The fact that some guy called the Duke of Westminster owns large parts of central London is another.
You don't have such a thing as inherited wealth over there? The fact that he gets to wear a gold hat and a weasel-skin coat on special occasions isn't particularly relevant.
a big clearing out of your ruling class and its institutions
Like in 1066? Plenty of them in the late 16th/early 17th centuries too.
I just think many British people are so used to these sorts of things that they don't realise that it is not normal that someone from the North without a posh accent grows up believing they can never be prime minister because they weren't born into the right family.
People like Harold Wilson, Neil Kinnock or, in the interest of balance, Margaret Thatcher?
Except it won't. It'll be a compromise between positions very few people voted for and positions a tiny number voted for.
The "watermelon" greens were in that position in Belgium for a long time. In Israel it was some Zionist nutbags. Even with FPTP, UK Tories have had to rely on the "fuck the pope" brigade on many occasions.
P.S. how do you work out a compromise with single-issue parties?
What's the distribution of the stars' ecliptics relative to the galactic equivalent? I know ours is tilted, or the milky way would be round the equator, which it isn't. And I looked it up.
Presumably we can deduce it for those where we can detect expolanets by, say, doppler shifts. But isn't there a selection bias there?
I worked at an instrument maker and they told me it was to simplify the spares situation; you don't need to keep [at least] one of every specific instrument to hand, just a few generic boxes that you flash the right software onto.
My point exactly. If someone builds another London Eye or La Defence or whatever I think the architect has a right to be more than a bit miffed. A photo of it? They can go suck a badger's nads.
Otherwise, you dump the analyst problem onto end-users, who are then constantly in contact with the contractor trying to tune the software via trial and error.
I thought that's what all this agile shit was about?
Slashdot Mirror
Humpty-dumpty defined it as a turnip.
You don't have such a thing as inherited wealth over there? The fact that he gets to wear a gold hat and a weasel-skin coat on special occasions isn't particularly relevant.
Like in 1066? Plenty of them in the late 16th/early 17th centuries too.
People like Harold Wilson, Neil Kinnock or, in the interest of balance, Margaret Thatcher?
WSJ is an anagram of SJW. Coincidence? I think not.
Except it won't. It'll be a compromise between positions very few people voted for and positions a tiny number voted for.
The "watermelon" greens were in that position in Belgium for a long time. In Israel it was some Zionist nutbags. Even with FPTP, UK Tories have had to rely on the "fuck the pope" brigade on many occasions.
P.S. how do you work out a compromise with single-issue parties?
You could get that figure down by half by including people like minors.
You've come so far. Why not go full retard and bung the population of China in the denominator too?
What's the distribution of the stars' ecliptics relative to the galactic equivalent? I know ours is tilted, or the milky way would be round the equator, which it isn't. And I looked it up.
Presumably we can deduce it for those where we can detect expolanets by, say, doppler shifts. But isn't there a selection bias there?
Wild guess: that was Joe_Dragon.
The title is appropriate, given that all ShouldFuckTotallyOff does is wind the readers up.
A new study suggests it's the dark aether.
Perhaps I should start a shit pseudoblog too.
Never heard of him. Perhaps the odds are even lower than we thought?
Ah, so Dice found a buyer at last?
No, in that case it's more like 12,500 miles.
Some software development isn't. Good luck convincing a PHB of even that.
Ethan's gone off on his fixie to see if Trader Joes have one.
I worked at an instrument maker and they told me it was to simplify the spares situation; you don't need to keep [at least] one of every specific instrument to hand, just a few generic boxes that you flash the right software onto.
My point exactly. If someone builds another London Eye or La Defence or whatever I think the architect has a right to be more than a bit miffed. A photo of it? They can go suck a badger's nads.
Complete nonsense.
Will you be voting for Trump, or Clinton?
False dichotomy, excluded middle.
Take your pick, moron.
A photo of a vase is not a vase. Neither is a poem about one, or an interpretive dance.
One of those countries is Italy, and another is Belgium.
They're both crap.
One, it was closer to 40% than 30%.
Two, boundary changes are decided by a neutral, independent body.
Why does that mean it has to be shit? There are plenty of children's tunes that aren't.
If the qualifications involve a PhD, 20 years of experience in C++17 and X86_128 assembly plus age < 30 I'm not surprised.
You might, but they don't.
It is left as an exercise for then reader to make up your own joke about attracting clicks.
For bonus points, work in a few hipster clichés, all of which are true in the submitter's case.
I thought that's what all this agile shit was about?
I hope that's per week and not per month!