How is "unravel" redundant? When I think of "ravel", I think of the third definition listed on dictionary.com
3. To tangle or complicate.
To "unravel" makes perfect sense. To untangle.
My biggest problem with "Irregardless" is that it sounds like a double negative to me. The "ir" prefix, and the "less" suffix negate each other. If you're bent on using the "ir", why not use "irregard"?
Besides, most places I've seen irregardless defined, there is a note to not use that term.
It's not *that* defective, depending on how you use it.
Think about it. If it only redirects you once every 8 hours, and you make sure to make 1,000,000 HTTP requests during that 8 hour period, then it is only breaking.00001% of the time.
Slashdot Mirror
I thought the news about E17 was out on April Fools day!
Didn't Amazon patent no-click phishing? Oh wait, that was 1-click phishing. Sorry!
Now they just need to make the mousepad play Simon. Then I'm sold.
provides alot of free nodes around Seattle. I would check out their website, as well as the NoCatNet authentication software...
Any mention of an AES release?
How is "unravel" redundant? When I think of "ravel", I think of the third definition listed on dictionary.com
3. To tangle or complicate.
To "unravel" makes perfect sense. To untangle.
My biggest problem with "Irregardless" is that it sounds like a double negative to me. The "ir" prefix, and the "less" suffix negate each other. If you're bent on using the "ir", why not use "irregard"?
Besides, most places I've seen irregardless defined, there is a note to not use that term.
It's not *that* defective, depending on how you use it.
.00001% of the time.
Think about it. If it only redirects you once every 8 hours, and you make sure to make 1,000,000 HTTP requests during that 8 hour period, then it is only breaking
That's not bad, right?