Browsing separate tabs really shouldn't be taking cpu at all. Haven't looked at Firefox's source but I will typically have a hundred plus tabs open and notice very little draw on my cpu resource. Right now it's pulling 5.1% on a quad core cpu with a guess at around a 100 tabs open and and at least 5 that are interactive. Streaming once again suspect the optimum use of the dollars is buying a higher end graphics card.
You have an application that can support fine grained parallelism , why run it on 18 cores of X86 when you run it on 1500 cores off a graphics card ?
Because a graphics card is not just 375 traditional CPUs jammed into a single package and just because something can scale to 18 cores doesn't mean it would run better on 1500 GPU cores.
You really have a desperate need to learn how to read or at least learn what the relevant terminology actually means.
Unless your desktop is doing something that parallelizes really well
I thought I was pretty clear saying that. Just how much of a performance boost is your web browser going to get from extra cores when it should just stop running scripts/vidoes in windows/tabs that don't have focus ? or for that matter your word processor or video game ?
Chores like raytracing, video transcoding and export, photo editing filters, science applications, and web-servers generally like this kind of processor
Well ray tracing is almost certainly better handled by a GPU these days, same for video transcoding. Web Server that needs parallelism is a server application not a desktop application. Some science applications certainly but if they parallelize easily and well then it's back to the GPU architectures once again.
Oh yes you did. It's perfectly clear that when you say NAZI you mean anyone you dislike.
Hell you didn't even include an axis for legitimacy/illegitimacy of nation states which is the only axis they have in common with any American conservative thought.
On every other question you can think of they are well aligned with the left. 1. Is it ok to kill children: Left yes, NAZIs Yes 2. Is eugenics acceptable : Left yes NAZIS yes 3. Should the state dictate the economy : Left Yes , NAZIS Yes 4. Is having an upopular opinion enough to take violent action against someone: Left Yes NAZIs Yes 5. Should the state insure citizens have employment and are provided for for life: Left Yes, NAZIs Yes 6. Should the Entrepeneurial Class have it's gains limited : Left Yes, NAZIs Yes 7 Should the state act as a parent to the people : Left Yes, NAZIs Yes 8 Here's a real big one, should precedent and cannons of justice bow to immediate needs of the state: Left Yes, NAZIs Yes
The list goes on and on and on. The only difference is the NAZIs were NATIONAL socialists and the Communists were INTERNATIONAL socialists.
Unless your desktop is doing something that parallelizes really well you probably will never notice the benefits of this. Even things that benefit from parallel processing are far better served by running them on truly parallel architectures. You have an application that can support fine grained parallelism, why run it on 18 cores of X86 when you run it on 1500 cores off a graphics card ?
So in your universe Republican = Right Wing because they believe in law and order , change through the constitution and property rights Libertarian = Right Wing because they believe in law, and property rights, and the individual right to discriminat NAZI = Right wing because they believe in the order and inequality
So Libertarian = NAZI
And if you think their views on economy are the main defining feature of Nazis, you are willfully ignorant.
No the defining feature of NAZIism was totalitarianism the state controlling all aspects of life, the same as it is for socialists and communists.
You just like using the word to mean people you don't like.
20th century (post Russian Revolution) Right wing = support of free economy Left wing = state control of the economy
The NAZIs most definitely believed in state control of the economy and they also believed in state control of just about everything else which puts them very nicely in the same boat as Stalin and San Francisco
As to hate they hated just about everybody. The Russians, Jews, Gypsies, the French etc etc,
Add in some propaganda machine's, ranging from populists to anti-populists, and more and more people realizing this is all propaganda. Why is it so hard to deal with fake news? Because the line between fake news and propaganda is blurring. And the civilian? Can choose between getting brainwashed or become cynical.
Well put only issue is that the line isn't blurring, it's that people are finally starting to have enough information they can see there never was any line.
He obviously doesn't like the idea of users taking their numbers to advertisers and cutting a deal directly with them, instead of twitter grabbing every red cent that comes out of the platform. He also probably doesn't like the idea of having the fact he suspends the accounts of people with millions of followers continuously thrown in his face.
Expect this to be eliminated or subtly fudged, maybe a new number like "Validated Followers", something mostly useless for people to negotiate with.
Don't be a complete dipshit. When there is an endless supply of people undercutting and willing to work either off the books or completely without the usual protections afforded labor in this country nothing you listed matters at all. Well except the red herring of CEO pay which is something that happens because it can and wouldn't have if they couldn't drive labor costs down.
Let me know about this universe you live in where the laws of economics are repealed what's it called Earth-Venezuela ?
Much of the stagnation in wages over the last few decades has been because of too much consumption, too much debt, too little savings, and too little capital investment, which has been worsened by declining workforce participation. Wage stagnation has NOT happened in countries with high rates of savings and investment.
Err no. The overwhelming cause of the stagnation of wages over the past 40+ years is allowing an unlimited amount of legal and illegal immigration of people willing to work for slave wages.
I did retire by selling my company. But if I hadn't why the fuck would I hand it over to a millennial or train up someone who is literally waiting for my generation to hurry up and die ?
Slashdot Mirror
Actually I just did that's where my numbers came from. Can't say I am ever playing more than 2 videos at a time
Nothing on Blu Ray ? No other external drives ? nothing ?
Spend that much on creating it, you need to budget back it up.
Browsing separate tabs really shouldn't be taking cpu at all. Haven't looked at Firefox's source but I will typically have a hundred plus tabs open and notice very little draw on my cpu resource. Right now it's pulling 5.1% on a quad core cpu with a guess at around a 100 tabs open and and at least 5 that are interactive. Streaming once again suspect the optimum use of the dollars is buying a higher end graphics card.
You have an application that can support fine grained parallelism , why run it on 18 cores of X86 when you run it on 1500 cores off a graphics card ?
Because a graphics card is not just 375 traditional CPUs jammed into a single package and just because something can scale to 18 cores doesn't mean it would run better on 1500 GPU cores.
You really have a desperate need to learn how to read or at least learn what the relevant terminology actually means.
Unless your desktop is doing something that parallelizes really well
I thought I was pretty clear saying that. Just how much of a performance boost is your web browser going to get from extra cores when it should just stop running scripts/vidoes in windows/tabs that don't have focus ? or for that matter your word processor or video game ?
Chores like raytracing, video transcoding and export, photo editing filters, science applications, and web-servers generally like this kind of processor
Well ray tracing is almost certainly better handled by a GPU these days, same for video transcoding. Web Server that needs parallelism is a server application not a desktop application. Some science applications certainly but if they parallelize easily and well then it's back to the GPU architectures once again.
You failed
Don't be a complete dipshit.
Really repeating yourself doesn't make you any less wrong than the first time.
Sounds about right. I am sure it would be the cat's pajamas at simulating a small network of processors and testing your program on them.
Oh yes you did. It's perfectly clear that when you say NAZI you mean anyone you dislike.
Hell you didn't even include an axis for legitimacy/illegitimacy of nation states which is the only axis they have in common with any American conservative thought.
On every other question you can think of they are well aligned with the left.
1. Is it ok to kill children: Left yes, NAZIs Yes
2. Is eugenics acceptable : Left yes NAZIS yes
3. Should the state dictate the economy : Left Yes , NAZIS Yes
4. Is having an upopular opinion enough to take violent action against someone: Left Yes NAZIs Yes
5. Should the state insure citizens have employment and are provided for for life: Left Yes, NAZIs Yes
6. Should the Entrepeneurial Class have it's gains limited : Left Yes, NAZIs Yes
7 Should the state act as a parent to the people : Left Yes, NAZIs Yes
8 Here's a real big one, should precedent and cannons of justice bow to immediate needs of the state: Left Yes, NAZIs Yes
The list goes on and on and on.
The only difference is the NAZIs were NATIONAL socialists and the Communists were INTERNATIONAL socialists.
For almost all desktop use.
Unless your desktop is doing something that parallelizes really well you probably will never notice the benefits of this.
Even things that benefit from parallel processing are far better served by running them on truly parallel architectures. You have an application that can support fine grained parallelism, why run it on 18 cores of X86 when you run it on 1500 cores off a graphics card ?
Yeah if you really want your problems solved best point the gun at yourself.
Yes. I just aim the gun at another asshole instead of me.
Fixed that for you.
So in your universe
Republican = Right Wing because they believe in law and order , change through the constitution and property rights
Libertarian = Right Wing because they believe in law, and property rights, and the individual right to discriminat
NAZI = Right wing because they believe in the order and inequality
So Libertarian = NAZI
And if you think their views on economy are the main defining feature of Nazis, you are willfully ignorant.
No the defining feature of NAZIism was totalitarianism the state controlling all aspects of life, the same as it is for socialists and communists.
You just like using the word to mean people you don't like.
Oh Russian Roulette is your game ?
It's an even easier comment to make when I have momma bear in my scope and a .223 round chambered.
Of course my state hasn't managed to set itself on fire trying to save the snail darter or not letting the forestry service do its job.
Please people here are bitching and moaning about what might have happened
How the fuck do you lot cross a street or get in a car ?
Then do the other species of the world a favor and off yourself.
You live in a reality where you don't know what you are talking about
Do yourself a favor and shut your pie hole and open your mind
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
20th century (post Russian Revolution)
Right wing = support of free economy
Left wing = state control of the economy
The NAZIs most definitely believed in state control of the economy and they also believed in state control of just about everything else which puts them very nicely in the same boat as Stalin and San Francisco
As to hate they hated just about everybody. The Russians, Jews, Gypsies, the French etc etc,
Far better people see and understand wildlife and learn to appreciate them than not care at all.
Well seeing as free thinking, independent, rigorous, robust are all B.S. at this point
Staged news
https://lens.blogs.nytimes.com...
Fake news
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
https://www.realclearpolitics....
Not Independent
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
https://theintercept.com/2016/...
https://theweek.com/speedreads...
I suppose robust might be legitimate as in robustly compromised
Amazing how badly people don't want links like these to be seen.
Add in some propaganda machine's, ranging from populists to anti-populists, and more and more people realizing this is all propaganda. Why is it so hard to deal with fake news? Because the line between fake news and propaganda is blurring. And the civilian? Can choose between getting brainwashed or become cynical.
Well put only issue is that the line isn't blurring, it's that people are finally starting to have enough information they can see there never was any line.
He obviously doesn't like the idea of users taking their numbers to advertisers and cutting a deal directly with them, instead of twitter grabbing every red cent that comes out of the platform. He also probably doesn't like the idea of having the fact he suspends the accounts of people with millions of followers continuously thrown in his face.
Expect this to be eliminated or subtly fudged, maybe a new number like "Validated Followers", something mostly useless for people to negotiate with.
Well seeing as free thinking, independent, rigorous, robust are all B.S. at this point
Staged news
https://lens.blogs.nytimes.com...
Fake news
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
https://www.realclearpolitics....
Not Independent
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
https://theintercept.com/2016/...
https://theweek.com/speedreads...
I suppose robust might be legitimate as in robustly compromised
Don't be a complete dipshit. When there is an endless supply of people undercutting and willing to work either off the books or completely without the usual protections afforded labor in this country nothing you listed matters at all. Well except the red herring of CEO pay which is something that happens because it can and wouldn't have if they couldn't drive labor costs down.
Let me know about this universe you live in where the laws of economics are repealed what's it called Earth-Venezuela ?
Much of the stagnation in wages over the last few decades has been because of too much consumption, too much debt, too little savings, and too little capital investment, which has been worsened by declining workforce participation. Wage stagnation has NOT happened in countries with high rates of savings and investment.
Err no. The overwhelming cause of the stagnation of wages over the past 40+ years is allowing an unlimited amount of legal and illegal immigration of people willing to work for slave wages.
I did retire by selling my company. But if I hadn't why the fuck would I hand it over to a millennial or train up someone who is literally waiting for my generation to hurry up and die ?
https://www.google.com/search?...