You mean he was responsible for the complete lack of any local response to the emergency in PR?
You mean the same bullshit excuse wingnuts used in 2005 when Bush left a major American city to drown? The "locals" are completely incapable of dealing with disasters of this magnitude, that's why we have FEMA. Do you also blather on about how the local fire department in Santa Rosa should have been able to hold off the record fires sweeping through California? Asshat.
But THE EMAILS! WHAT ABOUT THE EMAILS!... the voters
But Hillbot sycophancy. Even if Hillary couldn't be given an effective life sentence for mishandling classified evidence and obstruction of justice (deleting evidence while under investigation) she's still an unbelievable idiot.
First, because after weathering all kinds of BS scandals from Republicans in the 90's, why hand the GOP a legitimate issue on a silver platter for them to hit her with. And even putting that aside, there's her massive hypocrisy as she lambasted the Bush Administration for using private email a mere two years before setting up her own private email server and using it exclusively.
We tried buying off NK with tons of stuff in exchange for ending a nuclear development program, but they kept developing nuke capabilities and that "Agreed Framework" ended.
Because not only did you keep threatening them militarily, you kept practicing invasions of the country while actually invading TWO countries for bullshit reasons. And since then has overthrown two democracies and repeated the Iraq "mistake" in Syria and Libya.
And you wonder why NK wants nuclear weapons and missiles capable of delivering them.
President Xi is more belligerent than any Chinese leader since Mao
Yes, belligerent because he want's a Chinese sphere of influence around traditional Chinese waters and territory. As opposed to the United States, which wants hegemony over the entire planet, and isn't belligerent at all.
Putin is also not crazy, but he's been whipping the Russian military into an anti-US and anti-Western frenzy to support his own power and again
Putin cut Russia's defense budget, which is now smaller than the last increase given to the Pentagon. And how much of a frenzy would you American Exceptionalists be in if Russia overthrew the government of Canada and immediately started to bring it into the Warsaw Pact?
North Korea's leader will definitely want to try to nuke everybody he can if the US attacks just to take as many people with him as he can.
Right. Because the U.S. would sit by twiddling its thumbs if a foreign country invaded it.
WAKE UP! North Korea has been festering for a long time and it's not only the United States that is concerned about Kim Jong Un's nuclear armaments and hostile disposition.
You'd be hostile too, if a foreign government invaded your land, killed 1-3 million of your citizens, while flattening every city in the north, and has spent over 20 years practicing invasions every spring.
The U.S. has been violating the Geneva Conventions, the U.N. Charter and it's own Constitutional limits on war for so long that I can guess how many shits Moscow gives about the IMF.
At least Hilary wouldn't be riling up Iran just to appeal to her base.
Only because she was so busy promising to shoot down Russian jets in Syria. She served under Obama when he spent years threatening Iran with military attacks for a weapons program he knew Iran didn't have, she could have carried on that fine record after she was sworn in.
When the Soviet union was the threat, having the bombers on alert was a credible deterrant. Specifically, they put the Soviets on notice that even if they launched a strike sufficient to annihilate the U.S. we would get the bombers safely in the air first and they would go down with us.
More like when the US was a threat to the Soviet Union. It wasn't Moscow that ordered nuclear weapons to win a war already won a short distance from the continental United States.
That's a really interesting take on the Rosatom transaction. Did you get it from Fox News, perhaps?
That's Hillbot Handwaiving. Even if there's nothing to indict her with, Hillary flagrantly violated her confirmation promises to keep a wall between State and the Clinton's foundation, with any conflicts of interest disclosed. Much like with her email server that people make excuses for - even if there's nothing to indict her with, there's her attacks on the Bush Administration for using private email, made two years before she started her own private email server and used it exclusively.
China would attack Taiwan, and maybe Japan too. There'd be a regional war as all the other Asian powers divided into pro China and anti China groups.
Russia would invade all of Ukraine, and threaten one of the Baltic States. They'd be opposed by the UK, Poland, Czech Republic and Hungary. France and Germany may intervene on the NATO side or might decide to sit it out.
Except this and the rest of your post is nothing but an American Exceptionalist fantasy. The greatest destabilizing force in the world since the end of WWII has been American hegemony. Nothing else comes close. Just to pick at your first nutbar example. if Russia was going to invade Ukraine, it would have been to put down the American coup that overthrew the elect government, and they would have done it years ago.
Right, in the same way that Lenin and Stalin were hardcore capitalists.
/rollseyes
What color is the sky on your world? Not on this one, where the WaPo ran 16 negative stories on Bernie Sanders in 16 hours, and who's owner has a deal with the CIA work more than the paper.
that is apples to oranges and the fallacy of only high paid positions are filled by the rich who come from money and blah blah blah blah blah
Didn't look at the link, did you? All the working-class people you just hid behind wont make it a tenth as far as the scion of a wealthy family who drank himself through high school and university, based on his daddy's money and connections. Connections that got the drunk frat boy a better job fresh out of graduation than people who have spent ten years "pulling themselves up by their bootstraps" without any such help.
They know it and you know it. Why bother pretending otherwise?
But before the practice comes the study. Otherwise you are fumbling around in the dark without any idea what you are doing - a fact elitist snowflakes tend to forget.
In some alternate universe where Wal-Mart, Taco Bell and Amazon would love to increase their entry level pay to $20/hour but are prevented from doing so by government maximum-wage policies?
yeah there is a large movement toward disadvantage for the succesful and harder working to make it equal for the less capable
In some alternate universe where this was a meritocracy, instead of a place where the #1 factor in how far you go in life is how much money your daddy has. Not how hard one works - else every elementary schoolteacher would be worth millions, while investment bankers would be cramming four bankers into an efficiency.
The problem with education is the following statement:
"Those who can do, those who can't teach."
Indeed. Anyone who repeats that quote without being sarcastic is flying a "hey everybody I'm a stupid asshole" banner so big it can be seen from space.
Seems to me that it is really parents that need educating to create a change.
Seems to me, you and your spouse should work a few years averaging 100-120 hours per week between the two of you, for a lousy two-bedroom apartment, before you start lecturing people on how they aren't doing enough to support their families.
Said centers are being coached by hard left foundations and staffed with hard left staff that happily deletes posts that aren't violating any laws but don't suit their political worldview.
You wouldn't know "hard left" if Zombie Lenin and Zombie Stalin took turns biting you on the ass. It's just an empty headed pejorative for you to sling around.
Slashdot Mirror
You mean the same bullshit excuse wingnuts used in 2005 when Bush left a major American city to drown? The "locals" are completely incapable of dealing with disasters of this magnitude, that's why we have FEMA. Do you also blather on about how the local fire department in Santa Rosa should have been able to hold off the record fires sweeping through California? Asshat.
But Hillbot sycophancy. Even if Hillary couldn't be given an effective life sentence for mishandling classified evidence and obstruction of justice (deleting evidence while under investigation) she's still an unbelievable idiot.
First, because after weathering all kinds of BS scandals from Republicans in the 90's, why hand the GOP a legitimate issue on a silver platter for them to hit her with. And even putting that aside, there's her massive hypocrisy as she lambasted the Bush Administration for using private email a mere two years before setting up her own private email server and using it exclusively.
Based on what, the number of countries they've bombed, invaded and overthrown since the 50's? That number is zero, btw.
Because not only did you keep threatening them militarily, you kept practicing invasions of the country while actually invading TWO countries for bullshit reasons. And since then has overthrown two democracies and repeated the Iraq "mistake" in Syria and Libya.
And you wonder why NK wants nuclear weapons and missiles capable of delivering them.
Saddam, Gaddafi, and Assad are fascinated by your ideas, and would like to subscribe to your newsletter.
Yes, belligerent because he want's a Chinese sphere of influence around traditional Chinese waters and territory. As opposed to the United States, which wants hegemony over the entire planet, and isn't belligerent at all.
Putin cut Russia's defense budget, which is now smaller than the last increase given to the Pentagon. And how much of a frenzy would you American Exceptionalists be in if Russia overthrew the government of Canada and immediately started to bring it into the Warsaw Pact?
Right. Because the U.S. would sit by twiddling its thumbs if a foreign country invaded it.
You'd be hostile too, if a foreign government invaded your land, killed 1-3 million of your citizens, while flattening every city in the north, and has spent over 20 years practicing invasions every spring.
The U.S. has been violating the Geneva Conventions, the U.N. Charter and it's own Constitutional limits on war for so long that I can guess how many shits Moscow gives about the IMF.
Only because she was so busy promising to shoot down Russian jets in Syria. She served under Obama when he spent years threatening Iran with military attacks for a weapons program he knew Iran didn't have, she could have carried on that fine record after she was sworn in.
More like when the US was a threat to the Soviet Union. It wasn't Moscow that ordered nuclear weapons to win a war already won a short distance from the continental United States.
That's Hillbot Handwaiving. Even if there's nothing to indict her with, Hillary flagrantly violated her confirmation promises to keep a wall between State and the Clinton's foundation, with any conflicts of interest disclosed. Much like with her email server that people make excuses for - even if there's nothing to indict her with, there's her attacks on the Bush Administration for using private email, made two years before she started her own private email server and used it exclusively.
Except this and the rest of your post is nothing but an American Exceptionalist fantasy. The greatest destabilizing force in the world since the end of WWII has been American hegemony. Nothing else comes close. Just to pick at your first nutbar example. if Russia was going to invade Ukraine, it would have been to put down the American coup that overthrew the elect government, and they would have done it years ago.
And only five theatrically released Star Wars movies. The first three around 1980, only to start again in 2015.
Right, in the same way that Lenin and Stalin were hardcore capitalists.
/rollseyes
What color is the sky on your world? Not on this one, where the WaPo ran 16 negative stories on Bernie Sanders in 16 hours, and who's owner has a deal with the CIA work more than the paper.
Didn't look at the link, did you? All the working-class people you just hid behind wont make it a tenth as far as the scion of a wealthy family who drank himself through high school and university, based on his daddy's money and connections. Connections that got the drunk frat boy a better job fresh out of graduation than people who have spent ten years "pulling themselves up by their bootstraps" without any such help.
They know it and you know it. Why bother pretending otherwise?
But before the practice comes the study. Otherwise you are fumbling around in the dark without any idea what you are doing - a fact elitist snowflakes tend to forget.
Too facil.
1) Note the use of the word correlation, not causation
2) The link is to a study based on hard stats, not anecdotes
In some alternate universe where Wal-Mart, Taco Bell and Amazon would love to increase their entry level pay to $20/hour but are prevented from doing so by government maximum-wage policies?
In some alternate universe where this was a meritocracy, instead of a place where the #1 factor in how far you go in life is how much money your daddy has. Not how hard one works - else every elementary schoolteacher would be worth millions, while investment bankers would be cramming four bankers into an efficiency.
https://www.washingtonpost.com...
Indeed. Anyone who repeats that quote without being sarcastic is flying a "hey everybody I'm a stupid asshole" banner so big it can be seen from space.
Other than it being a skill you have to study to become good at it - same as any other profession.
Seems to me, you and your spouse should work a few years averaging 100-120 hours per week between the two of you, for a lousy two-bedroom apartment, before you start lecturing people on how they aren't doing enough to support their families.
The #1 correlation between a student's performance is how much money his or her daddy has.
https://www.washingtonpost.com...
I don't happen to have his cell number - you wanna call him and ask what church he was in when it was set on fire?
You wouldn't know "hard left" if Zombie Lenin and Zombie Stalin took turns biting you on the ass. It's just an empty headed pejorative for you to sling around.