You see when I go to a link that's going to tell me about some booth at a linux I want some graphical content.
Doubt this person works for a fortune 500
on
Corporate KDE
·
· Score: 1
Tell me what fortune 500 company is using linux on their desktop. I am very much in 2003. And when you say most people, what experience are you speaking from. If you have evidence of a company that standardized on linux. and they are a fortune 500. Let us know, otherwise, with no data to back up what you say, just shut up.
We use profiles and push down programs to users who need them. Or keep MSI installs on the network and use VNC to access their desktop and install the product. Novell is excellent as well, I must say I loved using groupwise and zenworks, but corporate Heads like to use Microsoft. And as far as apps go, their are a lot of Microsoft apps available I must say. Try making a linux network boot disk for proprietary Dell NICs and you'll know some of the annoyances I had with the previous Novell network.:)
religiously persecuted?
on
A Word a Day
·
· Score: 1
How many years ago?
Re:Excellent move
on
Corporate KDE
·
· Score: 2, Interesting
Hate to say this, but on a corporate desktop, I don't want to see linux. windows 2000 is very stable here at work and it is very manageable from the administration end. Plus active directory is something we use so that people from all over the country can go to any other facility, log in, and have everything work just as it did at their desk.
You know I would prefer them to wait and release a product when it works right as apposed to when Intel released the first P4s and they were slower than the P3s on the market.
Plus these processors originally named sledgehammer and clawhammer will be a great addition to the multiple cpu community because they contain there own memory processors, so the woes of redundant work in multiple CPU systems will be reduced by not having to recache the memory constantly, like modern Xeon servers do.
Plus don't you like the idea of your memory bandwidth actually increasing with each processor you install
Slashdot Mirror
You see when I go to a link that's going to tell me about some booth at a linux I want some graphical content.
Tell me what fortune 500 company is using linux on their desktop. I am very much in 2003. And when you say most people, what experience are you speaking from. If you have evidence of a company that standardized on linux. and they are a fortune 500. Let us know, otherwise, with no data to back up what you say, just shut up.
We use profiles and push down programs to users who need them. Or keep MSI installs on the network and use VNC to access their desktop and install the product. Novell is excellent as well, I must say I loved using groupwise and zenworks, but corporate Heads like to use Microsoft. And as far as apps go, their are a lot of Microsoft apps available I must say. Try making a linux network boot disk for proprietary Dell NICs and you'll know some of the annoyances I had with the previous Novell network. :)
How many years ago?
Hate to say this, but on a corporate desktop, I don't want to see linux. windows 2000 is very stable here at work and it is very manageable from the administration end. Plus active directory is something we use so that people from all over the country can go to any other facility, log in, and have everything work just as it did at their desk.
You know I would prefer them to wait and release a product when it works right as apposed to when Intel released the first P4s and they were slower than the P3s on the market. Plus these processors originally named sledgehammer and clawhammer will be a great addition to the multiple cpu community because they contain there own memory processors, so the woes of redundant work in multiple CPU systems will be reduced by not having to recache the memory constantly, like modern Xeon servers do. Plus don't you like the idea of your memory bandwidth actually increasing with each processor you install