Slashdot Mirror

← Back to Users

User: MegaThawt

MegaThawt's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
32
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 32

  1. Re:Cellphones are the Anti-Christ, Cameras in Clas on We're Jammin', Hope You Like Jammin' Too · · Score: 1

    ...you must be at least 35. older folks didn't like the telephone when it came out well, (wheeeze) I'm 48 and (cractchet cawf) what's this dagnab (whisle) phone thing you are talking about (wheeze)? you youngin's ought to be more polite and what were we talking about now?

  2. Re:Oh no..... on Novell's Certified Linux Engineer · · Score: 5, Funny

    Can't Slashdot think up any new jokes? Of course not.

    OK, here's something new...

    Q. Why did the MSCE cross the road?
    A. Someone told him/her to.

    Q. Why did the Certified Linux Eng. cross the road?
    A. Someone told him/her not to.

    (ok ... so only the "/her" part was new)

  3. Re:bozos .... on SCO Awarded UNIX Copyright Regs, McBride Interview · · Score: 1

    ummm, I opened it in OpenOffice, what is this "Excell" you are talking about?

  4. it's ok as long as on Hormel Sues Over SpamArrest Name · · Score: 1

    Spam Arrest doesn't have anything in their product resembling meat...oh...I see Hormel's point.

  5. Re:Wow. on The Bug by Ellen Ullman · · Score: 1

    >Either us geeks are buying more books ... (ahem) Either *we* geeks are buying more books... Several years ago I couldn't even spell "geek", now I is one.

  6. Re:It's not about the same code in both places... on Did SCO 'Borrow' Linux Code? · · Score: 1

    >Code doesn't just spring from the head of Zeus...

    They appear to be talking about a snippet of code that sprung from the other end.

  7. RIAA could cause harm on RIAA Apologizes for Incorrect Infringement Notice · · Score: 2, Interesting

    by mistakenly planting bogus files with the same name that they don't own. If RIAA mistakes someone else's file as one of their copyrighted ones (and we see how easy that was to do) they could be interfering with the distribution of someone else's property. That's in the same category as spamming, or worse. I hope there would be a way for the victim to get legal compensation ... seems like just a matter of time before it happens.