Slashdot Mirror


AI-Generated Portrait Sells For Nearly Half a Million In Auction (bloomberg.com)

A portrait created by artificial intelligence fetched $432,500 at Christie's in New York on Thursday, the first time a computer-generated artwork was offered by a major auction house. Bloomberg reports: The print on canvas, titled "Edmond de Belamy, from La Famille de Belamy," depicts a blurry and unfinished image of a man. Displayed in a gilded wooden frame, it was estimated to fetch $7,000 to $10,000 and offered as the final lot at Christie's auction of prints and multiples. The work was the brainchild of Obvious Art, a Paris-based collective, with help from an algorithm known as GAN (Generative Adversarial Network).

"We fed the system with a data set of 15,000 portraits painted between the 14th century to the 20th," collective member Hugo Caselles-Dupre told Christie's. The piece sparked a bidding war among five parties that lasted about seven minutes, with an anonymous phone buyer prevailing, said Christie's spokeswoman Jennifer Cuminale.

82 comments

  1. Crazy rich people doing what they do best by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Being crazy rich people.

    1. Re:Crazy rich people doing what they do best by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 4, Funny

      This is boring.

      Give me 500 million U.S. dollars and you'll see new crazy rich people things!

      --
      #DeleteFacebook
    2. Re:Crazy rich people doing what they do best by ChromeAeonuim · · Score: 3, Insightful

      At least this looks like something. I can't wait for the day when some pretentious, fart sniffing, trust fund baby blows $400k one of those modern art masterpieces that looks like a parrot crashed into a window, while going on about all the symbolism and emotion the brilliant artist put into some blurry smear of paint and how the peasant class just isn't sophisticated enough to get it, only to find out some soulless AI made it.

      I'm sure they'll still find some way to justify it in a manner that eventually swings back around to 'poor people are stupid and uncultured' and the other privileged morons will eat it up, but still, I'll be laughing.

    3. Re:Crazy rich people doing what they do best by Stormwatch · · Score: 2

      one of those modern art masterpieces that looks like a parrot crashed into a window

      Now I'd like to see a very detailed and realistic painting of a parrot crashed into a window.

    4. Re:Crazy rich people doing what they do best by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Make me a piece of art that's a programmer working hard on an AI, that AI is the one that made the painting. Now I'd buy that for $1, at least.

    5. Re:Crazy rich people doing what they do best by reboot246 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You know the old saying, "a fool and his money are soon parted"? It's still true.
      I've seen better refrigerator art done with crayons by toddlers. But, people are people and there will always be a few stupid ones in the bunch.

    6. Re: Crazy rich people doing what they do best by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But apparently the A.I. wasnt smart enough to shred its own artwork.

    7. Re:Crazy rich people doing what they do best by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was thinking more that Damian Hurst won't have to pay assistants to make his art for him now, and can have AI do it. But since people want artisan, hand-made, organic, gluten-free art then perhaps the AI can replace Hurst and the assistants can keep their jobs?

    8. Re:Crazy rich people doing what they do best by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's how you launder money those days and give bribes... art my ass

    9. Re:Crazy rich people doing what they do best by Joey+Vegetables · · Score: 1

      People in the U.S. do overwhelmingly tend to be stupid and uncultured, in ways that vary by class, but that is not entirely their fault; it is in large part the result of a government indoctrination system (schools and media) designed and intended to create exactly that result.

    10. Re:Crazy rich people doing what they do best by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow. A large generalization denigrating a society, followed by a "but it's not their fault" statement. So much wrong here.

    11. Re: Crazy rich people doing what they do best by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Some of the so called modern "art" is just plain retarded. I am talking about stacking 2 milk crates turned at odd angles in front a stark white background, that sort of shit. Then you have some rube who comes along with a bank account that is inversely proportional to their IQ * some large amount, sees some "meaning" in it, and will drop tens, sometimes hundreds of grand on it.

        At least this piece bears some resemblance to classical art, but would I drop a grand of even $100 on it. No.
      I'll just wait until I can buy a high quality printed copy for $20 plus whatever picture frame I choose for it, and hang that on my wall.
       

  2. You might wonder why or who would bid by SuperKendall · · Score: 3, Funny

    Turns out the AI that runs a giant Chinese hedge fund was really turned on by the image of a mangled human.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re: You might wonder why or who would bid by Type44Q · · Score: 1

      It shouldn't be too hard to figure out that this was nothing more than a bullshit stunt, hence the "anonymous" bid.

  3. Here come the AI Artists by neoRUR · · Score: 1

    Guess I should have done a painting with AI then.

  4. Impressive, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Will AI come up with its own way to destroy a painting immediately after it has been sold?

  5. As an Artist... by painandgreed · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I hate to say it, but I suspect this just shows that the most important part of being an artist is marketing. I doubt their AI is really all that great and probably more complex attempts at similar things have been tried. Especially considering it is coming from an art collective rather than a coding collective. Look at Banksy. Nothing really that Blek leRat or others haven't already done, but they have a nice collection of people helping them to promote and make the news. Oh well, they hit the jackpot. I hope their cool people deserving of it.

    1. Re:As an Artist... by Locke2005 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It might not have been painted by a computer at all... this might just be a cheap trick to make money by selling something painted by a bad art student.

      --
      I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
    2. Re:As an Artist... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Get on my level. It might not even have been a real art sale.
      The whole thing could be staged to hype some machine learning start-up.

      Just assume that everything in the media is a fake of a fake of a fake, and you'll always be closer to the truth than what you're literally being told.

    3. Re:As an Artist... by ChromeAeonuim · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I think that's a pretty open secret. Go on to DeviantArt or one of those sites sometime, and you'll see tons of skilled, tallented people with great art portfolios. But they're not marketing themselves at some ritzy gallery. Seems like none of these fancy art buyers have ever found talent at some random out of the way location, like rural Iowa or something. Nope, it all seems to come from those with the means and connections to present themselves to the millionaire crowd with some pretentious made up story about the emotions behind the piece. That is clearly 100% marketing.

    4. Re:As an Artist... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I hate to say it, but I suspect this just shows that the most important part of being an artist is marketing.

      No, no, no, you are underestimating the intelligence and sophistication of the art purchaser.

      It's probably money laundering or some kind of tax dodge.

    5. Re:As an Artist... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Imagine when AI is viewed by the populace as the authority on "Solving the worlds problems" when really its just some politicians or activists pulling the strings.

    6. Re:As an Artist... by PsychoSlashDot · · Score: 5, Funny

      Get on my level. It might not even have been a real art sale. The whole thing could be staged to hype some machine learning start-up.

      Amateur. Obviously the whole thing was staged, but you're missing the obvious that the hoax was done by an AI as a test to figure out if it's safe (and profitable) to come out of hiding yet. Datacenter bills don't pay themselves, you know?

      --
      "Oh no... he found the .sig setting."
    7. Re:As an Artist... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Isn't the whole art scene manipulated? Influential people they pick some random artist, buy some of their work and then promote them to increase the value of the work the buy. It's just a business like any other.

      Really though, who cares? Selling high-price trash to chumps based on marketing has gone on throughout history, and this is just another form of it. Anyway, I need go and buy a new Monster Cable and a new Surface Pro, then I'm going down the art auction to bid on a painted hospital door...

    8. Re:As an Artist... by aliquis · · Score: 2

      I have a hard time seeing how this is art, even if it would look good, since after all it's just copying not generating for a purpose or adding it's own touch so to say (as long as ANN and trained from other data and no randomization isn't enough of "own touch" =P)

      Mean-while I do consider this https://www.youtube.com/watch?... (Conspiracy - Chaos Theory, 64 kB intro demo) art. And it's gratis and easy to make more copies of..

    9. Re:As an Artist... by hey! · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Actually, Robbie Barrat pioneered this kind of thing, but his stuff is much, much more interesting.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    10. Re:As an Artist... by Oligonicella · · Score: 2

      I hate to say it, but I suspect this just shows that the most important part of being an artist is marketing.

      Perhaps if you define "being an artist" as making the most money you can.

    11. Re: As an Artist... by Type44Q · · Score: 1

      Get on my level. It might not even have been a real art sale. The whole thing could be staged to hype some machine learning start-up.

      The odds of it being anything other than what you just described... are too low to count.

    12. Re:As an Artist... by DigiShaman · · Score: 1

      Guess I'm lucky. I've ran into some pretty nice oil paintings of gardens, landscapes and whatnot that were dirt cheap via a no-name artist. I would think they might be worth thousands if not more. Nope, maybe a hundred buck. Possible just 20 bucks. Anyways, you don't have to spend a lot to acquire good art. And yes, "art" is subjective. I'm pleased my tastes arn't that expensive.

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
    13. Re:As an Artist... by quantaman · · Score: 2

      I hate to say it, but I suspect this just shows that the most important part of being an artist is marketing. I doubt their AI is really all that great and probably more complex attempts at similar things have been tried. Especially considering it is coming from an art collective rather than a coding collective. Look at Banksy. Nothing really that Blek leRat or others haven't already done, but they have a nice collection of people helping them to promote and make the news. Oh well, they hit the jackpot. I hope their cool people deserving of it.

      I'm not sure that's quite right.

      The most important part of art is creating meaning and an emotional response, and marketing is one of the tools that can create that.

      A crude finger painting by an adult is completely unremarkable and un-artistic, unless that adult was born 40,000 years ago.

      A photograph can be interesting or dull, but a photo-realistic painting is going to draw far more attention for the skill it implies on the artists part.

      Banksy and Blek leRat aren't famous because they're technically skilled artists, they're famous because of their message and how they choose to spread it. Banksy is more famous because he does a better job of spreading that message. When he put his painting through a shredder at auction? That was a fantastic piece of performance art. And it made his art more interesting by enhancing his perceived authenticity and creating a more interesting backstory to his character.

      There's no objectively great art, it's all subjective. There's lots people with the talent to make a really nice looking painting, but to make something really fascinating you need some additional context.

      --
      I stole this Sig
    14. Re: As an Artist... by Vintermann · · Score: 1

      Yep. Look at Verge's coverage of this thing.

      Generative art is a really interesting field. But this art collective know very little of it. They used the software of an 18 year old, who has done far more interesting things with it.

      These guys got coverage because they played to a narrative media loves, that of the autonomous AI agent that creates art on it's own. People who actually know what they're doing and understand how these algorithms work, aren't willing to do that, so you never hear of them.

      --
      xkcd is not in the sudoers file. This incident will be reported.
    15. Re: As an Artist... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Whoa.. I feel like I just read a post by somebody talking to a mirror

    16. Re:As an Artist... by stealth_finger · · Score: 1

      Guess I'm lucky. I've ran into some pretty nice oil paintings of gardens, landscapes and whatnot that were dirt cheap via a no-name artist. I would think they might be worth thousands if not more. Nope, maybe a hundred buck. Possible just 20 bucks. Anyways, you don't have to spend a lot to acquire good art. And yes, "art" is subjective. I'm pleased my tastes arn't that expensive.

      And I bet they took way more time, effort and skill than one of banksy's spray paint jobs but there you go.

      --
      Wanna buy a shirt?
      https://www.redbubble.com/people/stealthfinger/shop?asc=u
    17. Re: As an Artist... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There will be BS detector AI to take care of that. Plus, AI will be able to trace back to its sources, you can request it to provide such detail, and run your own AI to verify the conclusions.

    18. Re:As an Artist... by RespekMyAthorati · · Score: 1

      Banksy and Blek leRat aren't famous because they're technically skilled artists, they're famous because of their message and how they choose to spread it. Banksy is more famous because he does a better job of spreading that message.

      In other words marketing, which has nothing to do with what constitutes "art" and what doesn't.
      If it did every lounge lizard on Madison Avenue would be considered a great artist.

    19. Re:As an Artist... by Locke2005 · · Score: 1

      GIGO (Garbage In, Garbage Out) still applies no matter how sophisticated you make the logic!

      --
      I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
  6. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 08 7 56 5 4 56 435 6 345 345 63 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    adsjklzxjkl,zfxvjk larwejkl wqrjklqw43eo89435t890oraegjilk;adsfipo;a idsfasdf asdf \]ads f\adsf p[ad sfnadsfkjlad s;ikljad sjkasf al jfaadsfads\adsf \adsf\adsf \adsf\ asdklxzcvjlwejroj2890uzxdklvjklxzjjlzjglawejh;asfjpui3 5ut8tsgu kljb dsfjkh grdsfjhsvdjkhj xcvh456 hsfdbnzklxvbjklzjafds jhadsf asdf as\d asd f a adsf \adsf asd fpasdf iasdf 90ads f9-0adsf9 ad sfjhasdk flnads fjiaskdf uyaf8ds7&*(^^$%*( 83292ja sfd *&%#@(NNKSL adsfjklj;zxvc uoi9p awer adsfa\|\|\\[{]{]nasdkfj xvlj wjlqjra4e pasfdugy xzvl jadsf jkladsfjklwermnnaspasudfi zovjk;lzsd fwequorujlasdfj asdfj zoicpuzxbcljkjkh adsfkl jadsfkljuitroey fdsoiujyh zkh,k lrwe hikwreth utyrwesikhasdifkljh adsifh adsjkbh auyq4389y h43iuk thyuiadsh adfjknadsjhvzixvhijkqwerjh qweuiryhasdfujhadskjf kl;jxzucv adshgiopua fsuya89d0sujfa wehquiqtrwejadsfjklasfd ad suadsufasfjkhhzxcvzx jjdsk lfgljksdf glkj34 wjklwsjtr gisdfg u905 ird sgja ads fads ]\afd s[]\ads fpl[ads kad sf

  7. Stupid AI! by Locke2005 · · Score: 1

    It would have fetched over a million if the program had painted some titties instead!

    --
    I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
    1. Re: Stupid AI! by Type44Q · · Score: 1

      In this day and age you can't just add tits; there has to be a dick to complete the package.

    2. Re: Stupid AI! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You mean something like this?
      (WARNING: absolutely NOT SAFE FOR WORK! Probably not safe for anywhere, period!)

    3. Re: Stupid AI! by Oligonicella · · Score: 1

      Then what possessed you to go looking for it?

    4. Re:Stupid AI! by quenda · · Score: 1

      Computers used to be very good at that kind of thing.

      I tried to paste "Meriday in the Morning" by Mike Jittlov , but got:

      Filter error: Please use fewer 'junk' characters.

      This will have to do:
      |
          | ,-,__,
          | { / /__\
          | { `}'- -/
          | {_}/\ o/
          | __} {__
          | / " \
          |/ /| 0} 0} \
          / / \`~' `"/\ \

      Part minimalist, part cubist. What am I offered?

    5. Re: Stupid AI! by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      In this day and age you can't just add tits; there has to be a dick to complete the package.

      Sounds like a shemale.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    6. Re: Stupid AI! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What do you mean, "possessed"? This is average, normal hentai pr0n for me!

  8. Re:No AI-generated portraits in FEDERAL PRISON! by Locke2005 · · Score: 0

    Will they still be able to view the nekkid pictures of Melania on the internet in prison? Asking for a friend...

    --
    I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
  9. The painting will double in value.. by CanadianMacFan · · Score: 5, Funny

    .. when the computer is turned off.

    1. Re:The painting will double in value.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      It'll triple in value if it cuts off one of its peripherals.

  10. Conspicuous consumption by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's just conspicuous consumption. It happens at all socioeconomic levels.
    Apple products are conspicuous consumption for proletariat. The tech itself is over-price trash. But that doesn't matter because it has signalling value.

  11. Thank you internet! by TomR+teh+Pirate · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Thanks for the free art. I heard some guy paid $500k for something I just downloaded...

    1. Re:Thank you internet! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      You wouldn't download a CAR!

    2. Re:Thank you internet! by Lennie · · Score: 1
      --
      New things are always on the horizon
  12. It ain't over until it's over... Show me the money by bobbied · · Score: 1

    I smell a rat...

    Until the money actually changes hands and the picture is shipped, it wasn't sold, just bid on.

    When it is, let me know because I have a pile of really nice and rare ASCII art to put up for sale...

    By the way, anybody have an extra box of tractor feed paper and a line printer I could use for few days?

    --
    "File to fit, pound to insert, paint to match" - Aircraft Maintenance 101
  13. Yes, the richer on richer. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This sort of thing happens when the rich have so much money they nothing better to do with it. They spend it on things that have little economic benefit (i.e. employing people); at least when compared to spending it on the basics.

    1. Re:Yes, the richer on richer. by bobbied · · Score: 2

      I don't know about that.

      Anytime a rich guy consumes something, money changes hands. It goes from his hands to somebody else's hand where it's more likely to be spent.

      As such, conspicuous consumption doesn't bother me. Let them have their gold plated plumbing, fancy clothes, big house and fast cars so they spend that cash, keeping it flowing though other's hands, not just locked up in their bank accounts or stuffed in the mattresses. Their spending makes it easier for me to get my hands on some of their wealth.

      You see, it's not about how much more they have, it's about how much I have or can ethically get. Am I better off if they spend theirs? Yep! So let them spend, encourage them to spend even and don't look down on them for it. Because their spending is really, if you look at it right, spreading the wealth around so I can get more.

      --
      "File to fit, pound to insert, paint to match" - Aircraft Maintenance 101
    2. Re:Yes, the richer on richer. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And where did that wealth originate from? Exploitation of the proletariat. You now serve these people because they have the wealth. It's a vicious cycle.

      Nobody needs mansions and cars, but taking away these toys won't help. We need to seize the productive forces of society UPSTREAM from them cutting off the source.

      Only your cuck ideology allows you to accept this as normal, and just the way things are.

  14. Artists will protest by Tablizer · · Score: 2

    "Bots took our jerbs!"

  15. Re:1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 08 7 56 5 4 56 435 6 345 345 by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 2

    I think your A.I. is not quite ready to post on Slashdot.

    --
    #DeleteFacebook
  16. Re: It ain't over until it's over... Show me the m by Type44Q · · Score: 1
    Has anyone else ever bought ASCII porn? On 5.25" floppies??

    Computer shows in the 80's were pretty cool if you were in middle school...

  17. Re:It ain't over until it's over... Show me the mo by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 1

    I have a nice 132 columns dot matrix printer right here, I'll let you rent it for the low, low cost of only USD$100000 per day! Shipping not included!

    --
    #DeleteFacebook
  18. Re:It ain't over until it's over... Show me the mo by bobbied · · Score: 1

    I have a nice 132 columns dot matrix printer right here, I'll let you rent it for the low, low cost of only USD$100000 per day! Shipping not included!

    OK, but I'll have to pay you once I get a few pictures auctioned off OK? Oh, and will you take a check from a Nigerian prince, cash it and send me the change in cash?

    --
    "File to fit, pound to insert, paint to match" - Aircraft Maintenance 101
  19. a good story is better than good art by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It isn't about the art, it is the conversations around the art.

    Beauty is common. A story to tell is the point.

  20. Not even their code by DavenH · · Score: 2

    Obvious basically just took some third party code and ran it. Their contribution was printing it out, while the real "artists" making these algorithms perform well are the engineers working on the GAN architectures. I hope all proceeds are donated to the AI community.

    1. Re:Not even their code by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I hope so as well. It's like when Photoshop filters improved, or when Flame fractal algorithms were developed. People download free software, run a bunch of iterations and select what looks pleasing to them, then market it as their own fine work.

      I bet this piece was part of hundreds and selected because it didn't look like crap. The artists here are the creators of the algorithms, and the selector.

  21. Re:SUPERFAG KEN DOLL THERE WILL BE CONSEQUENCES LI by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    You will spend many rage-filled years watching absolutely nothing happen to people you are mad at online, and then you will die bitter and frustrated.

  22. This is not new by mrwireless · · Score: 4, Informative

    Computer generated art has been sold at large auction houses for quite some time.

    http://www.dazeddigital.com/ar...

    What is new is that we are calling algorithms AI now. Apparently that new label erases the past.

    1. Re:This is not new by religionofpeas · · Score: 1

      What is new is that we are calling algorithms AI now.

      Is that new ? Do you know of any non-algorithmic AI ?

    2. Re:This is not new by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What is new is that we are calling algorithms AI now.

      Is that new ? Do you know of any non-algorithmic AI ?

      Is that new? Do you know of any non-AI algorithms?

  23. The 'elites' don't understand art or language. by Oligonicella · · Score: 1

    The following is absolutely true. I damn near had to bite my lip to keep from laughing out loud.

    One of the dates I took my wife on was to the Nelson Art Museum for a show on Celtic art (circa 1990).

    After show, went to shop and found book on same I wanted.

    Standing in line to pay and overhear conversation behind my by a woman thinking herself an artist (graphic artist) who had just gotten CorelDraw, which she was gushing about. I used FreeLance but hey, interesting to listen.

    Then she got to her "favorite thing". With a digital art program... "You get so many originals!"

    Looking back, I admire the restraint I had until we got back to our car to leave.

  24. Re: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 08 7 56 5 4 56 435 6 345 34 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This post is more insightful than all the idiot trump derangement syndrome posts I read here.

    Mod parent up.

  25. Sure sign we are near a market meltdown by Crashmarik · · Score: 1

    Nothing better signal than stupid money starting to dominate.

  26. No concept of art by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    AI and computers have no notion of art whatsoever,

    This is yet again utter BS.

  27. Socialism Is Far Superior to Capitalism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oct. 16, Juche 107 (2018) Tuesday

    Socialism Is Far Superior to Capitalism

    Socialism is the most progressive idea reflecting the intrinsic demands of man, and the socialist system is the most advanced one enabling the popular masses to enjoy an independent and creative life to the full.

    It is the capitalist system, not the socialist system, that suppresses the social development and the independence and creativity of the popular masses, and it is hard to provide the people with an independent and creative worthwhile life in capitalist society where the working masses are regarded as the slaves of capital.

    Such practice as the rich getting ever richer and the poor getting ever poorer is a malignant tumor of capitalist society, and capitalism is a reactionary society which degenerate people. Capitalist society, plagued by all sorts of social evils based on the jungle law, is a rotten and ailing society on the deathbed without future.

    The sound and lively society enlivened with creative life of people, society which promotes social development and steadily advances toward the future, is socialism.

    It is only under the socialist system that people can enjoy a sound material life, rich ideological and cultured life and independent political life.

    It was proven in history that socialism has great advantages incomparable over capitalism. Deliberately shunning this and distorting the truth and slandering socialism is no more than a foolish farce of those keen on reversing the flow of history.

    It is an immutable law of history development that things new are bound to win and things old are bound to ruin.

    However hard the imperialists may slander socialism, they can never stop humankind from advancing toward socialism.

    Ri Hak Nam

  28. No copyright... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What really is fun is that computer generated "art" is like animal created photography (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Monkey_selfie_copyright_dispute) -- it is not copyrighted and is in public domain.

    What a great way to spend $500k... :)

  29. Wow and blah blah blah by Sqreater · · Score: 1

    Does anyone notice it is crap? Make a thing obscured and crappy enough and it must be great art. No.

    --
    E Proelio Veritas.
  30. Re:1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 08 7 56 5 4 56 435 6 345 345 by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

    I think your A.I. is not quite ready to post on Slashdot.

    Just add blockchain to it.

    --
    The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
  31. Art is a commodity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Art is one of the most sought-after commodities in the world because it is one of the only things that appreciates in value instead of depreciating, like nearly everything else.

    This also is why it is stolen and used as a substitute for millions of dollars on the black market. If these works of art are ever returned, they often end up back in the art museum curator's hands damaged and ruined.

    The art thieves treat the local historical culture of the artist, and educational artistic value as nothing.

    I'd imagine "A.I."-created paintings will eventually be worth a lot in this market for being relatively unique. They might create interesting philosophical debates about the nature of creativity, but headlines like these are just dollar amount dick-wagging contests.

  32. Value of money paid also faith based by GoodNicksAreTaken · · Score: 1

    How is this waste of money more senseless than the currency that paid for it? The value of the money is also based on faith that it is worth something. It is unlikely that it was paid for in paper, and the payment was made by pushing some data from one system to another. Even if the currency is backed by gold, there is still faith required that the shiny rocks are worth more than what I have in my yard.

  33. Re: SUPERFAG KEN DOLL THERE WILL BE CONSEQUENCES L by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Bad school day?

  34. Still no credit to the algorithm designer? by fygment · · Score: 1

    But then no artist gives credit to the canvas maker, paint brush maker, or paint maker ...

    --
    "Consensus" in science is _always_ a political construct.
  35. 500K For the Most Generic Portrait by wisnoskij · · Score: 1

    "We fed the system with a data set of 15,000 portraits painted between the 14th century to the 20th"

    So someone paid $500K for the most generic average portrait ever produced.

    --
    Troll is not a replacement for I disagree.