you _could_, but that practice is for the most part frowned upon, as the quality degradation due to the use of that method is unacceptable by many mp3 enthusiasts.
Re:!!!SPOILER - Re:Trust Me
on
Review: A.I.
·
· Score: 1
it's not that they cannot clone humans for over one day, it is that they cannot bring back a human who once lived for over a day -- because their time-space pathways were used up or some crap. i'm sure they could clone a human and not bring back their memories and stuff, in which case they'd be able to live for over a day.
imho what gives a language a future, whether it's closed source or not, are standards and functionality. if rebol can provide a good standard language that doesn't change in syntax, i feel that they then have a good shot at success. rebol looks to me at least like it has functionality down.
if you want to receive financial retribution from the distribution of your software, don't use an open source license, heh. all this says is you are allowed to sell what you've GPL'd without going against the GPL, makes perfect sense to me.
as cool as the standard might be, the technology isn't new. wireless products have been on the market for years, and are fairly inexpensive. that includes game controllers. the whole deal of bluetooth being anything special is the interconnectivity thing. i fail to see this as anything with a coolness level near bluetooth (if bluetooth ever gets mainstream and functions the way it was meant to).
i thought the same thing but then thought they should be fairly safe at places like airports. if they were installed at every small town gas station i'd assume there'd be much more potential for vandalism or even theft.
while stopping spam is a noble idea, this method is just too extreme and unjust. i'll bet that things are only to get worse from here. blocking the mail server is one thing, and makes some sense, but the web server? totally unwarranted.
if apple wasn't able to make a profit on their CRT's then i suppose dropping them was the way to go, but LCD's are by no means mainstream yet and dropping affordable mainstream technology in favor of the expensive alternative.. i don't know bout that. i guess apple is just refining their share of the market to include only people who have loads of cash to spend on computers. increasingly apple products seem to me to only makes sense for professional multimedia (esp. graphics/video) production.
i always thought that errors in standardized test scoring put me in a talented and gifted class (i got kicked out of it after two years due to bad academic performance, thank god, heh).
so many advances in mobile data input and display need to be made before any wireless technology will get my attention. i don't really care much for getting news headlines and sports scores no matter where i am. what i'd like to be able to do is read and post to/. while sitting on the beach. but i don't wanna carry a laptop around.. the device will have to be smaller to be worth it to me. but i doubt i would sit on the beach and use wireless internet anyway. so it really doesn't matter i guess. nevermind.
i'd love to work for such a high-profile company that gives their employees a can of spray paint and tells them to go deface public facilities and infrastructure with advertisements and propaganda.
I'm not so sure about that movie but I seem to remember a movie from around 1975 about a young boy who lost his senses due to being tramatized by witnessing Frank kill Captain Walker. Eventually he regains his senses. I believe it was based on a true story. If any one knows the title please post it so others can watch it. It could parallel what Stevie might go through.
Standard physics texts.. haha, you mean the only true BS in the world? As a believer in the Heisenberg-Bohr tranquilizing philosophy, I've been privy to the real laws of physics longer than most of you have been alive. I've forgotten more of that standard physics BS than you've ever known. No offence.
On the contrary anonymous coward, I hate Star Trek and try not to watch it. Mr. Spock's recklessly flawed logic tends to disgust me. Good point though.
I can only say that anti-matter in the classic sense will have an extremely hard time existing along with us. The problem lies in negative energy, which flows backward in time as opposed to our positive energy and our negative but positive anti-matter which flows forward in time. Negative energy (which is always showing up and disappearing (particularly in vacuums) due to its ever changing relationship with its position in time and our universe's position in time) will react with the anti-matter of our universe and in doing so they in effect cancel each other out. We're lucky that we're not made of anti-matter as we'd not exist due to this simple fact. The prospect of finding molecules of anti-matter is extremely slim, as the larger amount of anti-matter you have, the more chance you have of negative energy reacting with your anti-matter, which will immediately destroy any complex structure composed of anti-matter. This completely rules out finding galaxies made of anti-matter. One would think that by now all anti-matter in our universe would be gone, but this of course is wrong. The 'collision' which we've used to create anti-matter is extremely common throughout the universe and therefore, we have a seemingly inexhaustible supply of anti-matter, yet no 'complex' structures comprised of anti-matter.
As a believer in the Heisenberg-Bohr tranquilizing philosophy I can only contest this statement. It was contrived many years ago that black holes were not actually of physical existence but of a pseudo-perceptual existence, one which could only be brought upon by an intellectual being or beings (in this case the so-called 'astronomers' who are making this claim) thinking about seeing this phenomena taking place. However if we allow for an assumption that these so-called 'black holes' really do exist, we can easily put down the statement they've made regarding 'seeing matter being sucked into a black hole', where the 'black hole' they make reference to is claimed to be 'a dense region where extremely strong gravity sucks in everything, including light'. We can do this by applying this basic principle: consolidated holes in Heisenberg antiferromagnets are always drawn towards each other at rather large distances. This goes hand in hand with the Casimir force, which further substantiates my claim, it is caused by the alteration of the quantum zero-point spin wave energy. With the deficiency of a long-range Coulomb repellency among the holes, such an inclination introduces an instability of any charge-ordered state in the dilute doping hindrance. Therefore the 'black hole' of everyday understanding can not 'suck' at more than 6 million mph, or even 3 million mp3.
This has to be the most stupid thing I've ever heard of.. Thats pretty much my entire opinion about it.. heh. I may end up spending $10.95 on it though.. blah.
I frown upon this.. I know after all the previous posts mine is redundant but that was simply stupid. The least this guy could've done was thrown a few more pages together to waste my time. That site disgusts me, not entirely due to its content which is just plain stupid, but because the guy had the audacity to submit his own lame site to/., heh. oh well.
I heard a study that says these retinal scanners damage the DNA in your eyes, causing mutations when the cells reproduce, much like skin cancer from the sun. The problem is do to the rate at which eye cells reproduce, it will go unnoticed until its too late. I sure hope they've thouroughly tested this thing.
Slashdot Mirror
you _could_, but that practice is for the most part frowned upon, as the quality degradation due to the use of that method is unacceptable by many mp3 enthusiasts.
heh
it's not that they cannot clone humans for over one day, it is that they cannot bring back a human who once lived for over a day -- because their time-space pathways were used up or some crap. i'm sure they could clone a human and not bring back their memories and stuff, in which case they'd be able to live for over a day.
... and we're gonna have a press conference about it?
anyone else think that was rather odd? just wondering, heh
imho what gives a language a future, whether it's closed source or not, are standards and functionality. if rebol can provide a good standard language that doesn't change in syntax, i feel that they then have a good shot at success. rebol looks to me at least like it has functionality down.
if you want to receive financial retribution from the distribution of your software, don't use an open source license, heh. all this says is you are allowed to sell what you've GPL'd without going against the GPL, makes perfect sense to me.
as cool as the standard might be, the technology isn't new. wireless products have been on the market for years, and are fairly inexpensive. that includes game controllers. the whole deal of bluetooth being anything special is the interconnectivity thing. i fail to see this as anything with a coolness level near bluetooth (if bluetooth ever gets mainstream and functions the way it was meant to).
i thought the same thing but then thought they should be fairly safe at places like airports. if they were installed at every small town gas station i'd assume there'd be much more potential for vandalism or even theft.
while stopping spam is a noble idea, this method is just too extreme and unjust. i'll bet that things are only to get worse from here. blocking the mail server is one thing, and makes some sense, but the web server? totally unwarranted.
if apple wasn't able to make a profit on their CRT's then i suppose dropping them was the way to go, but LCD's are by no means mainstream yet and dropping affordable mainstream technology in favor of the expensive alternative.. i don't know bout that. i guess apple is just refining their share of the market to include only people who have loads of cash to spend on computers. increasingly apple products seem to me to only makes sense for professional multimedia (esp. graphics/video) production.
i always thought that errors in standardized test scoring put me in a talented and gifted class (i got kicked out of it after two years due to bad academic performance, thank god, heh).
so many advances in mobile data input and display need to be made before any wireless technology will get my attention. i don't really care much for getting news headlines and sports scores no matter where i am. what i'd like to be able to do is read and post to /. while sitting on the beach. but i don't wanna carry a laptop around.. the device will have to be smaller to be worth it to me. but i doubt i would sit on the beach and use wireless internet anyway. so it really doesn't matter i guess. nevermind.
i'd love to work for such a high-profile company that gives their employees a can of spray paint and tells them to go deface public facilities and infrastructure with advertisements and propaganda.
I'm not so sure about that movie but I seem to remember a movie from around 1975 about a young boy who lost his senses due to being tramatized by witnessing Frank kill Captain Walker. Eventually he regains his senses. I believe it was based on a true story. If any one knows the title please post it so others can watch it. It could parallel what Stevie might go through.
Standard physics texts.. haha, you mean the only true BS in the world? As a believer in the Heisenberg-Bohr tranquilizing philosophy, I've been privy to the real laws of physics longer than most of you have been alive. I've forgotten more of that standard physics BS than you've ever known. No offence.
On the contrary anonymous coward, I hate Star Trek and try not to watch it. Mr. Spock's recklessly flawed logic tends to disgust me. Good point though.
I can only say that anti-matter in the classic sense will have an extremely hard time existing along with us. The problem lies in negative energy, which flows backward in time as opposed to our positive energy and our negative but positive anti-matter which flows forward in time. Negative energy (which is always showing up and disappearing (particularly in vacuums) due to its ever changing relationship with its position in time and our universe's position in time) will react with the anti-matter of our universe and in doing so they in effect cancel each other out. We're lucky that we're not made of anti-matter as we'd not exist due to this simple fact. The prospect of finding molecules of anti-matter is extremely slim, as the larger amount of anti-matter you have, the more chance you have of negative energy reacting with your anti-matter, which will immediately destroy any complex structure composed of anti-matter. This completely rules out finding galaxies made of anti-matter. One would think that by now all anti-matter in our universe would be gone, but this of course is wrong. The 'collision' which we've used to create anti-matter is extremely common throughout the universe and therefore, we have a seemingly inexhaustible supply of anti-matter, yet no 'complex' structures comprised of anti-matter.
As a believer in the Heisenberg-Bohr tranquilizing philosophy I can only contest this statement. It was contrived many years ago that black holes were not actually of physical existence but of a pseudo-perceptual existence, one which could only be brought upon by an intellectual being or beings (in this case the so-called 'astronomers' who are making this claim) thinking about seeing this phenomena taking place. However if we allow for an assumption that these so-called 'black holes' really do exist, we can easily put down the statement they've made regarding 'seeing matter being sucked into a black hole', where the 'black hole' they make reference to is claimed to be 'a dense region where extremely strong gravity sucks in everything, including light'. We can do this by applying this basic principle: consolidated holes in Heisenberg antiferromagnets are always drawn towards each other at rather large distances. This goes hand in hand with the Casimir force, which further substantiates my claim, it is caused by the alteration of the quantum zero-point spin wave energy. With the deficiency of a long-range Coulomb repellency among the holes, such an inclination introduces an instability of any charge-ordered state in the dilute doping hindrance. Therefore the 'black hole' of everyday understanding can not 'suck' at more than 6 million mph, or even 3 million mp3.
This has to be the most stupid thing I've ever heard of.. Thats pretty much my entire opinion about it.. heh. I may end up spending $10.95 on it though.. blah.
I frown upon this.. I know after all the previous posts mine is redundant but that was simply stupid. The least this guy could've done was thrown a few more pages together to waste my time. That site disgusts me, not entirely due to its content which is just plain stupid, but because the guy had the audacity to submit his own lame site to /., heh. oh well.
I heard a study that says these retinal scanners damage the DNA in your eyes, causing mutations when the cells reproduce, much like skin cancer from the sun. The problem is do to the rate at which eye cells reproduce, it will go unnoticed until its too late. I sure hope they've thouroughly tested this thing.