This will reflect in their food choices, their tastes and those taste are not just tastes, those tastes are often molecular precursors for all sorts of brain chemicals, you will teach yourself to choose the ones that feed the nature of your brain, of your personality.
Well there's a butt-load of supposition on your part. Kinda like soc-sci in general.
There's nothing less "hard" about correlating data in civics as physics, in fact the same rules apply. The only question is how much more complex the data is involving human behavior as opposed to particle/wave behavior.
It ain't the correlation, it's the data. And it ain't the complexity of the data, it's the integrity and non-reproducibility.
Cells are not connected like electrical circuitry. They don't touch but send a chemical from one dendrite to another. That's why they're so much slower than a cpu.
You may have a point, they may be able to simulate the firing of 10K, but I'll give you something else to explain. We have no idea how or why neurons take in their various inputs, weigh them and send impulses to a select few of their outputs. Exactly how does the programming account for that?
"Soon" only appears in the lead of the story. If Wenyao Xu Feng Lin or Zhanpeng Jin wrote it, they're idiots. If someone else did, *they're* idiots. Not from the tech, they promote that they can do it with a special hat with three sensors, from the world outside the lab. It's another of those "people need to change their basic habits to work" things, which won't happen (reference the dramatic adoption of Google Glass).
Although I agree with others that their tests were "shallow", let us say, that's not what will kill it.
FTA:
Then the person would put on a soft comfortable hat or padded helmet with electrical sensors inside.
"Soon" we'll be seeing soft hats or helmets hanging on the ATM to verify us. Oh, we have to buy our own? Right. Not gonna happen either way.
it ain't VR. This is why it's failing. Wearing a headpiece will never, ever feel like 'reality'. Peripheral vision is being badly dismissed as a necessity.
No. It's just more exposed now. Hell, I can recall people getting into fairly dangerous fights over D&D.
Flame wars have been around since internet day one (maybe month one). There have been dicks and mentally and socially challenged gamers since early games like WoW, FFS. There are also good people gaming, you just don't hear much about them because, well, they behave.
The following is absolutely true. I damn near had to bite my lip to keep from laughing out loud.
One of the dates I took my wife on was to the Nelson Art Museum for a show on Celtic art (circa 1990).
After show, went to shop and found book on same I wanted.
Standing in line to pay and overhear conversation behind my by a woman thinking herself an artist (graphic artist) who had just gotten CorelDraw, which she was gushing about. I used FreeLance but hey, interesting to listen.
Then she got to her "favorite thing". With a digital art program... "You get so many originals!"
Looking back, I admire the restraint I had until we got back to our car to leave.
Slashdot Mirror
Well there's a butt-load of supposition on your part. Kinda like soc-sci in general.
And what theories that String Theory makes have been verified?
It ain't the correlation, it's the data. And it ain't the complexity of the data, it's the integrity and non-reproducibility.
Cells are not connected like electrical circuitry. They don't touch but send a chemical from one dendrite to another. That's why they're so much slower than a cpu.
Understand the words you're trying to use:
emulate VERB
computing
reproduce the function or action of (a different computer, software system, etc.).
simulate VERB
imitate the appearance or character of.
produce a computer model of.
They are not interchangeable.
Cite please.
The flexibility alone is enough. Most people who haven't studied the brain don't realize that dendrites aren't physically "locked" but change.
You are so very wrong. Read up.
You may have a point, they may be able to simulate the firing of 10K, but I'll give you something else to explain. We have no idea how or why neurons take in their various inputs, weigh them and send impulses to a select few of their outputs. Exactly how does the programming account for that?
*Forcing* people to is.
Heh. You just argued that the recipient took offense. Had they not, there would be no "giving" of.
Already addressed. It's an offense against the law. Perhaps not sophistry, but conflation. Criminal offense is merely a differentiation from civil.
"Fighting words" are regional, only occurring in municipalities that consider them equal to an assault.
You suspect incorrectly.
You cannot read others' minds. He might simply be amused at your infantile action.
No, they'd say you assaulted him. He just might take offense at that though.
And that "prank" cost the company hundreds (minimum) of dollars.
Anything beyond leaving a yellow sticky ridiculing them *is* an asshole move.
Although I agree with others that their tests were "shallow", let us say, that's not what will kill it.
FTA:
"Soon" we'll be seeing soft hats or helmets hanging on the ATM to verify us. Oh, we have to buy our own? Right. Not gonna happen either way.
Please keeps tabs on that until Sept of next year.
it ain't VR. This is why it's failing. Wearing a headpiece will never, ever feel like 'reality'. Peripheral vision is being badly dismissed as a necessity.
No. It's just more exposed now. Hell, I can recall people getting into fairly dangerous fights over D&D.
Flame wars have been around since internet day one (maybe month one). There have been dicks and mentally and socially challenged gamers since early games like WoW, FFS. There are also good people gaming, you just don't hear much about them because, well, they behave.
You're trolling. Purposely misrepresenting what happened.
Other swats have resulted in well publicized tragic outcomes before he made his. Bullshit he didn't know this.
Oh please. Your *only* point was religious.
Then what possessed you to go looking for it?
The following is absolutely true. I damn near had to bite my lip to keep from laughing out loud.
One of the dates I took my wife on was to the Nelson Art Museum for a show on Celtic art (circa 1990).
After show, went to shop and found book on same I wanted.
Standing in line to pay and overhear conversation behind my by a woman thinking herself an artist (graphic artist) who had just gotten CorelDraw, which she was gushing about. I used FreeLance but hey, interesting to listen.
Then she got to her "favorite thing". With a digital art program... "You get so many originals!"
Looking back, I admire the restraint I had until we got back to our car to leave.