I've been a winamp user since windows 95 -> I've been a Micro$oft user since DOS -> I still use winamp because it's small, takes up nearly no memory and doesn't tax my processor with the right settings. It doesn't surprise me that this [vulnerability] was discovered, I knew that I could download an mp3 and it could harm my computer back in the day so I guess that someone finally decided to announce that they were unsafe??
If the name Micro$oft appears on a product, it's guaranteed unsafe... if you are running a product on a Micro$oft product, it's guaranteed unsafe.
I know Linux isn't perfect[to some it is], I know MAC OS isn't[to some it is], I know Windows isn't perfect[If anyone thinks it is, get informed then talk to me] Each have their own good and bad points but one of these takes the bad points from the other two, multiplies them by 10 and puts a price tag on it that is insane compared to the other two... GUESS WHO?
Slashdot Mirror
In the top right corner of the winamp site, click the folded corner... it'll take you to the old WINAMP site with the older downloads -
I've been a winamp user since windows 95 -> I've been a Micro$oft user since DOS -> I still use winamp because it's small, takes up nearly no memory and doesn't tax my processor with the right settings. It doesn't surprise me that this [vulnerability] was discovered, I knew that I could download an mp3 and it could harm my computer back in the day so I guess that someone finally decided to announce that they were unsafe??
If the name Micro$oft appears on a product, it's guaranteed unsafe... if you are running a product on a Micro$oft product, it's guaranteed unsafe.
I know Linux isn't perfect[to some it is], I know MAC OS isn't[to some it is], I know Windows isn't perfect[If anyone thinks it is, get informed then talk to me] Each have their own good and bad points but one of these takes the bad points from the other two, multiplies them by 10 and puts a price tag on it that is insane compared to the other two... GUESS WHO?