I don't know about the author of the article, but I would support having the police arrest you if you did said activity in front of my house.
Perhaps the difference in this case is the difficulty of obtaining technological means to prevent your noise from disturbing me. I can hang up on a telemarketer. I can't just turn off your noise.
Now, if the telemarketer takes it a lot further and calls me back every time I hang up on them, they force me to leave the phone off the hook to get rid of them, thus making my phone unusable. In this case, I would also support going after the telemarketer. That would be a similar case to you making my house unusable by making a lot of noise in front of it.
Basically, libertarians don't want government interfering with our lives, even for the perceived benefit of getting rid of the annoyance of telemarketing calls. There are plenty of technological means for dealing with telemarketing calls that seem to work reliably well without needing to get the government involved.
Slashdot Mirror
Perhaps the difference in this case is the difficulty of obtaining technological means to prevent your noise from disturbing me. I can hang up on a telemarketer. I can't just turn off your noise.
Now, if the telemarketer takes it a lot further and calls me back every time I hang up on them, they force me to leave the phone off the hook to get rid of them, thus making my phone unusable. In this case, I would also support going after the telemarketer. That would be a similar case to you making my house unusable by making a lot of noise in front of it.
LP Press Release: Bill banning dinnertime telemarketing may be popular, but it's not needed (February 13, 2001)
Basically, libertarians don't want government interfering with our lives, even for the perceived benefit of getting rid of the annoyance of telemarketing calls. There are plenty of technological means for dealing with telemarketing calls that seem to work reliably well without needing to get the government involved.