If you're using dhcp, the correct way is to edit your dhclient script and prepend your own domain name server. Resolv.conf gets overwritten from time to time.
It is resolvconf package which overwrites/etc/resolv.conf (and when network configuration changes).
I put nameserver 127.0.0.1 to/etc/resolvconf/resolv.conf.d/base file.
Another place is put dns-nameservers 127.0.0.1 to/etc/network/interfaces file.
And as an anecdote, i'm on university network and nothing seems blocked (yet, anyway).
FUNET (Finnish University and Research Network) does not do censoring.
And DNS based censoring is not even possible on that case, because every university uses own DNS. ( So censoring may require proxy based approach, which is more expensive. )
Universities can not do that censoring. They do not get that censorship/filter list from police (law gives special permission police
to deliver that censorship/filter list to ISPs only.)
younggirls.org I started from the bottom and this page CLEARLY has naked girls UNDER the age of 18. Legal images as they are photographs by David Hamilton. They fall under art but are absolutly 100% of girls under the age limit you mention.
Well, according of lapsiporno.info, some ISPes use transparent WWW proxy instead. But Welho (my ISP) uses just DSN, so I used
It turns out that some sites hit also to some proxy. It looks like that this proxy is not owned by Welho either. So it looks like that
some of upstreams of Welho uses transparent WWW proxy also...
In response to a legal request submitted to Google, we have removed 1 result(s) from this page. If you wish, you may read more about the request at ChillingEffects.org.
ChillingEffects.org:
Google has received notice of a list of web sites from the Internet Watch
Foundation (web site URL) that contain child pornography. Google has removed
the related web sites from its search results.
For those of you who do not want to RTFA, this blocklist is within the ISP DNS server, so
switching to a non-Finnish DNS server or running your own is all that is necessary to bypass
it and access the numerous falsely blocked sites.
Well, according of lapsiporno.info, some ISPes use transparent WWW proxy instead.
But Welho (my ISP) uses just DSN, so I used
I used to own a Japanese-made car. In order to lock the doors, you had to lock it, then hold the handle up while you closed the door. If you didn't hold the handle up, the door would become unlocked.
In order to lock the doors, you can close it and then lock it with keys.
That is what I do do more usual than lock door
and then close it with keeping handle up.
Perchance, does anyone know how to lock a domain name at gandi.net? That's where a lot of my domains are, and I've been trying to find the feature there for the last ten minutes or so without success.
The gaining registrar will probably start the process by asking you
for some authorizations. On a second step, the transfer request will be
forwarded to the registry which will, in turn, notify Gandi of this
outgoing transfer. Then Gandi will send an email to the contacts of the
domain, just for their information. This email will look like:
IMPORTANT: Transfer of... to another registrar
For.COM.NET.BE domain names: If
you wish to leave Gandi, you do not need to answer this email. Our lack
of answer will be interpreted by the registry as an agreement, after a
5 days delay. There is no need to contact us during this 5 days delay.
For.ORG.INFO.BIZ.NAME domain names: In
this email you will find a link. You can use it to refuse or to accept
the transfer. Your action will be applied immediately. If you do not
use the link, the transfer will be interpreted by the registry as an
agreement, only after a 5 days delay.
Actually if you check Mandrake's bugzilla, they have the same problem. You can check it out at here. Mandrake listed the bug as resolved/fixed although it doesn't look like it actually was fixed.
On there is quite good description what is happening:
Part of the reason I could not understand the bug, is that I could not believe windows XP was still using the error prone int13 function 2 (CHS based) instead of the (available everywhere for some time) int13 function 0x42. Under linux, grub and lilo only use function 2 when function 0x42 fails (they don't even ask the BIOS if it manages 0x42 since some BIOS don't report correctly having this functionality, cf FORCE_LBA in grub)
The other reason is that I thought BIOS faking heads number (the so-called LBA mode) was a choice independant of the content of the drive. This is wrong, the BIOS tries to adapt its mode based on the partition table [1]
So here is what happened: - kernel 2.6 doesn't try to give the logical geometry, and gives the physical geometry instead [2] - diskdrake uses the physical geometry to generate the CHS information (which is a broken duplicate of the linear sector number) - the BIOS sees the partition table uses a different CHS geometry, and adapt to it -... and Windows computes the CHS to read its stage1.5 based on the previous geometry that it keeps in its boot sector. Alas the CHS doesn't get the same sector and Windows's boot dies (with very bad error detection) [3]
That is comment 21.
That same comment indicates that
problem is fixed:
Code fix description: inspired by the way new fdisk and parted detects the logical geometry based on the partition table [4]. parted code is especially quite robust. The fix is now included in cooker (DrakX #1.912), so:
I still would like to access the BIOS geometry, esp. for empty partition tables. But kernel 2.6 doesn't give us this (/sys/firmware/edd/int13_dev80/default_heads is plain wrong on a box here)
Slashdot Mirror
There is also another route.
Police blocking page gives link to law: http://www.finlex.fi/fi/laki/ajantasa/2006/20061068
In here there is link to "Valtiopäiväasiat": http://www.eduskunta.fi/valtiopaivaasiat/he+99/2006
Police is announced that it will going to list URLs instead of domain names in it's filtering list which it gives ot ISPs.
Effectively this means that ISPs must use proxy for filtering.
It is resolvconf package which overwrites /etc/resolv.conf (and when network configuration changes). /etc/resolvconf/resolv.conf.d/base file. /etc/network/interfaces file.
I put nameserver 127.0.0.1 to
Another place is put dns-nameservers 127.0.0.1 to
FUNET (Finnish University and Research Network) does not do censoring.
And DNS based censoring is not even possible on that case, because every university uses own DNS. ( So censoring may require proxy based approach, which is more expensive. )
Universities can not do that censoring. They do not get that censorship/filter list from police (law gives special permission police to deliver that censorship/filter list to ISPs only.)
- Go http://web.eduskunta.fi/
- Select Valtiopäiväasiat ja -asiakirjat
- Enter "HE 99/2006" to "Asian tunnus:" -field
- Press "Hae"
- Look "Ensimmäinen käsittely" (PTK 117/2006 vp)
- and look "Toinen käsittely" (PTK 117/2006 vp)
In either case there was no vote because nobody opposed.Specially look
Well, He was just operated. It is quite difficult to vote on that condition.
Sonera is planning implement blocking. They not have just software/hardware in place yet.
Filtering is active on
- DNA
- Elisa
- Kymp.net
- MPY
- Netikka
- Tampereen puhelin
- Welho
(from SensuuriWiki)There is list on http://sensuuri.wikidot.com/operaattorit
Also see http://www.hs.fi/kotimaa/artikkeli/+/1135234066254
Answering to myself: Not necessary lapsiporno.info is reported, because there is one file from lapsiporno.info also on search results.
Sebastian Porst have proof of LAME code on http://www.the-interweb.com/serendipity/index.php? /archives/52-Is-Sony-in-violation-of-the-LGPL-Part -II.html.
Nikki suspected that LAME reference on some weeks ago http://hack.fi/~muzzy/sony-drm/.
That was mentioned at least 2.11.2005e nts.
http://www.digitoday.fi/tekijanoikeus/?p=102#comm
In order to lock the doors, you can close it and then lock it with keys.
That is what I do do more usual than lock door and then close it with keeping handle up.
Hmm. Linux is unlikely to contain code which is based so new standard than ISO C99.
I not need my head examined.
Check again your C -grammar.
In C you can not declare variable on
for (int i = 0;
===
that 'int' is illegal.
It is valid on C++
Very unlikely that this kind code is on Linux (kernel), because that is not C.
(It looks like C++ code. )
FAQ chapter 3.4. Outgoing transfer (leaving Gandi) indicates that there is no any lock. I think.