You do know, of course, that Ms Rosen fears dongs. Dongs remind her of daddy, and his midnight visits to her room. That's why she's with like-minded Dong-Fearing Elizabeth Birch.
I'm thinking I should probably have explained my message a little more, as people who still obsess over what might have been, even when that "might have been" would have been demonstrably pathetic for the affected, don't necessarily pick up on stuff like this right away. Then again, I don't get paid to teach school to people who have developmental problems.
I suppose if you can't see the need for running the product, then it certainly must not have any use, eh? Did you read any of the other comments? Perhaps the original review, wherein the notion of testing for other platforms was mentioned as the SOLE REASON D'ETRE for needing VPC?
"In true honesty" [sic], you obviously have a lot of misconceptions about Mac users' anti-MS bias. It's you dirty socialist fat nerds who have the attitude problem where Microsoft is concerned, usually due to the fact you can't control your workplace environment, and thusly are forced to deal with Microsoft products. Too fucking bad. Maybe you should have got yourself one of them thar' college degrees and gotten yourself a real job where you get to pick your desktop operating environment. I haven't used Windows of any variety in over 5 years, and I love life. Not a minute goes by during the day in which I DON'T think about Microsoft, either positively or negatively.
And you might want to can the pedestrian analysis of alleged closed door meetings that killed non-existant projects. It makes you look like the fool that you truly are, as does your insipid hatred of Capitalism. Capitalism owns you, bitch. Now go pay your rent!
Ola, tard. You seem to have some alpaca assumption problems, but fortunately, I'm here to help:
1) Yahoo/Geocities doesn't have the time or manpower to check the content of every site they host.
I realize this might be a little hard for you to grasp, but think of the biggest number you can
think of (take off your socks, even... that should bring it up to 20 or 22, depending on how
much of a mutant you are), then add three or four million to it. Yes, it's overwhelming.
2) If a hosting company discovers "child porn" on their machine being hosted by a customer,
they shouldn't be just removing it, they should be calling the cops. Creation and distribution
of "child porn" is a crime almost everywhere in the US, and this is not an issue of censorship,
this is an issue of a crime having been committed. The pornographic material itself is documentation
of the actual crime. You follow so far? If this is getting too complicated for you, just go back
and read it a couple more times.
3) Company A provides hosting. Company B needs said services, so they sign a contract with
Company A, and they're off and running. Now, say Company C comes along and signs a contract
to host with Company A, but, as it turns out, Company C wants to host Child Porn. Naturally,
they're aware that this is against the law, so they don't tell Company A that's what
they're going to do, and thus, the child porn stays up for a little while. Now to make this as
simple as I possibly can, COMPANY B should not be punished for what COMPANY C tricked COMPANY A
into letting them do.
Now maybe you're ok with mass censorship to "stamp out child pornography", but I'm not.
My guess is that you should be spending less time advocating mass censorship on the chance
that maybe it will "stop some child porn", and more time in psychological counseling, dealing with
your own childhood abuse, bitch.
The whole slashdot method of story submission/rejection is an ineffecient means of running a "news site". Maybe, just maybe, it's prone to favoritism and the nuances of ass-kissing/benefit-garnering. Not that I'm pointing any fingers at anyone. It isn't my site, it's OSDN's.
Two Words: Web Objects. You stupid, cocksucking, dumb motherfucker. Does WebObjects run on your dirty socialist Linux? That's right, it doesn't. But I suppose we should switch to a "robust" solution like PHP and MySQL. After all, what possible performance gain could be had from using a non-flat-file database format.
Slashdot Mirror
s/Usenet/Slashdot/
I know how that is, dude. Sometimes, if my Chronilium levels are low, I can mess up the spelling of the simplest of words. Oh, mariala! 8^)
I think you spelled herfiterious wrong; it should be "herfiterious" instead of "herfeterious". HTH.
You do know, of course, that Ms Rosen fears dongs. Dongs remind her of daddy, and his midnight visits to her room. That's why she's with like-minded Dong-Fearing Elizabeth Birch.
You people need to get out more often.
If my aunt had a dick she'd be my uncle.
But she doesn't.
I'm thinking I should probably have explained my message a little more, as people who still obsess over what might have been, even when that "might have been" would have been demonstrably pathetic for the affected, don't necessarily pick up on stuff like this right away. Then again, I don't get paid to teach school to people who have developmental problems.
Um, yeah. Much unlike courage is lost on you, bitch.
Right, like you know any better. Ha!
I'm the fucking jew that's going to fill your house with concrete, you anonymous cunt.
I suppose if you can't see the need for running the product, then it certainly must not have any use, eh? Did you read any of the other comments? Perhaps the original review, wherein the notion of testing for other platforms was mentioned as the SOLE REASON D'ETRE for needing VPC?
"In true honesty" [sic], you obviously have a lot of misconceptions about Mac users' anti-MS bias. It's you dirty socialist fat nerds who have the attitude problem where Microsoft is concerned, usually due to the fact you can't control your workplace environment, and thusly are forced to deal with Microsoft products. Too fucking bad. Maybe you should have got yourself one of them thar' college degrees and gotten yourself a real job where you get to pick your desktop operating environment. I haven't used Windows of any variety in over 5 years, and I love life. Not a minute goes by during the day in which I DON'T think about Microsoft, either positively or negatively.
And you might want to can the pedestrian analysis of alleged closed door meetings that killed non-existant projects. It makes you look like the fool that you truly are, as does your insipid hatred of Capitalism. Capitalism owns you, bitch. Now go pay your rent!
Ola, tard. You seem to have some alpaca assumption problems, but fortunately, I'm here to help:
1) Yahoo/Geocities doesn't have the time or manpower to check the content of every site they host. I realize this might be a little hard for you to grasp, but think of the biggest number you can think of (take off your socks, even... that should bring it up to 20 or 22, depending on how much of a mutant you are), then add three or four million to it. Yes, it's overwhelming.
2) If a hosting company discovers "child porn" on their machine being hosted by a customer, they shouldn't be just removing it, they should be calling the cops. Creation and distribution of "child porn" is a crime almost everywhere in the US, and this is not an issue of censorship, this is an issue of a crime having been committed. The pornographic material itself is documentation of the actual crime. You follow so far? If this is getting too complicated for you, just go back and read it a couple more times.
3) Company A provides hosting. Company B needs said services, so they sign a contract with Company A, and they're off and running. Now, say Company C comes along and signs a contract to host with Company A, but, as it turns out, Company C wants to host Child Porn. Naturally, they're aware that this is against the law, so they don't tell Company A that's what they're going to do, and thus, the child porn stays up for a little while. Now to make this as simple as I possibly can, COMPANY B should not be punished for what COMPANY C tricked COMPANY A into letting them do.
Now maybe you're ok with mass censorship to "stamp out child pornography", but I'm not. My guess is that you should be spending less time advocating mass censorship on the chance that maybe it will "stop some child porn", and more time in psychological counseling, dealing with your own childhood abuse, bitch.
The whole slashdot method of story submission/rejection is an ineffecient means of running a "news site". Maybe, just maybe, it's prone to favoritism and the nuances of ass-kissing/benefit-garnering. Not that I'm pointing any fingers at anyone. It isn't my site, it's OSDN's.
I forgot two things: 1) to taunt you into modding me down, and 2) to end my comment with ", bitch." Now mod me down, bitch.
Two Words: Web Objects. You stupid, cocksucking, dumb motherfucker. Does WebObjects run on your dirty socialist Linux? That's right, it doesn't. But I suppose we should switch to a "robust" solution like PHP and MySQL. After all, what possible performance gain could be had from using a non-flat-file database format.