can if there's someone else with butter and no guns.
Everyone else is discussing what utter fucking oxygen parasites economists are.
I wasn't aware of a +1 Lah-di-dah option.
Don't forget his brilliant take on legal matters (there's an amendment between 4 and 6?) and his awesome solution to the burning man ice problem.
Suddenly, it all makes sense.
Hey Donald, you're supposed to hang it from the front of your belt!
Does anything he say need extending to make it beyond reason?
So do I, and I did.
So the guy who has the job of running the country didn't have time to participate in some stupid dog-and-pony farce because he was too busy running the country? And that was two years ago?
Yeah, that's news that matters.
Also, quora are spamming invasive bastards.
She only knows how to stop them.
You'd have thought someone with his name would like all things wind-related.
Even if it does, I doubt it'll be a comfortable ride.
Still, if I'm around to experience it that'll be a result.