You don't recognise the author? He peppers the site with them and then goes quiet for months, probably because he's back in the place where the rooms are like inside-out pillows.
Quite often they take the form of "UK does X". On investigation, it turns out some Tory twat had a few too many at Lulu's and - possibly jokingly - suggested Y.
Free markets don't look appealing because they only promise that total wealth generated will tend towards the maximal
Do they even promise that?
In this case, the invisible hand is a whole bunch of individual people all trying to act in their own best interests to get what they want.
As a purely hypothetical example totally plucked out of the air let's suppose people want lots of wool and mutton. And clearly the more sheep you have the more wool & mutton you'll get. So everybody gets more sheep. And then suddenly the land doesn't work any more because it's been overgrazed. And it turns out that 1000 skinny scraggy sheep are worth less than 100 furry fat ones.
I know it's crazy talk. If it was an actual thing there's be a name for it or a phrase that fits.
That's because the mainstream media don't even have a coherent "narrative". The most mainstream of mainstream media, i.e. Fox news (it's the #1 TV news channel) is completely at odds with the second most mainstream of mainstream media, CNN.
This is a good thing, isn't it?
If they start agreeing on anything on anything other than the weather it's time to get seriously worried.
What you say is true. The way they go on about Benghazi you'd think she was on sentry duty. But she somehow failed to win people over on those issues. A lawyer who can't defend herself, FFS! Maybe she was just too old, by about 8 years.
The way the primary (I almost wrote primatary - Freudian slip?) was biased against Bernie probably turned some natural Dems against her too.
300 million people and those two were the least bad they could find? Then again, Boris...
Slashdot Mirror
That's because he's got them all busy making license plates.
(Readers right of the pond may substitute "sewing mailbags")
Towing the line? What's on the other end of it?
Could I get away with kicking people in the face if I invent a religion which says that I have to do that? Or does it only apply to real ones?
Bain't thoi land, bigbelly. B'aint nobody's.
Which of course is plainly ridiculous, because Apple don't make them.
You don't recognise the author? He peppers the site with them and then goes quiet for months, probably because he's back in the place where the rooms are like inside-out pillows.
Quite often they take the form of "UK does X". On investigation, it turns out some Tory twat had a few too many at Lulu's and - possibly jokingly - suggested Y.
Tasmanian Devils are alive and well and living, oddly, in Tasmania.
It's yer Tazzy Abbo what got wiped out, mate.
What, all of it? Biology's a pretty broad subject.
I'd be almost as surprised if ecology & population dynamics were on the course as I would if I saw cryptobotany.
How can they become immune? There's no poison or any lethal - or even damaging - agent involved for them to become immune to.
It's just like sticking little invisible insect rubbers on their little insect willies.
I could eat ramen and shit better haikus than that.
Do they even promise that?
As a purely hypothetical example totally plucked out of the air let's suppose people want lots of wool and mutton. And clearly the more sheep you have the more wool & mutton you'll get. So everybody gets more sheep. And then suddenly the land doesn't work any more because it's been overgrazed. And it turns out that 1000 skinny scraggy sheep are worth less than 100 furry fat ones.
I know it's crazy talk. If it was an actual thing there's be a name for it or a phrase that fits.
[Australian accent] That's not Marxism! [/Australian accent]
Even my Eee 1000 can do it. GP is either delusional or unlucky.
Which part of "trained people" did you fail to understand?
This is a good thing, isn't it?
If they start agreeing on anything on anything other than the weather it's time to get seriously worried.
Didn't understand a word of that.
Think I'll wait for the movie to come out.
What you say is true. The way they go on about Benghazi you'd think she was on sentry duty. But she somehow failed to win people over on those issues. A lawyer who can't defend herself, FFS! Maybe she was just too old, by about 8 years.
The way the primary (I almost wrote primatary - Freudian slip?) was biased against Bernie probably turned some natural Dems against her too.
300 million people and those two were the least bad they could find? Then again, Boris ...
The thing that would solve everything is carding players for dissent.
A ref was punched to death in a kids' game a bit back. The fish rots from the head.
We did that at school once - last day of term. Two parallel pitches, four balls (two of them oval). Rules sort of improvised ...
it wouldn't be allowed now with all the human rights stuff.
Basketball games score like 101 to 97. Clearly that's the most skilful game there is, and if they made the hoops twice as big it'd be even more so.
It was originally public school[1] slang. Like Rugby -> Rugger.
Not bugger though. That was already well established.
[1] Which actually means a private school.
Then allow temporary replacements, like games for people that can count to more than 11 do. They use it for serious bleeding too.
In this WC there was an amnesty after the quarter final stage. Previously it was done at the end of the pool stage.
I there causation or merely correlation? And if so, which way round?
I thought the correct term was to quash a law?
Squash is what you do to bugs & tomatoes.