Slashdot Mirror


Ben Browder Joining Stargate SG-1 Cast

Ananamous Coward writes "Ben Browder, best known as Farscape's John Crichton, will become a SG-1 regular starting from season 9 (yes, there are already rumors about a 10th season), joining the SG-1 team although is role is quite unclear. He will fill the gap left by Anderson who's unlikely to return except for small appearances. Claudia Black, Farscape's Aeryn Sun, is also going to play in a fair number of episodes"

310 comments

  1. As long as by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

    They leave the Farscape puppets on the shelf, they'll be okay.

    1. Re:As long as by Cyberglich · · Score: 1

      I don't know watching Oniel and Rigel make a trade agreemnet whould be funny.

    2. Re:As long as by blaberski · · Score: 1

      I thought the asgaurd were puppets.

    3. Re:As long as by _Sprocket_ · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I have to admit that at first, the reason I didn't watch Farscape was just how bizzare it looked. A lot of that had to do with the puppets. But then late one night I found myself looking for something to watch and settled on watching an episode of Farscape. I was hooked. I went back through earlier episodes and really enjoyed the series.

      One of the interesting things about the show was its unique environment. And again, a key part of that was the use of puppets. This allowed for the inclusion of races and characters who all didn't look like the same body type with slight variations of facial features (not to take a swipe at other Scifi / fantasy shows).

      Of course, that's not to say that SG1 needs puppets.

    4. Re:As long as by Akaihiryuu · · Score: 1

      The Asgard were puppets in the first season or two, but in the later seasons they started using CGI for them instead...looks much better, and they can do things like walk around and pick up stuff.

    5. Re:As long as by computerme · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Your loss. Best writing on a sci fi show in the past decade IMO. But if you liked Babylon 5 i understand your comments.

    6. Re:As long as by blanks · · Score: 1

      Its the same with me, I didnt start watching farscape until a few months ago. I thought it just looked to cheezy to be good. And its the low qualtiy parts of the shows that kind of make it better. Yeah the puppets dont look perfect, and they could have made it more realistic with CGI, but the puppets really give it a sci-fi feel to it. One thing that allways bothered me was did they go with the puppets because of their budget, or because they wanted to go with a more traditional style with the series.

    7. Re:As long as by Sarev0k · · Score: 1

      Of course, that's not to say that SG1 needs puppets.

      Aren't they already doing the puppet thing with the Asguard?

    8. Re:As long as by oriordankevin · · Score: 1

      Being a child of the Jim Henson company may have had something to do with it :) I think the muppets are an asset. They really use the Pilot muppet to good effect for example. I don't know why people dismiss the show because of them. I mean there actually only 2 muppets there - Rygel and Pilot.

    9. Re:As long as by wo1verin3 · · Score: 1

      Coming up though the Asguard will be entirely CG...

    10. Re:As long as by blanks · · Score: 1

      "Being a child of the Jim Henson company may have had something to do with it"

      Heh that would have alot to do with It I guess :)

      I dont think its just the puppets, alot of the costumes used are also "unrealistic" meaning their not CGI enhanced.

      I think personally its because so many sci-fi shows / movies are trying to push the envelop so to speak with computer generated effects and visuals, so whem people see a show thats so "basic" compared to what has been coming out (starwars, star trek as example), people assume its not going to have a good plot, or acting, when in fact alot of times they focus on plot and acting...

    11. Re:As long as by Dekks · · Score: 1

      I felt the same about Firefly, very little effects in the great scheme of things apart from the odd cgi ship take off/landing bit, but the lowkey FX worked extremely well and added to the series, shame it was cancelled.

    12. Re:As long as by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Er what? I liked both B5 and Farscape. Liking one does not preclude liking the other.

    13. Re:As long as by glwtta · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The puppets were one of the best parts of the show. Maybe it's just me, but I've always found suspension of disbelief came easier with good animatronics than with CGI stuff. Maybe it's because with the puppets the actors have something more substantial than a blue-screen to interact with. Cheesy as it may be, Pilot on the set is the same Pilot we see onscreen.

      --
      sic transit gloria mundi
    14. Re:As long as by castlan · · Score: 1

      That's just in preparation for season 10. That's when Yoda is going to storm the Azguard homeworld.

    15. Re:As long as by Exatron · · Score: 1
      Farscape used puppets because it was initially conceived as a way to show off the Jim Henson Company's Creature Shop.

      I think it's the imperfections, and the fact that they physically exist, that make them more realistic than CGI.

      --
      "I think so, Brain, but 'instant karma' always gets so lumpy." - Pinky
      "Decepticons FOREVER!!!" - Ravage
    16. Re:As long as by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Funny, they're my two fav. characters. Rygel's great. I love this show and hate Sci fi for cancelling it. the puppets were an asset not a weak point.

    17. Re:As long as by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      their not CGI enhanced

      "they're".

    18. Re:As long as by Alsee · · Score: 1

      Haven't you heard? O'neil is pretty much gone in the next season. Rigel is going to run Stargate Command.

      -

      --
      - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
  2. yay!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    w00t...no really this is gonna kick ass

  3. YES! by CrackHappy · · Score: 1, Informative

    Sorry for all the Exc. points, but I LOVE this man!

    I can only imagine he will bring some new life to that series. I am so excited, I will actually start watching it again!

    --
    1f u c4n r34d th1s u r34lly n33d t0 g37 l41d Capitalization really works: i helped my uncle jack off a horse
    1. Re:YES! by Donoho · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      I LOVE this man!

      I respect Ben Browder as an actor and I Loved the show, but to say I love him is a bit more than I can muster...

      I LOVE Claudia Black! I mean, I also respect Claudia Black as... nah I F***in LOVE Claudia Black!

      I didn't watch Pitch Black until right before the CoR because I heard her character didn't fare well...

    2. Re:YES! by WizardRahl · · Score: 1

      What about Pierre Bernard?! NEVR FRGT!!!

    3. Re:YES! by CrackHappy · · Score: 1

      Alright...

      Admit it, you bawled your ass off at the end of season 4 (FS)!

      I bawled at that, then I bawled when they brought them back in the miniseries, then cried that at the end, just because it was so poetic and beautiful.

      --
      1f u c4n r34d th1s u r34lly n33d t0 g37 l41d Capitalization really works: i helped my uncle jack off a horse
    4. Re:YES! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm a big Ben Browder and Farscape fan. Browder was perfect casting for Chriton. I'm sure he'll be a great addition to SG1. Of course, I ditched my cable a year ago because there's nothign worth watching on except for SG1 and maybe a couple other shows. Not worth $100/mo.

      With bittorrent being attacked and suprnova being gone, I guess I'm not going to have a chance to see the new SG1 episodes - but that's okay.

      Anyway, yeah, Browder should be interesting. He has a certain charisma and you can't help but like the guy. And if they incorporate him in some way as his original character, I'm sure it could actually fit well. Even if it's considered "jumping the shark".

    5. Re:YES! by oriordankevin · · Score: 1

      She's in 2 movies this year. One is a remake of "The Swimmer" called "Naked in London" that comes out in Spring. I'd be watching it anyway because "The Swimmer" was a great film and I'm interested to see what they'll do with, having Claudia onboard just gives that bit more incentive :)

    6. Re:YES! by ericdano · · Score: 1
      Yes. I am there with you. The chemistry of Claudia and Ben is among the best on TV in my recent history. SG-1's interactions are good between Anderson and cast, but if Anderson is going to be effectively gone.....I don't see Amadana and the rest picking it up.

      Though the interesting question would be how will the series handle Ben and Michael, the two biggest beefcakes on SciFi? I mean, talk about boosting the female audience.....

      And if Claudia comes back as a regular, is she going after Ben or Michael? Or both? I can see the humor value already.....it will be Farscape with the best parts....

      --
      It's either on the beat or off the beat, it's that easy.
      I moderate therefore I rule!
      --
    7. Re:YES! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Browder coming onto the show has nothing to do with "jumping the shark" unless the show goes downhill after that.

      I'm intererested to see if Browder and Black's characters are going to be anything like Crichton and Sun (i.e., how much on Farscape was acting and how much was personality).

    8. Re:YES! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you are a guy this is understandable. I am female, and I too love this man. It becomes really clear when he's in one of his (too few I might add) shirt off scenes. OMG!

    9. Re:YES! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, I sure did. At both. Putting Ben and CLaudia on SG1 pisses me off. This show should've been cancelled, not FS. I will NEVER forgive scifi channel....ever.

  4. Oh Sweet Salvation! by eltoozero · · Score: 2, Funny

    My heart is one again!

    1. Re:Oh Sweet Salvation! by abradsn · · Score: 0, Redundant

      please someone mod this parent as flamebait.

  5. What about... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny


    ... the hot blue chick or the hot powder white chick or the hot red headed chick?. Fuck, they'll probably just bring over the hag with the eye in her forehead as a PC PR move.

    1. Re:What about... by thelizman · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The redheads dead, died in a nuke attack on the Eidelon temple on Arnesk. The blue chick 'died' years ago, but being a 9th Level Pa'ua has its merits. Look for Zhaan to rise just as soon as Revlon develops blue paint that doesn't cause kidney and liver damage. The gray chick? Don't even think about tapping that ass, because when D'Argo comes back (#1 of Sci Fi - if you don't see a body chopped into little peices, they're not dead), he'll cleave your ass in two.

    2. Re:What about... by ravenspear · · Score: 1

      being a 9th Level Pa'ua

      she became a 10th level before she died

    3. Re:What about... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      if you don't see a body chopped into little peices, they're not dead
      Well, we saw Areyn and John chopped into little pieces at the end of the last episode, and they came back in the movie. I think the actor has to die...
  6. Bork Bork Bork by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Will the Swedish Chef be joining also?

  7. Bah. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Who watches TV nowadays?

  8. Movie? by Richie1984 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    How will this affect the rumoured Stargate movie that is apparently in planning stages? I don't know about any other fans of the show, but a big budget Stargate film without Anderson in the main role somehow doesn't seem as appealing. Oh well, back to watching old McGyver episodes, I guess...

    --
    I'm not stressed. I'm just terribly, terribly alert.
    1. Re:Movie? by g0bshiTe · · Score: 2, Insightful

      About as much as if they brought back the same memorable guy who played Daniel Jackson in the Stargate movie.

      --
      I am Bennett Haselton! I am Bennett Haselton!
    2. Re:Movie? by D'Arque+Bishop · · Score: 2, Informative

      How will this affect the rumoured Stargate movie that is apparently in planning stages?

      I could be way offbase here, so if I'm wrong, correct me. That said...

      The movie was in the planning stages when they thought season six would be the last episode of SG-1. They wrote that episode intending it to be a series finale. (Kind of appropriate... the series would have started and ended with Abydos.) As it was, they got picked up for an additional season.

      The storyline that would have been the Stargate 2 movie ended up becoming the storyline for the season seven finale. That's probably why the ending felt a bit... well, epic I guess is the best word, with a gigantic air-to-air battle in the Antarctic with the Prometheus and its F-302's versus a bunch of death gliders and Al'kesh bombers. (For those who didn't read the article, Browder's character was the one who led the squadron of F-302's.)

      Anyway... I'm kinda interested in seeing how this plays out, especially with this "new enemy" we're supposed to be seeing. Also, Claudia Black's character will be coming back for five episodes... that also should be interesting to see.

      Just my $.02...

    3. Re:Movie? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Micheal Shanks is so darn cute, though. I wanna keep him.

    4. Re:Movie? by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

      Reading ahead- the new enemy doesn't seem to be very new- just an old enemy in a new form (replicators played by Carter). Unless, of course- the Wraith have intergalactic capability.

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    5. Re:Movie? by ericdano · · Score: 1

      The more I think about it, the more I am going to predict that Christopher Judge and Dean Anderson are going to be replaced by Ben and Claudia. Actually, Amanda could leave as well. Michael Shanks? Eh, I think he'd stay. Ben and him probably would have a lot of verbal sparring that will be priceless.

      --
      It's either on the beat or off the beat, it's that easy.
      I moderate therefore I rule!
      --
    6. Re:Movie? by iphayd · · Score: 1

      That's James Spader, he plays a really funny character on "Boston Legal" now.

    7. Re:Movie? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Oh well, back to watching old McGyver episodes, I guess...

      Patty or Thelma, is that you?

    8. Re:Movie? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually my biggest beef (until I decided I would just have to settle for it) was having Shanks instead of Spader. To me Spader made the Stargate movie what it was. To not have him in the series seemed vastly not right to me.

      Now Kurt Russle, different story. He's a good "action hero" type, but I don't think he would stand up to a weekly series. RDA was most definetly a good call for that role.

      Now Browder. Yay, more beefcake for us ladies (as if Judge isn't enough beefcake for anybody.. mmmmmmm).

    9. Re:Movie? by CTachyon · · Score: 1
      Now Browder. Yay, more beefcake for us ladies (as if Judge isn't enough beefcake for anybody.. mmmmmmm).

      As well as a few select men. *waves hand*

      --
      Range Voting: preference intensity matters
  9. Sci-Fi has crapped on me again by SplunkDotNet · · Score: 5, Insightful

    First they replace my favorite show of all time with a crappy series that's been on the verge of dying for years...then they take its cast. Viva la Farscape!

    1. Re:Sci-Fi has crapped on me again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Really, it seams that the cast have been taking themselves out more than the producers have been doing. Not that I blame them, particularly, they've been on the show for ages. It's bound to get tiring, you know.

      The best thing they can do at the moment, I think, is to wrap it up in season 9, maybe do a movie, then focus more on stargate-atlantis, but have cameo appearances by the SG-1 team (when the story warrants)--indicating that they're still alive and doing their thing (perhaps they've taken up command roles).

  10. I wonder... by Kierthos · · Score: 5, Funny

    Given that in one of the first couple episodes, they mentioned "MacGuyvering" the Stargate's control system and had Anderson glance at Tapping when that line was used, how long do you figure before there's the first Farscape reference in an episode?

    Kierthos

    --
    Mr. Hu is not a ninja.
    1. Re:I wonder... by _xeno_ · · Score: 1

      Given that in one of the first couple episodes, they mentioned "MacGuyvering" the Stargate's control system and had Anderson glance at Tapping when that line was used, how long do you figure before there's the first Farscape reference in an episode?

      "First couple episodes?" It was in the pilot, so my guess is "the first episode they appear in." :)

      --
      You are in a maze of twisty little relative jumps, all alike.
    2. Re:I wonder... by orkysoft · · Score: 4, Funny

      I'm still waiting for Captain Jonathan Archer to mutter "Oh boy" when he finds himself in a precarious situation...

      --

      I suffer from attention surplus disorder.
    3. Re:I wonder... by Planesdragon · · Score: 4, Funny

      He's going from playing a USAF pilot of an experimental vessel who gains knowledge of wormholes to fight aliens, to a USAF pilot who uses wormholes to fight aliens.

      I think his entire character's a farscape reference.

    4. Re:I wonder... by Kierthos · · Score: 1

      *shrug* I didn't see the pilot when it first came out (not having cable TV at that point), so when they started showing all the old episodes on Sci-Fi starting some time ago, they broke it up into two episodes. Frankly, I had no way of knowing if they did it that way when the pilot premiered, and it was in the second hour of the pilot, so I figured calling it in the first couple of episodes wouldn't be wrong.

      Kierthos

      --
      Mr. Hu is not a ninja.
    5. Re:I wonder... by FrostedWheat · · Score: 1

      how long do you figure before there's the first Farscape reference in an episode?

      In the episode that introduces Vala (Claudia Black's character), her entrance is very similar to her entrance in the Farscape pilot episode. I'm sure it was intentional.

      Not a verbal reference, but definitly a nod to Farscape.

    6. Re:I wonder... by CygnusXII · · Score: 1

      Not to mention, that they encapsulate her in an all, black, uniform. It is so similar to the Peace Keeper, garb as to not even be funny. Also she gets to open a can, of Major whoop Ass, on Daniel Jackson.

      --
      My cat's picked up a Hammer. HEY! Put down that Hammer. Put Down that Hamm...THUNK!
    7. Re:I wonder... by cosinezero · · Score: 1

      It'd be awesome if it became a crossover. They could do it without stepping on too many toes.

    8. Re:I wonder... by Snaller · · Score: 0, Redundant

      That was Tapping adlibbing, and they decided to keep it in.

      --
      If Google really cared they would fix Android Chrome to reflow text, instead of discriminating
    9. Re:I wonder... by Mercano · · Score: 1

      Stick him in the cockpit of an X-300 series vehicle and you could make an argument for typecasting.

      --
      #include <signature.h>
    10. Re:I wonder... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > He's going from playing a USAF pilot

      Not quite. John Crichton was an IASA astronaut, had nothing to do with the US Air Force. The Farscape producers tried to use NASA but our favorite government agency didn't let them use the name.

    11. Re:I wonder... by Planesdragon · · Score: 1

      read the article.

      he is. He led the x-303 fight against Anubis last season.

    12. Re:I wonder... by ericdano · · Score: 1
      Yeah, saw the episode. Very good. I love Claudia.

      Ben will be a great addition. However, what if some more of the main cast members leave, such as Christopher Judge. I could see a GREAT new SG1 turn replacing Judge with Claudia Black. Whoa. Very good things could happen.

      I mean, I love Christopher Judge, but he's been on the show for 8 years now. He's a major character. He's been doing a lot of voices for cartoons as well. Maybe he's going to die off or something?

      --
      It's either on the beat or off the beat, it's that easy.
      I moderate therefore I rule!
      --
    13. Re:I wonder... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, John Crichton (Ben Browder's character) is an IASA (Internation Aeronautics and Space Administration) scientist piloting an experimental space craft of his own design (well, his friend helped in the designing). I don't think he was an actual USAF pilot during the Farscape project testing.

    14. Re:I wonder... by dorsey · · Score: 1

      my guess is "the first episode they appear in."

      I've already seen the first Claudia Black episode, and I didn't catch any Farscape references. Of course, I haven't seen a whole lot of Farscape so I may have just missed them.

      --
      hinderfreude ('hin-dur-"froi-d&), n. The feeling of joy derived from being in the way.
    15. Re:I wonder... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Not quite. John Crichton was an IASA astronaut, had nothing to do with the US Air Force. The Farscape producers tried to use NASA but our favorite government agency didn't let them use the name.

      NASA didn't want their name used in Farscape, yet they allowed it to be plastered all over this movie:

      Mission to Mars
      http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0183523/

      Yeah, let's use Dr. Pepper to find holes in the ship made by micro-meteorites. And then the DP will make nice little ice sickles on the outside of the ship instead of completely vaporizing in the vacuum of space. And we all know that the laws of inertia don't apply in space so that as soon as you run out of jet-pack fuel you come to a dead stop. And you can keep all of the oxygen generated by your martian greenhouse in with loose tarps that the oxygen-deprived martian winds can blow right through. And then stand in same greenhouse and breathe the air as if you were standing on Earth. That's not even half of the things they screwed up, and NASA still signed off on it.

      Yeah, NASA was smart for not letting Farscape use their name. They might have been signing off on something that actually has more scientific credibility.

    16. Re:I wonder... by FrostedWheat · · Score: 1

      He's been doing a lot of voices for cartoons as well. Maybe he's going to die off or something?

      Nah, half the Trek actors did voices for cartoons at the same time as Trek. Gargoyles in particular, for some bizarre reason.

      Now if only Claudia Christian would make a guest appearance...

    17. Re:I wonder... by ericdano · · Score: 1

      Eh......She's not that hot. We could do without her. Jessica Alba guest appearance would be nice ;-)

      --
      It's either on the beat or off the beat, it's that easy.
      I moderate therefore I rule!
      --
    18. Re:I wonder... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      dude you don't watch enough enterprize. I swear durring that whole aliens building a super weapon to destroy the earth by order of the sphere builders thing he said oh boy at least once... or it could be my mind playing tricks on me...

    19. Re:I wonder... by Quantum+Jim · · Score: 1

      He led the x-303 fight against Anubis last season.

      F-302. The BC-303 is the Prometheus Battle crusier. And they lost their "ecks" designations in season 7.

      --
      It is impossible to enjoy idling thoroughly unless one has plenty of work to do.
      - Jerome Klapka Jerome
    20. Re:I wonder... by orkysoft · · Score: 1

      I'm pretty sure I'd have noticed if he said "Oh boy", so I think it's wishful thinking on your part...

      --

      I suffer from attention surplus disorder.
  11. Season 9 ??? by MisanthropicProgram · · Score: 2, Funny

    It's been on that long! I didn't know that. My girlfriend was a real fan (yes /.'ers, they're out there some where). She got me hooked on the show.

    1. Re:Season 9 ??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can I borrow her?

    2. Re:Season 9 ??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Only if you promise to rinse and deflate her afterwards.

    3. Re:Season 9 ??? by MisanthropicProgram · · Score: 1

      She's real!!! Honest!!!!!!!

  12. Claudia Black plays an...interesting character by RyanFenton · · Score: 3, Interesting


    Episode 8-12 has already been circulating in the TV-Torrent sites for a while. Not to spoil anything, but Claudia's character in it is a rather cliched, yet entertaining character because of it.

    For some reason, the episode had odd the feeling of a Bioware RPG scenario, with all the strange choices and snarky replies flying around.

    Ryan Fenton

    1. Re:Claudia Black plays an...interesting character by Spad · · Score: 1

      I was particularly impressed with the comedy fight scene.

      That's not a snide comment, I really was - one of the reasons I like SG-1 is because unlike Star Trek (for example) it has a sense of humour :)

    2. Re:Claudia Black plays an...interesting character by g00z · · Score: 1

      I wasn't too big of a fan of the character she played on that episode, or the writing in general. It's like they are trying to make EVERY character in SG1 act and talk like RDA.

      I did get a chuckle out of the "I'm crushing your head" gag.. other than that the episode was drek.

      --
      "The Wright brothers were the first to fly with a heavier-than-air machine, but boy did they have a lousy plane"
    3. Re:Claudia Black plays an...interesting character by LMariachi · · Score: 1

      Just in case you don't know, the whole "I'm crushing your head" thing is from Kids In The Hall.

  13. not flamebait, just a snide comment.. by phaetonic · · Score: 1

    i can't believe this series is on it's ninth season while babylon 5 didn't go past five =(

    1. Re:not flamebait, just a snide comment.. by Kierthos · · Score: 1

      Gee, could that be because B5 wasn't planned to go beyound five seasons?

      Nahhhhh.....

      Kierthos

      --
      Mr. Hu is not a ninja.
    2. Re:not flamebait, just a snide comment.. by Ironsides · · Score: 3, Informative

      B5 wasn't designed to go past 5. It was designed to be 5 seasons total. Read the 5 season DVD booklet sometime. It explains what they had to go through to get someone to approve a 5 season series.

      --
      Fly me to the moon Let me sing among those stars Let me see what spring is like On jupiter and mars
    3. Re:not flamebait, just a snide comment.. by PortHaven · · Score: 1

      Babylon 5 was not meant too...

      Crusade not going past "1" is the bumm...

      I also wish there was more Jeremiah!

    4. Re:not flamebait, just a snide comment.. by techno-vampire · · Score: 1

      You do know, don't you, that Babylon5 was designed to tell a specific story in five seasons then end?

      --
      Good, inexpensive web hosting
    5. Re:not flamebait, just a snide comment.. by aquabat · · Score: 1

      B5 was written specifically to run in five seasons. JMS Had the whole story planned out before they even started rolling tape.

      --
      A republic cannot succeed till it contains a certain body of men imbued with the principles of justice and honour.
    6. Re:not flamebait, just a snide comment.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Saying it ain't flamebait don't make it so.

    7. Re:not flamebait, just a snide comment.. by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

      Uh- Babylon 5 was NEVER meant to go beyond Season 5- the story arc completed. In fact, because it nearly didn't have a Season 5, they rushed some parts of the story arc to complete in Season 4. There was no way B5 was EVER going to go beyond 5 seasons except maybe as a sequel focusing not on the station, but on something/someone else (David Sheridan as a ranger, or the Crusaders looking for the cure to the Drak plague- though the second of those had a built in 5 season time limit too if TNT hadn't have gotten cold feet).

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
  14. Stargate is Rather Boring by VisualPolitics · · Score: 1

    Slim pickings for sci-fi on TV.

    1. Re:Stargate is Rather Boring by IANAAC · · Score: 1

      SG-1 may have fizzled, but its offshoot Atlantis is turning out to be a pretty good show. Decent cast too.

    2. Re:Stargate is Rather Boring by Tony+Hoyle · · Score: 1

      Atlantis has no depth... It'll get there (remember the first series of TNG?) but it's not there yet.

      SG1 has gone the other way - it's *too* familiar so they have a hard time doing anything new. Plus with the Prometheus and earth having Warp/Antigrav it's in real danger of becoming 'Voyager with decent actors'.

    3. Re:Stargate is Rather Boring by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Agreed - Stargate sucks.

      I'd rather have Farscape or Firefly back...

    4. Re:Stargate is Rather Boring by NoMoreNicksLeft · · Score: 1

      I used to think of SG1 as rather lame. It's a knockoff of a decent big budget movie, with second rate actors, etc.

      Then I started watching it. They do decent with the science. They do get "magical" stuff, but they do with it what I would think they would... here they are with an ancient artifact with instantaneous travel, and 8 years later, they're building a starship? That's forward. Plus the death glider, trying to retrofit it, and screwing up (and the recall device is rather clever).

      It's not asimov, it's not B5, but its pretty decent all the same. Only the worst episode even approach Voyager (and incidentally, only those that are the best of Voyager, haha!).

      In comparison, the cast of Voyager seems to be moving backwards (even as lame fuckwits B & B give them what truly are magical technologies for free). I just watched the episode where they get "letters from home" the other day. God was it horrible. They have computer technology 4 centuries ahead of us, but they have to send neelix around "handing out" letters? I work in an office where people people 30 feet from each other use email to communicate. And it's only 2004.

      Also, I must credit SG1 with another thing. Take "7 Days". I can believe that a tiny team on the NSA might be able to handle this, but they absolutely refuse to hire extras. The guy in the wheelchair needs this alien device implanted so he can walk? Oh, and the director of the time travel project also happens to be a surgeon, and does it? Puh-leeeeze.

      In SG1, you always get the sense that yeh, it's a small project, but not *that* small. If they need to lock the place down, there are 20 or 30 airmen there with guns, immediately. If they need some specialist, one is brought in. It works.

    5. Re:Stargate is Rather Boring by 1u3hr · · Score: 1

      I've never seen it, not available here on TV. But now I could get it on DVD, is it really worth watching? My criterion would be "better than STTNG", which I found silly and pointless. I actually do care about acting, plot, and at least some nod to science amongst the hand-waving, and action is nice if it advances the plot.

    6. Re:Stargate is Rather Boring by VisualPolitics · · Score: 0

      Do not buy it on DVD. You would be disappointed. Better to get some old classic sci-fi. They don't make good sci-fi TV shows much these days, because the producers aren't getting high enough, I suppose.

  15. Is it just me or... by WizardRahl · · Score: 1

    does Ben Browder look like Michael Shanks (Dr. Daniel Jackson) without his glasses?

    1. Re:Is it just me or... by pete-classic · · Score: 1

      Ever notice how Shanks always dissapears right before Browder shows up?

      He must really hate that guy.

      -Peter

    2. Re:Is it just me or... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have always thought the same. I thought at first they were brothers.

    3. Re:Is it just me or... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      no it's not just you. though Michael Shanks also did a fair Spader impression in the beginning of the series.

    4. Re:Is it just me or... by CrackHappy · · Score: 1

      Sorry, myself, I do not see much of a resemblance, other than the baby face.

      I mean, if you actually look at a picture of both of them side by side, I don't think they really look that much alike.

      --
      1f u c4n r34d th1s u r34lly n33d t0 g37 l41d Capitalization really works: i helped my uncle jack off a horse
    5. Re:Is it just me or... by underpar · · Score: 1

      Nope. He's hotter.

      They kinda do have similar features, but no more than most people considered really attractive do. Did I mention he's hot? I mean.. dang. They'll have to put some more cute females on the show to make up for the imbalance.

    6. Re:Is it just me or... by MrP-(at+work) · · Score: 1

      Actually, there is a side-by-side pic out there, someone posted it on the sg1 board on IMDb but I cant find it now.. They look really similar

      --
      [an error occurred while processing this directive]
    7. Re:Is it just me or... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Similar.

      It wouldn't be too much of a stretch of imagination for them to play brothers.

    8. Re:Is it just me or... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He's hotter.

      Which one?

    9. Re:Is it just me or... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ben Browder was the person in question.

  16. Verge of dying? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The ratings are as good as they've ever been, and they were always better than Farscape's while they were both on Sci-Fi.

    1. Re:Verge of dying? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe he means Enterprise?

    2. Re:Verge of dying? by SplunkDotNet · · Score: 1

      No I ment Stargate, back in it's early days. I tried watching it when it was on USA and it made me want to bash my head in.

    3. Re:Verge of dying? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It wasn't on USA. It was aired on Showtime until season 5, and then Sci-Fi after that. It also airs in syndication about a season behind. Perhaps you saw the original movie on USA?

    4. Re:Verge of dying? by Keeper · · Score: 1

      Farscape was still the #2 rated show on the SciFi network (even after shuffling the schedule around and randomly running new episodes).

      Apparently having a full night of good TV was too much for them to handle... So instead we now have to have Stargate and Stargate Atlantis back to back ... soon to be followed by Startgate Goes to the Moon and Stargate, the Jedi Returns. *sigh*

    5. Re:Verge of dying? by Keeper · · Score: 1

      This season has actually been pretty decent. I suspect they fired all of the writers from the first couple of seasons ... either that, or they sobered up long enough to write something that sort of makes sense.

    6. Re:Verge of dying? by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

      More that they fired Bergman and got somebody who had actually *watched* the other series and read the books....though T'Pau as a terrorist was a real twist.

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    7. Re:Verge of dying? by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

      Nah, just Battlestar Galactica, the Gender-bender series (with the female Starbuck).

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    8. Re:Verge of dying? by Keeper · · Score: 1

      Getting rid of Bergman would definately do it. The guy is a hack ... he ruined most of Voyager if I recall correctly.

    9. Re:Verge of dying? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it's early days

      "its".

  17. Sounds interesting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    No wait - the other thing - tedious. Seriously.

    1. Re:Sounds interesting by xcable_hhh · · Score: 0

      Cheeze it!

      Long live Futurama, oh wait???????

  18. no one watchs that show anyway. by Satcho · · Score: 0

    body cannot be empty.

  19. Don Davis by Dachannien · · Score: 4, Interesting

    They were going to have to add someone eventually. Of course, SG-1 has probably already jumped the shark, largely due to Richard Dean Anderson's unwillingness to either poop or get off the pot, so to speak.

    What I don't get is that they write Don Davis - who has said that he really enjoyed being a part of SG-1 and wanted to keep doing it as long as the fans kept the show alive - out of the show, so that they can promote RDA to the SGC's commanding officer, when they know good and well that RDA is fading fast from the show. Hell, they *froze him* at the end of Season 7, so why didn't they just keep him frozen and let Don Davis continue being the great performer he is?

    1. Re:Don Davis by Fnkmaster · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Agreed, Don Davis was a fabulous part of the show, most particularly because he served as a strong counterpoint to the tongue-in-cheek performances of Richard Dean Anderson and the altogether non-military SG-1 team. It kept the show grounded in its setting, and helped bridge the suspension of disbelief factor for me.

      Don Davis didn't need to be the ultra-charismatic leading man, there was RDA's manly rogueishness, Christopher Judge channelling a ridiculously buff black version of Brent Spiner's Data, and Michael Shank's geeky-but-sexy factor.

      Anyway, I too would like to see Don Davis come back in for a more regular role - send RDA off planet for the season on some special mission and bring back Davis.

    2. Re:Don Davis by blaberski · · Score: 1

      I though Don Davis was having some heart problems and that was some of the reason he didn't continue.

    3. Re:Don Davis by zeromemory · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Hell, they *froze him* at the end of Season 7, so why didn't they just keep him frozen and let Don Davis continue being the great performer he is?

      Actually, Don Davis wanted to reduce his role in Stargate SG-1 so that he could persue his interest in painting. You can verify this by reading transcripts of his statements at the Stargate SG-1 conventions.

      In the end, I think the decision to "promote" RDA was both his and Davis's desire to reduce their involvement in the show.

    4. Re:Don Davis by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and beyond that, if you saw the last episode of NCIS, he got busted down in rank to the "MTAC Control Officer", didn't catch what rank he actually was though, it just didnt seem so high.

    5. Re:Don Davis by g00z · · Score: 2, Informative

      *SPOILER ALERT*

      Don Davis makes a slight return in a recent episode that aired on Sky One (To show up state side in a month) where they teased that he might take over the SGC again. The reason I think they might do this is because I think the actor who plays Daniel Jackson is about to leave the show (again) since part of the plot of this episode is that he's on a ship with Hammond to check up on the Atlantis team.

      Maybe I should have signaled a geek alert as well.

      Anyway, Ben Browder wouldn't be the first farscape actor to hit the SG1 circuit since this episode in question also featured his busty counterpart Ms. Black.

      --
      "The Wright brothers were the first to fly with a heavier-than-air machine, but boy did they have a lousy plane"
    6. Re:Don Davis by Tony+Hoyle · · Score: 1

      Theres a "Do you miss this chair?" reference, which DD takes literally and askes for the chair to be sent to Washington... He's clearly not planning to take on SG1 in the near future.

      However he *does* pilot the prometheus (right before it gets stolen by a bounty hunter who has more than a slight resemblence to the one that kept teasing Picard in TNG).

    7. Re:Don Davis by g00z · · Score: 1

      Like I said, it was teasing at the idea about this. But also there is that dialog that occurs between Daniel Jackson and Hammond where Daniel accuses Hammond of missing the action too much to which Hammond confesses he does.

      I honestly think that if he doesn't re-join the SGC he might be shifted to Atlantis to replace the weakly casted commander there (although I think that show is pretty impressive right now and I enjoy all the rest of the characters)

      --
      "The Wright brothers were the first to fly with a heavier-than-air machine, but boy did they have a lousy plane"
    8. Re:Don Davis by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Jeez, you make it sound like you would like to make out with the entire cast.

    9. Re:Don Davis by Fnkmaster · · Score: 1

      To clarify - the assessments of sexuality of the cast are based on conversations with female friends and family members who watch SG-1 (strangely enough, my mother is a huge SG-1 fan, mostly because she thinks Richard Dean Anderson is a "hunk").

      As a straight guy, I myself would make out with Amanda Tapping, though she is getting along in years a bit (note the makeup they use to cover up the lines on her face), and is currently pregnant. And, uh... I'm not into that sort of thing.

    10. Re:Don Davis by Jarlsberg · · Score: 1

      Don Davis left for health reasons. Richard Dean Anderson wanted to leave to spend more time with the family, but agreed to stay on in a less active role.

    11. Re:Don Davis by bani · · Score: 1

      And, uh... I'm not into that sort of thing.

      I don't think it would stop a lot of slashgeeks though...

    12. Re:Don Davis by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I myself would make out with Amanda Tapping [...] [who] is currently pregnant. And, uh... I'm not into that sort of thing.

      You sound like someone who's never had sex [*], let alone never had sex with a pregnant women. Don't knock it until you've done it. Especially third trimester...

      ([*] OTOH, this is slashdot :-)

    13. Re:Don Davis by Dachannien · · Score: 1

      to Atlantis to replace the weakly casted commander

      I thought the woman who originally played Dr. Weir in her SG-1 appearance was far more convincing, and was disappointed that they didn't get her to take on the role on Atlantis.

      But as long as Rachel Luttrell is on the show, I don't mind *that* much ;)

    14. Re:Don Davis by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No wonder a lot of today's children are angry and bitter. Even when in the womb their parents are knocking them around.

      Though I guess your shooter has a problem getting far enough in to cause a problem. Ever hear of women having problems after a "tent" incident? They were with me.

    15. Re:Don Davis by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He could mean he's not into making babies... I mean how many guys really want to be a daddy, much less the guys who read slashdot *raises hand partially then lowers it cuz noone else has hand raised*
      heh. I know there are guys into raising a family reading slashdot, but most aren't even if they are capable of talking to females long enough to interest them in sex.

    16. Re:Don Davis by halo1982 · · Score: 1
      I myself would make out with Amanda Tapping [...] [who] is currently pregnant. And, uh... I'm not into that sort of thing.

      You sound like someone who's never had sex [*], let alone never had sex with a pregnant women. Don't knock it until you've done it. Especially third trimester...

      Wow. Too bad there's no mod +1 Creepy.

  20. Babylon 6 by nietsch · · Score: 2, Funny

    they should have named it babylon 6 if they wanted 6 episodes. It would only have spread out the inspiration of the screenwriters 20% more.

    --
    This space is intentionally staring blankly at you
    1. Re:Babylon 6 by techno-vampire · · Score: 1

      JMS paid a fine to the Screen Writer's Guild every year because he wrote every episode of B5 himself to keep it consistant.

      --
      Good, inexpensive web hosting
    2. Re:Babylon 6 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      he didn't write all 5 seasons. He wrote a large stretch (perhaps over 1 season straight) during the important season 3-4 arch, but didn't write every single episode during the 5 year run.

    3. Re:Babylon 6 by belg4mit · · Score: 1

      5 did not refer to the length of the series, no more than 24 does. B5 was the fifth station.

      --
      Were that I say, pancakes?
    4. Re:Babylon 6 by 1u3hr · · Score: 1
      5 did not refer to the length of the series, no more than 24 does. B5 was the fifth station.

      Of course, JMS had his 5-year arc planned out befoer he started shooting. The 5 refers to the space station, the 5th of its type. But "24" does refer directly to the number of episodes -- 24/season, that's the whole gimmick, "24 hours real time = 24 hours screen time" (less commercials, for quibblers).

    5. Re:Babylon 6 by 1u3hr · · Score: 1
      JMS paid a fine to the Screen Writer's Guild every year because he wrote every episode of B5 himself to keep it consistant.

      He didn't write every episode. In the first season, for instance, he wrote 12 of 22 episodes. See eg Babylon 5 logbook or any number of other fan sites.

  21. Sci-fi needs more Rishathra by VisualPolitics · · Score: 1

    I'd like to see Macgyver-dude from SG1 rish with a green lady, like kirk used to do.

    1. Re:Sci-fi needs more Rishathra by Pants75 · · Score: 0

      The need to film the original source of Rishathra, not just borrow the concept.

  22. Ben Browder character will be... by leftie · · Score: 2, Funny

    ... a cross-dressing transexual pilot named Starbuck.

    The first episode will have Teal'c giving Browder eyeshadow tips.

    1. Re:Ben Browder character will be... by WizardRahl · · Score: 1
      A user comment from the Farscape entry on imdb.com:
      LEXX only tried and failed to be what Farscape accomplishes with ease and VERY unusual grace for TV standards.
      I've never seen Farscape and after reading that I don't want to. *shudders* mmmm... pattern
  23. confusing and distracting by jeif1k · · Score: 4, Funny

    I find it confusing when people start popping up in other shows. I mean, when the holographic doctor from Voyager appears as a government lawyer in SG-1, one kind of expects him to have his emitter fail every minute.

    For movie actors or minor characters, that's not so much of a problem, but for regular cast members, it's weird.

    1. Re:confusing and distracting by barc0001 · · Score: 1

      And people wonder why some actors are afraid to join up on a sci-fi show for fear of typecasting?

    2. Re:confusing and distracting by g00z · · Score: 1

      The real reason for all this actor sci-fi crossover business is because almost all sci-fi shows are shot in Vancouver Canada (because it's cheap as hell), so all sci-fi shows are using the same actors who happen to live in Vancouver because of it's convenience.

      Note to all photogenic geeks with decent acting abilities: want to make it on an episode of your favorite sci-fi as an extra or small role? Move to Vancouver (And work on those pecks I suppose).

      --
      "The Wright brothers were the first to fly with a heavier-than-air machine, but boy did they have a lousy plane"
    3. Re:confusing and distracting by eclectro · · Score: 2, Insightful

      doctor from Voyager appears as a government lawyer in SG-1, one kind of expects him to have his emitter fail every minute

      Joking aside, this has to be one of the great injustices of current copyright law.

      I think that it would be interesting to see to different universes put together where you have plotlines from voyager intersect with SG-1 (as an example).

      It would give us a chance to explore characters in new ways. Sure, some of them might be bad, but many would be interesting nonetheless.

      --
      Take the cheese to sickbay, the doctor should see it as soon as possible - B'Elanna Torres, "Learning Curve"
    4. Re:confusing and distracting by moranar · · Score: 1

      Comic books already do this. It normally sucks. And of course there's always the Marvel vs Capcom videogames.

      --
      "I think it would be a good idea!"
      Gandhi, about Internet Security
    5. Re:confusing and distracting by corsec67 · · Score: 1

      I could be wrong, and my geography is really bad, but even I know that Sydney, Austrailia (Farscape) is a bit far from Vancouver, Canada.
      Like, a few thousand miles (many thousand kilometers).
      All of the specials in Farscape talk about filming in Austrailia, and most of the smaller parts were played by Austrailians.

      --
      If I have nothing to hide, don't search me
    6. Re:confusing and distracting by cat_jesus · · Score: 1

      What is even more confusing is when an actor plays another part in the same series. For example the woman who tortured Aeryn in Farscape ended up playing a good guy in the peacekeeper wars. I kept thinking, well I can see that it's the same bitch, what's going on here? It was a terrible distraction.

    7. Re:confusing and distracting by wolverine1999 · · Score: 1

      You could say there's enough crossovers as is on the Internet itself... but I would like to see them anyway.

    8. Re:confusing and distracting by bani · · Score: 1

      Not really all that confusing and distracting.

      In voyager he played a tight-assed doctor.

      In SG1 he played a tight-assed lawyer.

      If he hadn't played a tight-assed character, that would have been distracting.

    9. Re:confusing and distracting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As the old joke goes (at least as old as my good old Forever Knight and Highlander fandom days), Canada has six actors and one really good makeup artist.

    10. Re:confusing and distracting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The doc didn't bother me that much, the times when Q popped up was more disturbing :)

    11. Re:confusing and distracting by snilloc · · Score: 1

      I remember seeing "Tuvoc" as a (human) bad guy on a TNG episode... "Tom Paris" also, iirc.

    12. Re:confusing and distracting by jx100 · · Score: 1

      I was reading IMDB earlier, and Nick Locarno (the guy in the TNG episode played by Robert Duncan McNeill) *was* the model for Tom Paris.

      And Tim Russ (Tuvok) also had a bit part as himself in Star Trek 6 (which was also in a flashback in Voyager)

    13. Re:confusing and distracting by NoMaster · · Score: 1
      I think that it would be interesting to see to different universes put together where you have plotlines from voyager intersect with SG-1 (as an example).
      Hey yeah!

      And then they could ... I dunno ... have a baby? Yeah! Or maybe add a little green alien that only the main character can see! Yeah, that'd work too!

      And then, in the season finale, one of them could jump a tankful of sharks on a motorbike!

      Really, what is it with people; this twisted hope that inevitably leads to disappointment? I mean, we've got nearly 50 years of history to prove to us that 99.99% of crossovers suck - and yet that remaining .01% still causes people to think "no, this time it will be good..."

      Next week : I'll let you in on the "making 2 sequels at the same time" rule.

      --
      What part of "a well regulated militia" do you not understand?
    14. Re:confusing and distracting by Savage650 · · Score: 1

      cue to "Small Soldiers" where he plays a flaky chip designer lamenting about the Military not buying his rocket guidance chip (and just because it is a little too EM-sensitive).

    15. Re:confusing and distracting by twoshortplanks · · Score: 1

      Whatever next? Miles O'Brien turning up in a reoccurring role? Odo being the leader of a distant planet?

      --
      -- Sorry, I can't think of anything funny to say here.
  24. I wonder...how is SG-1? by Gudlyf · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    I never did watch SG-1 because, well, I thought Stargate the movie was ca-ca. How does the show compare? What's better than the movie?

    --
    Trolls lurk everywhere. Mod them down.
    1. Re:I wonder...how is SG-1? by doublem · · Score: 3, Interesting

      The movie was pretty lame, and I was surprised when they picked it to be the basis of a series.

      I was even more surprised when the series turned out to be good.

      A warning though, there's a lot of changes that take place during the run, and if you don't start at the beginning, then there's a lot to catch up on, and it's easy to get lost. You almost need a hard core fan sitting next to you giving pop-up bios and updates.

      That said, rent the first season or so. I haven't watched it in a couple years, due largely to factors outside the show itself, and when I had the chance to watch it again, I declined because I kept getting lost. "Wait, this character was DEAD for a season? Why's he back???"

      --
      "Live Free or Die." Don't like it? Then keep out of the USA
    2. Re:I wonder...how is SG-1? by g00z · · Score: 1

      I think the real reson the movie had potential to become as sci-fi tv series (and did) is because it had a great plot device for exploring space. In space based sci-fi, anything that makes crossing vast distances in space seem do-able, quick, and also cheap to shoot (ala the transporters in star trek:tos) is a great idea.

      --
      "The Wright brothers were the first to fly with a heavier-than-air machine, but boy did they have a lousy plane"
    3. Re:I wonder...how is SG-1? by thebudgie · · Score: 1

      The series is great... Right up to the end of series 7, then it gets a bit rubbish. Having O'Neill in charge of the SGC is just wrong...

    4. Re:I wonder...how is SG-1? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The first 4 seasons are watchable (but they ain't no Farscape, or Firefly or StarTrek).

      Give it a miss after that. They soon progress to entire episodes based around Richard Dean Anderson cracking lame aside jokes to the cameras about the series - the whole thing gets tiresome, and sad. Character dialogue consists exclusively of cliched old comments between the characters repeated over and over:
      Jack: I don't understand...
      Samantha/Daniel: It's really quite simple. You see -
      Jack: Bored already.

      Aha. Aha. Ha ha ha.

      Repeat 10,000 times.

      Seriously, if you haven't watched it you aren't missing much.

    5. Re:I wonder...how is SG-1? by mbourgon · · Score: 1

      I was even more surprised when the series turned out to be good.

      Oh, glad to hear it's gotten better. I watched a couple Season 1 or 2 episodes and went back to watching (insert name of a random sci-fi show... it was probably better). That was the most godawful derivative tripe. I wondered "why" when SciFi first started carrying it, since most of their original stuff was so much better. It was like they decided to pick up another "Lexx" (another godawful show, for those lucky enough to have not seen it), rather than a good show. (Guess Roddenberry's latest crap shows were priced too high)

      That said, rent the first season or so.
      That said, don't. I'll probably watch the last couple episodes... or maybe just start watching fresh.

      And oh, the irony... they cancelled Farscape because it got good ratings but cost too much, and now they're trying to bring over the (somewhat-less-alienated-since-the-miniseries) Farscape fans by grabbing the actors. Wonder if that was the purpose of the miniseries - give the fans a sense of closure(?), and give them (okay, "us") a reason to stop boycotting the network.

      That being said, my new favorite quote about how SciFi has gone downhill over the years: "the writing was on the wall when the Sci-Fi channel showed Braveheart".

      --
      "Sometimes a woman is a kind of religion, she can save your soul & set you free from all your sins" - Bad Examples
    6. Re:I wonder...how is SG-1? by glwtta · · Score: 1
      I watched the first few seasons - it was... serviceable, not bad, not great. Some review awhile ago called it "Your basic meat and potatoes escapism", I think that's pretty spot on.

      I stopped watching mostly because Michael Shanks' character annoys the hell out of me, and the storylines became increasingly about stroking his, um, ego. I mean how many episodes do you really need centered around his whining: "We should totally do the right thing, you guys!" then saving the team, some ancient civilization, the earth and in fact the entire galaxy with some brilliant discovery and/or single-handedly taking out all the baddies in a sudden burst of masculine prowess. All the while all the other characters stare at each other blankly and randomly walk into walls: "Save us Daniel! Save us with your unwavering morals and your massive intellect!"

      I mean geez, they made him a god for a season, wtf?

      --
      sic transit gloria mundi
  25. Frelling Cool! by slave+6742 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Frelling Cool!

    I couldn't help myself! The voices inside made me say it.

    --
    HGTTG: "I knew that there was something fundementally wrong with the Universe."
  26. End the series already! by Psx29 · · Score: 1

    It's had a great run, I enjoy the show, but there is nothing I hate more than shows that are just dragged on for so long, I want the thing to end already!

  27. Ben Browder by donbrock · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Never heard of him.

    1. Re:Ben Browder by DerKlempner · · Score: 1

      Guns don't kill people...it's usually the bullets

      I was under the impression that the bullets aren't what kills people, it was the force of the bullets hitting a person that killed them.

      So I guess guns don't kill people, nor do bullets kill people... physics kills people.

      --
      UNIX: Find it, fsck it, forget it.
    2. Re:Ben Browder by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "So I guess guns don't kill people, nor do bullets kill people... physics kills people."

      That's it. We should ban physics -- for the children!

    3. Re:Ben Browder by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The force of the bullets doesn't kill people. The tissue damage resulting from the force kills people.

    4. Re:Ben Browder by David+Horn · · Score: 1

      Excuse me. Guns don't kill people. Bullets don't kill people.

      Death kills people. :)

      [Thank you, GTA3]

      --
      PocketGamer.org - For the gamer on the go!
  28. IMHO they should cast him as... by PortHaven · · Score: 2, Interesting

    An ultra military hard-ass. A cocky SOB. Almost sanitized. More like a cross between the marines of "Aliens" and "Master Chief" of Halo.

    More mission centric. Military brat. Academy graduate....give him a father who is a naval admiral. Not a seemingly soft edge. A cut to the chase character.

    1. Re:IMHO they should cast him as... by IANAAC · · Score: 1

      They did something like that with Atlantis. He didn't last long and was killed off.

    2. Re:IMHO they should cast him as... by Keeper · · Score: 1

      That's because they didn't get the Master Chief part of the equation down right. ;) (and yes, that character was hella annoying)

  29. Legal clearing of name by T-Kir · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I like where they say they are still trying to clear the character name through legal channels... if you read between the lines kinda thing (or then again, maybe not)

    --
    Are you local? There's nothing for you here!
  30. SG1 == poo poo by VisualPolitics · · Score: 1

    The show is also caca. Richard Dean Anderson should start doing macgyver again. That show rocked.

  31. Do what? by IronChefMorimoto · · Score: 0

    [splat]

    Uh -- that was the sound of the brick falling from my ass.

    W...T...F?

    First off, if Browder is coming in to replace Richard Dean Anderson, I'd have to recommend that the writer who conjured up THAT storyline be told to stand in front of the gate during an incoming traveler event -- preferably FACING the event horizon.

    Anderson is integral to the SG-1 universe, and ending the series with Browder replacing his character would sort of suck. Although, General Hammond managed to snag a role on NCIS as the head of MTAC (the communications room at NCIS) along with the great cast on that show (as of last week's episode). Perhaps Anderson will find a spot on that show as well as the entire SG-1 cast migrates to CBS.

    I also wonder -- does Amanda Tapping's character (assuming she doesn't leave the show to be a FT mommy) suddenly, upon realizing that O'Neil is chaste, find comfort in the arms of Browder, a.k.a. the better looking SG-1 team addition?

    This could be a trick to bring back Farscape. Crichton won't be on Earth when he joins SG-1. No -- SG-1 opens a wormhole that Crichton finds with whatever is left of his wormhole-hunting-ability. Poof -- SG-1 finds themselves floating around with a MALP and Moya picks them up. O'Neil (or whomever is leading the team) makes a few comments about the floating, farting dominar, and Crichton is like, "What's up, folks -- where the frell are you guys from?" Moya starbursts to the Pegasus galaxy, and the Farscape + SG-1 + Atlantis team starts the all out war on the baddies from THAT show. The vampire dudes. Whatever they're called.

    I just wrote SG-1: Season 9, Atlantis: Season 2, and Farscape: The Atlantis Vampire Thingy Wars. Where the frell is my paycheck? "Indeed," as T'ealc would say.

    Seriously speaking, though, I am sad to see that Anderson will be leaving the show and only showing up piecemeal. I hope and pray SG-1 does not end the way The X-Files did. I don't have enough Maalox in the cabinet for that again.

    IronChefMorimoto

    1. Re:Do what? by CrackHappy · · Score: 1

      Thanks Morimoto - that was a good laugh!

      I can just see Crichton and O'Neil go at it... the two of them in a single room, I don't know how long it would be before Crichton pulls out Wanonna and points it at O'Neil...

      And then you'd have Scorpy horning in on the vamp's business of course and starting wars with them, etc....

      --
      1f u c4n r34d th1s u r34lly n33d t0 g37 l41d Capitalization really works: i helped my uncle jack off a horse
    2. Re:Do what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What, no Rembrandt Brown being chased through an artificial gateless trans-dimensional wormhole into the SGC by Kromaggs?

  32. yawn... by Lord+Haha · · Score: 1

    This might have been interesting say 5-6 years ago when I used to watch tv alot - but now with tv being quite aweful do we really care about some actor moving into a show that may be good but no longer in its prime...

  33. Re:Movie? = Spader again please. by hornrimsylvia · · Score: 1

    screw that! Bring back James Spader!!! Make sure he's got a secretary too.

  34. "Benson" in Space by leftie · · Score: 3, Funny

    I couldn't get used to all the characters from the sitcom Benson appearing in Star Trek as lead characters.

    I was certain that Gretchen Kraus was going to show up as the Borg Queen.

    1. Re:"Benson" in Space by schon · · Score: 1

      I was certain that Gretchen Kraus was going to show up as the Borg Queen.

      Nah.. it would have been funnier for her to show up on DS9 as a changeling - to provide Odo a good nemesis. :o)

    2. Re:"Benson" in Space by Jedi+Alec · · Score: 1

      when watching Buffy i kept expecting the principal to start asking for bribes in gold-plated platinum...alas, no such luck.

      --

      People replying to my sig annoy me. That's why I change it all the time.
    3. Re:"Benson" in Space by Wehesheit · · Score: 1

      so true...

      --
      This P.I.G. will walk on the water, This P.I.G. will walk on the sea, This P.I.G. will walk whereever he wants.
  35. After 5, it deserved to die by ArbitraryConstant · · Score: 1

    Can anyone honestly say they liked 5?

    --
    I rarely criticize things I don't care about.
    1. Re:After 5, it deserved to die by NoMoreNicksLeft · · Score: 1

      Not his fault. He was afraid of being canceled, sped up the story a bit to finish in 4 seasons... and then he got approved anyway. So 5 is has a bit of filler.

  36. It's awesome by ArbitraryConstant · · Score: 1

    There have been exactly 3 good scifi shows this century: Firefly, Farscape, and Stargate SG-1

    --
    I rarely criticize things I don't care about.
    1. Re:It's awesome by NoMoreNicksLeft · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately, one isn't good, and the other too are '99 or earlier.

    2. Re:It's awesome by ArbitraryConstant · · Score: 1

      They were in production in 2001 and later.

      --
      I rarely criticize things I don't care about.
    3. Re:It's awesome by NoMoreNicksLeft · · Score: 1

      And they'll be in reruns for the next 50 years. Doesn't mean you get to count them for this century.

    4. Re:It's awesome by DeathByDuke · · Score: 0

      this century? its only just started :P

    5. Re:It's awesome by ArbitraryConstant · · Score: 1

      meh

      If the majority of seasons are in this century, I'm inclined to count it.

      --
      I rarely criticize things I don't care about.
  37. RDA want time to spend with his daughter by leftie · · Score: 1

    RDA has been telling everyone he was on his last season for three seasons. He really want to spend time with his young daughter.

    No matter what, RDA's character will apparantly stay alive in the background. BB will be playing a new character.

    1. Re:RDA want time to spend with his daughter by Fallen_Knight · · Score: 1

      its been 5 years, how young can his daughter be now?

    2. Re:RDA want time to spend with his daughter by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

      As the father of a 19-month-old wondering when in hell I'll be able to teach him C++- probably just old enough to be getting interesting.

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    3. Re:RDA want time to spend with his daughter by Magic5Ball · · Score: 1

      The character of Jack O'Neil(l) will be disembodied into some computer/device/other being/same being who can remain in SGC without the RDA body.

      This is somehow necessary as at the end of this season, he presses some magic ascension device/has his body killed, stolen, or otherwise made unusable/takes over the Alpha Site or other off-world facility.

      Watch for it.

      --
      There are 1.1... kinds of people.
  38. Re:Why do people watch SG1? by Holi · · Score: 1

    Excuse me, I have a life, does that mean I can't enjoy a television show? Why don't you get off your high horse and leave your snide comments to yourself.

    --
    Sorry, teleporters just kill you and then make a copy. A perfect, soul-less copy.
  39. I'm a little behind... by adam31 · · Score: 1
    Does anyone know where I can get the Season 1-8 DVDs?

    I feel like I'm not appreciating the real gravity of this story.

    1. Re:I'm a little behind... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most stores that carry DVDs have them, especially HMV and Best Buy, which always have a ton. If you can't find it in store though, Amazon has all of them.

    2. Re:I'm a little behind... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Kazaa.

    3. Re:I'm a little behind... by Brian+Stretch · · Score: 1

      Netflix, through Season 7 at least. Worked for me.

    4. Re:I'm a little behind... by Darthmalt · · Score: 1

      Saw them at Wal-Mart today

    5. Re:I'm a little behind... by om3ga · · Score: 1

      Tried ebay? I've got two seasons so far from there.. keep an eye out and you may get all 8 seasons for $$$ cheaper!

  40. Dear MacGuyver: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Dear MacGuyver,

    Enclosed is a toothpick, some dental floss and twist-tie. Please save Stargate SG-1.

  41. No spoilers by dj245 · · Score: 1
    What I don't get is that they write Don Davis - who has said that he really enjoyed being a part of SG-1 and wanted to keep doing it as long as the fans kept the show alive - out of the show, so that they can promote RDA to the SGC's commanding officer, when they know good and well that RDA is fading fast from the show. Hell, they *froze him* at the end of Season 7, so why didn't they just keep him frozen and let Don Davis continue being the great performer he is?

    Well if you've seen "Prometheus Unbound" (and you torrent users know who you are!) then it seems to me that it looks like that is exactly what they did. Don Davis is in. Dean is out.

    --
    Even those who arrange and design shrubberies are under considerable economic stress at this period in history.
  42. Why do people read /.? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Seriously. Get a life people. Oh wait. I read /. and watch SG-1. I'm doooooooomed!!

  43. Quick Problem/Solution to Save SG-1 by firegate · · Score: 1

    Richard Dean Anderson wants to be in California and the show films in Toronto

    Quick Solution: Move the show to California!

    (That show will die quickly without the O'Neal character)

    --
    "Make it idiot proof, and someone will make a better idiot."
    1. Re:Quick Problem/Solution to Save SG-1 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Oh yeah, like that worked for X-files.

    2. Re:Quick Problem/Solution to Save SG-1 by Fallen_Knight · · Score: 1

      stargate films in vancouver.....

  44. skepticism by Savatte · · Score: 2, Funny

    It's not that we don't believe she is a fan. We here at /. have a hard time believing that you have a girlfriend.

  45. Re:Why do people watch SG1? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Seriously. Get a life people ;-) You're posting that on /. for the irony, right?

  46. Re:Why do people watch SG1? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Get a life people
    OK, so explain to me why I shouldn't mod you -1 flamebait?

    Still got 3 mod points, so posting anonymously...

  47. Let me understand this... by thelizman · · Score: 2, Insightful

    You're bitching because some obscure website which is overly fascinated with obscure technologies also happens to throw in the occasional obscure pop culture reference to an obscure science fiction show?

    Maybe you'd be happier over at news.com.com.

  48. Wow... by uits · · Score: 1

    I didn't think they could do anything to make me love the series, but here it is...*not missing an episode now*.

  49. Re:Why do people watch SG1? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Same reason I watched the X-Files.

    Smart chicks are hot. Yea, yea I know both are goobers IRL.

  50. So now SG1 gets to feast on its kill by searchr · · Score: 1

    Farscape was killed off thanks to Stargate (Sci Fi crunched the numbers, SG1 was cheaper to produce, yet had more viewers, even with reruns) Personally, I think there's room for a good old-fashioned crossover! Browder's character actually IS Crichton, he runs into SG1 while they're unwittingly exploring a Peacekeeper planet, they have to take him with them just as the planet is destroyed, blah blah.

    Next up: 21 Jump Street goes undercover on Law and Order

    1. Re:So now SG1 gets to feast on its kill by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

      Next up: 21 Jump Street goes undercover on Law and Order

      That MIGHT actually make sense- since all of the characters on 21 Jump Street (which was about 20-something cops going undercover in high schools in the late 1980s) are in their mid-40s by now...

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
  51. Sci-Fi can eat a dick by plasm4 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I'm not sure if the show was ever on the verge of dying, but I certainly was after watching ten minutes of it. Browder and Black must feel at least a little bit humiliated. I guess maybe sci-fi misses some of the viewers they lost with Farscape. This really is a big fuck you to all the Farscape fans. And please, no inane comments about how sci-fi was doing its fiduciary duty by canceling Farscape.

    I have karma to burn. Come and get me!

    1. Re:Sci-Fi can eat a dick by CTachyon · · Score: 1

      Is there something wrong with enjoying *both* Farscape *and* SG-1? Totally different shows, but they're both pretty darn good. (SG-1 moreso in the glory days of mid-S1 to mid-S3 or thereabouts, but still...)

      --
      Range Voting: preference intensity matters
  52. Re:Why do people watch SG1? by thelizman · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Granted, SG1 is played out, and I think it is truly time for a graceful transition either into a new mission and new cast, or into oblivion. But the mythology is still rich with variation. I'm actually impressed with what I've seen on Stargate Atlantis. As far as small screen sci fi, its the best we have going right now.

  53. Stargate films in Vancouver. by leftie · · Score: 1

    Moving the show would probably double the cost.

    1. Re:Stargate films in Vancouver. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Moving the show would probably double the cost.


      At the rate of which the US peso errr dollar is devaluing, probably not... AND it would be removed from Soviet kontrolled Kanuckistan.
    2. Re:Stargate films in Vancouver. by firegate · · Score: 1

      I don't know about doubling the cost; yeah, it'll cost more, but considering the fact that the show is SciFi's biggest hit, they could probably afford an increase in production cost to keep the actor that turned the concept from a crappy movie into the best sci-fi show since the original star trek..

      --
      "Make it idiot proof, and someone will make a better idiot."
  54. Oh, get a life, it's only a TV show by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    On an unrelated note, does anybody have a .torrent for Season 1-8?

  55. Voices in his head? by Sarev0k · · Score: 1

    So are they going to put Dom Deluise in his head so he'll have someone to talk to, just like in those Farscape episodes?

    1. Re:Voices in his head? by MrP-(at+work) · · Score: 1

      i never watched farscape but are you referencing the stargate episode with dom (gets into the heads of SG1 team) or was he also a character on farscape?

      --
      [an error occurred while processing this directive]
    2. Re:Voices in his head? by Sarev0k · · Score: 1

      In farscape John had a chip implanted into his brain for the sole purpose of trying to divulge what information he knew about wormholes. As a result John had persieved this facimile of Scorpius in many different instances. Along the same lines as the stargate episode with Dom Deluise, but with a more evil intent.

  56. Strange and interesting by TygerFish · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Browder has a wonderful range as an actor and he can even act in front of blue screens, Muppet's and people wearing makeup and foam rubber by the kilogram, but you gotta wonder what he's going to do on SG-1.

    I mean on Farscape, he regularly pulls off Cocky, Funny, "burnt," and once, a very powerful death scene... pretty much everything his character is asked to be/do with one exception: he is nothing like convincing as someone who has anything to do with science.

    The thought of Browder on SG-1 asks a buttload of questions about what made the producers want him. I mean, SG-1's humor (as delivered by R.D.A. in the current cast) tends to be far more downplayed and suble than what Browder has played on Farscape.

    Could be interesting. Could be an accident waiting to happen.

    Can't wait

    --
    To mail me, remove the 'mailno' from my email addy.
    "Yeah. It smells, too..."
    1. Re:Strange and interesting by pipingguy · · Score: 1


      ...can even act in front of blue screens

      Big deal. I myself often act (angrily) in front of blue screens.

      Yup. I'm another luser Windows guy.

  57. Seems like a step down by beforewisdom · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Seems like a step down after Farscape, but work is work.

  58. This is SciFi by thelizman · · Score: 1

    They'll beat this horse until its dead. Then they'll beat it until it is a frothy pink and blue foam. Then, they'll bottle it and try to sell it to us again. Sci Fi KILLS good sci-fi. They kept playing musical airdates with Farscape, then dropped it because the ratings could no longer justify the expense. They did the same to Lexx, but the writers there pulled a trump card on SciFi and brought the story arc to completion before SciFi could utter the words "cancelled". Before too long, SciFi will be nothing but low cost creature features and cheap space alien horror flicks. Oh shit...too late.

    You know, I get more sci-fi on the other 78 channels on my box in a given day than I get in two days of SciFi.

  59. Cool!... Fargate by gregm · · Score: 3, Funny

    that is all.

    1. Re:Cool!... Fargate by Joe+Tie. · · Score: 1

      Oglethorpe: NO! It is the FARGATE! It is not some other kind of gate from a movie or TV show that I've never seen! Notice that it has a wheelchair and a pink mohawk? We're not getting sued!

      --
      Everything will be taken away from you.
  60. Can't be doing too much painting... by thelizman · · Score: 1

    In this last year, he has had three projects

    GI Joe: Valor vs Venom
    Miracle
    Meltdown

    1. Re:Can't be doing too much painting... by Magic5Ball · · Score: 1

      And a lovely spot on Andromeda.

      --
      There are 1.1... kinds of people.
  61. Starscape? by borgheron · · Score: 1

    Weird. It's going to take a little getting used to seeing John Chriton running around a Goa'uld ship. :)

    GJC

    --
    Gregory Casamento
    ## Chief Maintainer for GNUstep
    1. Re:Starscape? by Jedi+Alec · · Score: 1

      depends whether he's wearing the typical fatigues uses in SG-1 or one of those cool peacekeeper outfits. i vote for the latter.

      --

      People replying to my sig annoy me. That's why I change it all the time.
  62. Farscape vs. SG1 by alexo · · Score: 1


    SG1 is not a bad series but compared to Farscape it looks simplistic, formulaic and moralistic.

    If SG1 is going into its 10th season, how hard it would have been to do the 5th season of Farscape properly instead of the tacked-on miniseries?

    1. Re:Farscape vs. SG1 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, now we know it will never happen.

      By bringing him on to Stargate they have effectively killed any remaining hope that something more would come from the Farscape universe.

      How sucky. I just don't understand why Stargate is such a popular show.

      I love sci-fi - I watch so many different shows, and love them each in their own way...but Stargate is the one show that has offered me nothing. Past season 3 or 4 it went downhill so quickly I wondered what the hell was happening. It's farcical, a parody of itself when it started. It's misuse of what is supposed to be humour clashes with the American jingoism that pervades the entire cheap plywood set.

      I don't know what people see in it...

      (9+ seasons and a spin-off??? This, while Firefly, Farscape etc. get cancelled way before their times... It sucks.)

    2. Re:Farscape vs. SG1 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      how hard it would have been to do the 5th season of Farscape properly

      Harder than doing more Stargate. The problem is that Farscape is a very special effects-heavy show. Don't get me wrong - I'd rather have another one season of Farscape than another ten of Stargate.

      But most of the characters aren't human (Chiana, D'Argo, Scorpius, plus any Scarrons) and require 4+ hours of makeup - or in the case of Rygel and Pilot, a team of people to operate. Then there are the new sets wherever they end up in a particular episode - and the computer graphics that show the environment / planet / alien spaceships. There's a lot of production trickery (compositing, recording the voice actors) that goes into compiling an episode - and that gets expensive.

      In contrast, Stargate has all-human (or humanoid) characters that require about 2 minutes of makeup and a change into military clothes to look ready. Then there are two scenes: (1) Interior, military bunker, a conference room, (2) A field with the Stargate in it on an "alien" planet. Occasionally they'll have some computer graphics to explain some plot point, but that's one or two shots per show.

      It wouldn't suprise me if a Farscape episode was twice as expensive as a Stargate one - so guess which series they'd rather make more of?

  63. Gimme more by Gadzinka · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I liked Farscape, I like SG1 and I've seen "Prometheus Unbound" SG1 episode with Claudia Black today.

    Give me more Black in SG1, it was the first really good episode in this season. But on the other hand, the best of SG1 are all the tongue-in-cheak, very out-of-character episodes -- "Window of Opportunity", "Wormhole X-Treme" or the one with O'Neil speaking Ancient, for the first time ;)

    Robert

    --
    Bastard Operator From 193.219.28.162
    1. Re:Gimme more by StarKruzr · · Score: 1

      She was absolutely terrific. But all in all, this wasn't a great episode. It was very fluffy and full of plot holes (why didn't Daniel ask her what she wanted in the first place? why did General Hammond command the Prometheus mission and actually get away with being the SOLE CREWMAN to go over to the cargo ship and grab the processor crystals?). But the chemistry between Shanks and Black was awesome. I can't wait for more.

      --

      +++ATH0
    2. Re:Gimme more by CrackedButter · · Score: 1

      Also, we will never know if they picked up that ore shipment off the planet or how one SG team was to reinforce the atlantis crew. Considering it was a rescue mission, did you think (like I did) that there were to few people going on the mission, that one bounty hunter seemed to clear that ship of personal fast.

  64. Ananamous Coward? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Someone can't even spell Anonymous!

  65. UK Gets It First by Nurgled · · Score: 1

    Indeed. Somehow UK's Sky One ended up getting the second half of Season 8 before the US, despite the first half showing in the states months before. Episode twelve of both SG-1 and Atlantis are due to air on Sky One on the 4th Jan, which seems to be a week before US viewers will even see episode eleven.

    I thought Claudia Black's character was too much like Aeryn, but perhaps that's just because she's a really poor actor? ;)

    1. Re:UK Gets It First by Kjella · · Score: 2, Informative

      Episode twelve of both SG-1 and Atlantis are due to air on Sky One on the 4th Jan, which seems to be a week before US viewers will even see episode eleven

      FYI Atlantis showed in Canada first, eps 12-15 are already out and about.

      Kjella

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    2. Re:UK Gets It First by Kyn · · Score: 2, Funny

      Don't you mean oot and aboot?

    3. Re:UK Gets It First by instarx · · Score: 2, Funny

      "I thought Claudia Black's character was too much like Aeryn, but perhaps that's just because she's a really poor actor? ;)"

      If she were a really poor actor they would have made her a character on Stargate Atlantis.

  66. aw man... by curtlewis · · Score: 2, Insightful

    None of Browder's jokes will be funny. Those Earth reference jokes he uses on Aliens just won't cut it in the Stargate universe...

    "Bill Gates can't guarantee Windows. What makes you think you can guarantee my safety?"

  67. Re:Why do people watch SG1? by VisualPolitics · · Score: 0

    LOL! Come on, that show is so boring! Look, we deserve better sci-fi than that. If it truly amuses you to watch that show, then don't let my snide comment affect your enjoyment. But I believe you're entitled to more interesting and thoughtful sci-fi with better actors. I liked Richard Dean Anderson as Macgyver, but SG1 blows.

  68. Bah by panxerox · · Score: 1

    I want to see an SG1 Battlestar Galactica crossover.

    --
    "It's so convenient to have a system where everyone is a criminal" - A. Hitler
    1. Re:Bah by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't be surprised if there was one when they try to "reimagine" Galactica 1980 in about 3 years...Vipers and Puddle Jumpers vs Wraith Darts and Type 3 Cylons (assuming of course, that the order of invention was original cylons, super-sleek military cylons, automated ships, then humanoids), that would be oool....

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    2. Re:Bah by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, that would be Zuul.

      I am the keymaster, biotch.

  69. Re:Movie? = Spader again please. by ericdano · · Score: 1
    Haha, a good reference to Boston Legal!

    No, James Spader is 1000 times better as Allen Shore than he was Dr. Daniel Jackson. As Dean Anderson is 1000 times better than...um......who was that guy in the movie? ;-)

    --
    It's either on the beat or off the beat, it's that easy.
    I moderate therefore I rule!
    --
  70. Why is everyone so upset? by LoTonah · · Score: 2


    It seems like most everyone on here thinks that it's the producer's fault that Richard Dean Anderson isn't on the show anymore. Get a grip, some people get tired of the same job day in and day out and want a change. After all, he's not only an actor on the show, but he's also the executive producer. I imagine that makes for a long work week.

    SG1 and Farscape are both excellent shows. I bear no ill will toward Sci-Fi for canning Farscape, I imagine that the show was massively expensive to produce so although the decision was a tough one to make, it had to be done for the network to survive.

    Richard is a fine actor. Ben is an awesome actor. It's kinda like comparing William Shatner to Patrick Stewart. Give Ben time, you may grow to love him.

    1. Re:Why is everyone so upset? by StarKruzr · · Score: 1

      You make an excellent point. Half the reason SG-1 is as good as it is is RDA's being at the production helm. The show will not go downhill with him off the cast.

      --

      +++ATH0
    2. Re:Why is everyone so upset? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Everyone is upset because for 7 seasons one of the core parts of the show is RDA's character getting to blow stuff up to resolve plot points. I think a lot of material in the season 8 episodes is hilarious, but I have to admit I'm often waiting for an explosion so I know the story has moved forward. It's something the audience has been trained to expect. Also, they really haven't got a equivalent character to cover O'Neil sarcasm/playing dumb moments. If anyone can do it it's Ben. We'll just have to see how he's written in.

  71. crap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    this is going to FUCKING KILL this series

    wtf is wrong with sci fi

  72. Don't worry. by StarKruzr · · Score: 1

    Claudia's chemistry with Michael Shanks is absolutely delicious.

    This is some of the best news I've heard in Sci-Fi since I found out the BSG remake didn't suck at all (and was actually quite good). My two favorite scifi shows are merging! :D

    --

    +++ATH0
    1. Re:Don't worry. by ericdano · · Score: 1
      Yeah, I saw the SG1 episode. It was good. I think SG1 would benefit by dumping Richard Dean Anderson, and perhaps Christopher Judge or Amanda, and replacing them with Claudia and Ben. My God, the show would have a great new face and edge to it.

      Seriously though, Christopher Judge has been doing this since the beginning. He's character is kind of getting boring. Claudia as the alien that is part of SG1 would be awesome.

      --
      It's either on the beat or off the beat, it's that easy.
      I moderate therefore I rule!
      --
    2. Re:Don't worry. by IANAAC · · Score: 1
      Seriously though, Christopher Judge has been doing this since the beginning. He's character is kind of getting boring. Claudia as the alien that is part of SG1 would be awesome.
      They've humanized Chrstopher Judge's character a lot over the years. It's the nature of the beast, I would say. It happened in the original Star Trek with Spock, Data in TNG, 7 of Nine in Voyager, etc. And I think the same thing would happen to any alien character Claudia would play.
    3. Re:Don't worry. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He's character is kind of getting boring

      "His".

  73. It was a very fluffy episode by StarKruzr · · Score: 1

    But still, in my opinion, extremely enjoyable.

    Every character in SG-1 is still quite unique. One of the things I like about it is that it's fairly internally consistent with respect to some other sci-fi shows. It makes sense that after 8 years, the guys would have rubbed off on each other quite a bit. Hell, they're all the best of friends at this point (the actors AND the characters). Naturally RDA's extremely snarky attitude and sense of humor would rub off on Shanks (and O'Neill's on Dr. Jackson).

    --

    +++ATH0
  74. USAF? by thelizman · · Score: 3, Informative

    Commander John Crichton was not in the USAF. He was a scientist working on an IASA project. Think Pete Siebold with TierOne/SpaceShipOne.

  75. Re:Movie? = Spader again please. by LetterJ · · Score: 1

    It's actually a reference to the movie "Secretary" that he's in (http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0274812/). It's an . . . interesting film.

  76. He's right by thelizman · · Score: 1

    The series was put into syndication before SciFi was even a channel. USA Networks bought syndication rights from MGM. When Showtime cancelled, USA's parent company bought the rights, and Sci Fi begain airing episodes. Until a few years ago, you could still see very old reruns of SG1 on USA. Even now, Sci Fi and USA share rerun and syndication on some shows, including Xena, Hercules, Andromeda, and Beastmaster. They both are owned by the same parent company.

  77. Thanks for the spoilers. by Radak · · Score: 0, Troll

    Those of us who deliberately do not closely follow the news on the shows we watch (personally, I want to be surprised by the evolution of the characters) would appreciate not having this kind of information plastered all over Slashdot's front page.

  78. Busty? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    busty counterpart Ms. Black.
    Claudia Black is hot, yes. But, busty, no.

    Remeber Ben calling her a "flat assed Peacekeeper" in one episode of Farscape? The ass ain't the only thing that is flat.

    In the SG-1 episode she is in a black body suit and the differences between her and 7 of 9 don't end at their hair colour.

    BYW, exactly what changed with her between Season 1 & Season 4? In Season 1 she is OK, curly haired and kind of pale. By Season 4 she is drop dead gorgeus, with straight hair.
    I have yet to care enough to do a side by side compairson, but aside from sraightening her hair, what changed that she became sexy?

    1. Re:Busty? by bani · · Score: 1

      Her personality. She became more "accessable" in season 4.

  79. what about Jonas? by tsioc · · Score: 1

    I was kind of hoping Corin Nemec (Jonas) would rejoin the SG1 team now that Anderson (Oneil) is out off the team... I never cared for Farscape, so I really dont know what to expect from this guy. Hopefully I wont be too disappointed.

    1. Re:what about Jonas? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The dude is a freako scientologist. I doubt they'd want him back.

  80. Come on. by StarKruzr · · Score: 1

    I watched 7 consecutive episodes of MacGyver over the past week.

    You want to talk about boring? None of the classic RDA jokes, lame dialogue and fairly terrible action scenes.

    In comparison, SG-1 has honest-to-God military consultants giving them tips about what combat is like (or at least, how humans fight in their armed forces :D).

    --

    +++ATH0
    1. Re:Come on. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I watched 7 consecutive episodes of MacGyver over the past week.

      You want to talk about boring?


      If you watched 7 consecutive episodes of that show and you considered them boring, then your life must be really pathetic and meaningless.

    2. Re:Come on. by StarKruzr · · Score: 1

      Well, it IS pathetic and meaningless, but that's not why.

      What I mean by consecutive was that they were all one after another in the 3rd season.

      And I really wanted to give it a chance, because I figured, "Dude, it's got RDA, how bad can it be?"

      Apparently MacGyver was before he caught his stride.

      --

      +++ATH0
  81. Agreed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    I feel that SG-1 in season 8 is a bit adrift. The 3 main actors seem to be vying for the vacuum left by RDA.

    Hopfully the importation of Farscape will give the show a needed shot in the arm. Instead of a slow death.

  82. Babylon 5 + Rangers + Crusade by Erik_ · · Score: 1

    Babylon 5 was a five year show, with two additional spin-offs such as Babylon 5 - The Legends of the Rangers, and Crusade, including 5 or 6 TV movies. Not bad...

  83. Re:Movie? = Spader again please. by ericdano · · Score: 1

    Oh, hmmm. Haven't seen it. However, check out Boston Legal. Spader is the man on that show!

    --
    It's either on the beat or off the beat, it's that easy.
    I moderate therefore I rule!
    --
  84. Harvey! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I was just saying after Tuesdays episode on Sky 1 that had Claudia in, "I just hope they don't find Crichton as well". Seems like they will :)

  85. Re:Movie? = Spader again please. by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 1
    Oh, hmmm. Haven't seen it. However, check out Boston Legal. Spader is the man on that show!

    And Rhona Mitra is definitely the woman!

    She also used to be the real Lara Croft before they made the movies and Jolie got the big screen role.

    Smokin.

    --
    When information is power, privacy is freedom.
  86. Isn't SG-1 getting kind of long in the tooth? by Zobeid · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It'll be nice seeing a couple of familiar faces again, with fresh characters and settings. I don't seen any problem with that.

    Personally, I thought Farscape was a great series that got way too dark and jumbled in the last season or two. It was a show that lost its way. Maybe it was too ambitious? SG-1 is less ambitious, and though it may have stumbled a few times, it never really lost its way.

    I'm a big fan of SG-1, all the more since there aren't many real SF shows left on TV. However. . .

    Am I the only one who thinks SG-1 is getting kind of old? And cheap? I mean. . . In the beginning they had great, elaborate costumes and sets, and lots more bit parts and extras (including great ethnic actors to represent some of the planets they visited) and great military equipment props. As season after season rolls by, the production gets pared down more and more -- it gets more austere and repetitious. Fewer characters, fewer cool props, more austere sets, more of the same stuff getting recycled. And I swear, someday they are going to step out of that stargate onto yet another alien planet covered with the same damned pine trees, and I'm going to lose it.

    YEARGH!

  87. Re:Movie? = Spader again please. by ericdano · · Score: 1

    Yes she is! And now that James Spaders' character is with her.....oh my. It's good. Very very good.

    --
    It's either on the beat or off the beat, it's that easy.
    I moderate therefore I rule!
    --
  88. Matrix Adaptation :) by b374 · · Score: 1
    I guess this could be a real dialog from the set when Anderson comes for one of his next small appearances mentioned:


    Ben Browder: Mr. Anderson! Welcome back, we missed you.
    Ben Browder: Like what I've done with the place?
    Richard Dean Anderson: It ends tonight.
    Ben Browder: I know it does, I've seen it. That's why the rest of me is just going to enjoy the show because we already know that I'm the one that beats you.
  89. Season 9?? This is season 8 news for Black. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We've not got the last half of season 8 done yet, and to be precise, Claudia Black is going to be in season 8. What I found amusing was, looking at the season guide, some pics of Black and Shanks, with Shanks haveing a very Crichtonesqe haircut, and a ripped black t-shirt (think black shirt John.. for all you other 'scape fans). I was like.. "Browder?.. no Shanks.. damn" lol!

  90. Filler work waiting for Farscape's 5th season by ArhcAngel · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Perhaps the reason scifi is doing this is to keep Browder around while they come up with a script for another movie/season of FarScape? We all know it's about the benjamins and perhaps the free publicity and decent reviews the recent mini-series garnered were enough to kick start another run....I mean they did decide to proceed with the new Battlestar Galactica (which I personally didn't find very good) so how much of a stretch is it to believe Farscape is FAR behind ;)

    --
    "A person is smart. People are dumb, panicky dangerous animals and you know it." - K
  91. Yeah it's getting old by Schwarzchild · · Score: 1

    They should kill Stargate and bring back Farscape. Stargate used to be a good show but it has gone downhill in a bad way in recent years. Since Richard Dean Anderson and Amanda Tapping have personal issues that are taking up their time, they should just kill the series.

    --

    "sweet dreams are made of this..."

  92. Re:Why do people watch SG1? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    One of the great things about SG-1 is that it pokes so much fun at itself.
    Another is really funny dialogue:

    Burke: So is that that thing that made that guy do that thing? (episode 712)

  93. Doesn't Count by thelizman · · Score: 1

    I hear Kemper used a 12 sided die, and the rules specifically call for a 4 sided die when promoting your Delvian's in their Pa'ua.

    : )

  94. No. Farscape just sucks- Don't drink so much by ThoreauHD · · Score: 1

    If you have to get hooked on a series at 4 am when infomercials are slamming all the channels, something is wrong. Perhaps you don't see it. But, let me help you.

    The show sucked. It was gayer than a guy with his hand up a puppets ass for a hour. I hope this helps. Since it's not 4 am, you can better trust your judgement.

    1. Re:No. Farscape just sucks- Don't drink so much by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you must be thinking of that frelling dren they call SG1. i wouldn't even watch that shite for Crichton. *worships Farscape*

  95. my reasons for watching by l3v1 · · Score: 1

    Where I live, SG-1 has barely put feet in season 6. but I already saw all episodes aired wherever up to this day. Alas, I'm not a die-hard-give-all-fsck-others fan of SG-1 (but you could call me one in the case of Trek and Babylon :) for tv-shows, and for a storefull of sci-fi literature), but there were many bits and points in the storyline [of SG-1] which kept me watching episodes one after the other.

    These bits and points thing was a huge miss for me in the Farscape show, especially for two main reasons: the very immaturely childish nature of the storyline, and the actors [i.e. acting]. I deliberately don't include the design and the puppets, because a story's goodness factor doesn't really depend on there being puppets or not.

    So when I read this story on guys coming over for extendd periods from Farscape, I just shivered. I guess SG-1 has provided me(us) fan(s) with a pretty long enjoyable story (pushed to be lenghtened twice already), so I won't be especially sad to see it go, but I hope these guys won't think they are still in Farscape, and provide us with a show worthy to still be called Stargate SG-1.

    I hope JDA and AT will be back for good play, the show wouldn't be the same without JDA's "comments" either :))

    --
    I am putting myself to the fullest possible use, which is all I can think that any conscious entity can ever hope to do.
    1. Re:my reasons for watching by Presidential · · Score: 1

      Where I live, SG-1 has barely put feet in season 6.
      So, how is life back in the year 2001? ;)

      --
      Whenever Mrs. Fitch breaks wind, we beat the dog.
  96. Twin Peaks by yurigoul · · Score: 1

    The best part about seeing him in SG1 is his role in Twin Peaks where is a connected to a top secret government project researching aliens. So every time I see him in is SG1 role I smile (Okay, okay, I do not watch it that often)

  97. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  98. Chopped? by thelizman · · Score: 1

    No no, they shattered. Being that they were already crystallized (regular atomic structure), its not inconceivable that with the right superglue and hours of patient attention, one couldn't be put back together. Now, being partially digested by Rygel, I had some qualms with that scene.

  99. Yes. by StarKruzr · · Score: 1

    Kurt Russell's O'Neill didn't really have much of a sense of humor. He was more of the tortured-haunted-guy.

    --

    +++ATH0