Where are you from? And exactly how long have you been on this planet, dood? PLATO sucked royally and big time -- that programmed instruction was another simpleton corporate scam, exactly what Gates is trying to do, privatize all education, because the much smarter Steve Jobs wisely began investing in getting Apples into the schools and now they are the computer of choice, across the spectrum. 'Nuff said....
Yup, you certainly know a lot (pure sarcasm here!!!!!!!).
When the My Lai Massacre was first reported, a Col. Colin Powell, of Americal, was instrumental in covering it up.
Which is how those clowns reach general and admiral rank (see the background of douchey John McCain's father and grandfather).
Only after the gunship crewman became a civilian, and continued to pursue the matter did it ever reach the light of day.
But with endless duty and service in today's nonconscripted slave military, and partially-privatized, how could Manning know when, or if, he would ever be separated from service?
A lot of posters today simply can't locate their genitals....
...he could have dealt with it through appropriate channels...
Manning did, and he was repulsed in the matter. The US Congress, and the USA's criminal Senate, never, ever -- that is, REFUSED, to ever call Mark Klein to testify before them as to the unlawful warrantless wiretapping in progress under the Bush Administration (the installation of Narus boxes he witnessed at switching centers).
The US Senate, back in December, in complete contravention to the US Constitution and all historic US law, had a unanimous voice vote (so that no record would be kept of each senator's vote) to allow a complete exemption to all the banksters' illegal activities with regard to illegitimate foreclosures, and those action preceding and coming after!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Only Obama's veto of it kept this country intact for a little while longer. You couldn't even find your own vagina, dood!
He will receive a fair trial through Courts Martial, and may be found guilty or not.
As of this time, the commander-in-chief, the DoD, the IG of the DoD, stand in violation of the UCMJ, in not giving him a speedy trial, but holding Manning in an conscionably long time in solitary confinement while practising sleep deprivation on him.
There is no indication as yet that anything "fair" has taken place.
Again, not according to the law. War crimes MUST be reported, there is no ''buts" nor "ifs" tangentially. Manning acted according to the law, something the DoD, the US congress present and past presidents, have refused to do and stand in violation of the National Security Act. Why wasn't Hillary Clinton (the fascist) recent appointment, Mark Grossman, prosecuted for sharing the covert ID of Valerie Plame with Richard Armitage, who then spread it around to Ari Fleischer and Libby who made it public?
who tried to do what he felt was the right thing as "reasonable" and...
"Reasonable" has nothing to do with it - please remember -- it was the Uniform Code of Military Justice, martial law, which Manning was obeying, and obeying it to the hilt, unlike all those criminal career pukes in the bag.
There are many, many, actually countless, numbers of laws congress has and is now in violation of. The vast majority of them should be dangling at the end of a noose for crimes against the people.
"Wow, a lot of dumb posts for this article. I'm not a lawyer of military justice, but releasing sensitive classified documents onto the internet is certainly, in layman's vernacular, "aiding the enemy".
No, you are correct, and there are many other things you aren't as well, especially an analytical thinker, and independent thinker, nor a former military type, as we former vets are familiar with the UCMJ, and know that it requires all war crimes to be reported, which Pfc. Manning did, but was repulsed by his commander, and took the only way out. You would also know that Manning has been held in violation of the UCMJ, with 10 months in isolation and sleep deprivation, when he is supposed to be accorded a speedy courts-martial.
One must assume THE ENEMY you refer to are all those non-Taliban and noncombatants and civilians murdered in Afghanistan?
The one intelligent thing McChrystal ever uttered was the military was shooting everyone BUT the Taliban in Afghanistan and Pakistan.
McChrystal is now with his buddy John Negroponte, you know, "death squad" John, at Yale University's prestigious Jackson Institute, also know as "government-in-a-box."
Sonny, you and your kind (Limbaugh, O'Reilly, and all the rest of the candy butt draft-dodging cowardly wormy pack) wouldn't know treason if you jumped up and bit you in your ass.
sorry, dood, but that was one of thousands of "My Lais" which have occurred in Iraq, Afghanistan and elsewhere.
No doubt you would claim those 9 children obliterated the other day by Nato gunship crews were also "armed" as they would picking up wood for a cooking fire.
Damn the ENEMY, but they are sneaky, huh? Frankly, the "Apache community" should stand trial the way Lt. Calley once did, but we know that's not about to happen, especially not in the lawless rogue empire nation of the United Skynet Almagamated (USA).
Perhaps you are related to the vice-prez of the USA, Joey Bin Biden. No doubt we should seek his wise counsel on the matter, just as we wonder what he would say about whether Gadhaffi is an actual dictator, or even a psycho dictator, something which evidently appears to have caught our banksters, pharmaceutical lobbyists, Monsanto lobbyists, and Exxon-Mobil lobbyists, like Susan Rice and the other neocons on Obama's administration, completely by surprise!
We do know of vice-prez Joey Bin Biden's recent sage declarations: that Mubarrak of Egypt was "NOT a dictator" and that "Julian Assange is a high-tech terrorist" --- you go, Joey Bin Biden, man of many achievements (such as that op you were a part of, together with Anita Hill, to get Clarence Thoms seated on the US Supreme Court --- you go, Joey!!!!).
I've know a variety of military pilots over the years; some stalwart and of absolute integrity, such as Maj. Fritz Meyers, who refused to take the path of least resistance and retired early to publicly denounce the "official version" of the surface-to-air missile shootdown of Flight 800 (which the radar data, released some years later under an FOIA request, has proven).
But those Apache crews, and the Nato crews, aren't among them.
"I very much doubt anyone is saying Hawking radiation is disproven..."
Sorry, dood, but the book you've recommended I've already read, and in THIS VERY BOOK Susskind states he has DISPROVEN Hawking radiation.
Your track record sucks, but thanks for the effort.......
"...caught shooting non-combatants in the back,..."
They reason that Blackwater stooge is in deep doo-doo was because those two he shot were ISI agents who were following him, and the Pakistani ISI evidently protects and is damn mad about having their own murdered -- for whatever reasons (this is all over the world press). But I concur with your commentary overall ---- let us recall the links between G4S, which works closely with the Swedish security police (Säpo) and has links to the US Defense Intelligence Agency (Jeffrey Starr, former higher up at DoD and a DIA upper echelon type who is a senior exec at G4S) and G4S receives heavy Goldman Sachs financial backing.
To boristhespider, a serious question: I have read repeatedly over the past thirty-some years that cosmic entanglement, or the EPR paradox, has been proven by experiments at the CERN reactors.
But then a prof of quantum mech at MIT stated that it has never been successfully proven to date.
Also, there appears to be some physicists who believe the existence of Hawking radiation has been completely disproven, while others aren't quite there yet.
Exactly, which is why it is most suspicious that Foreign Affairs Minister, Carl Bildt, was a director at Lundin Petroleum: (Bildt first appointed Justice Minister Beatrice Ask to the cabinet when he was previously prime minster of Sweden, and she was the one who re-opened the Assange case which had been closed due to flimsy and lacking evidence)
Carl Bildt was a member of the board of directors of Lundin Oil while a consortium of Swedish, Austrian and Malaysian companies were directly involved in starting and financing a bloody battle for oil resources.
Sorry, dood, but the Financial-Intelligence Complex, fully established in the USA at the end of WWII, has nothing to do with your perception of "national security" -- instead it has always been about financial intelligence and control of the populace. There's a reason why NSA has broken EVERY commercial code out there.
Best five books to read to fully grasp my comments: Family of Secrets, by Russ Baker, Brothers, by David Talbot, JFK and the Unspeakable, by James Douglass, John Kenneth Galbraith: His Life, His Politics, His Economics, by Richard Parker (paying close attention to the three chapters on the JFK administration, and the brilliant final chapter, and, The Rich and Super-Rich, by Ferndinand Lundberg.
Negative, unthinking one, it is far more difficult -- given the judicial setup in the UK and the present political turmoil and scandals going on there -- to extradite from there, far easier to extradite him to Gothenburg, where Jeppesen Systems AB is located (FYI, douchebag, Jeppesen is also known as Boeing's "Extreme Rendition" airlines --- beginning to understand now? Nope, didn't think so!) --- but what is bizarre is that a local, instead of national, prosecutor would be attempting to extradite Assange of Wikileaks, (but the fact it's Goteborg, or Gothenburg, is the tipoff) and that an Interpol warrant would be issued --- against their charter --- for a charge which carries no jail sentence!!!
Now I would like to repost the comments by arbed12 from a Swedish news site (thelocal.se):
Questions (not being asked by the mainstream media):
The 100 page police protocol now on the internet is the complete prosecution file as it existed on 18 Nov when it was given to Assange's lawyer (in Swedish) by Marianne Ny. Her letter to the Australian High Commission (20 Dec) mentions "a small number of documents" held back that have been verbally described to the lawyer, so this must be more or less the whole thing.
My question: I thought a European Arrest Warrant could only be issued for offences that carry a minimum 1 year sentence. I think this applies to only 1 of the 4 offences detailed - the one concerning Miss W being "asleep". Miss W's witness statement in the protocol is unfinished and unsigned. So, has this EAW been raised on the basis of allegations that have not been formally made (ie. no signed witness statement)?
Alternatively, has it been raised on the basis of the hearsay evidence of friends, family and work colleagues about this incident given by Witness B (statement taken by telephone on 8 Sept), Witness D (telephone statement 13 Sept) and Witnesses G, H and I (telephone statements 6, 22 and 27 Oct respectively)?
More questions: where is Miss W's full witness statement (either recorded police interview or properly finished and signed document)? There's been plenty of time to obtain it between 20 Aug and 18 Nov surely? Why hasn't this been given to the defence?
Where is Miss A's full witness statement? Subsequent to the telephone statement taken on 21 August, there has been at least one opportunity to do a full recorded police interview (when she gave the police the torn, used condom on 25 August). Again, there has been plenty of time between 21 Aug and 18 Nov to obtain a formal statement. Why hasn't this been given to the defence?
Apparently, police forensics were unable to find any DNA (male or female) on a torn, supposedly used, condom. How is this even possible? To me, the lack of any DNA indicates the condom has never even been worn and therefore, potentially, has been presented by the complainant as false evidence. Why have most reports in the mainstream media about the latest leak (from an incredibly porous police investigation) not mentioned this detail at all?
Finally, one for Nick Davies of the Guardian, who wrote a highly prejudicial article on 18 December based on a 68 page police report (he says he was given "unauthorised" access to a few days previously. Given the police file on the internet now is 100 pages long, does this mean Davies' report did not include Witness E and Witness F's statements (lengthy recorded police interviews done on 20 Sept) by two Swedish journalists? It's the only thing I can see that might account for the difference in page count. If so, why not - they were available by 18 December. And why did he choose to publish an article based on only one side of the story? In a rape case? Would he consider that good journalistic practice? Or a disgrace to his profession?
One more thing:
Witness I's statement is very troubling. First, she doesn't seem to live where her statement indicates she does and, second, in it the police ask her about the SMS messages with Miss W that
I think you may be a bit off: (from another post the other day)
"OK, now a lot of people have been wondering how Egypt managed to isolate itself on the Web. There are principally two ways this is done, first physically forcing the individual ISPs (ASN level) to halt all in and out-going IP traffic, but the second way is probably how they accomplished it. Let this be a warning to all who try.
They would have had the site which is their top-domain registry, or.eg registry, perform editing of their country's web sites by removing the terminating "." to DNS records in the.eg zone.
(That is, deleting the "." following the lower level sites, indicating no ".eg" was to follow.)
As an example, were one to evilly hack into Sweden's.se country registry (www.iis.se), and remove the terminating "." after the main ASN sites, no IP traffic would be incoming or outgoing for that country.
As an example, were one to evilly hack into the United Kingdom's.uk country registry (www.nominet.org.uk), and remove the terminating "." after the main ASN sites, no IP traffic would be incoming or outgoing for that country.
As an example, were one to evilly hack into Switzerland's.ch country registry (www.switch.ch/all), and remove the terminating "." after the main ASN sites, no IP traffic would be incoming or outgoing for that country.
Now, this is assuredly against the law, so be warned not do undertake any such operation --- even if the global banking elite manages to have Assange of Wikileaks illegally extradited to Sweden to be later removed to some extreme rendition site."
Actually, had you bothered to pay attention -- assuming you have an attention speed which lasts longer than the customary 3 seconds -- you would know that the FCIC, especially Phil Angelides and Brooksley Born -- conducted extensive hearings and investigations around the country, from NYC to California and points inbetween, which established fraud and culpability.
Yes indeed, perhaps you have been existing in a cave in Afghanistan along with the FOB (Friend of the Bushes), Osama b.
They are known as JPMorgan Chase, Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley, Citigroup, BankofAmerica, Blackstone Group, Citadel, Fortress Asset Management, Standard & Poor, Meany's, Fitch's, KKR, Carlyle Group and friends.
Friends would be: Reagan, Bush (1), Clinton, Bush(2) (p. 13 of Chapter 1 of the FCIC report), and the Gramms, Robert Rubin, Arthur Leavitt, Larry Summers, Timothy Geithner, and a bunch of perps presently with the Obama Administration (Gene Sperling, Neal Wolin, etc.).
"And people ignoring history. Everyone from investors to banks to insurance companies were betting on housing markets never falling.""And people ignoring history. Everyone from investors to banks to insurance companies were betting on housing markets never falling."
Negative, semi-clueless one! They were copying the history of the Great Crash and Great Depression, when those financial institutions who had financed the passage of Prohibition (lasting from 1920 to 1933, and equating to a gigantic tax cut -- sound familiar?? -- and dark pools for laundering through the stock exchange) picked up assets at bargain basement prices after they purposely crashed the system --- in other words, a massive transfer of wealth.
Same thing this time, except they have created a new and improved version with their control of credit derivatives (JPMorgan Chase, Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley) which acts --- when properly exercised --- as a global financial virus.
And your last sentece is wanting --- what occurred was that the second and third tier banks realized the extent of the ultra-leveraging which had occurred --- when the banksters peddled their securitized debt, i.e., issuing securities multiple times based upon one loan, which the next bank or financial institution purchased on the asset side, then further issued securities of some type on the liability side, when the next bank purchased on the asset side, then issued further securities on the liability side, ad infinitum......which is what we call ultra-leveraging, and what was used by Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley, Citigroup, BofA, and others, for all that ultra-leveraged speculation to manipulate the commodities: oil, energy, gas, foodstuffs, precious metals, etc., etc., etc.
You are talking about the NYT after all. Not exactly a valid source of anything reliable, after all. I mean, which rag did Dick Cheney go to when he wanted planted stories written by Judy Miller (now with a highly paid position at the Manhattan Institute, of course)?
Slashdot Mirror
Where are you from? And exactly how long have you been on this planet, dood? PLATO sucked royally and big time -- that programmed instruction was another simpleton corporate scam, exactly what Gates is trying to do, privatize all education, because the much smarter Steve Jobs wisely began investing in getting Apples into the schools and now they are the computer of choice, across the spectrum. 'Nuff said....
When the My Lai Massacre was first reported, a Col. Colin Powell, of Americal, was instrumental in covering it up.
Which is how those clowns reach general and admiral rank (see the background of douchey John McCain's father and grandfather).
Only after the gunship crewman became a civilian, and continued to pursue the matter did it ever reach the light of day.
But with endless duty and service in today's nonconscripted slave military, and partially-privatized, how could Manning know when, or if, he would ever be separated from service?
A lot of posters today simply can't locate their genitals....
Manning did, and he was repulsed in the matter. The US Congress, and the USA's criminal Senate, never, ever -- that is, REFUSED, to ever call Mark Klein to testify before them as to the unlawful warrantless wiretapping in progress under the Bush Administration (the installation of Narus boxes he witnessed at switching centers).
The US Senate, back in December, in complete contravention to the US Constitution and all historic US law, had a unanimous voice vote (so that no record would be kept of each senator's vote) to allow a complete exemption to all the banksters' illegal activities with regard to illegitimate foreclosures, and those action preceding and coming after!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Only Obama's veto of it kept this country intact for a little while longer. You couldn't even find your own vagina, dood!
As of this time, the commander-in-chief, the DoD, the IG of the DoD, stand in violation of the UCMJ, in not giving him a speedy trial, but holding Manning in an conscionably long time in solitary confinement while practising sleep deprivation on him.
There is no indication as yet that anything "fair" has taken place.
Again, not according to the law. War crimes MUST be reported, there is no ''buts" nor "ifs" tangentially. Manning acted according to the law, something the DoD, the US congress present and past presidents, have refused to do and stand in violation of the National Security Act. Why wasn't Hillary Clinton (the fascist) recent appointment, Mark Grossman, prosecuted for sharing the covert ID of Valerie Plame with Richard Armitage, who then spread it around to Ari Fleischer and Libby who made it public?
"Reasonable" has nothing to do with it - please remember -- it was the Uniform Code of Military Justice, martial law, which Manning was obeying, and obeying it to the hilt, unlike all those criminal career pukes in the bag.
There are many, many, actually countless, numbers of laws congress has and is now in violation of. The vast majority of them should be dangling at the end of a noose for crimes against the people.
No, you are correct, and there are many other things you aren't as well, especially an analytical thinker, and independent thinker, nor a former military type, as we former vets are familiar with the UCMJ, and know that it requires all war crimes to be reported, which Pfc. Manning did, but was repulsed by his commander, and took the only way out. You would also know that Manning has been held in violation of the UCMJ, with 10 months in isolation and sleep deprivation, when he is supposed to be accorded a speedy courts-martial.
One must assume THE ENEMY you refer to are all those non-Taliban and noncombatants and civilians murdered in Afghanistan?
The one intelligent thing McChrystal ever uttered was the military was shooting everyone BUT the Taliban in Afghanistan and Pakistan.
McChrystal is now with his buddy John Negroponte, you know, "death squad" John, at Yale University's prestigious Jackson Institute, also know as "government-in-a-box."
Sonny, you and your kind (Limbaugh, O'Reilly, and all the rest of the candy butt draft-dodging cowardly wormy pack) wouldn't know treason if you jumped up and bit you in your ass.
No doubt you would claim those 9 children obliterated the other day by Nato gunship crews were also "armed" as they would picking up wood for a cooking fire.
Damn the ENEMY, but they are sneaky, huh? Frankly, the "Apache community" should stand trial the way Lt. Calley once did, but we know that's not about to happen, especially not in the lawless rogue empire nation of the United Skynet Almagamated (USA).
Perhaps you are related to the vice-prez of the USA, Joey Bin Biden. No doubt we should seek his wise counsel on the matter, just as we wonder what he would say about whether Gadhaffi is an actual dictator, or even a psycho dictator, something which evidently appears to have caught our banksters, pharmaceutical lobbyists, Monsanto lobbyists, and Exxon-Mobil lobbyists, like Susan Rice and the other neocons on Obama's administration, completely by surprise!
We do know of vice-prez Joey Bin Biden's recent sage declarations: that Mubarrak of Egypt was "NOT a dictator" and that "Julian Assange is a high-tech terrorist" --- you go, Joey Bin Biden, man of many achievements (such as that op you were a part of, together with Anita Hill, to get Clarence Thoms seated on the US Supreme Court --- you go, Joey!!!!).
I've know a variety of military pilots over the years; some stalwart and of absolute integrity, such as Maj. Fritz Meyers, who refused to take the path of least resistance and retired early to publicly denounce the "official version" of the surface-to-air missile shootdown of Flight 800 (which the radar data, released some years later under an FOIA request, has proven).
But those Apache crews, and the Nato crews, aren't among them.
Thanks for the reply, much appreciated, sir.
"I very much doubt anyone is saying Hawking radiation is disproven..." Sorry, dood, but the book you've recommended I've already read, and in THIS VERY BOOK Susskind states he has DISPROVEN Hawking radiation. Your track record sucks, but thanks for the effort.......
They reason that Blackwater stooge is in deep doo-doo was because those two he shot were ISI agents who were following him, and the Pakistani ISI evidently protects and is damn mad about having their own murdered -- for whatever reasons (this is all over the world press). But I concur with your commentary overall ---- let us recall the links between G4S, which works closely with the Swedish security police (Säpo) and has links to the US Defense Intelligence Agency (Jeffrey Starr, former higher up at DoD and a DIA upper echelon type who is a senior exec at G4S) and G4S receives heavy Goldman Sachs financial backing.
But then a prof of quantum mech at MIT stated that it has never been successfully proven to date.
Also, there appears to be some physicists who believe the existence of Hawking radiation has been completely disproven, while others aren't quite there yet.
Any opinions on the matter??????
http://www.liquida.com/page/7491240/
Carl Bildt was a member of the board of directors of Lundin Oil while a consortium of Swedish, Austrian and Malaysian companies were directly involved in starting and financing a bloody battle for oil resources.
Full report on atrocities and situation in Sudan.
http://www.ecosonline.org/reports/2010/UNPAID_DEBT_fullreportweb.pdf
Best five books to read to fully grasp my comments: Family of Secrets, by Russ Baker, Brothers, by David Talbot, JFK and the Unspeakable, by James Douglass, John Kenneth Galbraith: His Life, His Politics, His Economics, by Richard Parker (paying close attention to the three chapters on the JFK administration, and the brilliant final chapter, and, The Rich and Super-Rich, by Ferndinand Lundberg.
Now I would like to repost the comments by arbed12 from a Swedish news site (thelocal.se):
Questions (not being asked by the mainstream media):
The 100 page police protocol now on the internet is the complete prosecution file as it existed on 18 Nov when it was given to Assange's lawyer (in Swedish) by Marianne Ny. Her letter to the Australian High Commission (20 Dec) mentions "a small number of documents" held back that have been verbally described to the lawyer, so this must be more or less the whole thing.
My question: I thought a European Arrest Warrant could only be issued for offences that carry a minimum 1 year sentence. I think this applies to only 1 of the 4 offences detailed - the one concerning Miss W being "asleep". Miss W's witness statement in the protocol is unfinished and unsigned. So, has this EAW been raised on the basis of allegations that have not been formally made (ie. no signed witness statement)?
Alternatively, has it been raised on the basis of the hearsay evidence of friends, family and work colleagues about this incident given by Witness B (statement taken by telephone on 8 Sept), Witness D (telephone statement 13 Sept) and Witnesses G, H and I (telephone statements 6, 22 and 27 Oct respectively)?
More questions: where is Miss W's full witness statement (either recorded police interview or properly finished and signed document)? There's been plenty of time to obtain it between 20 Aug and 18 Nov surely? Why hasn't this been given to the defence?
Where is Miss A's full witness statement? Subsequent to the telephone statement taken on 21 August, there has been at least one opportunity to do a full recorded police interview (when she gave the police the torn, used condom on 25 August). Again, there has been plenty of time between 21 Aug and 18 Nov to obtain a formal statement. Why hasn't this been given to the defence?
Apparently, police forensics were unable to find any DNA (male or female) on a torn, supposedly used, condom. How is this even possible? To me, the lack of any DNA indicates the condom has never even been worn and therefore, potentially, has been presented by the complainant as false evidence. Why have most reports in the mainstream media about the latest leak (from an incredibly porous police investigation) not mentioned this detail at all?
Finally, one for Nick Davies of the Guardian, who wrote a highly prejudicial article on 18 December based on a 68 page police report (he says he was given "unauthorised" access to a few days previously. Given the police file on the internet now is 100 pages long, does this mean Davies' report did not include Witness E and Witness F's statements (lengthy recorded police interviews done on 20 Sept) by two Swedish journalists? It's the only thing I can see that might account for the difference in page count. If so, why not - they were available by 18 December. And why did he choose to publish an article based on only one side of the story? In a rape case? Would he consider that good journalistic practice? Or a disgrace to his profession?
One more thing:
Witness I's statement is very troubling. First, she doesn't seem to live where her statement indicates she does and, second, in it the police ask her about the SMS messages with Miss W that
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZOab8lYI2H8
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=obmP9UuOn-4
"OK, now a lot of people have been wondering how Egypt managed to isolate itself on the Web. There are principally two ways this is done, first physically forcing the individual ISPs (ASN level) to halt all in and out-going IP traffic, but the second way is probably how they accomplished it. Let this be a warning to all who try.
They would have had the site which is their top-domain registry, or .eg registry, perform editing of their country's web sites by removing the terminating "." to DNS records in the .eg zone.
(That is, deleting the "." following the lower level sites, indicating no ".eg" was to follow.)
As an example, were one to evilly hack into Sweden's .se country registry (www.iis.se), and remove the terminating "." after the main ASN sites, no IP traffic would be incoming or outgoing for that country.
As an example, were one to evilly hack into the United Kingdom's .uk country registry (www.nominet.org.uk), and remove the terminating "." after the main ASN sites, no IP traffic would be incoming or outgoing for that country.
As an example, were one to evilly hack into Switzerland's .ch country registry (www.switch.ch/all), and remove the terminating "." after the main ASN sites, no IP traffic would be incoming or outgoing for that country.
Now, this is assuredly against the law, so be warned not do undertake any such operation --- even if the global banking elite manages to have Assange of Wikileaks illegally extradited to Sweden to be later removed to some extreme rendition site."
Actually, had you bothered to pay attention -- assuming you have an attention speed which lasts longer than the customary 3 seconds -- you would know that the FCIC, especially Phil Angelides and Brooksley Born -- conducted extensive hearings and investigations around the country, from NYC to California and points inbetween, which established fraud and culpability.
They are known as JPMorgan Chase, Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley, Citigroup, BankofAmerica, Blackstone Group, Citadel, Fortress Asset Management, Standard & Poor, Meany's, Fitch's, KKR, Carlyle Group and friends.
Friends would be: Reagan, Bush (1), Clinton, Bush(2) (p. 13 of Chapter 1 of the FCIC report), and the Gramms, Robert Rubin, Arthur Leavitt, Larry Summers, Timothy Geithner, and a bunch of perps presently with the Obama Administration (Gene Sperling, Neal Wolin, etc.).
Try reading the frigging report prior to making idiotic and moronic comments. Are you above the age of 7?
Thank the gods! Somebody besides myself has read this 662 page report.
You are incapable of forming your own independent conclusions?
You must be an American Zombie ConsumerTard? And the FCIC did make referrals for criminal prosecution, sonny 'tard.
Negative, semi-clueless one! They were copying the history of the Great Crash and Great Depression, when those financial institutions who had financed the passage of Prohibition (lasting from 1920 to 1933, and equating to a gigantic tax cut -- sound familiar?? -- and dark pools for laundering through the stock exchange) picked up assets at bargain basement prices after they purposely crashed the system --- in other words, a massive transfer of wealth.
Same thing this time, except they have created a new and improved version with their control of credit derivatives (JPMorgan Chase, Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley) which acts --- when properly exercised --- as a global financial virus.
And your last sentece is wanting --- what occurred was that the second and third tier banks realized the extent of the ultra-leveraging which had occurred --- when the banksters peddled their securitized debt, i.e., issuing securities multiple times based upon one loan, which the next bank or financial institution purchased on the asset side, then further issued securities of some type on the liability side, when the next bank purchased on the asset side, then issued further securities on the liability side, ad infinitum......which is what we call ultra-leveraging, and what was used by Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley, Citigroup, BofA, and others, for all that ultra-leveraged speculation to manipulate the commodities: oil, energy, gas, foodstuffs, precious metals, etc., etc., etc.
New York Times, 'natch!