Redistributing actually does help the economy. Not in the imaginary ways that derivatives trading does, to be sure, but instead in the practical transaction of goods and services for money sense. Every business needs customers, and customers make decisions on purchases first by availability of funds. For your understanding (or at least those with no empathy): No money means no jet ski, no mansion. For everyone else (and probably actually you too): No money means no transportation (meaning no job), no dinner, no beds tonight, and no decent food for the kids. The decisions for utility of survival are superior for all people to those of the luxury goods you seem to so (enviously?) cherish instead.
You mean your biased, opportunity based, convenience samples collected by untrained observations with unchecked internal bias on interpretations? Yeah, the research with carefully planned survey analysis is better.
Every you say is false. Any business run so close to maximum leverage that the funds required for quarterly taxes are the difference in project decision is about to declare bankruptcy.
You need a mobile with data plan to be in job search now. Recruiters don't wait, and neither do employers. The days of leaving messages are over. Guess what happens if/when you don't answer immediately and comply with every command/requirement? They move on the the next candidate.
Post failed at the unnecessary failed and self-interested ideology. There is no connection between your "points" in reality. Government is the only force representing the interests of all people and is the only force to represent any interest against those of the wealthy and powerful. Dismantling ('defunding', etc.) official government leads to default government by the interests of the wealthy, which is normally called for what it is: slavery and feudalism.
You are an over-entitled fool. Give people money and they spend it on what they need. That does mean food and housing, and while the long-term poor who have lived without longer than with may not have guidance to do that at first once the reality of a steady support sinks in and guidance is provided (it already is available at employment centers, which most of that group already attend often).
Ignore the idiots here, your position is the only legitimate one MDSolar. Meta-moderation will punish those abusing their allotment to bully you. In specific applications certain technologies like radioactive decay in space probes are more effective as they move away from the sun, but for Earth which simply rotates in a consistent manner the technology should be the focus of energy development for everything from Industry to daily use. Porsche has show it is possible to run a manufacturing facility from a large PV pylon, but for cost efficiency I believe the more traditional solar array and sterling engine approach is very promising. And of course, engineered algae production of biofuel on the biotechnology side, for those applications where liquid fuels can't be substituted by stored solutions - battery, or kinetic, etc.
One is cumulative, the other is simply for a period. Next time try not picking for-profit firms with vested interests, and don't copy pasting shit you don't really understand you fucking idiot. Also your numbers are wrong - Bush Jr. left 11.6 Billion Debt, Obama has added 6.5 Billion in what is now an equal amount of time. The CBO is leaning increasingly conservative but those are the official figures from them, check the link.
That assumes operation in industrial nations, which is not where any military deploys on a regular basis. For the same reasons significant research has been done in remote power generation including using radioactive decay for nuclear power without building a reactor. Environments differ, and your knowledge of your mother's basement has little application to a battlefield in Afghanistan or anywhere else with rugged and inhospitable terrain.
You fucking idiot, human and economic geography are well established fields. The poorest live where it is cheapest to survive. Social position predicts poverty, not racial stereotypes.
Look into corporate decision making you god damn idiot. Legal is the dominant party for large organizations, and the justification here is obvious to people who aren't fucking idiots.
Not quite, again your fucked up fantasy isn't reality. The decision by Apple is about reducing company liability, Microsoft is doing the opposite in hopes of gaining from idiots like you.
Usage of the emoji can and will increase incidence of threats as children lack the maturity to understand the implications of their communications. Providing a ready-made gun emoji readily accessible and distributed without notice to minors puts Apple in a bad position when those same minors are investigated and their parents seek repayment for court costs or damages from Apple.
Nice try, but you're ignoring the reality of this entire situation. Your post is irrelevant, because language and culture have nothing to do with this decision. It isn't a state action, it is one by a voluntary private firm concerned about its future liability in civil and criminal courts.
Slashdot Mirror
Redistributing actually does help the economy. Not in the imaginary ways that derivatives trading does, to be sure, but instead in the practical transaction of goods and services for money sense. Every business needs customers, and customers make decisions on purchases first by availability of funds. For your understanding (or at least those with no empathy): No money means no jet ski, no mansion. For everyone else (and probably actually you too): No money means no transportation (meaning no job), no dinner, no beds tonight, and no decent food for the kids. The decisions for utility of survival are superior for all people to those of the luxury goods you seem to so (enviously?) cherish instead.
You mean your biased, opportunity based, convenience samples collected by untrained observations with unchecked internal bias on interpretations? Yeah, the research with carefully planned survey analysis is better.
Every you say is false. Any business run so close to maximum leverage that the funds required for quarterly taxes are the difference in project decision is about to declare bankruptcy.
Again that's a space and time problem. If you want people to work you can't be picky about how or when they can be contacted for it.
You need a mobile with data plan to be in job search now. Recruiters don't wait, and neither do employers. The days of leaving messages are over. Guess what happens if/when you don't answer immediately and comply with every command/requirement? They move on the the next candidate.
Post failed at the unnecessary failed and self-interested ideology. There is no connection between your "points" in reality. Government is the only force representing the interests of all people and is the only force to represent any interest against those of the wealthy and powerful. Dismantling ('defunding', etc.) official government leads to default government by the interests of the wealthy, which is normally called for what it is: slavery and feudalism.
You are an over-entitled fool. Give people money and they spend it on what they need. That does mean food and housing, and while the long-term poor who have lived without longer than with may not have guidance to do that at first once the reality of a steady support sinks in and guidance is provided (it already is available at employment centers, which most of that group already attend often).
Ignore the idiots here, your position is the only legitimate one MDSolar. Meta-moderation will punish those abusing their allotment to bully you. In specific applications certain technologies like radioactive decay in space probes are more effective as they move away from the sun, but for Earth which simply rotates in a consistent manner the technology should be the focus of energy development for everything from Industry to daily use. Porsche has show it is possible to run a manufacturing facility from a large PV pylon, but for cost efficiency I believe the more traditional solar array and sterling engine approach is very promising. And of course, engineered algae production of biofuel on the biotechnology side, for those applications where liquid fuels can't be substituted by stored solutions - battery, or kinetic, etc.
One is cumulative, the other is simply for a period. Next time try not picking for-profit firms with vested interests, and don't copy pasting shit you don't really understand you fucking idiot. Also your numbers are wrong - Bush Jr. left 11.6 Billion Debt, Obama has added 6.5 Billion in what is now an equal amount of time. The CBO is leaning increasingly conservative but those are the official figures from them, check the link.
That assumes operation in industrial nations, which is not where any military deploys on a regular basis. For the same reasons significant research has been done in remote power generation including using radioactive decay for nuclear power without building a reactor. Environments differ, and your knowledge of your mother's basement has little application to a battlefield in Afghanistan or anywhere else with rugged and inhospitable terrain.
You fucking idiot, human and economic geography are well established fields. The poorest live where it is cheapest to survive. Social position predicts poverty, not racial stereotypes.
Consider liability - easy choice is avoid it.
That's about the exact opposite of reality, and I think you need to step outside and move the fuck on you litltle bitch.
Look into corporate decision making you god damn idiot. Legal is the dominant party for large organizations, and the justification here is obvious to people who aren't fucking idiots.
Well aren't you just the most special little techno-anarchist SJW snowflake?
Yeah, Slashdot is just full of too many fucking idiots.
Not quite, again your fucked up fantasy isn't reality. The decision by Apple is about reducing company liability, Microsoft is doing the opposite in hopes of gaining from idiots like you.
Approved by unicode does not mean IMPLEMENTED - that and the related negotiations are what this story and those of the last month are about.
Usage of the emoji can and will increase incidence of threats as children lack the maturity to understand the implications of their communications. Providing a ready-made gun emoji readily accessible and distributed without notice to minors puts Apple in a bad position when those same minors are investigated and their parents seek repayment for court costs or damages from Apple.
Try both here and here you fucking idiot.
How about you grow the fuck up? Spend some time in the real world.
Removing the emoji reduces the non-thinking use of the emoji as a threat, which is legally defined in various ways and includes electronic messages.
Apple is a private company so none of that applies. You are a bad troll.
How about you be honest for 5 minutes? That post was on legal basis of threat, not your fucked up ideological fantasy.
Nice try, but you're ignoring the reality of this entire situation. Your post is irrelevant, because language and culture have nothing to do with this decision. It isn't a state action, it is one by a voluntary private firm concerned about its future liability in civil and criminal courts.