Slashdot Mirror


User: Fallen_Knight

Fallen_Knight's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
570
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 570

  1. Re:RDA want time to spend with his daughter on Ben Browder Joining Stargate SG-1 Cast · · Score: 1

    its been 5 years, how young can his daughter be now?

  2. Re:Well, two big reasons for that on Skunkworks At Apple -- The Graphing Calculator Story · · Score: 1

    #2 applies to closed source just the same, except worse as you can't go in and fix it if you want and your stuck with what you got.

  3. Re:Why are there two?? on Is Apache 2.0 Worth the Switch for PHP? · · Score: 1

    i think its simple enough to say "if you don't know if you need 1.3 you don't need 1.3" and to use prefork MPM with 2.0 if you use PHP or non-threadsafe libs.

  4. Re:It's a threading issue on Is Apache 2.0 Worth the Switch for PHP? · · Score: 1

    yea, my CMPT 300 teacher wnet on and one about threas being 100s of times faster then processes... i was half tempted to stamd up and call him on it.

    sure on windows processes are fucking slow and threads are fast.

    But,iirc, under linux thread/process are pretty much the same thing except 1 has shared memory.

  5. Re:FUD in it's purest form ... on Is Apache 2.0 Worth the Switch for PHP? · · Score: 1

    sounds like something you wouldn't see as a user and only as a site dev/admin...

  6. Re:apache2 is essential for Windows on Is Apache 2.0 Worth the Switch for PHP? · · Score: 1

    ISS will use less CPU as (IIRC) parts of it are IN the kernal (VERY BAD) so there is less overhead.

    the reason to use apache over ISS is security. ISS is just not as secure with all patches in palce.

  7. Re:Uhm on "Dark Alleys" on the Internet · · Score: 1

    its 2004, i'd think modren muds would allow you to use ssh??

  8. Re:Uhm on "Dark Alleys" on the Internet · · Score: 1

    its easier to moniter phone/radio then it is the net, alot less, easier to reconize and parse information. definite start and end.

    phone is just talking, 1 format, linear, easy to understand.

    the net is hundreds of well know protocalls, and thousands of leser/unkown ones all being used at once, many diffrent ones across a node all the time, and random times, infinite number of codes and ways to hide stuff.

    sure the goverment is probaly monitering e-mail, ftp, msn and the common ones, but what about encrypted stuff, and all the random thigns that like 2 poeple on the planet use?

    to much data even for the goverment to track and moniter it all.

  9. Re:Who's going to read it? on "Dark Alleys" on the Internet · · Score: 1

    now adays its pretty hard to just do a search on raw net data and figure out wtf is going on, lets say you have a largish router, with a million poeple's data going thru it on and off.

    you going to have missing packets.

    Your going to have massive amoutns of traffic that you can't identify. because its encrypted or some strange private protocall.

    so you ignore all that and focus on cleartext: you now have to search through tons of clear text with typos, bad grammer, shrtnd wrds, thigns only a human could under stand, 1334 speek, and more.

    Now from things the search engine CAN roconize, you will have emails about poeple killing others.. in games, tole playing, jokes, and lots of stuff that could be terrorists but isn't.

    creating a search engine that could do that is a very tall task. I dont' think i would even be possible to write, let along review the data faster then it comes in, i mean ALOT of data is moved each day across the internet.

    And no matter how hard you try, 2 people in some remote area of some MMORPG talking in code will not be noticed... its a lost cause...

    monitering all phone conversations and radio on the planet is easier then monitering the net. alot less data, and easier to decode and notice oddities. not like the net at all. (hell if you wanted to you could use acode that puts data in the TCP/IP headers and whos going to botehr to look there?)

  10. Re:don't worry on Flaw in Google's New Desktop Tool [Update: Fixed!] · · Score: 3, Funny

    Shame!?

    If i start telling people about my multi terabyte porn collection they start asking me to send it to them!!

    wait... umm I don't have any porn.. nothing to see here...

  11. Re:Google Link (of course!) on Flaw in Google's New Desktop Tool [Update: Fixed!] · · Score: 2, Informative

    thats why some palces have that "type in the text in the image" stuff

  12. Re:Secure Audio Path on Labels Trying New CD Copy Prevention Systems · · Score: 1

    you can always load unsigned drivers...

  13. Re:Maybe its just me but.... on A .Net CPU · · Score: 1

    i was refering to the compiled .net programs...

  14. Re:Maybe its just me but.... on A .Net CPU · · Score: 1

    overpriced is right, i guess it needs that 4mb of memory for the huge .net binary?

  15. Re:Maybe its just me but.... on A .Net CPU · · Score: 1

    it looked like 200$ for JUST the modual, not the kit....

    STAMP may be nice but its so much cheaper to buy a PIC for 5$ and use some veroboard.

  16. Re:There was an article a little while ago. on China and its Relation With Spam · · Score: 1

    The Linux box was attacked about twice an hour.

    did they break in or was it a unseccussfull acttack?

  17. Re:Tablet PC on Tablet Mac Becomes Reality · · Score: 1

    hmm, most of the poeple i know use PS:6/7/CS

  18. Re:Make that 5 out of 5 on PeopleSoft Goes To Oracle · · Score: 1

    yea, thank god theres always good local beers in case the merger screws up canadian.

  19. Re:What about a larger company on Australian TCO Study: Linux Wins Again · · Score: 1

    for a given number of computers you need far less people to run a linux based network when compared to windows. And if it was mac desktops with linux servers yet again even less:)

    So while you may pay as much as double for a linux sys admin, you need far fewer of them. A linux server once setup requires little effort to keep updated and running, not to mention can handle more traffic then the equivilent windows setup.

    If you use debian, it has many MANY programs packaged and ready install, totaly automated, alls you have to do is pick the apps you want. Update all debian isntall applications is just as easy, 1 click updates everything.

    with non debian linux stuff, most commen programs have automated installers, and for simple user applications they just work. No DDLs, no registry entries, none of that crap. Just download the proper build, unpack, ./config if needed, and run the program.

  20. Re:Do you yahoo? on Yahoo! Releases Desktop Search Tool · · Score: 1

    old? they are on TV right now lol

  21. Re:Bribing on Dutch Gov't Doubles Back On Open-Source Goals · · Score: 1

    but was that said about a year ago now?

  22. Re:Tablet PC on Tablet Mac Becomes Reality · · Score: 1

    photographers and digital artists.

    i would bet plenty of artists who would love to beable to get a tablet running photoshop with a really good interface for drawing.

  23. Re: field inspections on Tablet Mac Becomes Reality · · Score: 1

    Sadly that seems to be the case. Any portable device should beable to take a beating.

    I own a canon 10d dSLR, uses a Magnesium alloy that has yet to scratch, dent, or show a mark in the year i've had it. Heavy use, don't baby it, use it in the pouring rain, hikes, climbs, everywhere and it never misses a shot.

    Now why can't they build a powerbook like that!

  24. Re:Bribing on Dutch Gov't Doubles Back On Open-Source Goals · · Score: 1

    No... what happened here is something like congress saying all departments MUST change to open source but a year later the departments going with MS again even thou congress (the boss) has said no, open source only.

    There is no legit reason to go with MS once you have been told by your boss (the parliment, representing the people) to switch of OS.

  25. Re:Lawyers for dummies handbook, page 154 on ACS Sues Google Over Use of 'Scholar' · · Score: 1

    >These guys have been doing this stuff for six years >and I'm sure almost nobody here has heard of them. >I doubt seriously there will be any "confusion" in >the marketplace or "loss of goodwill".

    Yep, can't lose what you dont' have!