As far as opting out goes, I figure what have I got to lose? Most spammers can verify the validity of your email address because of those script images (ex <img src="spammer.com/address.php?addr=myemailaddress@d omain.com">), right?
I don't belive in the big bang, but it seems strange to me that they think it had any "sound" at all if, according to that theroy, there was no air to carry it.
Use a free throwaway web-based account . ..
I use Spamgourmet, I can give out an address I make up on the spot. After a certain number of messages are sent to that account, (and options can be set, like trusted senders and the like) Spamgourmet eats all the messages sent to that account instead of forwarding it. It's great.
Slashdot Mirror
. . . but when people run GUI applications with buttons and scrollbars [in the future], it will be using the Windows API.
Ummm...that stinks. You ever use the Windows API?
Where x is the golden ratio:
1/x = 0.618...
x = 1.618...
x^2 = 2.618...
Woah, woah, woah. Back up. ;-)
Since when is MS gonna acquire OSDN? I was kida hoping is was gonna be the other way around
As far as opting out goes, I figure what have I got to lose?d omain.com">), right?
Most spammers can verify the validity of your email address because of those script images (ex <img src="spammer.com/address.php?addr=myemailaddress@
Welcome to Slashdot, where you can insult lawyers on one story, and on another story give out Lawyer-style advice. :-)
I don't belive in the big bang, but it seems strange to me that they think it had any "sound" at all if, according to that theroy, there was no air to carry it.
I think someone had a bit too much coffee this morning.
I recommend you stop drinking that stuff.
Use a free throwaway web-based account . . .
I use Spamgourmet, I can give out an address I make up on the spot. After a certain number of messages are sent to that account, (and options can be set, like trusted senders and the like) Spamgourmet eats all the messages sent to that account instead of forwarding it. It's great.