You moved your mouse. Please restart the computer to complete the changes. What I'm saying here is this. You can't use NT in a 24/7 environment unless you want to spend twice as much for a spare server. You make a simple change on an NT server and you have to reboot. No so good for the enterprise...
Hey, I was a carpenter for 15 years, now I'm a network engineer. Carpentry _can_ be very satisfying. Obviously, you're not saving lives, but you _do_ directly impact peoples lives. Where the hell was I going with this, anyway? Oh well, it's late. As far as the name thing, who cares?
I WANT SecuRemote!! I want it! I want it! I run a FW-1 v4 box at work, on NT. Unbelievably, it hasn't crashed yet. Over 6 months! Of course, I've got everything turned off... BTW, Roblimo - put a damned spel cheker in here will ya? "There are two things which are truly universal: hydrogen and stupidity." -- Frank Zappa webmaster: http://amazing.divingdeals.com
To whoever wrote this: Are you building the whole shopping cart logic from scratch in PHP or are you using it as an interface to something like Minivend? I'm looking at a straight PHP and a straight Minivend (very confusing software, BTW). Oh yea, I'm not a programmer, I've just built a huge number of websites and can hack around a little. If anyone out there has built a shopping system in PHP, please let me know about it.
Actually, you'd be suprised how much DOs crap is still being run. I know of at least 25 workstations on our network running DOS only, just to access a single app that nobody has bothered to re-write. I don't think it's cheapness so much as it simply works, so why change it? On the other hand, I would love to see more plugins ported to Netscape on Linux. Or a version of Opera for Linux that had them built in. To bad I'm not a programmer, simply a hack who runs networks. I'd jump in in a heart beat.
As much as I _hate_ NT, it is relatively stable, under the right conditions. Like running a single app on it. I was forced to use NT (damn politics) for the firewall and for an extranet server.Both of them haven't crashed yet, with an uptime around 3 months for the firewall. Of course, the same firewall software, running on a FreeBSD box I know of, has been up for around 2 years. Yes, NT sux, but mainly because you can't do any _real_ admin remotely, or for that matter, locally.
Would that be Green Bay or Sturgeon Bay? heh... Well, 10^3 drunken Linux geeks in the same room _has_ to create something silly.:) How 'bout a new Guiness powered webserver?
Execpc in Milwaukee had problems with onje of thier routers last nite. I use ISDN dialup thru them and wasn't to happy. Anyway, everything puked past this box: bash-2.02$ traceroute crack.linuxppc.org traceroute to crack.linuxppc.org (169.207.154.108), 30 hops max, 40 byte packets 1 208.212.81.1 (208.212.81.1) 0.936 ms 0.949 ms 0.864 ms 2 e0-supranet04.supranet.net (205.164.161.7) 7.226 ms 7.733 ms 7.280 ms 3 e1-supranet01.supranet.net (205.164.161.1) 8.014 ms 7.250 ms 8.417 ms 4 558.Hssi5-0-0.GW3.CHI1.ALTER.NET (137.39.130.65) 13.850 ms 13.837 ms 13.424 ms 5 104.ATM2-0.XR2.CHI4.ALTER.NET (146.188.208.62) 13.758 ms 14.926 ms 14.071 ms 6 194.ATM9-0-0.GW1.CHI1.ALTER.NET (146.188.208.157) 15.742 ms 14.623 ms 15.221 ms 7 norlight-gw.customer.ALTER.NET (137.39.130.178) 15.052 ms 14.686 ms 14.740 ms 8 inet-gw300.execpc.norlight.net (207.170.6.74) 19.209 ms 19.331 ms 19.009 ms 9 2-18.atm1-0-0.rtr0.nbl-wi.execpc.net (169.207.50.161) 23.259 ms 23.633 ms 21.658 ms 10 vl2.sw1.nbl-wi.execpc.net (169.207.50.250) 21.039 ms 20.432 ms 19.654 ms 11 dslmux0.execpc.net (169.207.36.202) 18.932 ms 20.632 ms 23.516 ms 12 169.207.154.108 (169.207.154.108) 38.815 ms 30.807 ms 27.400 ms Which would explain not being able to see the crackme box.
Slashdot Mirror
You moved your mouse. Please restart the computer to complete the changes.
What I'm saying here is this. You can't use NT in a 24/7 environment unless you want to spend twice as much for a spare server. You make a simple change on an NT server and you have to reboot. No so good for the enterprise...
webmaster: http://amazing.divingdeals.com
Hey, I was a carpenter for 15 years, now I'm a network engineer. Carpentry _can_ be very satisfying. Obviously, you're not saving lives, but you _do_ directly impact peoples lives. Where the hell was I going with this, anyway? Oh well, it's late. As far as the name thing, who cares?
webmaster: http://amazing.divingdeals.com
OK Students, it's time to check this out and let us know!
webmaster: http://amazing.divingdeals.com
I WANT SecuRemote!! I want it! I want it!
I run a FW-1 v4 box at work, on NT. Unbelievably, it hasn't crashed yet. Over 6 months! Of course, I've got everything turned off...
BTW, Roblimo - put a damned spel cheker in here will ya?
"There are two things which are truly universal: hydrogen and stupidity." -- Frank Zappa
webmaster: http://amazing.divingdeals.com
To whoever wrote this:
Are you building the whole shopping cart logic from scratch in PHP or are you using it as an interface to something like Minivend? I'm looking at a straight PHP and a straight Minivend (very confusing software, BTW). Oh yea, I'm not a programmer, I've just built a huge number of websites and can hack around a little. If anyone out there has built a shopping system in PHP, please let me know about it.
Actually, you'd be suprised how much DOs crap is still being run. I know of at least 25 workstations on our network running DOS only, just to access a single app that nobody has bothered to re-write. I don't think it's cheapness so much as it simply works, so why change it? On the other hand, I would love to see more plugins ported to Netscape on Linux. Or a version of Opera for Linux that had them built in. To bad I'm not a programmer, simply a hack who runs networks. I'd jump in in a heart beat.
As much as I _hate_ NT, it is relatively stable, under the right conditions. Like running a single app on it. I was forced to use NT (damn politics) for the firewall and for an extranet server.Both of them haven't crashed yet, with an uptime around 3 months for the firewall. Of course, the same firewall software, running on a FreeBSD box I know of, has been up for around 2 years.
Yes, NT sux, but mainly because you can't do any _real_ admin remotely, or for that matter, locally.
As of 8:58 am central, the server is down, at least from WI. Of course, it could be the /. effect. I hope these folks are OK.
Echelon Keywords: Allah Semtex Castro Plutonium Pakistan Jihad Fnord Intelsat Yakima Sarin Hezballah Fertilizer Bomb Al-Qaidah RSA Sendero Luminoso Linux
OK, I'm kinda lost here. What are "Echelon Keywords" about?
I never claimed to be able to count, much less read...
Would that be Green Bay or Sturgeon Bay? heh... Well, 10^3 drunken Linux geeks in the same room _has_ to create something silly. :) How 'bout a new Guiness powered webserver?
Execpc in Milwaukee had problems with onje of thier routers last nite. I use ISDN dialup thru them and wasn't to happy. Anyway, everything puked past this box: bash-2.02$ traceroute crack.linuxppc.org traceroute to crack.linuxppc.org (169.207.154.108), 30 hops max, 40 byte packets 1 208.212.81.1 (208.212.81.1) 0.936 ms 0.949 ms 0.864 ms 2 e0-supranet04.supranet.net (205.164.161.7) 7.226 ms 7.733 ms 7.280 ms 3 e1-supranet01.supranet.net (205.164.161.1) 8.014 ms 7.250 ms 8.417 ms 4 558.Hssi5-0-0.GW3.CHI1.ALTER.NET (137.39.130.65) 13.850 ms 13.837 ms 13.424 ms 5 104.ATM2-0.XR2.CHI4.ALTER.NET (146.188.208.62) 13.758 ms 14.926 ms 14.071 ms 6 194.ATM9-0-0.GW1.CHI1.ALTER.NET (146.188.208.157) 15.742 ms 14.623 ms 15.221 ms 7 norlight-gw.customer.ALTER.NET (137.39.130.178) 15.052 ms 14.686 ms 14.740 ms 8 inet-gw300.execpc.norlight.net (207.170.6.74) 19.209 ms 19.331 ms 19.009 ms 9 2-18.atm1-0-0.rtr0.nbl-wi.execpc.net (169.207.50.161) 23.259 ms 23.633 ms 21.658 ms 10 vl2.sw1.nbl-wi.execpc.net (169.207.50.250) 21.039 ms 20.432 ms 19.654 ms 11 dslmux0.execpc.net (169.207.36.202) 18.932 ms 20.632 ms 23.516 ms 12 169.207.154.108 (169.207.154.108) 38.815 ms 30.807 ms 27.400 ms Which would explain not being able to see the crackme box.
>>First pumping them full of various drugs and then giving lethal doses of radiation. Uh.. pretty bad torture.
Sounds like fun to me!!!