Symantec is retiring the certificate, and has asked for it to be removed from Google (and probably other) products. End of story. Nobody should be affected.
Translation: the NSA no longer needs to use certificates that are signed against this root.
In the past, the Republican leadership could pull candidates back into line using party money. Now, the ultra-right wing Republicans can replace that money with money from the Koch brothers and their like.
It seems that any time anyone makes a generalization about Islam, there's somebody who comes up with a group who has a strict interpretation of this or that which refutes it.
Because there is no overarching authority of what Islam is or isn't, it makes it very easy to use a "no true Scotsman" argument when Islamic practices are discussed.
Definition of terrorism (from dictionary.com): the use of violence and threats to intimidate or coerce, especially for political purposes.
The homeless guy clearly fits this definition. He killed people with the intent of making a political point in the process. You think that the Paris attackers or the San Bernadino attackers were sane? If so, you have a different definition of sane than I have. Your definition is only likely to be applied to people with brown skin and/or muslim connections and is largely used to justify vast military spending.
Because that's what your definition is all about: justifying the trillions of dollars that are being lavished on "defence" companies.
I'm inclined to think that sensitivity might be caused by the expansion difference, but for it to actually crack the tooth is almost certainly going to take some combination of circumstances like an air pocket or a prolonged period of expansion/contraction
I am inclined to believe that the explanation was complete BS.
Some years ago, I had a tooth that had an older amalgam filling completely shatter. What was I doing? I was biting down on... a chocolate chip. Yeah, at home, normal temperatures and the force of biting down on a chocolate chip was enough to cause the tooth to shatter. So, more likely explanation: there was already enough damage to the tooth that any small pressure could cause the failure.
The replacement of your other two fillings may well have been unnecessary work just to boost the dentist's income.
Absent a sale (i.e. if I had actually owned direct shares of the charity), I believe the valuation of shares is determined by a balance sheet of assets vs liabilities.
So what you are saying is that you owned shares in the LLC and NOT the charity? This seems to make your whole posting off-topic
Also, the shares in the charity don't have value because even if the charity is disbanded and its assets sold, it cannot distribute any of those funds to you as a shareholder.
You are just as guilty of being financially illiterate as the people you claim "cannot figure out this simple stuff". The situation is made more complex by:
1. Affordability. People may not be able to afford the monthly payments on a 30 year mortgage
2. Taxes. Depending on what other deductions you may have, the interest may be tax deductible.
3. Other loans: A smart person pays off the highest interest loans first.
4. Security: it may be a good idea to pay off a loan more slowly if it means that you have cash available for emergencies.
I am puzzled about how shares in a "non-profit charity" can have a value of $16k. Non-profits cannot pay dividends to shareholders, so why do the shares have value? Perhaps there is some indirect benefit to owning shares? This sounds sketchy to me.
He continues to be MSâ(TM) largest single investor. That gives him a large vested interest in advocating that it behave rationally, even when rationality in this sub-game is at odds with the strategy he pursued previously.
Well, smart people do change their minds in the face of contrary evidence, but there is no particular reason to believe that his judgement of what is the best strategy for Microsoft is any better than his judgement in years past when he was CEO.
I'd just like to see an SSD in the 10TB mark, "cheapie" or not, under $300 US within 24 months. My FreeNAs machine is spinning 6x5TB Toshiba 7200RPM disks and it's just gross. The heat, the noise, the failures. Just not fun.
Do you really need to store your porn stash on a RAID array?
In the past two years (2013-2014) Marissa Mayer has been paid a total of $66 Million. And they just recently announced that they've hired a big consulting company to tell them how to run the business. So what exactly did they pay their CEO $66 Million for??
Someone has to hire the consultants. Do you think that just anyone can spend millions of dollars of their employer's money paying someone else to do their own job?
You didn't "fix" anything. It doesn't require a SCOTUS ruling. All it requires is a ruling that is not appealed (or the higher courts refuse to hear an appeal).
Another part that is troubling, but also interesting, is that various courts have already decided that gathering some of this data without a warrant is unconstitutional. Just because an NSL is used to get the data doesn't magically make it legal.
AT&T can hold the customer to the terms of a contract, but the customer cannot hold AT&T to the terms of a contract.
What do you mean? The customers have been able to cancel this contract for years. AT&T would be very happy if the customers with unlimited contracts cancelled. Even if the customers did not have a pre-existing right to cancel, this rate rise would create a right to cancel.
Slashdot Mirror
Or fee-shifting rules, where the looser pays.
Translation: the NSA no longer needs to use certificates that are signed against this root.
FTFY
Microsoft thinks that it did issue an SP2 for Windows 7. The name is a little misleading: "Windows 10".
We should break out the sandwiches to watch this fight ....
Example video here. Wait, no ... even models of B52s sound amazing!
In the past, the Republican leadership could pull candidates back into line using party money. Now, the ultra-right wing Republicans can replace that money with money from the Koch brothers and their like.
Because there is no overarching authority of what Islam is or isn't, it makes it very easy to use a "no true Scotsman" argument when Islamic practices are discussed.
Really? Are you so badly informed? If so, you have no place in this argument.
Definition of terrorism (from dictionary.com): the use of violence and threats to intimidate or coerce, especially for political purposes. The homeless guy clearly fits this definition. He killed people with the intent of making a political point in the process. You think that the Paris attackers or the San Bernadino attackers were sane? If so, you have a different definition of sane than I have. Your definition is only likely to be applied to people with brown skin and/or muslim connections and is largely used to justify vast military spending.
Because that's what your definition is all about: justifying the trillions of dollars that are being lavished on "defence" companies.
More pertinent, radicalized man goes into medical clinic in Colorado, shoots it up to make a political point and somehow that *isn't* terrorism?
I am inclined to believe that the explanation was complete BS.
... a chocolate chip. Yeah, at home, normal temperatures and the force of biting down on a chocolate chip was enough to cause the tooth to shatter. So, more likely explanation: there was already enough damage to the tooth that any small pressure could cause the failure.
Some years ago, I had a tooth that had an older amalgam filling completely shatter. What was I doing? I was biting down on
The replacement of your other two fillings may well have been unnecessary work just to boost the dentist's income.
So what you are saying is that you owned shares in the LLC and NOT the charity? This seems to make your whole posting off-topic
Also, the shares in the charity don't have value because even if the charity is disbanded and its assets sold, it cannot distribute any of those funds to you as a shareholder.
You are just as guilty of being financially illiterate as the people you claim "cannot figure out this simple stuff". The situation is made more complex by:
1. Affordability. People may not be able to afford the monthly payments on a 30 year mortgage
2. Taxes. Depending on what other deductions you may have, the interest may be tax deductible.
3. Other loans: A smart person pays off the highest interest loans first.
4. Security: it may be a good idea to pay off a loan more slowly if it means that you have cash available for emergencies.
I am puzzled about how shares in a "non-profit charity" can have a value of $16k. Non-profits cannot pay dividends to shareholders, so why do the shares have value? Perhaps there is some indirect benefit to owning shares? This sounds sketchy to me.
Well, smart people do change their minds in the face of contrary evidence, but there is no particular reason to believe that his judgement of what is the best strategy for Microsoft is any better than his judgement in years past when he was CEO.
What part of "submission" don't you understand? Yes, articles can have paragraph breaks, if the /. editor adds or restores them.
You are showing your age. Haven't you seen how the younger generations use cellphones today? Using them to make calls is very rare.
Do you really need to store your porn stash on a RAID array?
Someone has to hire the consultants. Do you think that just anyone can spend millions of dollars of their employer's money paying someone else to do their own job?
You didn't "fix" anything. It doesn't require a SCOTUS ruling. All it requires is a ruling that is not appealed (or the higher courts refuse to hear an appeal).
You can.
Another part that is troubling, but also interesting, is that various courts have already decided that gathering some of this data without a warrant is unconstitutional. Just because an NSL is used to get the data doesn't magically make it legal.
What do you mean? The customers have been able to cancel this contract for years. AT&T would be very happy if the customers with unlimited contracts cancelled. Even if the customers did not have a pre-existing right to cancel, this rate rise would create a right to cancel.