There are still individuals, as well as companies, that utilize OpenBSD. It has prooven to be quite stable and secure for many. From firewalls to webservers, vpns to ids, personal workstations to x servers. Comments that "BSD is dead" and "noone uses OpenBSD" are purely not true. It maybe a specialized BSD designed for a small niche of uses, but it does what it does and it does it well.
IBM MQseries, Fiorano, Tibco, WebLogic JMS (if you use weblogic), SonicMQ. Personally, my company is currently using Fiorano for internal messaging, and MQseries for middleware between partners.
So now that PC's and Mac's will share the same architecture, will this mean an end to all the fighting over which is faster?
Now it appears to be down. I hope this anonymous coward gets some real life karma for this. I need my sp2 fix!.
There are still individuals, as well as companies, that utilize OpenBSD. It has prooven to be quite stable and secure for many. From firewalls to webservers, vpns to ids, personal workstations to x servers. Comments that "BSD is dead" and "noone uses OpenBSD" are purely not true. It maybe a specialized BSD designed for a small niche of uses, but it does what it does and it does it well.
-Cyberhide
Oh man, the countless number of computers i bought at Boeing surplus for corporate use...
Just a passing thought...
IBM MQseries, Fiorano, Tibco, WebLogic JMS (if you use weblogic), SonicMQ. Personally, my company is currently using Fiorano for internal messaging, and MQseries for middleware between partners.
I would think that one of the nics would be for internet traffic, and the other for NFS (storage) traffic.