It doesn't much matter, Google's UI skills really suck. The only reason the original Google search was a success is because they essentially didn't even have a UI, it was just a text entry box. When they try to add UI elements, it's all downhill. Microsoft's Ui often sucks too, but at least with Microsoft, I can at least usually tell what they're trying to do. With Google, I can't even tell what they were trying to do at all, it's pure WTF?
Where've you been? Obviously you didn't get the memo. FBI needs to tech-up. And what do you think the NSA is all about? Tech trumps everything, and makes every job easier and more effective. That's the pitch, anyway. You must not work in the tech industry, or at least not anywhere that makes contact with marketing at any point...
Such sites are the only places people get exposed to widely divergent views anymore. "Homogeneous" (read: "insulated") protected communities are not it. Sure, often such divergent communities meltdown into flamefests, but that doesn't mean we should all be cocooned into safe little worlds where everyone mostly agrees with us. If you can't take the heat, stay inside and remain ignorant.
It's clear that it is necessary to show that the NSA violations are widespread and pervasive. And it's clear that what has been exposed so far is NOT enough, as discussion has occurred in the media and various forums but there's no evidence that things do not remain business as usual at the NSA. I only hope there are still some juicy bits in the trove yet to reveal. It looks like it's going to take a drip water torture of secret releases in order to keep attention focused on the problem before it may actually get resolved.
No, it was Jet Packs. And we got them. The problem was, the real thing wasn't as great as our imaginations of them. In fact, they kinda suck. Pretty much like Giant humanoid robots or mobile suits. The physics of these things just doesn't add up.
I've been a member for some time but let it lapse a few years ago because it got to the point that the benefits didn't justify the expense. Or rather, the benefits hadn't justified the expense for some time, I finally got fed up hoping that might change. I finally noticed I wasn't getting my money's worth and pulled the plug on it. Much of ACM seems designed to extract maximum income from its membership. That gravy train is over, as far as I'm concerned.
My wife and I have adopted a policy of not paying until at least 6 months later, or after those two sort it out, since you can never get your money BACK once sent, but until they settle it out there's no way to know what is owed..
I generally had this policy, but now that I've got $1500 deductible and $4500 out of pocket maximum, and this year am having to have cataract surgery, I went ahead and paid the $450 prep office visit bill. If the insurance company didn't negotiate it quickly and correctly, it's their loss because it's clear I'm going to exceed the out-of-pocket this year by enough that THEY will end up paying for anything they fail to properly negotiate. And in fact I've got another minor issue I'm going to be sure to take care of this year, because once the max is reached, everything else is free for that year. So for the rest of this year anyway, I've got the Caddilac plan.
I don't want a phone with ANY kind of keyboard, slide-out or virtual or whatever. A ONE button phone would be just fine. In fact, I don't even care if it has a screen, either, as I won't be looking at it. A phone is a mobile voice device, not a laptop or desktop computer, video game machine or TV. If I want something like that I'll get a tablet or laptop, not a phone. Take your instant messaging text and jam it up your ass.
Given the military budgets are VASTLY different between the US and all other countries, comparing taxes with other countries makes no sense at all. Or do you figure the militaries aren't paid for by taxes? Or maybe you figure business gains no benefit from military operations, and therefore shouldn't have to foot the bill for them? Better look again, at least in the US, business gains PLENTY from the military expenditures, since much of the money is going to businesses that provide what the military needs. The US military is the biggest customer for a lot of US businesses. And as another user commented, plenty of these businesses don't pay ANY taxes (GE as one example).
You also might want to consider that many of the countries with "lower" corporate tax rates than the US have higher personal income rates. In addition, they don't spend anywhere near as much on a military.
If industry isn't thriving, it's not due to taxes and regulation, as there's nowhere near as much of those than there were decades ago. Taxes are down, wages are down, deregulation has been running rampant, and the oversight organizations haven't been doing their job (FDA,FCC,SEC,etc.). If industry still can't survive, could it be because the CEO's have run off with the profits and used the money to buy the politicians? Or maybe it's because employees can't afford to buy enough products anymore?
A better system is a mixture of the better aspects of both capitalism and socialism. Getting the mix right is a challenge, but arguing for impossibilities like "a purely free market" or "pure socialism" are extremist and unrealistic.
Yes, they "cheat" more because that's how they learned to cope with the state. Any state. And given the American state's ethics, or I should say, near complete lack thereof, I see no reason to hold communist state emigre's adaptation behaviors against them. The IRS on the other hand, most likely has a different view.
You were socialized by your environment to be better at lying that telling the truth. You learned to "cheat" and it's easier than not at this point. Living in the US I once knew a Russian emigre who essentially was living in the US completely under the radar. He was an excellent and successful programmer and mathematician, but the way he did business with everyone was as if he needed to work-around or subvert the system, not because he was "unethical" but simply because it was what he knew best how to do.
Socialism, communism ( Same shit! ) = Corruption by default.
Can someone please come up with a new political pragma that derives from, intelligence, ethics, moral, responsibility and perhaps also respect for the individual?
Well, don't look to capitalism. Even Adam Smith recognized it's largely driven by the "invisible hand" of greed. Not exactly ethical, moral or responsible. Or for that matter, respectful of the individual and not particularly intelligent (pragmatic though, I suppose).
Absolutely, in the upside-down world of communist states, it may be that lying and stealing are the appropriate ways to remain ethical. So you can't use these elements to measure ethics.
Slashdot Mirror
It doesn't much matter, Google's UI skills really suck. The only reason the original Google search was a success is because they essentially didn't even have a UI, it was just a text entry box. When they try to add UI elements, it's all downhill. Microsoft's Ui often sucks too, but at least with Microsoft, I can at least usually tell what they're trying to do. With Google, I can't even tell what they were trying to do at all, it's pure WTF?
I would agree with this, what the heck is the problem with it? Maybe you just need to bone up on your search word skills...
Stretch those femtoseconds into hours, nice...
Stop using insulation that tastes like chicken. Or the shark equivalent of chicken...
Where've you been? Obviously you didn't get the memo. FBI needs to tech-up. And what do you think the NSA is all about? Tech trumps everything, and makes every job easier and more effective. That's the pitch, anyway. You must not work in the tech industry, or at least not anywhere that makes contact with marketing at any point...
Such sites are the only places people get exposed to widely divergent views anymore. "Homogeneous" (read: "insulated") protected communities are not it. Sure, often such divergent communities meltdown into flamefests, but that doesn't mean we should all be cocooned into safe little worlds where everyone mostly agrees with us. If you can't take the heat, stay inside and remain ignorant.
And then we should put him in charge of National Security...
It's clear that it is necessary to show that the NSA violations are widespread and pervasive. And it's clear that what has been exposed so far is NOT enough, as discussion has occurred in the media and various forums but there's no evidence that things do not remain business as usual at the NSA. I only hope there are still some juicy bits in the trove yet to reveal. It looks like it's going to take a drip water torture of secret releases in order to keep attention focused on the problem before it may actually get resolved.
No, it was Jet Packs. And we got them. The problem was, the real thing wasn't as great as our imaginations of them. In fact, they kinda suck. Pretty much like Giant humanoid robots or mobile suits. The physics of these things just doesn't add up.
I've been a member for some time but let it lapse a few years ago because it got to the point that the benefits didn't justify the expense. Or rather, the benefits hadn't justified the expense for some time, I finally got fed up hoping that might change. I finally noticed I wasn't getting my money's worth and pulled the plug on it. Much of ACM seems designed to extract maximum income from its membership. That gravy train is over, as far as I'm concerned.
My wife and I have adopted a policy of not paying until at least 6 months later, or after those two sort it out, since you can never get your money BACK once sent, but until they settle it out there's no way to know what is owed..
I generally had this policy, but now that I've got $1500 deductible and $4500 out of pocket maximum, and this year am having to have cataract surgery, I went ahead and paid the $450 prep office visit bill. If the insurance company didn't negotiate it quickly and correctly, it's their loss because it's clear I'm going to exceed the out-of-pocket this year by enough that THEY will end up paying for anything they fail to properly negotiate. And in fact I've got another minor issue I'm going to be sure to take care of this year, because once the max is reached, everything else is free for that year. So for the rest of this year anyway, I've got the Caddilac plan.
I don't want a phone with ANY kind of keyboard, slide-out or virtual or whatever. A ONE button phone would be just fine. In fact, I don't even care if it has a screen, either, as I won't be looking at it. A phone is a mobile voice device, not a laptop or desktop computer, video game machine or TV. If I want something like that I'll get a tablet or laptop, not a phone. Take your instant messaging text and jam it up your ass.
The US may have a high corporate tax rate on paper, but not in actual practice:
http://www.financialsense.com/...
Given the military budgets are VASTLY different between the US and all other countries, comparing taxes with other countries makes no sense at all. Or do you figure the militaries aren't paid for by taxes? Or maybe you figure business gains no benefit from military operations, and therefore shouldn't have to foot the bill for them? Better look again, at least in the US, business gains PLENTY from the military expenditures, since much of the money is going to businesses that provide what the military needs. The US military is the biggest customer for a lot of US businesses. And as another user commented, plenty of these businesses don't pay ANY taxes (GE as one example).
You also might want to consider that many of the countries with "lower" corporate tax rates than the US have higher personal income rates. In addition, they don't spend anywhere near as much on a military.
If you think the corporate tax rate is high, compare it with the rates from the 1950s through 1980s. Then cry me a river.
If industry isn't thriving, it's not due to taxes and regulation, as there's nowhere near as much of those than there were decades ago. Taxes are down, wages are down, deregulation has been running rampant, and the oversight organizations haven't been doing their job (FDA,FCC,SEC,etc.). If industry still can't survive, could it be because the CEO's have run off with the profits and used the money to buy the politicians? Or maybe it's because employees can't afford to buy enough products anymore?
So in other words, Dropbox confirmed Snowden's claims.
A better system is a mixture of the better aspects of both capitalism and socialism. Getting the mix right is a challenge, but arguing for impossibilities like "a purely free market" or "pure socialism" are extremist and unrealistic.
Except I'm not talking about a phone, I'm using an iPad tablet.
Yes, they "cheat" more because that's how they learned to cope with the state. Any state. And given the American state's ethics, or I should say, near complete lack thereof, I see no reason to hold communist state emigre's adaptation behaviors against them. The IRS on the other hand, most likely has a different view.
You were socialized by your environment to be better at lying that telling the truth. You learned to "cheat" and it's easier than not at this point. Living in the US I once knew a Russian emigre who essentially was living in the US completely under the radar. He was an excellent and successful programmer and mathematician, but the way he did business with everyone was as if he needed to work-around or subvert the system, not because he was "unethical" but simply because it was what he knew best how to do.
Socialism, communism ( Same shit! ) = Corruption by default. Can someone please come up with a new political pragma that derives from, intelligence, ethics, moral, responsibility and perhaps also respect for the individual?
Well, don't look to capitalism. Even Adam Smith recognized it's largely driven by the "invisible hand" of greed. Not exactly ethical, moral or responsible. Or for that matter, respectful of the individual and not particularly intelligent (pragmatic though, I suppose).
And if you doubt my assertion, read this: http://science.slashdot.org/co...
Absolutely, in the upside-down world of communist states, it may be that lying and stealing are the appropriate ways to remain ethical. So you can't use these elements to measure ethics.