If you have sample code you _can_ show then bring your laptop. I think it is important not only to show you can code but how you go about solving problems. If an interviewer expected me to "code" on a whiteboard I don't think I would want to continue the interview. Whiteboards can't compile or execute code. Also they can't show how well you know vim or emacs or how well you've configured your environment. These are all important and can tell you a lot about a developer.
So first "we" get upset when the government proposes regulations on internet technologies and then when the government can't regulate something we all hate(like spam), we get pissed that the government isn't trying to regulate an aspect of the thing we think should remain inherently unregelated.
Oh believe me, every cs major here at USC already believes they are 1337 h4x0rz.
I'm no cracker but I'm pretty sure UNIX is a good operating system to know before declaring oneself a 1337 h4x0r. Most students here don't even know what bash or csh stand for... much less what they are.
If God is the Alpha and the Omega, then it only fits that men would try to know the Alpha and the Omega in such simple terms as beginning and end. Science searches for the finite answers the universe holds while never considering the infinite. The only way men feel they can disprove God's existence is by becoming God and the only way to become God is to be omniscient, omnipresent, omnipotent, and infinite. The unending search for truth through science is a humanistic attempt to place one's self above God and finally be "free" from Him.
Feel free to contemplate your "Whoah! Stop right there!" replies at this point.
Lastly, let's not fool ourselves. No one can disprove God's existence. In order for someone to disprove God's existence they would have to be omniscient and omnipresent. Now until science reaches these ends and is able to place in the minds of a singular individual all knowledge of all places at all times and be infinite in all of these senses, then you can safely say God does not exist. Unless, of course, science finds God. But, then there's always that problem of becoming God. You cannot be omniscient and omnipresent infinitely as that would mean you were always omniscient and omnipresent. Which is quite impossible in our finite view of the world. In other words, one cannot become God because God's nature is that He always was, is, and will be. The God science would create would then have to be relegated to the little 'g' god.
Anyways, my point is that the understanding of how the universe began and how it will end cannot answer whether or not God exists. Science will never ever be able to do this.
My opinion, you ask? Well, no, you probably do not, but I offer it for anyone who may care. I believe a soul exists. Follow the logical spiritual conclusions from there.
I understand the creators are most likely trying to stay true to anime or something similar to that form of animation, but did they have to keep the horrible writing of anime? I have seriously seen better philosophically centric writing on a cam girl's website. Give me a break. The writer was either entirely too lazy to piece together the things we so affectionately call words into cogent sentences forming the basis for an introduction into the storyline or he was afraid of the viewers having to read more than a bunch philosophical one-liners.
Despite my distaste for the writing the animation is top-notch and compilation is quite well-done for flash. I appreciate the kind of work they're trying to accomplish through this series, as well.
Good Day
I think if the NY Times has a problem with then they have the right to stop google from caching the site, but I do no think it would be a wise decision on the part of the NY Times. The NY Times enjoys being a reputable news outlet and if they were to lower their readership and more imporantly not allow everyone to read their articles. It would hinder their reputation in a slight way and all slashdotters might turn to a different news outlet, which is only bad for them.
Clinton didn't win the popular vote... but I know what vote he did win... the same one GW won... double standard or Americans suddenly interested in politics?
Slashdot Mirror
Except Amazon Payments does not work on Amazon... seriously. When I asked about this I was told there were no plans to create the feature.
If you have sample code you _can_ show then bring your laptop. I think it is important not only to show you can code but how you go about solving problems. If an interviewer expected me to "code" on a whiteboard I don't think I would want to continue the interview. Whiteboards can't compile or execute code. Also they can't show how well you know vim or emacs or how well you've configured your environment. These are all important and can tell you a lot about a developer.
Metric System
So first "we" get upset when the government proposes regulations on internet technologies and then when the government can't regulate something we all hate(like spam), we get pissed that the government isn't trying to regulate an aspect of the thing we think should remain inherently unregelated.
Say goodbye to Usenet now. IRC is soon to follow.
Oh believe me, every cs major here at USC already believes they are 1337 h4x0rz. I'm no cracker but I'm pretty sure UNIX is a good operating system to know before declaring oneself a 1337 h4x0r. Most students here don't even know what bash or csh stand for... much less what they are.
Feel free to contemplate your "Whoah! Stop right there!" replies at this point.
Lastly, let's not fool ourselves. No one can disprove God's existence. In order for someone to disprove God's existence they would have to be omniscient and omnipresent. Now until science reaches these ends and is able to place in the minds of a singular individual all knowledge of all places at all times and be infinite in all of these senses, then you can safely say God does not exist. Unless, of course, science finds God. But, then there's always that problem of becoming God. You cannot be omniscient and omnipresent infinitely as that would mean you were always omniscient and omnipresent. Which is quite impossible in our finite view of the world. In other words, one cannot become God because God's nature is that He always was, is, and will be. The God science would create would then have to be relegated to the little 'g' god.
Anyways, my point is that the understanding of how the universe began and how it will end cannot answer whether or not God exists. Science will never ever be able to do this.
My opinion, you ask? Well, no, you probably do not, but I offer it for anyone who may care. I believe a soul exists. Follow the logical spiritual conclusions from there.
Good day.
I understand the creators are most likely trying to stay true to anime or something similar to that form of animation, but did they have to keep the horrible writing of anime? I have seriously seen better philosophically centric writing on a cam girl's website. Give me a break. The writer was either entirely too lazy to piece together the things we so affectionately call words into cogent sentences forming the basis for an introduction into the storyline or he was afraid of the viewers having to read more than a bunch philosophical one-liners. Despite my distaste for the writing the animation is top-notch and compilation is quite well-done for flash. I appreciate the kind of work they're trying to accomplish through this series, as well. Good Day
I think if the NY Times has a problem with then they have the right to stop google from caching the site, but I do no think it would be a wise decision on the part of the NY Times. The NY Times enjoys being a reputable news outlet and if they were to lower their readership and more imporantly not allow everyone to read their articles. It would hinder their reputation in a slight way and all slashdotters might turn to a different news outlet, which is only bad for them.
Clinton didn't win the popular vote... but I know what vote he did win... the same one GW won... double standard or Americans suddenly interested in politics?