of course it should be publicly funded until it is given to the private sector for commercialization: big pharma did not get any bail out recently, so we owe them as much!
Well: do you think that holding a belief against all evidence, against the best judgement of all experts on the matter, simply because an old book told you, with consequences which go way beyond your personal beliefs (because it involves actual, real life policy, as education and what not) detracts or adds to the credibility of a VP candidate?
There is really no need to give highschoolers examples of badly written literature for wannabe-yuppies that wish they had been born for the grand 80s...
[citation needed]
What you may have in mind is that one can build models of the brain which are formally computers. But I doubt you are claiming you know how the brain works... No one does so far!
I was not thinking about GÃdels' incompleteness theorem. But we can use it too. One of the reasons GÃdel was so happy about that theorem is that it implies that (being imprecise...) no axiomatic system is sufficient to describe the integers. Therefore an axiomatic system (of the kind considered...) is never good enough to capture all the richness of behaviour of the integers.
It's a great tool for those writing pseudo-ironic posts who are, at the same time, concerned with the preservation of the valuable resource of ones and zeroes...
To be honest, I could not care less what OS you use. If you enjoy using Windows, then by all means use it. Neither I nor any one of the myriad of developers out there owes you anything. They are offering you something: you are free to use something else.
Slashdot Mirror
echo $PATH | tr : \\n
You are a great candidate for the Useless Use of Cat award... specially endearing is your making a comment on the few commands your line uses :D
of course it should be publicly funded until it is given to the private sector for commercialization: big pharma did not get any bail out recently, so we owe them as much!
Do you always have to end up referring to "these people"?
In the name of all that is holy, who has a file matching *.* in their root?!
What shell is that?
Your trick involves cutting and pasting, presumably using a mouse?!
Read on the -exec thingie in find. Your construction will hit command line length limits in many patforms easily.
Ooooo. He sought out marxists friends! In bold! Oooo. That's so scary. Ooooo.
Do you REALLY believe you would be "soon as socialist as China"? I mean, do you *REALLY*?!
Well: do you think that holding a belief against all evidence, against the best judgement of all experts on the matter, simply because an old book told you, with consequences which go way beyond your personal beliefs (because it involves actual, real life policy, as education and what not) detracts or adds to the credibility of a VP candidate?
There is really no need to give highschoolers examples of badly written literature for wannabe-yuppies that wish they had been born for the grand 80s...
The good thing about that comment is that you could hhave perfectly well used it if the result had been the opposite.
I hereby salute your ability to emit comments which do not provide any information!
What was the adoption rate of Y? Was it really done? Was it little more that a proof of concept?
Well, don't let reason get in the way of a seemingly cool reference, though.
pong... pong pong... pong... pong pong.
Hey! It works! At last, I have an purpose in life!
pong pong... pong... pong... pong pong.
Heh.
BTW, do you have a reference for the original "you should be eating pills and listening to repetitive electronic music" quote?
$DEITY. Being of the pong generation, I do not even know what unexplainable urge I am supposed to have!
You should get hold of Penrose's The Shadows of the Mind which, while very speculatve, is very interesting...
That distros ship their binaries dynamically linked does not mean, in any way, that statically linked binaries do not work in those distros.
I seriously doubt you know what you are talking about if you think that...
[citation needed] What you may have in mind is that one can build models of the brain which are formally computers. But I doubt you are claiming you know how the brain works... No one does so far!
I was not thinking about GÃdels' incompleteness theorem. But we can use it too. One of the reasons GÃdel was so happy about that theorem is that it implies that (being imprecise...) no axiomatic system is sufficient to describe the integers. Therefore an axiomatic system (of the kind considered...) is never good enough to capture all the richness of behaviour of the integers.
Actually, it is a theorem that computers are not enough to do maths.
Let me introduce you to ^W.
It's a great tool for those writing pseudo-ironic posts who are, at the same time, concerned with the preservation of the valuable resource of ones and zeroes...
Show me *one* distro which builds things so that statically linked binaries do not work. *One*.
To be honest, I could not care less what OS you use. If you enjoy using Windows, then by all means use it. Neither I nor any one of the myriad of developers out there owes you anything. They are offering you something: you are free to use something else.