If he doesn't, rest assured he can have a new career on the lecture circuit. He can call it Pick the real memo As for me, I think I want to look into starting a consulting company of engineers fired for non-engineering-related reasons.
"I'm a white male myself and I cannot fathom how some people with my same complexion cannot notice the skin colour and genital makeup of Congress, company boards and most positions of power."
Because from a very young age, I was punished any time I referred to anybody by skin color. How young are you that you were never beaten for noticing people's skin color?
For instance, my preferred solution to global warming: Buy more renewable energy and plant more trees and other long-lived food bearing plants.
Doesn't play the blame game. Doesn't need anybody's livelihoods to suffer. Doesn't even require more fracking and oil pipelines. Doesn't even need a GOVERNMENT- because it's based on individual purchase choices and what you do with your own property.
A hypocrite would say that OTHERS have to do things. A non-hypocrite just quietly accepts what is and does what is necessary from their own point of view.
You're too busy blaming other people to actually solve the problem or change your own life.
RIGHT. But you can tell a presumption of prejudice by an overwhelming vote of a LOT of people, thus making the point of the original rant from google, that stereotypes are about *groups* not *individuals* and you should never judge individuals based on stereotypes.
Well, for that matter, at the time most men outside of religious orders and the high elites were too busy gathering food during the middle ages to bother much with school.
If you didn't become a monk or a nun or were not born into nobility, education was very hard to come by at the time.
No they aren't. Google is specifically trying to make the culture unfriendly to white and Asian males, in an effort to get them to quit and pretend that they are more "diverse" by suppressing majority cultures.
The debate to me seems to be not whether global warming exists, but whose fault it is.
One side wants to play the blame and punishment game, and all of their solutions are based around blame and punishment.
The other side wants to play the adaptation game, and all of their solutions are based around adaptation, which the first side sees as "pretend the problem doesn't exist".
Slashdot Mirror
Diversity does not mean everybody is the same, except to Unoi’m Carasee, Vice President of Mutually Exclusive Propositions.
So your point is that individual actions are useless, and thus we need the heavy hand of government to beat everybody into submission.
Sieg Hiel!
Yes, he is
What is the difference between being non-PC and being a sexist ass? Before you answer, read on just how illogical these demands are
An engineer who thought he had a reasonable answer who didn't realize that the basic problem is essentially irrational
If he doesn't, rest assured he can have a new career on the lecture circuit. He can call it Pick the real memo
As for me, I think I want to look into starting a consulting company of engineers fired for non-engineering-related reasons.
You must be related to Unoi’m Carasee, Vice President of Mutually Exclusive Propositions.
Beaten. My school used corporal punishment to enforce the Zeitgeist.
"I'm a white male myself and I cannot fathom how some people with my same complexion cannot notice the skin colour and genital makeup of Congress, company boards and most positions of power."
Because from a very young age, I was punished any time I referred to anybody by skin color. How young are you that you were never beaten for noticing people's skin color?
Six years of salary is more than he can possibly hope for in court- so I suppose you are likely right.
Funny how you consider adaptation to be evil.
For instance, my preferred solution to global warming: Buy more renewable energy and plant more trees and other long-lived food bearing plants.
Doesn't play the blame game. Doesn't need anybody's livelihoods to suffer. Doesn't even require more fracking and oil pipelines. Doesn't even need a GOVERNMENT- because it's based on individual purchase choices and what you do with your own property.
A hypocrite would say that OTHERS have to do things. A non-hypocrite just quietly accepts what is and does what is necessary from their own point of view.
You're too busy blaming other people to actually solve the problem or change your own life.
RIGHT. But you can tell a presumption of prejudice by an overwhelming vote of a LOT of people, thus making the point of the original rant from google, that stereotypes are about *groups* not *individuals* and you should never judge individuals based on stereotypes.
Uh, no it wasn't. His assertion was one of INTEREST. There's a huge difference between interest and capability.
Wait, if Henry VIII had to restrict public reading of the Bible to men, isn't that proof that women were literate privately?
Just goes to prove that *some* professors can't think their way out of a wet paper sack.
Well, for that matter, at the time most men outside of religious orders and the high elites were too busy gathering food during the middle ages to bother much with school.
If you didn't become a monk or a nun or were not born into nobility, education was very hard to come by at the time.
Given gender confusion, the majority of "women" winning at the Olympic level are transwomen anyway.
No they aren't. Google is specifically trying to make the culture unfriendly to white and Asian males, in an effort to get them to quit and pretend that they are more "diverse" by suppressing majority cultures.
Can you please explain to me what demographics have to do with individual engineering ability?
No, if you're part of a massive groupthink that hates everybody else, you're bigoted and prejudiced.
Plenty of Trump supporters are bigoted and prejudiced too, just like Hillary supporters.
The debate to me seems to be not whether global warming exists, but whose fault it is.
One side wants to play the blame and punishment game, and all of their solutions are based around blame and punishment.
The other side wants to play the adaptation game, and all of their solutions are based around adaptation, which the first side sees as "pretend the problem doesn't exist".
You obviously failed to read either IBM's recommended 1950 hiring manual OR the GP post. Computers are for GIRLS!
" because of this only women should be doing computing and men should stick to manual labour."
You win the internet for today. Collect 200 quatloos and do not pass go.
All the systemic sexism in the last 46 years has been on the part of women.
Trump lost overwhelmingly in Silicon Valley.
Which just goes to show how bigoted and prejudiced the Silicon Valley really is.
Clinton and Trump were clones of each other. Clinton was as horrible for the left as Trump was horrible for the right.