So I suppose youtube shut down a site dedicated to economic education as hate speech because page rank ? It also shut down a firearms education channel because hate speech ?
How is a page supposed to appear if it doesn't exist? Fewer pages indexed means fewer pages that can rise to the top. Do you think I'm saying "look here, CNN has lots of articles so let's promote all their pages"? No, each page/article gets their own weight and rank.
The BBC having far, far fewer articles on the subject
One do you have any proof of that ? Or do you think the English speaking world has no interest in the actions of the president of the U.S. especially when he is an even more polarizing figure in the U.K. than he is here ?
But lets test your premise looking at the BBC home page right now
That's useful Just looking at that, the WSJ has more sites linking in than either the WAPO or USA Today but isn't represented in the top 100 search results while the the others were.
I was just talking to a friend from the U.K. this morning. His take on the state of London is a little different than yours, seeing as he no longer feels safe going to large parts of the city.
I see you reference Sagan. You do realize he faked the Nuclear Winter research to drive a political agenda which if it had of prevailed would have left the world in considerably worse shape than it is now. Something to think about the next time you wish to substitute your biases for facts of reasoning.
P.S. Milwaukee was a great city same for Chicago, can't say much about them lately apparently their democrat governments have been doing damage to them. G
Google is a private company. Republicans are notorious for asking for less government intervention and regulation. Google can return whatever results they do choose. You can choose to boycott Google for their actions. See how far that'll get you... Or start your own search engine that guarantees pro DT news only.
Do you recall Google fighting for net neutrality ? Do you recall the premise that no company should control what users could see on the internet. I am fine with them censoring and acting as a publisher, they just have abandon the protections they enjoy as a neutral conduit that doesn't publish.
Prolific is not a useful metric (the plague was prolific).
The plague was only significant because it was prolific. If it affected 10 people nobody would have cared. The news outlets I mentioned are ranked amongst the top on the web while the ones making google's top results were not.
There is a word for that. It's "BIAS" can you say that ?
LOL you know something like 95% of the country is urban or suburban. In my case I am from what is probably the most urban place on the planet possible exception parts of Tokyo.
If you are going to lash out blindly, you should at least use a little intelligence (assuming it's available to you) to make certain the odds are on your side.
Hmmm You think the The Atlantic is more prolific than Breitbart or the Federalist, or even NRO ?
What's more comparing news organizations FOX is the number one rated news channel, CNN can't beat ancient aliens on the history channel, despite having similar standards with regard to factuality.
What is so complicated about having no authority to challenge an action solely at the discretion of the executive branch ?
This was an action of the state department concerning export of firearms. So not only has he usurped the authority of the executive he has also made national law from a federal district.
Nuclear power is the only alternative that has all the qualities you need to power civilization. It provides on demand power, it doesn't require very limited geographic features the way hydro or geothermal do, and it has the lowest impact of any power technology.
Slashdot Mirror
Oh now we have another vector. Hmmm
Maybe you're right it's not as if Google doesn't have a pattern of censorship for conservative content. Oh wait what do you know they do.
http://www.foxnews.com/tech/20...
http://thehill.com/policy/tech...
https://www.theblaze.com/news/...
So I suppose youtube shut down a site dedicated to economic education as hate speech because page rank ? It also shut down a firearms education channel because hate speech ?
Feel free to go again
Do you carry homeowner's insurance* ? What do you think the chances are of the things you are insured against actually happening ?
*Seeing as it's SF that would more likely be renters either way
OK riddle me this how does London with much stricter gun laws than anywhere in the U.S. have a higher crime rate and murder rate than NYC ?
And these two are dead proof you are wrong
https://www.jpost.com/Middle-E...
What's more the fact that london now has a higher crime rate and murder than NYC is further proof you are wrong.
But I am one hundred percent certain you have the same standards of proof those poor stupid cyclists had.
How is a page supposed to appear if it doesn't exist? Fewer pages indexed means fewer pages that can rise to the top. Do you think I'm saying "look here, CNN has lots of articles so let's promote all their pages"? No, each page/article gets their own weight and rank.
The BBC having far, far fewer articles on the subject
One do you have any proof of that ? Or do you think the English speaking world has no interest in the actions of the president of the U.S. especially when he is an even more polarizing figure in the U.K. than he is here ?
But lets test your premise looking at the BBC home page right now
http://www.bbc.com/
Trump attacks 'left-wing' Google search results
It seems you are factually challenged.
This may trigger you. Hug your therapy dog in your safe space and maybe close your eyes
May 2018 Ratings: Fox News Is Most-Watched Cable News Network for 197 Straight Months
https://www.adweek.com/tvnewse...
Didn't you think it a little pathetic to crow about one day ?
I am sorry are you now reversing yourself on the amount of coverage being important as opposed to the prominence and global reach of the site ?
Seems we were talking about local/regional/national/global and now you are trying to switch over to another metric
That's useful
Just looking at that, the WSJ has more sites linking in than either the WAPO or USA Today but isn't represented in the top 100 search results while the the others were.
Are you out to demonstrate my premise for me ?
I was just talking to a friend from the U.K. this morning. His take on the state of London is a little different than yours, seeing as he no longer feels safe going to large parts of the city.
I see you reference Sagan. You do realize he faked the Nuclear Winter research to drive a political agenda which if it had of prevailed would have left the world in considerably worse shape than it is now. Something to think about the next time you wish to substitute your biases for facts of reasoning.
So that would be why the BBC managed not to be included ?
HMMMM
Here you go
https://www.agclassroom.org/ga...
P.S. Milwaukee was a great city same for Chicago, can't say much about them lately apparently their democrat governments have been doing damage to them. G
I haven't been to the Sun but I am pretty certain it's mostly Hydrogen.
Google is a private company. Republicans are notorious for asking for less government intervention and regulation. Google can return whatever results they do choose. You can choose to boycott Google for their actions. See how far that'll get you... Or start your own search engine that guarantees pro DT news only.
Do you recall Google fighting for net neutrality ? Do you recall the premise that no company should control what users could see on the internet. I am fine with them censoring and acting as a publisher, they just have abandon the protections they enjoy as a neutral conduit that doesn't publish.
Prolific is not a useful metric (the plague was prolific).
The plague was only significant because it was prolific. If it affected 10 people nobody would have cared. The news outlets I mentioned are ranked amongst the top on the web while the ones making google's top results were not.
There is a word for that. It's "BIAS" can you say that ?
You do realize Google customizes its search results by the location the query is submitted from ?
Just noting you are pulling your argument out of your ass or just plain ignorance.
LOL you know something like 95% of the country is urban or suburban. In my case I am from what is probably the most urban place on the planet possible exception parts of Tokyo.
If you are going to lash out blindly, you should at least use a little intelligence (assuming it's available to you) to make certain the odds are on your side.
Hmmm You think the The Atlantic is more prolific than Breitbart or the Federalist, or even NRO ?
What's more comparing news organizations FOX is the number one rated news channel, CNN can't beat ancient aliens on the history channel, despite having similar standards with regard to factuality.
You would be more believable if you had actually read the linked article.
I will observe, the immediate response was to try and silence my post so it wouldn't be noticed.
https://pjmedia.com/trending/g...
Something of a pattern amongst the left.
Seeing as 96 percent of google search results about Trump come from liberal media outlets
https://pjmedia.com/trending/g...
You may wish to rethink you naive view of this.
Yep that's why I switched over as well. The problem though is one size never fits all.
What is so complicated about having no authority to challenge an action solely at the discretion of the executive branch ?
This was an action of the state department concerning export of firearms. So not only has he usurped the authority of the executive he has also made national law from a federal district.
I hear they work for any kind of electrical power, but you need far less of them to stabilize your grid when you can actually control generation.
Nuclear power isn't on-demand, except in the sense that you can sometimes throw the output away.
Does a heck of a lot better than waiting for the sun to come out, or the wind to blow.
There are places that get their power from diesel or are forced to depend on solar + battery, mini nuke easily outdoes them.
Nuclear power is the only alternative that has all the qualities you need to power civilization. It provides on demand power, it doesn't require very limited geographic features the way hydro or geothermal do, and it has the lowest impact of any power technology.
If we are lucky we will see its resurgence soon.