Slashdot Mirror


E17 Available From CVS

Lisandro writes "As stated by Rasterman on his site, Enlightenment 0.17's window manager is now available on CVS, which means you can build e17 completely from it, as it is, and give it a try. Of course, it's still work in progress, and lacking in several areas, but it is usable, and looks as gorgeous as ever. Also, in related news, the XFCE team, one of the best 'light' desktop environments for *NIX, has released the first release candidate for XFCE 4.2, with a lot of long due improvements." About e17, Rasterman's note says "It's limited in its support for ICCCM, no NETWM support and it has no iconification, virtual desktops, shading, keybindings or button bindings, but it does WORK (just). it's also fast and beautiful."

308 comments

  1. Work in progress by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Enlightment has been work in progress for many many years and did include a complete rewrite. Which is OK because Rasterman considers himself an artist not a programmer. As for real world every day use, I'll stick to sawfish.

    1. Re:Work in progress by shrykk · · Score: 2, Interesting

      It's surely a bad idea to rewrite and take a step backwards. After all, Code doesn't get rusty.

      --
      #define struct union /* Reduce memory usage */
    2. Re:Work in progress by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you don't think that code get rusty, you haven't seen enough code. That statement assumes a few things, for instance that each change made to the code base is an improvement. This just isn't true, it can just as well be a bad quick fix, a horrible API added, ill-designed additions, and just plain old cruft lying around rotting.

      There is nothing wrong with doing rewrites at the correct moments. I hardly think win32 could have been improved to .NET standards, nor Firefox patched up from the old Netscape source...

      To rewrite or continue is a case by case question as so much else. Trying to somehow throw "universal truths" around just doesn't fly that long. Remember the earth being flat?

    3. Re:Work in progress by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Joel is a smart guy, and I agree with him in most respects. But...

      Software is not static. Lets say you're an uber-programming wizard and you create a typesetting language and rendering program. You know what you are doing, spend years perfecting it and eliminating every known bug.

      20 years later, some schmucks roll along with cheap color printers. Some other schmucks want to include graphics stored in formats that didn't exist when you wrote your software.

      The result isn't bugs, but features you _would_ have included in your design.

      You can alter your code to include the new features. Patch it together, test it, release a beta, gather feedback, fix any bugs and eventually release a 2.0 (or 1.1). That is what we usually do, and it usually works.

      Some features arn't so easy to add. To add them 'properly' requires you to replace existing code with a whole new idiom. All the references to the affected routines need to be updated. For simplicity you may add 'stub' routines for backward internal API compatability. It's refactoring gone mad.

      Does it happen? Yes. Is it tempting to rewrite the 'whole thing' instead? Absolutely. Do you actually start up a blank file and rewrite the application? Nope. You may build the new framework 'from scratch' but much of the code will be cut-n-paste or at least sitting in the next window over.

      While this doesn't prevent new bugs it does make re-development of old bugs less likely. If the new framework has inherent design advantages over the old the rewrite will give you long-term advantages.

      Joel's big example is Netscape Navigator. I don't think that jury is in. Could any amount of patching and refactoring have brought Netscape 4.x on par with Firefox?

  2. some random screenshots by SignificantBit · · Score: 0, Offtopic
    1. Re:some random screenshots by xcomputer_man · · Score: 5, Funny

      Thanks for pummeling my poor web server with a direct link to my screenshots page, even though it doesn't have any actual E17 screenshots yet. :)

      (At least you didn't link to the video, and no-one's gonna find it since it's all slashdotted and everything now!)

    2. Re:some random screenshots by Victor+Antolini · · Score: 1

      Well i just saw 2 videos on your site, and they rock I'm impressed

    3. Re:some random screenshots by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      couldn't you at least have gone

      http://xcomputerman.com/gallery/screenshots?page =2 .nyud.net:8090/

      now nobody gets nuffink!

    4. Re:some random screenshots by empaler · · Score: 1
    5. Re:some random screenshots by End11 · · Score: 1

      And now you got yourself modded to 5 funny.. might want to put that server in a water bath or something.

      --

      Which is worse: ignorance or apathy? Who knows? Who cares?
    6. Re:some random screenshots by hisham · · Score: 1

      E17 Xinerama Screenshot

      http://shots.hisham.cc/shots/2004.11.28.just.ano th er.e17.day.png

      --
      Codito Ergo Sum
    7. Re:some random screenshots by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Does he think he's superman with superb visual sight? Those are damn small letters on the terminals!

    8. Re:some random screenshots by hisham · · Score: 1

      haha. (=
      well, i took the screenshot, and I can read pretty clearly what those temrinals say. this font, nexus, is what a lot of E people use, not to mention, Raster himself. (=

      --
      Codito Ergo Sum
  3. Screenshots by Gilesx · · Score: 5, Funny

    Does anyone have any screenshots of it that don't look like one of those hacker greetz pages you used to get on pirated Amiga games?

    --
    Sunday you're Thinking Different, Monday you're a huge tool, paying too much and waiting to think like everyone else.
    1. Re:Screenshots by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dont worry Gilesx, I thought it was funny...

    2. Re:Screenshots by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, it looks like 1337 gr331 stuff all right, but it's beautiful 1337 gr331 stuff.

      Something like a Dell or Gateway under the Xmas tree. Dazzling but aesthetically tasteless - and ugly.

      Ya know what? I'll stick with Jonathan Ive. And vector graphics. And shared pixels with alpha channels.

      Yeah.

      So no, folks, no news here, move along, move along now. ;P

      But it _is_ well done. That's for sure!

  4. no iconification? by Lord+Ender · · Score: 0

    Wow. So basically, you're saying it compiles! That's headline news. Or not.

    --
    A slashdotter who didn't build his own computer is like a Jedi who didn't build his own lightsaber.
    1. Re:no iconification? by DrSkwid · · Score: 1


      I consider it worthy.

      E17 has been one of those packages you had to annoyingly build by hand and keep another working WM handy once you'd finished having a look.

      *you* might not be nerdy enough if you think this isn't interesting. :)

      --
      There are places where the networks are not touching,and there are places where they are-Boeing's Lori Gunter
  5. fluxbox by Gyorg_Lavode · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Personally, fluxbox is my favorite light desktop. What advantages do enlightenment or XFCE have over fluxbox? (if any)

    --
    I do security
    1. Re:fluxbox by thryllkill · · Score: 1, Informative

      Fluxbox is pretty cool. Don't know much about XFCE, but I do know that Enlightenment is, and probably never will be, a light desktop. It has always been about the eye candy.

      --

      Note to self: No more arguing with the faithful.

    2. Re:fluxbox by thryllkill · · Score: 1

      Damnit!

      Fluxbox is pretty cool. Don't know much about XFCE, but I do know that Enlightenment is NOT , and probably never will be, a light desktop. It has always been about the eye candy.

      --

      Note to self: No more arguing with the faithful.

    3. Re:fluxbox by FlipmodePlaya · · Score: 1

      Well, XFCE is supposed to have all the awesome lightweightedness of something like IceWM or Fluxbox, but since it's built with GTK, look cool. I tried the new version yesterday, and was impressed with its looks. However I didn't find it to be noticeably faster than KDE, once it starts up (startup time is next to nill).

    4. Re:fluxbox by erikharrison · · Score: 4, Informative

      Fluxbox really isn't a desktop. It's just a window manager. A pretty featureful window manager (which starts to blur the distinction), but a window manager none the less.

      Fluxbox has a menu, minimal taskbar like support, tabbed windows, and a place for windowmaker dockapps.

      Xfce is a complete and highly modular desktop environment. Unlike Gnome, components are loosely coupled, so you can easily run part of the environment without much overhead.

      Xfce includes: A window manager, a taskbar program, a panel with plugins (launchers, menus, workplace switchers), a file manager, a desktop menu with a backdrop system, a session manager, a plugin capable settings manager, and a small application development environment.

      There are some other micellaneous toys - calendar, a gtk theme engine, a nice resolution switcher, an iconbox. And the third party apps are growing - a couple of terminal programs, a fine media player, a growing number of panel plugins.

      Making fluxbox and it's kin usable winds up requireing I run half a dozen other apps. Xfce is those apps, bundled together. You can think of it as Gnome done right.

    5. Re:fluxbox by bcrowell · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Making fluxbox and it's kin usable winds up requireing I run half a dozen other apps. Xfce is those apps, bundled together. You can think of it as Gnome done right.
      I guess I'll come off as a troll, but I'm honestly wondering if you could explain a little more. I use fluxbox, and I don't feel anything is lacking. I right-click, and I get a menu that lets me run the apps I want to run, or I can open an aterm and start other gui apps from the command line. Is it the file browser that you really feel is missing from fluxbox? Personally I'm happier with ls, rm, etc. from the command line. Some of the stuff you listed I either don't consider part of the desktop (like a development environment), or I'm not sure what you're describing ("backdrop system, a session manager, a plugin capable settings manager").

      Maybe part of it is that I've had right-hand tendonitis problems from the mouse, so I actually prefer to type as much as possible and avoid the mouse.

    6. Re:fluxbox by Gyorg_Lavode · · Score: 1

      you may be modded troll. I got modded overrated w/ just my karma bonus to a question thats got 3 replies. Anyway, maybe someone can shed some light on the difference between a windows manager and a desktop? I honestly have never understood that since it seems most windows managers can be used as desktops but desktops (like KDE) somtimes use different windows managers.

      --
      I do security
    7. Re:fluxbox by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      is there a bug in fluxbox? when i alt-tab to the next window, the first keypress doesn't register in the new window. anybody else get that bug? is there a nice quickie fix? :)

    8. Re:fluxbox by Lisandro · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Give it a try and you'll understand. I used to use Fluxbox a lot, but being only a WM it's rather limited in what it can and can't do. I then moved to KDE, whose interface i loved but was dog-ass slow. From there i moved to GNOME, which was still dog-ass slow, and while it's interface is not as polished as KDEs, it looks (for me) a whole lot better.

      Now i'm settled with XFCE 4, and i have to say is the first time i've ever been really comfortable with an *NIX desktop enviroment. Think of it as being somewhere between a WM and a DE: it borrows the best from both worlds. XFCE looks much like GNOME, being GTK based, but it just *flies*. In fact, i'm pretty sure that if your system runs Fluxbox well it will also run XFCE well.

      The latest XFCE release is major in the sense they've started to polish the weak spots in the design - there's now a nice session manager, better configuration options, more eye candy :) and sleeker interface overall. Desktop icons are being developed for those who asked for it aswell. It's also one of the more Free Desktop-compliants DE available. It does what it's supposed to do, with zero bloat. In fact, i think the GNOME crew should take a few hints from XFCE.

    9. Re:fluxbox by goofyheadedpunk · · Score: 1
      --

      What if the entire Universe were a chrooted environment with everything symlinked from the host?
    10. Re:fluxbox by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      only thing i run on top of fluxbox is grekllm and a whole lot of xterms. well sometimes xpdf also, sometimes.
      filemanagers you say? i get along perfect with mc (midnight commander) or just ksh. web browser is lynx. editor is vim. etc. etc. it's a Unix box man! :)

    11. Re:fluxbox by reallocate · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I think he explained it rather well. XFCE has a bunch of little apps that don't come with Fluxbox or the other minimal window managers. If you use Fluxbox and add in those capabilities by running the equivalent individual programs, the only remaining difference is aesthetic.

      In the end, asking if XFCE is better than Fluxbox, or if KDE is better than Gnome, is a bit like asking if blue is better than yellow. It all depends on what you like to look at, because if you want, for example, to put a clock on your desktop, you're gonna hafta run a clock program.

      --
      -- Slashdot: When Public Access TV Says "No"
    12. Re:fluxbox by Hal+XP · · Score: 0, Troll
      Making fluxbox and its kin usable winds up requiring I run half a dozen other apps. Xfce is those apps, bundled together. You can think of it as Gnome done right.

      Incredible! Does this mean a base installation of XFce includes Firefox, Abiword, Emacs, GVim, The Gimp, GPhoto, Inkscape and Scribus? These are the apps I require in order to make Fluxbox usable.

      --
      I'm a sci-fi vegan: I don't want the aliens to think we have as much right to live as the fried chickens we eat.
    13. Re:fluxbox by Gyorg_Lavode · · Score: 1

      I use KDE for my normal computers, but I have one k6-2 400 thats slow as sin so I needed something really stripped down for it. Thats where I use fluxbox.

      --
      I do security
    14. Re:fluxbox by ari_j · · Score: 1

      No. Those are the apps you require in order to make your system usable, regardless of desktop environment. They would all work essentially the same regardless of window manager, even if it's twm or none at all.

    15. Re:fluxbox by fengme · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      I use the FVWM . :)

      --
      The God must click the "OK" button to confirm that he had created us if he was using the Windows .
    16. Re:fluxbox by Lisandro · · Score: 1

      Like i said, try XFCE on it. I think you'll like it. That's how i discovered it, trying to make an old PII laptop run smoothly.

    17. Re:fluxbox by jacksonscottsly · · Score: 2, Interesting

      enlightenment runs faster on my both of my x86 machines than xfce4...hell, it's almost as quick as fluxbox, depending on settings. I think i remember seeing some comparisons done on the gentoo forums where a lot of users actually had it running quicker than fluxbox.

      --
      [ you and I are ugly ]
    18. Re:fluxbox by 0racle · · Score: 3, Informative

      windows managers can be used as desktops but desktops (like KDE) somtimes use different windows managers.

      Your very close. Obviously Fluxbox and KDE are desktops in the way most people think of them, drawing windows and providing a workspace, but what KDE is that Fluxbox is not is a Desktop environment.
      A window manager in their most basic form just draws windows on the screen, thats it. Thats not very usable since simply doing that does not give a method to actually run applications, so a menu is added. So thats all it does.
      Now look at everything KDE does and is. kwin draws windows, kdelibs provides IO slaves to handle background IO, kdenetwork provides access to protocols for every KDE app, and provides the kparts that come together for mail (kmail), news (knode), IM (kopete) and whatnot, all of which then also show up (along with others) in KDE's PIM, kontact. The khtml kpart is available to all apps, along with the file browser component, and so with those and the other kdenetwork kparts, konqueror becomes usable as a browser, file manager, ftp client, or whatnot depending on how its used. There are integrated apps for managing sound, X settings, your kernel config and virtual desktops, and that's just the beginning.

      So often with a simple window manager you may have a bunch of apps that do many or all of these functions, but they are separate apps and if they all talk to each other, well your quite lucky. A full desktop environment has all the parts needed for a completely usable system to handle all those parts, and often more then you need, in a very integrated manner that all work together by design.

      --
      "I use a Mac because I'm just better than you are."
    19. Re:fluxbox by mercuryresearch · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I couldn't agree more. XFCE feels like what Gnome used to be in the 1.4 days, fast and light and "just works." The other really nice trait about the XFCE 4 rewrite is that it's a DE built on the unix philosophy of simple, small components. For example, I have no need for a taskbar, and one just comments out that particular module in the startup script. There's still a few areas that could stand a bit of polish, but I've switched from gnome to XFCE 4 (and now 4.2) and am very pleased with the system overall.

      It's also worth highlighting that there is a graphical installer available for XFCE 4.2, which made installing it beyond simple.

    20. Re:fluxbox by rk87 · · Score: 1

      I have this same problem with ion2 when switching workspaces. I have no idea what its related to, but its DAMN annoying :)

      --
      I'M NOT ANGRY!
    21. Re:fluxbox by teslafreak · · Score: 1

      You probably did, it runs faster then Fluxbox on mine (although I think I may have screwed up my copy of fluxbox)

    22. Re:fluxbox by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I had my ex's feces once, when I was drunk. I didn't care for it.

      But seriously, XFeCEs is a decent program. I use it on my ancient 486, and it sorta works.

    23. Re:fluxbox by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "However I didn't find it to be noticeably faster than KDE,"

      is this noticed on a P1/200 or on a P4/3000? Try to benchmark on low-end x86s...

  6. It won't be the same... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Without Brian Harvey... *sigh*

    1. Re:It won't be the same... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That guy looks gayer than a cock covered in shit, and what the fuck is it with 30 year olds dressing like teenagers and shaving their eyebrows?

    2. Re:It won't be the same... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It took me a minute to get that one (actually I first got it when I saw this post.

      Somehow, I think that this is healthy. I mean, me not thinking about something so crappy right off.

  7. In case of slashdotting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    SourceForge Logo
    Support This Project

    Welcome to The Enlightenment Project.

    We are dedicated to providing advanced graphical libraries, tools, and environments. Currently, the project is made up of three different components: Enlightenment DR16, The Enlightenment Foundation Libraries, and Enlightenment DR17. While we are best known for the Enlightenment Window Manager itself there is a long history of providing advanced libraries and tools to support the window manager and other applications, such as Imlib, FNLib, and Imlib2, which extend far beyond the window manager itself in scope. Today, in development toward the DR17 Desktop Shell we have created an entirely new set of libraries and tools that provide more power and flexibility than any other group of graphical libraries available, which we refer to collectively as The Enlightenment Foundation Libraries.

    Enlightenment DR16

    The Enlightenment DR16 window manager was released in 2000, along with its dependencies Imlib and Fnlib, and remains in heavy usage today. While rumors of its death still circulate, DR16.6 was release on Nov 2nd, 2003, and it remains in development today with a long life still ahead of it. DR16 has been the choice of power users and artists due to its low overhead, highly graphical, widely theme-able, extremely configurable, yet unobtrusive interface. Nearly all functions of the window manager can be handled without mouse input, including application launching via e16keyedit. It also remains highly portable, with ports avalible for Linux on all platforms, FreeBSD, IRIX, Solaris X86 and Sparc, HP-UX, AIX, OS/2, and more.

    Imlib has lived a long life, still in heavy usage today, as one of the most popular image manipulation and rendering libs available. Its development was taken over by the GNOME project and used as GNOMEs rendering engine until it was replaced with GdkPixbuf in GNOME 2.0. It's popularity surpasses just development in C thanks to bindings for several scripting languages including PERL, Python, and Ruby.

    Enlightenment Foundation Libraries

    In developing DR17 it was made clear that we needed an entirely new set of libraries and tools. Raster had a bold vision of what was possible and where he wanted the next release to go, starting with Imlib2 and EVAS, and eventually growing into new libraries largely based on or around EVAS. It became clear that the usefulness of these libraries and tools went far beyond the DR17 release itself, just as Imlib did in DR16. Thus the collective library back-end of DR17 was given the independent title: the Enlightenment Foundation Libraries, or EFL for short.

    The EFL contains solutions for almost any graphical interface task, far beyond just rendering images. EVAS provides a highly optimized canvas library. Ecore provides a simple and modular abstraction interface and advanced event management including timers. Etox provides a complex text layout library complete with theme-able text stylization capabilities (previously Estyle). EDB provides a compact database format for intuitive and easy configuration management, including the storing of binaries. EET provides an integrated and flexible container that ends the traditions of providing themes in tarballs. Edje provides a revolutionary library and tool set for completely abstracting application interfaces from their code, including a complex and flexible method of designing interfaces. EWL provides a complete widget library built on all the other components of the EFL. And more!

    Enlightenment DR17

    Development Release 17 of the Enlightenment window manager represents an evolution into the next generation of desktop environments: the desktop shell. DR17 will provide integration between files and your environment in a seamless manner while encompassing a graphically rich and flexible architecture. It will not compete with GNOME or KDE, but be a completely new way of visualizing your desktop, based around the EFL which was built from the ground up for this task.

    Still in

    1. Re:In case of slashdotting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll
      This is idiotic, you're think going to slashdot SourceForge?
      blah@blahhost:~$ host www.enlightenment.org
      www.enlightenment.org CNAME enlightenment.org
      enlightenment.org A 66.35.250.210
      blah@blahhost:~$ host 66.35.250.210
      Name: vhost.sourceforge.net
      Address: 66.35.250.210
    2. Re:In case of slashdotting by sweede · · Score: 2, Funny

      ya, sourceforge can take care of its self when it comes to bringing down servers :)

      --
      I follow the SDK and GDN principles.. Spelling Dont Kount, Grammer Dont Neither
  8. Took a while by pediddle · · Score: 1, Troll
    It's limited in its support for ICCCM, no NETWM support and it has no iconification, virtual desktops, shading, keybindings or button bindings, but it does WORK (just). it's also fast and beatiful."


    Okay, so it's been 4 years since the last major release, and yes, I used to love Enlightenment back in the day, but the world has moved on to bigger and better things (KDE, Gnome, OS-X). Enlightenment still has a lot of catching up to do before it is newsworthy!
    1. Re:Took a while by wyldeone · · Score: 1

      Okay, so it's been 4 years since the last major release, and yes, I used to love Enlightenment back in the day, but the world has moved on to bigger and better things (KDE, Gnome, OS-X). Enlightenment still has a lot of catching up to do before it is newsworthy!

      This is not true. As can be seen on this page, the last release was only three months ago. Also, you do not descern between the different releases. The release noted in the post in DR17, which is very new. I know being informed before you post on /. is too much to ask, but at least RTFA.

      --
      In the beginning the universe was created. This made a lot of people very angry and is widely considered as a bad move.
    2. Re:Took a while by Coryoth · · Score: 1

      Enlightenment is competing fr a different market than GNOME and KDE. It's more in line to compete with XFCE and even *box. The new E is suprisingly fast, and as such provides a reasonably "fast light desktop" option. At the same time, however, the new E is incredibly rich in eye candy - way more so than any of the competing light desktops. Add to that configurabilty - which E doesn't have yet, it's still early days - which you can be sure E will get, and well...

      I look orward to seeng what they have to offer.

      Jedidiah.

    3. Re:Took a while by auzy · · Score: 4, Interesting

      actually, the reason its taken so long is because they have completely made EFL uber dynamic.. Believe me, after trying out entrance (the Enlightenment GDM/KDM/XDM equiv), I just seriously sat there staring at it for 20mins.. They can easily beat gnome/kde.

      I personally think KDE and gnome (or GTk/QT) are in need of a rewrite, and many programmers have agreed with me.. GTK# might save GTK, but the C code for it can be hell. I think its extremely promising considering E17 is still barely finished yet.

      Take my advice and give at least engage and entrance a try from CVS.. You'll see its very newsworthy

    4. Re:Took a while by popeyethesailor · · Score: 1

      More importantly, its usefulness to less-powered systems like Zaurus and ipaq. Evas runs on Zaurus, and looks beautiful.

    5. Re:Took a while by ajs · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Oh, but it's "fast"... I'm getting so tired of that. I remember when Sawfish came out and everyone loved it because it was so "fast"... then it added support for all of the desktop features everyone wanted and it was deemed too slow. There was a new "fast" window manager called Metacity. Gnome adopted Metacity as its primary window manager because they didn't want something that was that heavy-weight, but Metacity needed some additional features to be fully Gnomish.

      Today's Metacity is as heavy-weight as Sawfish.

      E has always been "fast", but fast in a different way. There are true optimizations that aren't just a result of feature incompleteness (mostly the rendering model which allows for greater hardware acceleration). Still, it's frustrating to see this process of the new toy being compared to a mature tool with a modern feature set. I love Gnome (and I'm sure I'd love KDE too) because it provides a deep and rich integration between applications. It doesn't really matter if the Window manager is Sawfish, Metacity, E or whatever comes out tomorrow, I'll still demand strong support for internationalization; multiple desktops; interaction with the session and desktop managers, panel and applications; configuration through the same configuration system as the rest of my apps; etc.

      If your window manager can do all of this, THEN I'll look at how fast it is. Same for a mailer or terminal or web browser, etc, etc.

    6. Re:Took a while by pediddle · · Score: 1

      If I didn't RTFA, then how'd I get the quote at the top of my post? Like I said, it's been 4 years since the last major release, which is completely accurate. That is, unless you want to get into a fight about version numbers, but if Enlightenment's developer considers 0.16.5 to 0.16.6 a major release, then he needs a new numbering scheme!

    7. Re:Took a while by Taladar · · Score: 1

      Well, lets see. I use Fvwm. It is very mature (has been around much longer than all those Desktop Environments you call mature). It can be configured with the same interface as the rest of my apps (config files) has gettext-support (don't know about bi-di support though), the best multiple desktop system I've ever seen (they call the ones I mean pages, but all other WMs swould consider them desktops) and you can use different panels and desktop managers (although I don't use a Desktop as I mostly maximize my apps and a desktop is the worst place for the programs I need)

      Fvwm is definitely faster than any DE I've ever seen and I use it because the DE are bloated with features I never used and never will use. Fvwm isn't for everyone (at least configuring it isn't) but it fits my needs. I don't think one WM or DE can satisfy every linux user's needs without being awfully bloated and slow.

    8. Re:Took a while by IamTheRealMike · · Score: 1

      I was under the impression metacity was written because sawfish did not meet the projects usability goals, and also because Sawfish was partly written in the authors own specific dialect of Lisp. A language per author was deemed a bit much.

    9. Re:Took a while by trondd · · Score: 1

      I've never tried entrance, but 20 min. staring at the login screen? How great can it be? Enter your username: ..., enter you passwd: ... -> and that all you'll ever see of it....

    10. Re:Took a while by DrSkwid · · Score: 1

      lol, you fucking idiot

      I can't even be bothered

      --
      There are places where the networks are not touching,and there are places where they are-Boeing's Lori Gunter
    11. Re:Took a while by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      GTK# might save GTK, but the C code for it can be hell.

      Well, well, well. I have to give it to you, comparing completely different languages, the other practically requires you to use oop and the other doesn't even have certain handy constructs for it. There are plenty of bindings for oop languages for GTK+, most notably Python, C++, Ruby and the oh-so-advertized C#.

      Have you ever used a elegant and good API for widgets that has an C API? I don't really like the Gtk+ API because of the long names, but without them, how would you differentiate between your own functions and the ones from gtk and what they actually do? OOP languages tend to have namespace and class constructs that handle this.

    12. Re:Took a while by diegocgteleline.es · · Score: 1

      Fully agree with you.

      Anyone who have seen engage or entice or any other E app based in the new EFL knows what it's. The real power seems to be behind evas/edje. Just go to http://www.rasterman.com/news.html and check the "Avalon vs E" topic, they have a sort of "UI markup language".

      They're a couple of years ahead of Gnome/KDE/Longhorn/MacOSX in that field IMNSHO. Impressive.

    13. Re:Took a while by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Okay, that's just frightening. You sat there and stared at a login screen for 20 minutes? Honestly, if you believe that's the sign of a good desktop, no wonder desktop Linux is miles behind the rest of the world.

    14. Re:Took a while by ajs · · Score: 1

      fvwm is a window manager, not a desktop environment. If you don't know the difference, then this is not going to be a very productive discussion.

  9. Stupid question by magefile · · Score: 4, Funny

    Stupid question, for which I expect a stupid answer ... having downloaded e16 a while back, and tried it a bit ... how the fuck do I learn to use it?

    1. Re:Stupid question by Goeland86 · · Score: 1

      err, have you tried clicking around? have you noticed left click, middle click and right click all popup different menus? Do you understand the names on those menus? they're pretty self-explanatory... And yes, E is for Excellency.

      --
      ---- I am certain of only one thing : I know nothing else.
    2. Re:Stupid question by Slime-dogg · · Score: 1

      Probably the best way to do it is to use E as the WM, and use nautilus or some other desktop manager around it. That way, you can have your icons, panels, and taskbar (if you want to use it). I forego the taskbar, because the pager is good enough.

      The best way to learn is to experiment with it. If you want to get even more in depth, check out CmdrTaco's site.

      --
      You need to restart your computer. Hold down the Power button for several seconds or press the Restart button.
    3. Re:Stupid question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      First pretend you are 13 years old and just discovered that Windows 98 isn't the only operating system in the world.

      Second, get really into this movie called The Matrix. Watch it at least 20 times -- It will help you customize your Enlightment environment.

      Third, develop a crush on an anime character. You'll need this for your desktop background.

      Finally, just fire up your fake-transparent terminal and get on IRC. The "chicks" there will be glad to help you become an elite Enlightenment dood!

    4. Re:Stupid question by Linuxathome · · Score: 3, Informative

      I had the same reaction when I started using it years ago. It took me days to finally read somewhere that the mouse is INTEGRAL to the functionality of e. In other words, in other desktops, lots of functions (if not all) are mapped to certain keys or hotkey combinations (which makes sense to me for efficiency) -- not to say that e doesn't have hotkeys. But in e, you have to throw that "conventional" wisdom out the door and re-adjust yourself in a new type of environment -- that is, one where the mouse is the center of all action (without a menubar).

      That said, your mouse should be a three button mouse to best utilize e. And as another person posted, you can play around with it by right clicking the desktop, middle clicking, etc. to see all of the menus and functions.

      I haven't kept up with DR17 development, but am I right to assume that the developers are trying to not only map mouse buttons, but also button and mouse movement combinations?

    5. Re:Stupid question by CharlesF · · Score: 1

      You're right, that WAS pretty stupid.

      --
      Do not read this sig!
    6. Re:Stupid question by DrSkwid · · Score: 1


      if you have to ask, you never will

      --
      There are places where the networks are not touching,and there are places where they are-Boeing's Lori Gunter
    7. Re:Stupid question by NoMercy · · Score: 1

      Hopfully soon it'll not be a fake transparent terminal, ahh true transparancy to see that beautiful anime girl on my background... uhh wait a minute I'm not a sterotype.

    8. Re:Stupid question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I *hate* the mouse! Sorry to say it, but this is somewhere that MS Windows shines. I can do nearly everything I want without touching the damn thing. Note to Trillian programmers: stop with resource sucking eye candy and make it work like a Windows programme. Now you're telling me that E is more keyboard unfriendly than the usual X environments? GRRRR.

    9. Re:Stupid question by magefile · · Score: 1

      That would be my problem, then. My "middle button" is my scroll wheel, so it's stiff, and I hate clicking R+L at the same time. Maybe I should buy a mouse so I can try it ... or not.

      Anyway, the point of my post was, although I hate this feature in Windows, it'd be nice to have it pop up "do you need a tutorial" with a "show this again y/n" box, simply because it is radically different from the vast majority of desktop environments out there.

    10. Re:Stupid question by magefile · · Score: 1

      Forgot this in my other reply ... I love the way Maya does menus (the hotbox - hit and hold space to open it); is that similar to how it works in E?

    11. Re:Stupid question by cloudmaster · · Score: 1

      You've never used e before, have you? I think the documentation must be buried in the same place as the docs for esd. I *hate* the e sound daemon and its lack of docs...

    12. Re:Stupid question by cloudmaster · · Score: 1

      Huh. I wish Slashdot wouldn't attach orphaned children in threads to the parent's parent...

    13. Re:Stupid question by CharlesF · · Score: 1

      Er, whoops, clarity issue. I was referring to the answer being stupid, not the question. Everyone knows that everyone on IRC, no matter which question you ask, will reply with "RTFM"

      --
      Do not read this sig!
    14. Re:Stupid question by cloudmaster · · Score: 1

      That's not true - sometimes they just ignore the question or make some comment about "stupid newbie". :)

  10. Jumping the gun by Lancaibheal · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    "It's limited in its support for ICCCM, no NETWM support and it has no iconification, virtual desktops, shading, keybindings or button bindings, but it does WORK (just). it's also fast and beautiful."

    If you don't mind, I'll wait until it actually does something other than "work" before I get too excited.

  11. Re:OK by skids · · Score: 1

    Practically none of the window managers available today properly support some of the most basic features you'd expect them to support. Like say Xlib.

    /me is just cranky because WM's screw up my GGI X target code.

  12. Re:OK by nuclear305 · · Score: 4, Informative

    It has been around longer than 5 years, and if you had ever used it you'd know it has plenty common features (virtual desktops, for one)

    I *believe* e17 was a total rewrite, which is why those features are missing...simply because the rewrite hasn't been completed yet.

  13. Too Late? by Retribution · · Score: 5, Interesting

    There was a time, long ago, when Enlightenment was my WM of choice, and WindowMaker played backup, when I needed things to either be a bit more lightweight, or I was working over the network, or whatever.

    Nowadays, I want a lot less visually from a WM--I want it to be as unobtrusive and thin as possible. I put up with Gnome/KDE (depends on what machine I'm working on) because of the nicer and nicer applications being built around them, but I dislike all of that extra overhead--"this app depends on *WHAT*?" This is, of course, my personal taste, and nothing more.

    Enlightenment, how I used to long for you. I yearned for another release. I ached to spend long nights interfacing with you... but that was long ago. I've grown up, you've chnaged. We've moved apart. Can it ever really work again between us? Can't we just let the past stay the past, beautiful in what it is, but nothing more?

    Call me.

    --
    -- That tickles!
    1. Re:Too Late? by jonathantan · · Score: 1

      I like the KDE apps too (I use Konqueror and Kopete regularly for my Internet needs), but I run them in Ion2. You don't have to put up with the extra stuff (Kicker and KDesktop, for instance) and still be able to use the KDE apps.

    2. Re:Too Late? by Nothinman · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I can't stand a full Gnome or KDE desktop either so I still use E16. As long as you pick a good theme (and man are there a lot of bad ones out there) E16 is still one of the best WMs out there.

    3. Re:Too Late? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well... You know, command line?

    4. Re:Too Late? by Lisandro · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Actually, Enlightenment has as many shitty themes as every other WM/DE in existence - i've seen both e16 and e17 look pretty slick and nice with some themes and downright awful with others.

      The important thing about e17 is, IMHO, the technology that drives it. Some of the stuff that can be done with the Enlightenment libraries (particularly Evas) is amazing, and simply couldn't be done with software available before.

    5. Re:Too Late? by Stephen+Williams · · Score: 1

      As long as you pick a good theme

      This guy's themes are superb. I used to use the Sawfish ports of D.A.E. and Orange Juice, then stuck with Orange Juice when I switched to E16.

      Orange themes are nice.

      -Stephen

    6. Re:Too Late? by jovlinger · · Score: 1

      I dunno. I downloaded E 16 recently, found a nice minimal theme (orange something or other) that (and this is a deal breaker for most themes) has a clear difference between focussed and unfocussed windows.

      It's rock stable, and with 30mins customization, is as good as sawfish was, back in the day. Sawfish broke for me ~ RH 9.0, and I never got around to fixing it. The secret was finding the option to get rid of the multiple desktop slider bar.

  14. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1, Informative

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  15. It supported such things by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They are recoding it, and due that, they have not added many things.

  16. "Beautiful" by labratuk · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    I've never got why people call enlightenment beautiful. Every time someone has described an enlightenment screenshot as beautiful I've thought it was hideous.

    It's like enlightenment's attitude is "Hey, let's put pixmaps everywhere!".

    --
    Malike Bamiyi wanted my assistance.
    1. Re:"Beautiful" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny
      There was this post on SA a while ago about Safari using brushed metal everywhere and how ugly it looked:

      "I got over brushed metal through enlightenment"

    2. Re:"Beautiful" by Goeland86 · · Score: 1

      hey, maybe you don't have the same tastes... but that's why E is great, you can create your own theme from scratch if you want to, and DR17 is going to be no exception, there's going to be alot of configurability for folks like you to make it pretty in their own way.

      --
      ---- I am certain of only one thing : I know nothing else.
    3. Re:"Beautiful" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Well yeah but defaults matter.

    4. Re:"Beautiful" by Stevyn · · Score: 1

      While beauty is subjective, I completely agree with you. Every time I see screen shots of these light window managers, I wonder how anybody can look at them for more than 5 minutes without going blind. They are hideous!

      In my humble opinion, the default views of GNOME, KDE, and XFCE4 are really nice looking. I feel this is a major reason people use them. I read light window manager zealots bitch all they want about how bloated they are, but at least they look good (yeah, soon XFCE will be too much to be considered "light").

      Another thing I don't get is transparency. It confuses the eye about what it's looking at and I don't like it at all. But I guess that's another story.

    5. Re:"Beautiful" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It confuses the eye about what it's looking at

      You mean brain. The eye doesn't think about anything.

      Fun fact: did you know that the image at the back of your eye is upside down and your brain flips everything? The computer screen that you are looking at right now is actually upside down in your brain. Also, if you wore special glasses that inverted everything you see, your brain would soon get used to it and flip the image again. RESPECT for your brain.

    6. Re:"Beautiful" by tolan-b · · Score: 1

      The new default winter theme for e16 is about as plain and simple as you can get without removing theming all together.

      it was enough to make me give enlightenment another go, and i've been finding it to be excellent.

      screenshot

    7. Re:"Beautiful" by huntse · · Score: 1

      100% agree. If enlightenment only looks as beautiful as ever, then we really do have a problem.

      I'll stick with ratpoison. It may not look like the interface to a videogame, but it is fast, elegant, small, and (most importantly for me) a productive work environment.

  17. Always been in CVS by Ogerman · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Uh.. E17 has always been in CVS. This is not news, people. An official final release of E17 will be news. Until then, quit filling /. with useless fluff.

    1. Re:Always been in CVS by datafr0g · · Score: 1

      But the WM app called "e" has not been in CVS until now and you need this to actually use the WM side of E17. Only the libs, and dev tools, etc have been avaliable up till now.

      --
      "Who says nothing is impossible? Some people do it every day!" - Alfred E. Neuman
    2. Re:Always been in CVS by Entropy_ah · · Score: 3, Informative

      There was an E17 in CVS, this is an all new E17.

      Allow me to explain. They had started development a long while ago on E17 which they had put in CVS (this is what you are thinking of). Since then raster has decided to start over. They have been concentrating on the EFL(Enlightenment Foundation Libraries) since then. Today's "release" exciting beause this is our first look at the real E17

      --
      my other penis is a vagina
    3. Re:Always been in CVS by xcomputer_man · · Score: 2, Informative

      The E17 that was in CVS has been dead for a very long time. It was nothing more than a glorified test app while the Enlightenment Foundation Libraries were still in development. This is a brand new window manager and it was just committed to CVS earlier this week.

      Now please don't go rushing to check it out yet. It is still barely functional and is not usable as a day-to-day wm yet - this is pre-alpha code essentially. We need more people who are interested in actually helping to contribute code than excited users especially at this stage.

    4. Re:Always been in CVS by Tragek · · Score: 1

      It's always nice to have a real dev answer comments on slashdot. It makes warm fuzzies inside for E users.

    5. Re:Always been in CVS by Ogerman · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the clarification. Too bad the article poster didn't take the time to research first and make this more clear. You moderators can feel free to kill off my original post.. karma points to spare! (:

      And to you E developers.. rock on. We look forward
      to what you come up with.

    6. Re:Always been in CVS by jbrandon · · Score: 3, Funny
      Until then, quit filling /. with useless fluff.

      You're new here, aren't you?

  18. sco hacked by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    www.sco.com/redhat

  19. progress by Misanthropy · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Enlightenment has been a work in progress since 97 or so I'd guess (been a fan ever since the fvwm-xpm days). Seemed like whenever it would start getting good Rasterman would decide to do a complete rewrite. Not that I'm complaining. I think it's cool that he has all these different ideas that he wants to try out. I guess it's more of a hobby/art project than a realworld solution.

    1. Re:progress by BoomerSooner · · Score: 1

      I couldn't have said it better. I used E in 2000 and it was slick. Slick just doesn't cut it anymore. I like Gnome (fought against this for a long time) and still have a box running Slack/FVWM. Linux has come a long way since I started using it in 1996 (programming dot clocks to get my damn fx card to work in X) and the fact that people can argue about all these window managers is great. If you don't believe me try twm, it's horrible (although I used to use it to run quake because it was so tight!!!)

      The next big thing for Linux is a distro that doesn't install the entire fucking world (a la suse/redhat/etc...)

    2. Re:progress by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Debian?

    3. Re:progress by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The next big thing for Linux is a distro that doesn't install the entire fucking world (a la suse/redhat/etc...)

      Gentoo.

    4. Re:progress by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      try ubuntu. it's really fucking slick. I bet someone will make a ubuntu style dist with kde soon too.

  20. Put it back in the distros by buffoverflow · · Score: 0

    I know that in most projects, an incremental dev release is usually no big deal, but with E, any release is big. Being a devoted user for many years, I can only hope the release of this beautiful new codebase will get E back into the ISOs of some of the bigger distro's (hint, hint Patrick).

  21. Fortunately, reality is much better :) by mr_tenor · · Score: 3, Informative

    Erm, I hope you're just saying that because you haven't heard anything in the last several years about the several rewrites and the refocusing of the enlightenment project on producing a set of extensive, massively featured libraries for application development with state of the art graphical capabilities and the ability to build complex applications using their components.

    The window manager mentioned here is the very start of the "2 lines of code" (a long runnign in-joke) that builds a window manager out of these libraries. If you want a fully featured window manager, e16 is quite mature already.

    1. Re:Fortunately, reality is much better :) by Slime-dogg · · Score: 1

      The parent is probably saying that because the parent is a troll.

      There's really no way that you can look at Enlightenment and miss the virtual desktop capabilities, or the fact that it has the best pager of all wm's I've seen.

      E is great. There's so much you can do with it, especially when it's combined with a normal desktop environment.

      --
      You need to restart your computer. Hold down the Power button for several seconds or press the Restart button.
  22. Not to rain on the parade, but... by Yurian · · Score: 2, Insightful
    From the website:
    Adding new backgrounds to E is easy. Just copy them into .enlightenment/backgrounds and restart!
    Gee, sounds great. I only have to restart the windowing system to add a new background? Not even a reboot? How painless.

    I think E is a long way from really being useable.

    1. Re:Not to rain on the parade, but... by Xenith · · Score: 2, Informative

      That is not true. It hasn't been for a while. While a restart *does* restart the cache, e16 has been able to reload the bg cache without a restart for a while now. (there's a menu option for it, and you can even do it from a shell with IPC)

      Where do you see that on the site? That most likely needs to be changed.

      And besides, that's refering to e16, not e17.

      --

      Never argue with a fool. He will drag you down to his level and beat you with experience.
      -Xenith
    2. Re:Not to rain on the parade, but... by BlastM · · Score: 3, Insightful

      E16 has been quite-usable for a few years now. "Restarting" involves merely restarting the Enlightenment process, which takes a grand total of three seconds on any machine bought in the new millenium, during which time windows lose their positions and borders but are all back when E has finished reloading.

      There is a common misconception (or more of a preconception as I doubt most people who hold this opinion have actually tried Enlightenment) that anything pretty must sacrifice speed. E16 (and from what I've seen so far, E17) are very fast to load and don't even register in 'top'. The main reason for this is that Enlightenment is just a window manager, not a desktop environment which has an entire framework of libraries that must be loaded to run the simplest programs. Enlightenment with all its bells and whistles will run faster on an old machine than KDE 2.x series or Gnome 1.x.

      It seems that bashing Enlightenment of loading slow has become a Slashdotism as important as saying that Gentoo releases are made sooner than they can be compiled or Natalie Portman's hot grits.

    3. Re:Not to rain on the parade, but... by Nothinman · · Score: 0, Troll

      E has always been more of proof-of-concept project than an environment for everyone. I believe it was started in the first place for Raster to learn how to use things like imlib for another project and it just grew from there. I use E16 on my machines because it's light, fast and looks good. But I wouldn't recommend it for most people.

    4. Re:Not to rain on the parade, but... by IO+ERROR · · Score: 1
      I suppose you'd just like to be able to click on an image and then click "Set as Background"? We could do that, but then e would be 300MB larger.

      It's all those little touches that keep me buying more RAM and bigger hard drives so I can run the latest GNOME or KDE. Not that they aren't a bit bloated, but all the libraries they use ARE reusable, and half your apps use most of them anyway, so why not have them around?

      --
      How am I supposed to fit a pithy, relevant quote into 120 characters?
    5. Re:Not to rain on the parade, but... by MikeBabcock · · Score: 1

      Middle-click, "restart window manager", watch spinny thing, done.

      Or better, in this case, you don't have to restart at all ... middle-click, select last menu, select "regenerate menus".

      Done.

      Of course, if you wanted to, you could write a little tool that uses fam to automatically update the menus when the files changed. Assuming you were willing to pre-parse and make sure they were valid first.

      --
      - Michael T. Babcock (Yes, I blog)
    6. Re:Not to rain on the parade, but... by Enrico+Pulatzo · · Score: 1

      That statement is funny to me, as when I started using enlightenment back in 199[7|8] I ended up upgrading my machine to support it.

      Not that anybody cares.

    7. Re:Not to rain on the parade, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Gee, sounds great. I only have to restart the windowing system to add a new background?

      Yeah, that, or you click "reload menus". That works too.

    8. Re:Not to rain on the parade, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Natalie Portman's hot grits

      Hmm. Natalie Portman covered in hot grits. Yummy.

    9. Re:Not to rain on the parade, but... by Yurian · · Score: 1
      I was the caption for one of the screenshots.

      Sorry, it just seemed a little absurd when I read it. Obviously from what people have been saying, it's not really an issue.

    10. Re:Not to rain on the parade, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You so pathetically stupid it's frankly mind numbing. You don't restart the f--king windowing system, you restart E. It takes about 2 seconds and doens't effect ANY of your running applications. X never skips a beat, E just looks at all it's configuration files again. Is that so damned hard? Has is this unusable? I like being able to copy files over and restart, not sit there and tinker with a stupid background loader application. Welcome to UNIX d00d.

  23. rtfm? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  24. Click a button by mr_tenor · · Score: 5, Informative

    Enlightenment has a button you click which restarts the wm. All the user sees is a little spinning clock for a second or two.

    1. Re:Click a button by One+Childish+N00b · · Score: 0

      Enlightenment has a button you click which restarts the wm. All the user sees is a little spinning clock for a second or two.

      It's still unnecessary. Why on earth should you have to restart the whole WM (no matter how easy it is to do so) just to change the background? There has to be an easier way. (and no, I don't care for 'the source is there, go fix it yourself' type attitudes).

      --
      Dealing with lawyers would be a lot less tedious if they all looked like Casey Novak.
    2. Re:Click a button by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well it's pretty easy actually. It's a very rough code base with more pressing problems than background switching.

    3. Re:Click a button by jacksonscottsly · · Score: 2, Informative

      actually, you don't even have to restart... clicking on "regenerate menus" will get you the same result without restarting the wm.

      --
      [ you and I are ugly ]
    4. Re:Click a button by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I know -- my idea of changing the backgrounds is running `qiv -z newpicture.jpg` and then putting it in my .xinitrc

      hmmm... maybe I should make a shell script to do both at once...

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    5. Re:Click a button by Dominatus · · Score: 1

      It's not for changing the background, it's for adding a new background to the list of backgrounds you can pick from in the menu.

    6. Re:Click a button by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why do you have to restart the WM to begin with? All you're doing is changing the image of the root window.

      How ridiculous.

  25. Re:OK by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    those are screenshots of e16.
    e17 is still in VERY early stages with basically no features yet. However, due to the libraries used (Enlightenment Foundation Libraries), one can already do things like animate the border theme, have complex, multi-layered backrounds that resize cleanly to ANY resolution, etc. Just wait a few more months for the WM code to get written...

  26. x.org, gnome, enlightenment by DMJC-L · · Score: 0

    seems that x.org and gnome will do for people a lot of what enlightenment is trying, although I do find their idea of being able to run on top of X/framebuffer/directfb/qtopia to be kind of cool... it'll be interesting to see which of the two.. x.org or enlightenment have the better performance.

    1. Re:x.org, gnome, enlightenment by jacksonscottsly · · Score: 2, Interesting

      ""it'll be interesting to see which of the two.. x.org or enlightenment have the better performance.""

      I'm pretty sure the answer to that question is "e". If i recall correctly, there was an irc discussion posted on xcomputerman's site that showed a few stats...EFL murdered xorg. I wish i could get back at the site to doublecheck the results, but it's been slashdotted.

      --
      [ you and I are ugly ]
    2. Re:x.org, gnome, enlightenment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Ahem.

      http://xcomputerman.com/pages/archives/2004/11/21/ why-the-e-team-still-isnt-excited-about-xorgs-new- features/



      This is why it's still gonna be a while before we start to see any real benefits from Xrender/Xdamage/Composite and other such new features in Xorg:

      (21:44:12) -!- raster [~raster@vagw.valinux.co.jp] has joined #edevelop
      (21:44:15) -!- mode/#edevelop [+o raster] by ChanServ
      (21:44:36) ok
      (21:44:38) lets give xorg a run for its money
      (21:45:06) werd
      (21:45:10) *** ROUND 1 ***
      (21:45:11) ----------------------------------------&#151 ;
      (21:45:11) Test: Test Xrender doing non-scaled Over blends
      (21:45:11) Time: 7.473 sec.
      (21:45:11) ----------------------------------------&#151 ;
      (21:45:15) Test: Test Xrender (offscreen) doing non-scaled Over blends
      (21:45:17) Time: 7.460 sec.
      (21:45:20) ----------------------------------------&#151 ;
      (21:45:22) Test: Test Imlib2 doing non-scaled Over blends
      (21:45:24) Time: 0.315 sec.
      (21:45:26) it still sucks! :)
      (21:45:33) that's ridiculous
      (21:45:37) But not as much!
      (21:45:48) thats the test in whihc xrender does BEST

      (21:50:13) *** ROUND 3 ***
      (21:50:13) ----------------------------------------&#151 ;
      (21:50:13) Test: Test Xrender doing 2* smooth scaled Over blends
      (21:50:13) Time: 105.336 sec.
      (21:50:13) ----------------------------------------&#151 ;
      (21:50:14) Test: Test Xrender (offscreen) doing 2* smooth scaled
      Over blends
      (21:50:16) Time: 105.866 sec.
      (21:50:20) ----------------------------------------&#151 ;
      (21:50:22) Test: Test Imlib2 doing 2* smooth scaled Over blends
      (21:50:24) Time: 2.560 sec.
      (21:50:26) :)
      (21:50:28) thats a bit more like it



    3. Re:x.org, gnome, enlightenment by mobley02 · · Score: 1

      Well it seems that raster has done some benchmarks. Raster has always done the right and wise choices, have you ever used EFM some years ago, it was the best file manager out there. Can't wait to see E17 released.

  27. Enlightenment's still the best eye candy WM around by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    For those of you who did not start using Linux back at the time when KDE and Gnome were still very primitive, E was the best WM in term of usability and look. Simple enough to use and beautiful enough to keep the users around.

    I have always chosen to use E for all these years as my primary WM, no matter what Gnome and KDE can bring to the tables.

    Linux is about the freedom of choices and you as the users have the freedom to use whatever WMs you please. I've been pleased with E and I can't wait to have E 17 officially released to enjoy so many new excellent features. Period.

  28. Re:OK by adamruck · · Score: 2, Informative

    Wow... mods are just as retarted as you are. Even the old version E16 had the features you are talking about, and it did them damn well also. I would say there are way more options to configure Enlightenment than any other desktop. With a little setup, you can make Enlightenment the best interface you have ever used.

    things I would like to see
    1) reorginize the configuration menus(a little on the confusing side)
    2) have e16 keyconfig and menuconfig come built in

    IMO enlightenment is sort of like debian, it goes a little slow, but damn when the thing finally comes out, it is impressive.

    --
    Selling software wont make you money, selling a service will.
  29. Re:OK by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    OK, I posted this without realising that the article said E17 didn't support these features yet. Sorry, I jumped the gun.

  30. actually, thats kind of wrong. by auzy · · Score: 4, Interesting

    E17 has been around for a very long time, but about a year ago they started a total rewrite, so technically, only 1 or 2 years.

    And you must understand, what rasterman, etc are trying to do is a hell of a lot more advanced then anything tried before. They for instance are developing their own composite system instead of using Xorg's, and they do a lot of work optimisation wise.

    They have also been developing it to be completely dynamic. In retrospect for instance, the windows start bar, the best you can do is theme it, but it will always be the same. Rasterman and the rest of the enlightenment team are making it so that the way things work on the bar are completely dynamic for instance. An example would be when you put your mouse away from the applications button, it moves to the right (bad example, but you get the point).

    So, I hate to say it, but I dont think you realise the real benefits. The default theme cannot show off the full power of enlightenment 17, and you can only see it after using it for a while. And btw, I'm sure they'll add virtual desktops, its still an early alpha. virtual desktops dont take many lines of code...

    As a programmer, I actually very eagerly await e17, because the foundation libraries and concepts seem pretty amazing, and believe me, all the other window libraries like GTK and QT are mostly static.. In fact, the library seems so cool that I might be changing the application I'm programming to EFL from gtk

    1. Re:actually, thats kind of wrong. by Lisandro · · Score: 2

      This is what first struck me about the e17 developement. Evas alone is impressive, and a kick in the ass to several other X graphic libraries.

    2. Re:actually, thats kind of wrong. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't agree. I hate retained drawing APIs like evas.

    3. Re:actually, thats kind of wrong. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think that no matter how cool applications that use the Englightenment Foundation Libraries look, it will be a long time before we start to see many that actually use them. If you ask me, having an application that looks beautiful sharing desktop space with an app that doesn't look so good is just bad style. Imagine the last time you saw an old app with Motif widgets sitting next to a more modern application. Add Java apps into the mix and it looks like a complete mish-mash. Blech!

      If free software is to compete with modern OS's like MacOS and Windows, it will need to have applications that don't aesthetically clash. E17 is no solution unless all programs are magically rewritten to use the EFL's.

      Would it be possible to design GTK and QT themes that use the Enlightenment Foundation Libraries to draw widgets? Sort of like what gtk-qt does?

    4. Re:actually, thats kind of wrong. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      I am a bit tired of this rant, on Windows you have:
      -WMP (looks like nothing else)
      -Delphi apps (own buttons)
      -Qt apps (look "almost" windows)
      -Office 2000+ (if you're not on XP, they look completely different).
      -Swing apps

      Still think that consistency is that important for success?

    5. Re:actually, thats kind of wrong. by auzy · · Score: 2, Interesting

      GTK-QT will never work 100%, because QT and GTK have different widgets, and some dont exist within the others libraries, and some widgets have different functionalities.. The only way they will ever work completely together is when GTK gets all the QT elements embedded within the language, and vice versa.

      Meanwhile, EFL has completely dynamic elements, so any QT or GTK theme would be missing a lot of critical elements, and wouldn't be dynamic at all. Thats the beauty of EFL, its completely dynamic. At the very least, I couldn't foresee any way of porting EFL themes to GTK or QT anyway, so either way, it would be a one way conversion.

      Either way, QT and GTK need a rewrite anyway to be more dynamic (if you want proof, try learning GTK and you'll see exactly what I mean. GTK is ok for standard applications aimed at businesses and GIMP, etc.. but when it gets around to designing something dynamic which can attract any crowd, and provide a visually nice desktop to impress people, GTK can be a pain.

      GTK has its uses, and EFL does too.. I severely doubt that EFL is best for everything yet (obviously for starters, GTK is more stable so better for businesses).

    6. Re:actually, thats kind of wrong. by droolfool · · Score: 1

      Not to mention Winamp, Lotus Notes, MSN Messenger, Norton Antivirus, Avast, AVG, PSI, Pandion, Dreamweaver...
      Users don't care that much of two apps look different. For example, I'm yet to see someone bitching about the Messenger interface being inconsistent with the rest of the OS. Users *really* want consistency in Drag and Drop, Copy/Paste, etc. Users want to drag a picture from the file browser directly to Evolution, or OpenOffice, or X app, and see things work.

    7. Re:actually, thats kind of wrong. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree that there are plenty of Windows applications that do not have identical styles, but those applications are the exception, not the rule.

      I was not arguing that the applications do not exist in Windows. I guess what I'm really trying to same is that when you have two applications sharing the same desktop space, if one of them looks like it was written in 1983, your desktop will look awful. I'd argue that the greater the disparity between the two applications, aesthetically, the worse the desktop looks. EFL alone does not solve this problem.

  31. Duke Nukem.... by fieldcomm · · Score: 3, Funny

    ... uses Enlightenment.

    E17 forever.

  32. Yes (nt) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    nt = no text

  33. Leave the house more often by vfs · · Score: 2, Funny

    ..as gorgeous as ever

    is...beautiful


    Damn, you guys gotta get out more.

    1. Re:Leave the house more often by 2mcm · · Score: 0

      Hey dont insult them !!!
      I remember the first time i saw that clean perfect C code .... *sigh*

  34. Your Server... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    She has melted.

  35. Re:OK by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny
    Wow... mods are just as retarted as you are.


    This is just priceless. Really...

    pot... kettle... black.
  36. E16 vs. E17 by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 4, Interesting

    If I were still a Linux desktop user, I'd be using E16 without a doubt. Enlightenment always seemed to just offer more than other X11 window managers; even if it was a bit finicky. After E16 development was turned over to new folks and picked up steam again (making it compliant with the freedesktop window hints and such), it was once again the most advanced window manager available.

    But I remember building and running E17 from CVS something like two years ago; and I'm pretty sure it was further along then than it is now. I know Raster decided to rewrite everything from the ground up, but c'mon. This is in no way news. Should they ever actually FINISH - then let us know.

    --
    #DeleteChrome
    1. Re:E16 vs. E17 by deek · · Score: 4, Insightful
      • If I were still a Linux desktop user, I'd be using E16 without a doubt.

      Absolutely! In fact, I'm using E16 right now, as I'm typing up this reply. It's simple, good looking, very customisable, and extremely suited to someone who has very good linux skills. It doesn't have the clutter of KDE/Gnome, nor their orientation towards giving users an almost windows-like menu feel. It's almost perfect for me.

      • But I remember building and running E17 from CVS something like two years ago; and I'm pretty sure it was further along then than it is now. I know Raster decided to rewrite everything from the ground up, but c'mon. This is in no way news.


      What you don't know is that Raster decided to rewrite the rewrite. And he possibly rewrote that too. This recent E17 release should really be called E20 or something around that. The CVS E17 hasn't actually had a window manager in it for ages, as they kept on working with the foundation libraries until they felt they finally got them right. Raster only started working on this new WM code in the last 3 or 4 months, and this is his first upload of that code to CSV, as far as I can tell.

      Personally, I feel that naming this E17 is confusing many people. They think it's the same E17 window manager from a few years back, which is completely incorrect. This update is definitely news, and it's news I've been waiting for.
    2. Re:E16 vs. E17 by teslafreak · · Score: 1

      It IS big news! You are talking about a window system that is basically brand new. Comparing it to what was there 2 years ago is like comparing 2 completely different window systems. The fact that it is finally running after being scratched and re-written a few times is significant.

    3. Re:E16 vs. E17 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Agreed! I use E16 at work and home. Its getting a little long in the tooth, yet still beats the pants off the extraordinarily mundane gnome and kde WMs. Its biggest plus though is also its also its biggest minus; its utterly configurable but theres a fairly steep curve in learning how.

      Rasterman deserves a hell of a lot of respect I think, he seems to always be pushing the curve rather than trying to reach the current (windows) status quo. Bring on my OpenGL backed WM, and allow me to drool at the thought of an E widget set if ever he decides to release one.

  37. Re:OK by gjheydon · · Score: 3, Informative

    Remember this is a complete rewrite. E16 can do all this, but IMO is getting too old, and slow. The Enlightenment team have been mainly working on all the building blocks at this stage, and not too much on the actual window manager.
    With componets like evas which now has a media player built into it is going to be the best window manager out there.
    If they have built it the way they were saying, it can be a fairly lean window manager if you build your theme correctly, without the builtin dvd player. ;-)

  38. it pays to be moderately dyslexic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...read it the first time as "IE7 Available From CVS".

  39. Screenshots and Videos by x.Draino.x · · Score: 5, Interesting
    1. Re:Screenshots and Videos by NewWaveNet · · Score: 1

      Luckily this is just a redirect to a free host that most likely has loads of bandwidth to spare :)

    2. Re:Screenshots and Videos by the_gimpel · · Score: 1

      exactly that's what it is. i hope the guys from that austrian free-hoster don't kick the page :) some newer shots will be upped later today! with different themes and working menu...

  40. No kidding? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    It's limited in its support for ICCCM, no NETWM support and it has no iconification, virtual desktops, shading, keybindings or button bindings, but it does WORK (just). it's also fast and beautiful."

    So it's got no support for anything, but it looks pretty and runs fast? Great! Who would've thought that dropping functionality would speed things up?

    I haven't used Enlightenment since the days of the Pentium II, but the one thing I remember most about it was that you could choose fast or pretty. I'll stay skeptical about that "and" for now.

    1. Re:No kidding? by teslafreak · · Score: 1

      Do me a favor, look up the phrase "work in progress". The support is coming, I doubt you could do that work any faster.

    2. Re:No kidding? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do me a favour and look up the release date of E16, then look up the phrase "giant leap backwards". I'm pretty positive I could've removed all those features in two and a half years.

  41. ps. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ksh = korn shell (openbsd's /bin/sh), not some kde thing... ;)

  42. DR 17 Movie by digitalfallout · · Score: 5, Informative

    Raster did a short demo movie of the DR 17 wm showing the current iconbar and runtime module handling, here is a mirror www.atmos.org/tmp/e17_movie-00.avi

    1. Re:DR 17 Movie by davidu · · Score: 0

      Wow.

      I just got that feeling I had the first time I saw E way back in the "Hand of God" days.

      Awesome...and in the words of 'leet children everywhere. "Rox0rs!!1111"

      Great work E Dev Team...and the aardvarks too!

      -davidu

      --

      # Hack the planet, it's important.
    2. Re:DR 17 Movie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A bandwidth-saturating movie posted to slashdot WITHOUT A LINK? Not bloody likely.

    3. Re:DR 17 Movie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Damn AVI format. It's a PITA and I don't have the codecs for this particular one on my system. I had to go searching around for something that can detect the fourCC in the video and tell me which codec I need. Only to discover it's that DivX crap. Is it still as buggy as it was a couple of years ago when I tried it and it introduced system instability?

    4. Re:DR 17 Movie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Weee, watch me do the same dull thing over and over again. I won't do anything useful though to show the system really in use.

      Great movie.

    5. Re:DR 17 Movie by Miffe · · Score: 1

      One word: ffdshow
      atleast if you'r running windows...

    6. Re:DR 17 Movie by flibberdi · · Score: 1

      Very cool indeed! I can't remember the year I first tested Enlightenment, but I think it was on RH 4.1 and it blew me away!! Awesome!! In scool, I used to show people some screenshots (on enlightenment homepage) of E when thay said "linux is so ugly". All they had seen was the icky fvwm (which is good, but not pretty) and openwindows. It sure shut them up!! Anyhow, keep those cool inventions coming!!

  43. No need for all this new junk - vtwm forever! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    I'm still running on vtwm. I just checked the source and it's the one from 1993. Happy 11th birthday!

    I tried KDE and Gnome recently. All junk. Sorry! Total waste of time and space. Better luck next time. :-)

  44. Seconded by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Enlightenment is hideous and amateurish looking. That's just my opinion. To each his own.

  45. Let's get some things straight here by flithm · · Score: 5, Informative

    There's a lot of stuff being said here about enlightenment, and people need to really understand was Raster is trying to do with E17.

    First of all I use E16.7.1 as my WM of choice. I've been using E since I first found it several years ago.

    A lot of people don't understand that, why would I use E when there's Gnome or KDE? Well, personally I can't understand why people use Gnome or KDE when there's E, but that's just personal preference.

    I'm one of those people who like minimal functionality, uber-flexibility, combined with easy of use, and demands aesthetics above all. E is for me, but I can see why it's not for everyone.

    People are scoffing at the poster who said E17 is beautiful and fast by suggesting that without functionality of course it's going to be fast.

    Some people are laughing at Enlightenment for being around for 5 years and still not having virtual desktops, pagers, etc.

    E16.7.1, the latest stable release, has everything you could ever want from a WM. It has THE greatest pager ever. It even updates the mini window images in real time! The virtual desktop support is second to none. You can even have different layers of virtual screen accessed by using the scroll wheel on the desktop.

    E also has the best Xinerama support I've ever seen in a WM, for those of you who are into dual monitors like me.

    Now let me address some of things people have been saying about E17. Apparently the poster forgot that this is slashdot and most of the posts will come from people who have never actually used Enlightenment, or who don't know anything about it.

    Like many others have said, E17 is a complete re-write, and it's not anywhere near finished. The post is simply an acknowledgment that the window manager code for E17 has finally been put back into the CVS repo. So if you're wondering why it has such limited functionality, it's because it hasn't even been available to be worked on by anyone other than Raster yet!

    Some people said that this is not news because it has always been in the repo. Not true. It was in the repo a while back before major rewrites to the foundation libraries, but it got taken out because the changes were too great. Raster had to start again on the WM code.

    And finally... why should we care about E17? It is going to be cool... seriously cool. Raster and his team are excellent coders. The reason why it's taking so long is because they're doing it right this time.

    The supporting libraries have an OpenGL rendering back-end. Think about that. A WM finally rendered in OpenGL. And think about the possibilities it will bring.

    E17 will be worth waiting for. It will be feature-packed. It will be beautiful. And it will be fast.

    1. Re:Let's get some things straight here by macshome · · Score: 5, Informative

      The supporting libraries have an OpenGL rendering back-end. Think about that. A WM finally rendered in OpenGL. And think about the possibilities it will bring.

      FWIW, the Quartz Extreme in Mac OS X 10.3 is just that, an OpenGL rendered WM.

    2. Re:Let's get some things straight here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The supporting libraries have an OpenGL rendering back-end. Think about that. A WM finally rendered in OpenGL. And think about the possibilities it will bring.

      Ummm... OS X?

    3. Re:Let's get some things straight here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Like many others have said, E17 is a complete re-write, and it's not anywhere near finished.

      And since it's rewritten every few years, it'll never get anywhere.

      And it will be fast.

      Yeah, whatever. I want to see fast on a 400mhz celeron, not a 3ghz p4.

      Enlightenment has always been excessive in every aspect, to the point of being a joke. It's for people who are more concerned with the look of their desktop than being productive.

    4. Re:Let's get some things straight here by Nailer · · Score: 2, Insightful

      . Think about that. A WM finally rendered in OpenGL. And think about the possibilities it will bring.

      A few, but much less than a windowing system - X - being rendered on top of OpenGL. Which is what freedesktop.org will do.

    5. Re:Let's get some things straight here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      From this movie, it seems slow due to the animations of the highlighted menu bar and menus. If it's really fast, why make it seem slow for eye candy? It would be faster without rendering those animations. (Remove any space in link)

      http://developers.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1 31 047&cid=10940340

      Why slow it down with OpenGL? It's not like Open Source 3D drivers are great anyway.

      I looked at the licenses for DR16, and it's awesomely BSD like.

    6. Re:Let's get some things straight here by raster · · Score: 5, Informative

      1. the xserver was severely slowed down thanks to xvidcap hammering x to capture pixels (e17 was runing inside xnest which was running inside x, and xnest basicaly nukes extensions so all the speedups you get on a real x are gone and the extra indirections really hurt). 2 it's encoding a video realtime while e17 running and xvidcap is hammering x to grab pixels, 3. no it wont be faster not animating as the window pops up instantly and reacts instantly - you just get to see the animation. i like it and its insanely smooth "on a real display" the video is just an indication. get it, install it, run it yourself to see what i mean. the video does not do it justice. sure - you can remove the animation - no code changes needed. it's part of the theme. themes can animate and transition as they like. also the "it uses opengl" comments are wrong. it *CAN* use opengl *IF* it inits using opengl to render. we have a perfectly fast software rendering engine that beats the pants off most things around. all the exmaples you see all use the software renderer. no opengl or hardware help. in fact our preferred renderer is software. its 1. more reliable (stability) than opengl, 2. higher quality than opengl or xrender, and 3. in most usage scenarios much faster and smoother than opengl or xrender - even IF opengl is hardware accelerated (due to lock contention, DRI etc).

      --
      --------------- Codito, ergo sum - "I code, therefore I am" --------------------
    7. Re:Let's get some things straight here by bogomipz · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      No, Quartz is not "just" an OpenGL rendered WM. It's much more important than a window manager will ever be. Quartz Extreme is what draws any component on the screen in OS X and is based on Display PDF. It's more comparable to a windowing system and a toolkit than to a WM.

    8. Re:Let's get some things straight here by Wolfbone · · Score: 1

      "It has THE greatest pager ever. It even updates the mini window images in real time!"

      Yes it has - which is probably why someone is attempting to steal the idea and patent it as though it were their own invention ;-)

      I just watched the video and it certainly is cool and beautiful. Maybe E17 could make itself some extra development funding by making appearances in some movies. I've always liked E16 but found it a bit too flaky for everyday use and it's development progressed painfully slowly over the years. Eventually I ended up using mostly Window Maker and Fluxbox. This constant rewriting everything from the ground up and the goal of extreme user configurability and flexibility makes me think they should've been (or at least wish they had been) developing E17 with Lisp.... [dream] # emerge cl-efl [/dream].... :)

    9. Re:Let's get some things straight here by macshome · · Score: 1

      I know that it is more than a WM. As a replacement for QuickDraw it suffered from performance issues until the Quartz Extreme dramatically improved speed by using OpenGL to hardware accelerate things. FWIW, even the software renderer in 10.3 is a good bit faster than the 10.2 Quartz implementation.

    10. Re:Let's get some things straight here by ddilling · · Score: 1

      The reason why it's taking so long is because they're doing it right this time.

      That is, until the next rewrite.

      --
      Mahnamahna!
    11. Re:Let's get some things straight here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thanks for your clarifications! I thought the video was encoded from a camera's capture.

      About OpenGL, I realized Enlightenment can use OpenGL as in optional in the post I replied to. I was just wondering why anyone would want to use it just for eye candy, if speed and bloat was their concern. Since you're not going the way of bloat, I am looking forward to Enlightenment and have been for a while.

  46. like the finder? by moosesocks · · Score: 2, Insightful

    From the FAQ
    It means that DR17 will combine features of a window manager and a file manager. It will provide nicely integrated GUI elements for managing your desktop elements, both files and windows. It does *not* mean that DR17 will be another application framework like Gnome and KDE.

    I'm not very familiar with E, so feel to correct me, but this sounds a heck of a lot like the function of the Finder in MacOS (both X and classic) and explorer.exe in Win9x.

    I'm not saying that this is a BAD thing, but it's hardly original. Needless to say, I think this will be a good thing overall for Linux if we're to actually get a good desktop. It's been established that the KDE/Gnome metaphor doesn't work at all and that the file manager and window manager need to be intergrated (as shown by the OS X Dock-like thing in the E17 screenshots)

    Now, of course, you do have the problem of an application framework. It REALLY should be intergrated into the WM / File Manager (FM). As said already, monolithic models like KDE and Gnome just don't work. They're bloated, ugly, and force developers to commit to one platform.

    E17 seems to be a step in the right direction but not quite enough. First off, this stuff is pretty basic and should probably be intergrated right into X11. Secondly, we need some sort of UI toolkit which could theoretically have more than one implementation (in the same way that there are several implementations of the X protocol).

    XUL could be the answer to all this. It's a cross-platform UI language. If someone wanted to make their own XUL implementation, they'd be free to do so and the K/Gnome folks could finally get along.

    So in short -- keep the current 'layering' model that we've got going on with the unix desktop metaphor, but make it so that different implementations of these layers don't break compatibility.

    --
    -- If you try to fail and succeed, which have you done? - Uli's moose
    1. Re:like the finder? by mattdm · · Score: 1

      XUL could be the answer to all this. It's a cross-platform UI language. If someone wanted to make their own XUL implementation, they'd be free to do so and the K/Gnome folks could finally get along.


      Hmmm -- a XULWM? (Or MozWM?)

    2. Re:like the finder? by MikeBabcock · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Rasterman's way of writing software differs quite a bit from others' in some cases. His direction and goals often encompass both cool and correct code.

      Imlib2 for example has both efficient caching for remote image display as well as all-round support for image formats of various kinds and a lot of cool tricks up its sleave.

      His decisions to create libraries of code that are used by other modules so that like can be kept with like and linked together as necessary is wise, even if it slows down release schedules.

      I've been using DR16 for "ever" now and love it.

      PS, DR17 has been in CVS for "ever" as well.

      --
      - Michael T. Babcock (Yes, I blog)
    3. Re:like the finder? by moosesocks · · Score: 4, Interesting

      In other words, he doesn't follow the traditional OSS development at all.

      If all open source stuff was developed this way, Windows/MacOS would have died a long time ago.

      I also admire the guy for not releasing a final release at all 'til all the major bugs are polished out. Calling it 0.17 is gutsy as well. Most people would call something like this a whole version number bump.

      Pity that more people aren't working on this project and in this fashion.

      Look at Mozilla. Remember the old Milestone builds? Talk about unnecessary bloat/misguidance. While firefox is a lean machine compared to its older cousin, it's still got MILLIONS of lines of gratuitious code in it for unnecessary 'features'. As much as XUL sounds like a good idea, imagine how much faster the browser would be if it either used native widgets or XUL was stripped clean of unnecessary features which are now permanent.

      --
      -- If you try to fail and succeed, which have you done? - Uli's moose
    4. Re:like the finder? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      It's been established that the KDE/Gnome metaphor doesn't work at all and that the file manager and window manager need to be intergrated (as shown by the OS X Dock-like thing in the E17 screenshots)

      No, that hasn't been established at all. And it's possible to make a dock-like thing that is not the window manager.

    5. Re:like the finder? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why Mozilla Doesn't Use Native Widgets

      XUL is a smart move IMHO.

    6. Re:like the finder? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      imagine how much faster the browser would be if it either used native widgets

      Now that would be heaven.

    7. Re:like the finder? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "I also admire the guy for not releasing a final release at all 'til all the major bugs are polished out. Calling it 0.17 is gutsy as well. Most people would call something like this a whole version number bump."

      This is a BSD project. Looking at the licenses in some of the code, they're BSD. Expect quality code from BSD.

    8. Re:like the finder? by gowen · · Score: 1
      It's been established that the KDE/Gnome metaphor doesn't work at all and that the file manager and window manager need to be intergrated
      That's been established, has it? By whom? When and how?

      Oh, wait ... you're just blowing smoke up our asses, aren't you, generalising your personal preferences by pretending that everyone else agrees with you...
      --
      Athletic Scholarships to universities make as much sense as academic scholarships to sports teams.
  47. Re:OK by Ignominious+Cow+Herd · · Score: 2, Funny

    What's priceless is imagining what 'retarted' _should_ mean. I pictured an elderly British whore who got a makeover. ;)

    A sniglet if I ever saw one.

    --
    Lump lingered last in line for brains, and the ones she got were sorta rotten and insane.
  48. Interview with Rasterman by davejenkins · · Score: 5, Informative

    For anyone wondering what Rasterman has been up to lately (aside from Enlightenment), I sat down with Rasterman last month and have posted my interview here. Rasterman has some interesting thoughtson the Asian market, embedded platforms, and how they will interact with network middleware.

    Oh, and he can drink like a fish-- Enjoy!

    1. Re:Interview with Rasterman by MikeBabcock · · Score: 1

      Great interview -- about 4 years ago I got asked if we could do Japanese on dual screens for an embedded project. I said sure. We used Enlightenment and Eterm with UTF8 support.

      Printing was a nightmare of PERL and fontsets and all kinds of wierdness.

      In fact, if you look here, you can see the slightly customized RedHat login screen I did for them back then.

      Disclaimer: They are no longer a customer, I can't recommend their project professionally but I think its really cool on a personal level and I helped develop a lot of the back-end code and interfacing that runs the thing which I won't say more about because it was on a contract ;-).

      PS, Dave, if you're reading this, any Slashdot reader would have figured out the Enlightenment, Gnome and Eterm connections on their own.

      --
      - Michael T. Babcock (Yes, I blog)
    2. Re:Interview with Rasterman by KainX · · Score: 1

      It troubles me that you used Eterm with UTF-8 support. I have been waiting for a patch to enable UTF-8 support in Eterm for some time now, but I have yet to receive one. If you have been holding onto one for 4 years now without sharing it with the rest of the community, I encourage you to renounce your wicked ways and contribute the patch, if for no other reason than to save my sanity.

      --
      Michael Jennings | HPC Systems Engineer, Lawrence Berkeley National Lab | Author, Eterm (eterm.org)
    3. Re:Interview with Rasterman by MikeBabcock · · Score: 1

      I believe you've forgotten the E-mail exchage we had at the time ... ... and more importantly, I no longer have the E-mail conversations nor the sources in question (yay for contract work). My many appologies -- I was certain I'd kept you apprised of the work I'd done. There was a very messy "so long sucker" ending to that contract over which I had no control.

      That said, as I recall, I wrote a wrapper around a UTF-8 -> UCS-16 conversion routine that then used the wide font (--mfont) support in Eterm.

      --
      - Michael T. Babcock (Yes, I blog)
    4. Re:Interview with Rasterman by KainX · · Score: 1

      You never sent it to me. I have every e-mail we exchanged. The first was October 14th, 2001, in which you asked if it would be possible to have UTF-8 support in a future Eterm version. The last of the 6 e-mails was March 3rd, 2003, asking me to post CVS instructions on eterm.org. Only the first two dealt with UTF-8, and neither contained a patch.

      --
      Michael Jennings | HPC Systems Engineer, Lawrence Berkeley National Lab | Author, Eterm (eterm.org)
  49. XFCE by ari_j · · Score: 1

    I run XFCE (on Arch on my PC and on Debian sarge on my laptop for the time being) and only have a few problems with it. Everything else is perfect, but...

    First and foremost, the file manager sucks. It's exceedingly slow, difficult to navigate, and easy to click into things like "SMB Network" by mistake. The top-level hierarchy is also heterogeneous - "Book" (wtf?), home directory, "SMB Network", "Applications", "Find", "Trash", and "Fstab". But mainly it's slow as hell.

    Next up, I'd love for the main launcher bar thingy leaves a little to be desired, as does the task bar. Also, the only really good configuration I've found is to have them at opposite ends of the screen, which is annoying. A system more like the MacOS X dock would be nice - application launchers that tell you when the application is already open and give you a small control menu for it.

    Fixing the previous issue gets rid of the entire taskbar except for the small system tray area. Making this into a launcher bar applet would solve that problem and get rid of the taskbar entirely.

    That's all I can think of right now. There are other issues that preclude me from declaring Linux "ready for the desktop" (even though I use it as such 80% or more of the time and for 95% or better of my serious work), such as Firefox launch time, Thunderbird new mail notification while iconified, and communication between those two; but those are all basically unrelated to Xfce4.

    1. Re:XFCE by jacksonscottsly · · Score: 2, Interesting

      since you've brought it up, and we're talking about e17 cvs, I might as well mention that the misc/ cvs of e contains a OSX-docker application that functions almost exactly like the OSX dock (though this form and function can change drastically if you change themes and settings.). anyway, it requires e17's EFL, and it's called engage. I've been using it for a few months now... it's effective and stable for me.

      --
      [ you and I are ugly ]
    2. Re:XFCE by ari_j · · Score: 1

      Are there any other X window managers that do that? Specifically, any that have had an actual release of the version that does that, or even that have had any release at all since Clinton was in office? As fun as it is to deal with source all the time, my lifestyle demands that I not invest time in manually tracking source code and dependencies.

    3. Re:XFCE by Taladar · · Score: 1

      If you don't want to manually track source code and dependencies but want version that are not yet available as rpm or deb you should try Gentoo. After a few days for the install you basically have to tell it what to install (even cvs sourcecode) and wait for it to finish compiling.

    4. Re:XFCE by ari_j · · Score: 1

      I've had serious issues with Gentoo. After spending a day installing it, it won't run. And even when it does run, it tends not to be stable. Moreover, there's no way at all that I can run the same distro on my laptop and PC if I do that, as, quite frankly, my 650MHz laptop with 128MB of RAM would likely run it fine, if the hard drive weren't only 12GB. Speaking of which, Gentoo is bloated in the first place. It frustrates me. :(

  50. These screenshots aren't e17. by jacksonscottsly · · Score: 2, Insightful

    These screenshots, if you could see them, do not represent e17 in its current form last I checked (a day or two ago). They reflect, at best, legacy e17. The new e17 does not in any way resemble those teaser e17 screenshots we were seeing 2+ years ago or so. There are quite a few enthusiasts out there hosting videos and pictures, but out of respect for them and their home servers, I'll not link to any of their sites. Those who are desperate enough to seek out the real thing will hopefully find images and sources without bogging down those who've donated their bandwidth.

    Anyway, the real treat in e17 isn't what is apparent in the wm cvs... as the team has emphasized time and again, the beauty right now is in the EFL (the enlightenment foundation LIBRARIES) and the beautiful potential they hold for applications, including the upcoming desktop environment. e17 is pretty (i have it "running" on my gentoo box), but completely impractical for use now...the current e17-based apps are also beautiful and impressively useful and stable for me (including elicit, entice, engage, entrance, evidence, and a host of other great apps!). It's exciting to see the beginnings of e17 in cvs, indeed, but I expect a lot of changes and a good deal of time before the next e17 even makes it to beta-level.

    --
    [ you and I are ugly ]
  51. haven't used anything but E for years now by kardar · · Score: 2, Interesting

    maybe it's the trackball I use... I don't know. It's great with trackballs (good ones).

    Mine (16.6 right now) is set up 3x3x3 - 9 virtual desktops, times 3 multiple desktops (each with a different background). It's a 3x3x3 cube.

    alt-shift combined with right,left,up,down arrows moves you around the virtual desktops (same background, the virtual desktops also wrap around)

    ctrl-alt combined with left and right arrows takes you from one multiple desktop to another (different backgrounds, no wrapping)

    you kind of have to remember where you are, and right click on the top bar helps you if you get lost.

    cd .enlightenment, vim user_apps.menu - add those favorite programs you use all the time to your menu

    you can have any menus you want, name them what you want - then link from one to another - the syntax is very easy to pick up - not unlike building a website or something.

    I made the first item in the main menu my personalized xterm, so anytime I click the double-click key on my fancy trackball anywhere on the background and an xterm pops up. Then I can dict, or calc, or anything I need. (First click opens up the main menu, second click clicks the first item)

    I don't know what more you could want - the only problems I tend to run into is if something is "built for" Gnome or KDE, for instance just the other day - the Straw RSS aggregator - you need to "set" a browser preference to follow the RSS links (like to this story, for instance) - but you need to set the browser preference in Gnome, not Straw. Duh. I found the "sage" RSS aggregator plugin for Firefox and I'm happy as a clam. Place your live RSS links into the "Sage Feeds" bookmark folder in Firefox. Not bad at all.

    Enlightenment has done everything, and more - that I have needed. I also like being able to have very nice pictures in the background - I love really nice nature photography, or other relaxing photography when working on a stressful project - it helps.

    I start up wmclockmon every time I turn on or reboot the PC, which is not that often - put it in the lower corner, make it sticky and borderless, turn on its "light" and there's my date and time.

    So far, anyway, I haven't needed anything badly enough that any other window manager or desktop environment offers to convince me to switch away from the things that I really like about E. Multiple desktops allow you to do several different things at once, keep things seperate, and spread those seperate things out if they too complicated using the virtual desktops within each multiple desktop. And talk about overkill, You can have up to 8x8 virtual desktops - 64 virtual desktops for each multiple desktop - so that's 64 TIMES 32 for each of the possible multiple desktops. That's 2,048 desktops. I use 3x3x3, or 27 and I haven't yet filled them up completely even when working on several complicated projects at the same time.

    I love E. That being said, I probably wouldn't use E17 for a while as anything regular - I am apprehensive, because I like E16 so much. Maybe I am alone, maybe it's the way I work, maybe it's the trackball/ergonomic keyboard/setup I have, but E is just -- I don't know - I haven't found anything better, and I have tried lots of things - blackbox, fluxbox, XFCE, Gnome, KDE, sawfish, FVWM, CDE -- nothing - nothing has even come close, in my opinion.

  52. This is in fact a Milestone by ROunofF · · Score: 1

    This news is much more a milestone in the development of the e17 WM... During the last year the EFL was the part developed, a wonderful set of library to do many things(did I mention many?), in the scope of building a WM based on them. The code "that just work" that raster talks about is only the base of the window manager based on the EFL, most features are still to implement but nonetheless this represent a step in the E development... Stay Tuned

  53. More complaints. by Penguinoflight · · Score: 1

    At least they announced an E release. They announced an afterstep 2.0 beta1 release last year, but nobody bothered when 2.0 final was released (Sept. 28) It's a shame too, Sasha has done some excellent work on afterimage... I'm sure I'd have used it by now if he just documented it (hint...)

    --
    "And we have seen and do testify that the Father sent the Son to be the Savior of the World"
    1 John 4:14
    1. Re:More complaints. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, the didn't annouce an E "release", they announced "hey, some alpha version is now available via CVS!". This is hardly front page news-worthy.

    2. Re:More complaints. by Flower · · Score: 1
      And I don't remember seeing them mention that WindowMaker has a new version out after ~2 years and only after a search did I find the article for 0.90.0 being released. A whopping 55 posts so it obviously didn't make the frontpage.

      Checked and it seems 0.91.0 is available in the FreeBSD ports. I intend on upgrading in a couple of weeks when I have the time.

      --
      I don't want knowledge. I want certainty. - Law, David Bowie
  54. Screenshots and Videos-Jenny 867-5309 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Here ya go guys.. I feel sorry for this guy's server"

    That's like saying "I feel sorry for this guy's girlfriend", then giving her number to every guy around.

  55. Blah blah blah by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    E other than the runing unix joke of being a more nerdvanic OS and theirfor this is the next step to jokes. It is stinky.

  56. RE: LEARNING & UNDERSTANDING WHEN YHBT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    LEARNING & UNDERSTANDING WHEN YHBT

    slashbots apparently don't get it: it's called a TROLL because you have been trolled [as in trolling the line on a fishing rod in order to attract more fish].

    IN OTHER WORDS:

    1. grandparent posted something that was very clearly intended to get the pro-linux slashbots upset
    2. jackasses like yourself respond with long, thought-out responses because you [and said jackasses] assumed the grandparent was serious
    3. see point #2 for the reason that your inability to pick up on subtle humor is very likely responsible for your lack of social graces. if you have trouble interpreting emotional cues, you may well be autistic. get that checked out, friend

  57. It's not April 1st! by punkkid · · Score: 1, Redundant

    I thought the news about E17 was out on April Fools day!

  58. Re: LEARNING & UNDERSTANDING WHEN YHBT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Subtle, perhaps. Humor? No. Sorry. GGparent just wasn't funny. I understand, though, that "subtle pointlessness" doesn't have the same ring to it.

    You might try learning how logic works in a debate context, too.

    Nice try, though. Thanks for playing. HAND. Good luck next life. Come back when you grow up.

  59. Re: LEARNING & UNDERSTANDING WHEN YHBT by bpd1069 · · Score: 1

    I always thought of it as...

    A Troll tries to get your goat...

    but maybe thats just me...

    --
    --
  60. Why is this on slashdot? by Jim+Hall · · Score: 1

    Maybe it's just that I've been called in to work late on a Sunday night, that I'm tired, or maybe this is a trend of posting non-news on Slashdot.

    Why is this "news" posted on slashdot? Sure, I know this is a big software re-write effort on a pretty major window/desktop system (which I used to use once upon a time, and it was very nice). But when new software is available, doesn't that belong on Freshmeat instead of a site that's about "news for nerds, stuff that matters"? Freshmeat is even part of the same group that runs Slashdot!

    E17 is cool, and it's great that it's now available from CVS, but it's not "stuff that matters".

    1. Re:Why is this on slashdot? by tedrlord · · Score: 1

      Well I, for one, have been interested in how (read: whether) E17 is developing, so I was glad to see some news on slashdot. It's a pretty big project.

      Also, slashdot posts a lot of things that aren't necessarily important. Really, "news for nerds" is almost the opposite of "stuff that matters," when you think about it. Even so, most of what's on here is a lot more revelant than the kind of stuff they come up with to fill the air on CNN and Fox News and such, so you can't complain too much.

      --
      [insert witty quote here]
    2. Re:Why is this on slashdot? by KilobyteKnight · · Score: 1
      Really, "news for nerds" is almost the opposite of "stuff that matters,"

      I always read "News for Nerds. Stuff that matters." as meaning "New stuff that matters to nerds." So I completely understand news about new desktop releases.

      If they start posting news about the latest fashion trends and dating secrets I'll be surprised.

      Come to think of it, nerds could use some dating advice....
      --
      When will Windows be ready for the desktop?
  61. Re:Completely unimpressive by rco3 · · Score: 2, Funny

    I take it that you aren't an Enlightenment fan, then?

    --

    Ce n'est pas un vrai mouvement de robot!
  62. Re:Completely unimpressive by jacksonscottsly · · Score: 1

    way over ornamented? -- try a new theme. Wasteful of desktop real estate -- that's about the last charge I'd consider e guilty of. I'm a desktop real-estate nutcase, which is why i cannot stand using gnome, kde, or windows. distracting -- again, try a new theme. Take a look at the e16 default theme "winter" and tell me that it's distracting...hardly. My current e16 theme is nothing more than small text on thin black backrgounds with white text... it looks almost like a fluxbox interface (if it weren't for my pagers and engage). non-user-centric -- I don't know what you mean by this, but it's exactly what I want in a window manager...which to me seems mighty user-centric.

    --
    [ you and I are ugly ]
  63. Looks awesome! by breon.halling · · Score: 1

    I can't wait for the Win32 port! ;)

    --
    "Yeah, well, Dracula called and he's coming over tonight for you and I said okay."
  64. E17??? by Mind+Socket · · Score: 4, Funny

    Isn't that some crappy boy band from a few years back?

    1. Re:E17??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      House of Love is a great song! It wasn't a crappy band.

    2. Re:E17??? by tech49er · · Score: 1

      Was this timed to coincide with Brian Harvey's quitting of "I'm a Celebrity get me out of here"?

      --
      "... always going forward 'cause we cant find reverse! "
    3. Re:E17??? by eetiiyupy · · Score: 1

      It's a place in London called Walthamstow. It's OK for pie and a pint, but I wouldn't expect to find enlightenment there.

  65. Enlightenment and Evidence by kris · · Score: 4, Informative

    Enlightenment also has a file manager application called Evidence. Strong on metadata support, and with cool themes, evidence is specifically written to handle large or deeply nested directories. Have a look at the Pretty pictures.

  66. why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Have any of you asked why this has been done?

  67. Go Rasterman, Go E17! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    E17 is the most beautiful desktop I've ever used. It just works and it's so stunningly beautiful! It's gfx engine is the fastest on this planet and everything works smoothly!

    E17 is for us artists! Thank You Rasterman!

    1. Re:Go Rasterman, Go E17! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I haven't used it. Is it fast on a p2 400MHz and lower with 64MB RAM? If it's only fast on your latest CPU, then I don't think it's that fast.

    2. Re:Go Rasterman, Go E17! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is a lot faster than E16! Graphics libraries are super-optimized. If you have a decent (for example NVidia) video adapter on your computer then I suggest you give it a try! Be sure to use NVidia's drivers also - not the general Linux Nvidia driver.

      If you got a crappy video adapter on your computer, then do not bother to give it a try on that slow computer.

  68. What I don't understand... by slavemowgli · · Score: 1

    Why is it that most people seem to be either totally devoted followers of Enlightement who will jump at you if you ever dare question that Enlightenment is the one and only window manager and the answer to all questions ever asked, or the exact opposite - people who hate Enlightenment with a passion and would like to see it and its developers rot in hell forever?

    I mean... it's a window manager, just like many others, and it's not radically different, either (or at least not more radically different than others, like blackbox etc). What is it about Enlightenment that people get so worked up about?

    --
    quidquid latine dictum sit altum videtur.
  69. I don't believe it by ndogg · · Score: 2, Funny

    This can't be happening yet, unless Duke Nuke'm Forever is going to be out soon!

    --
    // file: mice.h
    #include "frickin_lasers.h"
  70. My eyes! Oww! Make it stop! by Pseudonym · · Score: 4, Funny

    I realise that E17 is still a WIP, but...

    Did anyone else see those screenshots and think "OMG! It's Kai Krause! Run for the hills!"?

    As one artist once commented to me, you can envisage Spock with some alien's computer saying: "I'm sorry, Captain. I cannot work out how to use this. The interface appears to have been designed by Kai Krause."

    --
    sub f{($f)=@_;print"$f(q{$f});";}f(q{sub f{($f)=@_;print"$f(q{$f});";}f});
  71. E17 has the fastest GFX engine? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I did some benchmarks and was surprised to see that E17's GFX engine beats Apple's OS-X hands down. With NVidia drivers it's about 60% faster than OS-X. I believe Rasterman has coded the fastest graphics libraries ever!

    1. Re:E17 has the fastest GFX engine? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, it has the fastest gfx engine on this planet. That's part of the reason they rewrote the code. Rasterman came up with some new ideas and was able to improve already _heavily_ optimized gfx libraries.

    2. Re:E17 has the fastest GFX engine? by teslafreak · · Score: 1

      Doesn't suprise me, OS-X is a minced piece of crap. Whereas Enlightenment is built from the ground up to be pretty, useful, and fast.

  72. Re:No need for all this new junk - vtwm forever! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What improvements does vtwm have over twm? Is it worth the upgrade?

  73. Re:Completely unimpressive by teslafreak · · Score: 1

    "Shiny things distract simple minds", guess what this makes you. I have never found it distracting.

  74. Re:OK by 2mcm · · Score: 0

    I guess that it is a very good thing when the Open Source community is more interested in making sure that the software that they are developing is fast , clean , and secure than being overly laden with features. But still we do need to push forward and keeping this careful balance between stability and features is a hard thing indeed.

  75. Very Innovative by Halcyon-X · · Score: 1
    If you take a look at this screenshot, you will see that (in the darkened window) the full directory path is represented as TABS that you can navigate and presumably drag groups of files onto to perform actions.

    Really awesome. Perhaps this could be added to Firefox, especially for browsing local folders. If it's targetting IE as competition, perhaps it should also include such capabilities. It pioneered tabs as a way to revolutionize browsing, and it would be useful (to me at least) if it included this functionality.

    If not, Nautilus and Konqueror could also benefit from this ability. It would help cut down on time. Drag a file onto a tab, you can paste/move/extract to that folder. Click back on a tab, move a directory higher up into the tree, maybe you're organizing your MP3 collection and you need to recategorize a few songs or whatever.

    --

    .sig: Open Source, Open Mind

    1. Re:Very Innovative by Taladar · · Score: 2, Informative

      Mixing local and remote file management is NOT a good idea. It opens holes where remote files can trick the user into believing they are local files and to be trusted.

    2. Re:Very Innovative by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      FWIW

      This is an idea from MacOS X and not very innovative.

      It does work very well though.

  76. Re:yes it does by teslafreak · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    No, it doesn't.

    Windows will NEVER be as fast as a properly configured Linux machine, nor will it ever be as stable.

    As for it not being ready for general distribution in 15 years, HA! It will never be ready for the general public, they're morons. I don't think I need to prove this one considering the content of your post.

  77. Alpha channels and E17 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you're talking about alpha channels as an alternative to E17, you obviously have no idea what's went into this new version.

  78. Re:Enlightenment's still the best eye candy WM aro by Jasa · · Score: 1

    I know this might seem like Flamebait, but...

    Hey I started using Linux before there was a KDE or GNOME, and I've never really liked E. It has always been max on eye candy and min on usefulness.

    I use KDE now, mostly because I think its set of apps are more integrated than GNOME. IMHO one the things that makes GNOME not so good is the fact that you can have the same settings in different places which makes a bit confusing. For example "Do you set the background picture in GNOME itself or in your chosen window manager?" because it can be set in both places. KDE just keeps it simple. I've used Window Maker a bit when I had a low spec machine (like a P1 or P2) and I wanted speed, but with my new machine (P4 with hyper theading) KDE flies along. KOffice is just a better integrated app than the apps which make up GNOME office. I use Open Office as well but that still hasn't shed its own (IMHO crappy) look and feel no mater what they say!

    If I was making a hacker movie I might have them using E just because it looks different/cool, but I don't think it is a serious contender yet! I am prepared to keep an open mind!

    --
    -Jasa -- Linux - The SOURCE will be with you, ALWAYS
  79. openbox+ by maharg · · Score: 1

    openbox, with pypanel and gkrellm works well for me. It's fast, pretty, configurable and robust. I prefer to start from a minimal WM and add just what I need to the menus rather than start with a load of stuff I don't. YMMV.

    --

    $ strings FTP.EXE | grep Copyright
    @(#) Copyright (c) 1983 The Regents of the University of California.
  80. E was cool like 5 years ago.... by Chanc_Gorkon · · Score: 1

    I remember when I longed for running E but alas I was still and am still tied to Windows at work. I have since grown up and bought a Mac. The Mac uses transparency correctly, IMHO. I have never ever seen the point of using a transparent terminal except for possibly using it for running tail on soem logs and such. Othere then that, it's an annoyance. It makes the text hard to read and I really don't like it.

    --

    Gorkman

    1. Re:E was cool like 5 years ago.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You don't seem to understand the art value in Enlightenment. Transparent terminals are actually quite easy to read if you got the correct color scheme. Anyway - when your desktop pleases your eye (transparent windows etc.), your creativity and productivity rises greatly! This has been studied a lot and it is regarded as a fact. So it's not just about eyecandy - it's about making you more productive!

    2. Re:E was cool like 5 years ago.... by KainX · · Score: 1

      Silly boy. MacOS X has transparent terminals too.

      "Correct" or "incorrect" use of technology is in the eye of the beholder.

      Besides, nobody's forcing you to make anything transparent. Technology is like a rope. You can use it to hang yourself, but you don't have to. You can also use it to tie pretty knots and impress all your Boy Scout friends, but you don't have to.

      --
      Michael Jennings | HPC Systems Engineer, Lawrence Berkeley National Lab | Author, Eterm (eterm.org)
  81. Simple. It dares to be different by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 4, Interesting
    Enlightenment is not like KDE or Gnome. It is a different way of looking at a desktop and with E17 Rasterman is trying some things that might finally get Hollywood to use a real desktop in the movies. It just really looks that good. Entrance is finally worthy of being "hacked" by a pretty girl by pressing the "hack" key.

    Linux is not the linux of old. You got a lot of people who grew up with windows only for whom the whole idea of configuration files is alien. Now that isn't much of a problem. Some distros have come a long way into making a linux install extremely easy. But any new desktop user soon wants to chance the look and goes searching on the internet for pretty desktops. E has some very very pretty ones. Then they try it and hit the learning curve. It ain't a wall. It is a ceiling. Breaking through it is hard if you come from a windows gui for everything background. The reward is full control but the price is RTFM.

    Add to it that most E users don't want or need things like a start button. Its far more extreme use of virtual desktops. Themes wich look cool in screenshot but perhaps grey on black text in real life is hard to read.

    This then soon scares people off who are scared and humiliated that they could not use it. This is the "sucks" era. If you can't use something it must suck, it is never your fault.

    So now you got two camps. Those that managed to break through the learning curve and those who didn't (of course you also got a camp who could care less either way but they are boring) and the perfect setup for a holy war.

    On the one hand you got those who miss their GUI theme configurations and start button on the bottom left corner. On the other hand you got people who enjoy a window manager that just draws the bloody windows as they want it without turning into the bloat that is KDE or the "you can't do this because it would be confusing" that is Gnome.

    Welcome to Linux where people got choice. The price for freedom might be eternal vigilance but the price for choice is eternal holy wars. Choice is all very well but unless you choose what I choose you are the sucks.

    The difference about E17 is not just the desktop layout, it is how things are drawn. ALL windows managers use the similar model at the moment wether it is MS windows or Apple or any of the linux ones. If Rasterman realizes his vision then E17 could be one of the most important steps forward in desktops (as he has already used it on his Zaurus. Yeah that is right. E17 on a pda. Try that MS.) Remember that most enlightenment haters are probably using it already. The libraries developed for E have found widespread use. Just check for something like imlib2 on your average linux desktop.

    --

    MMO Quests are like orgasms:

    You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

    1. Re:Simple. It dares to be different by slavemowgli · · Score: 1

      *s* That sounds like you're a member of the first camp (those who broke through the learning curve and are not devoted followers of E). ^_~ Seriously, though, what is the big shift in paradigm that E17 is supposed to bring?

      --
      quidquid latine dictum sit altum videtur.
  82. your junk is someone else's feature ... by GreenEggsAndHam · · Score: 1

    ... but I guess it makes you feel l33t to laugh at it.

    1. Re:your junk is someone else's feature ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I guess it makes you feel l33t to laugh at it.

      Laughing is the only option. To think of all the effort being spent trying to make X11 into a knockoff Windoze clone that could be spent instead on something new and better, well, I just have to laugh. Otherwise I'd cry.

      I'll check again in another 11 years and see if anything available can top vtwm by then.

  83. One week after I give up on Enlightenment 16... by NoMercy · · Score: 1

    Finally something visable as E17!... only took my entire college and university education to do it :)

  84. Re:Enlightenment's still the best eye candy WM aro by fozzmeister · · Score: 1

    GNOME comes with Metacity that has no "set background" option, its only in the menu. Aside from that the same thing configurable from different locations and different ways isn't a bad thing providing its sane, take copying a file (drag + drop or copy + paste).

    Most KDE people complain that GNOME has no options for everything, your just that little bit different :-)

  85. E uses one config system. It is called vi Use it. by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 1
    What you probably mean is you want a gui. Say so. All my apps are configured through vi. Wich is why gnome is a no-no.

    What you demand is your business, E is for people who demand different things. Oh and you are probably already using E. Just check for any of its libraries on your linux machine. That is the real value of E. It has given the rest of linux an awfull lot of tools to work with.

    --

    MMO Quests are like orgasms:

    You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

  86. No, that is the attitude of some themers by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 2, Insightful
    You can find hideous themes on any desktop. Weird borders, black on black apps with black buttons that light up black when you press them.

    E gives you the flexibilty, you can abuse it and create some pretty ugly/unworkable themes or you can make a very refined one. They do exist.

    --

    MMO Quests are like orgasms:

    You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

  87. Is it really called Enlightenment? by viktor · · Score: 1

    According to the screenshots on the site, e.g. , it's called "Enliahtenment".

    At least it says so all over the "settinas" windows, above the "Aoolv"-buttons.

  88. Fastest thing we've ever seen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    E17 has the fastest graphics routines you've ever seen anywhere. Frankly - I'm amazed!

  89. Re:No need for all this new junk - vtwm forever! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Virtual desktops. M4-macros in config files.

  90. Re:OK by Taladar · · Score: 1
    but IMO is getting too old, and slow.
    Strange. Most old software I know runs faster on new hardware, not slower.
  91. EEEEEEwwwwwwwww by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You guys are laughable. You're always crying about how Mac OS X is all eye candy and whatnot. Then, out comes E17, and you end up slobbering all over yourselves. I'll stick with OS X. It's the best "window manager" going. Its elegant and fluid. In my experience, E's performance can best be describe as "clunky". And, that's on a good day.

  92. Whatever... by Hitchcock_Blonde · · Score: 0

    "Rasterman is trying some things that might finally get Hollywood to use a real desktop in the movies."

    What do you mean? Like trying to get FinalCut Pro to run on it!

    --
    Karma Schmarma
  93. Or you could mirror the actual news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Or you could mirror the actual news posting on the site, instead of the front page which hasn't been updated yet.

    Sun Nov 28 - benr - DR17 now in CVS!!!

    Enlightenment DR17 has been added into the primary CVS tree. No, hell hasn't frozen over and last we looked pigs weren't flying although this might signal Duke Nukem Forever sometime before Christmas. Feel free to grab it and muttle around. It's limited in its support for ICCCM, no NETWM support and it has no iconification, virtual desktops, shading, keybindings or button bindings, but it does work. Patches are welcome, contributions are welcome, but bug reports should be ignored... this is CVS code afterall.

    If you haven't followed Enlightenment in a while, you'll need to catch up on the EFL first. The EFL is the foundation (get it?) of the DR17 window manager. Information on CVS and the build order can be found here.

    Learn more about Enlightenment DR17 on its project page.

  94. GTK# ??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I, for one, am never going to install mono/.NET on my system. I don't even have JVM.

    C/C++ source, perl/python/PHP/ruby and bash scripts are the only things that will ever run here.

    If you want bytecode you might as well do it in perl/python from the beginning. So, nope. GTK# ain't going to save the day because there will be big groups of users who will be unable to run it, and therefore it will be a not-portable toolkit.

  95. Running CVS now... by NoMercy · · Score: 1

    Well what can I say, it's a work in progress for sure, though it looks like a solid foundation, even a bunch of idiots could build a decent desktop ontop of something this good :)

  96. Re:OK by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    IMO enlightenment is sort of like debian, it goes a little slow, but damn when the thing finally comes out, it is impressive.

    Hey, that reminds me about what Longhorn ought to become ;)

  97. So what does "Essence" do? "Elicit", anyone? by A+Merry+Finn · · Score: 0

    Not to be mean or anything, but firstly these names don't tell the purpose of the application. Secondly they sound like marketing Bull$hit from Intel/Microsoft/Name-Your-Evil-Company, not an open source project.

  98. CVS! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    woah... i read that and immediately thought... "I can run down to my local drugstore and pick up a copy? woah!"

    shows how stupid i am... needless to say, i'm NOT a developer!

  99. CALLING ALL SKINNERS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Let your artist/themer/skinner friends know about E. Make them drop whatever they're skinnin and fire up their grafix tools for this. We will need themes themes and more themes. And people will point and ask, there's an x86 under all that? Running what again?

  100. e17 by dash2 · · Score: 1

    With this revolutionary desktop, all Linux users will be able to get deep, deep down (so rest upon my chest).

  101. Confusion about OpenGL rendering by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    People seem to be confused about the "OpenGL rendering" going on in things like OS X. It's not actually rendering polygons, it's just using the video card as a really fast 2D blitter. This is different from, say, what Longhorn is planned to be, where it's actually pushing polys onto the screen to draw 3D window surfaces.

  102. Gentoo = bloated???? by jacksonscottsly · · Score: 1

    gentoo is only bloated if you make it bloated. if you set your USE flags conservatively, you'll install nothing but the absolute minimum required to run a system...hell, it wont even install cron unless you do it yourself.

    --
    [ you and I are ugly ]
    1. Re:Gentoo = bloated???? by ari_j · · Score: 1

      The problem with USE flags lies in the sheer amount of effort and "Oh, shit, I have to start over from scratch!" they are to get right. The cause of this is that, through trial and error, I often found that I should have set such-and-such flag before I did the first emerge six days of compiling ago, and now I could just as well start completely from scratch. I have never found a truly well-documented list of USE flags and how they interact with each other and with certain applications.

      The sheer amount of trivia that needs to be remembered in order to actually install and maintain a perfectly-crafted Gentoo system doesn't seem to be worth it.

      I liked Gentoo, don't get me wrong. I just found it lacking in a few areas. Right now my PC runs Arch, which tracks versions pretty well, has a good wealth of desktop-productivity software (it was quick on the ball with Gaim 1.0, Firefox 1.0, etc.), and isn't nearly as bloated as Gentoo tends to be. I'd be amenable to installing Gentoo again, but would want a definite battle plan going in.

      On a side note, I still haven't found anything remotely as good as aptitude for managing installed packages. I like package menus that clearly show me what's available, what I already have, and what will happen if I add, remove, or upgrade a particular package. Is there anything similar for Gentoo? That was another killjoy for me.

      PS: Thanks for keeping up with this thread so far. I really do appreciate your recommendation of e17 and indication that Gentoo's got it. :)

  103. Re:Enlightenment's still the best eye candy WM aro by cloudmaster · · Score: 1

    I've been using Linux since before KDE and before Gnome. I've also been wondering when E is gonna get some documentation or some level of usability down since before KDE and Gnome. It's been in unstable states of development for as long as I can remember. Personally, I always felt that Windowmaker was the best in terms of usability and appearence. Then again, I don't like to waste half of my display on crazy robot-arm window frames, and I think I've got some irritation towards E that's come from the utterly undocumented esd. I also don't care if menus use shaped windows or rectangles... Perhaps if I hung out on IRC more often, I'd like E. But I don't, and I don't.

    That said, it's great that Raster hasn't given up on the stupid dead project after all these years of still not quite getting things right. Maybe one day he'll surprise me and finish it. I doubt it, though. Others are free to use it, of course, but there's no place for E in my computer use - professionaly or personally. I'll stick to fake-transparent aterm/wterm and rectangular menus in a lightweight package, thanks.

  104. Agreed, but by Halcyon-X · · Score: 1

    Agreed, but the Firefox codebase is very extensible. It already covers actions on local files, allows you to program applications in XUL markup (such as the Calendar that you can download from Mozilla themselves), this could simply be one of those applications.

    --

    .sig: Open Source, Open Mind

  105. Ah by Halcyon-X · · Score: 1

    But many more people could benefit from this idea if it were part of Firefox, or some other cross-platform application. It doesn't have to be Firefox, that just sprung to mind because it also brought tabs to the masses, even if Opera already supported this.

    --

    .sig: Open Source, Open Mind

  106. E17? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I would never use a WM/DE with the name of an insipid (and thankfully defunct) boy band on principle...

    1. Re:E17? by schlumpf_louise · · Score: 1

      But E17 were so so cool! yeah really, couldn't they have skipped this number?

  107. Xfce by xtronics · · Score: 1

    I've been running KDE and like it -- but have considered running Xfce if it might preform better. Have you run both desktops and might you be able to fill in more blanks?

  108. Re:yes it does by handslikesnakes · · Score: 1

    How is grep more ridiculous than XP's animated dog?

  109. Re:Enlightenment's still the best eye candy WM aro by raster · · Score: 1

    whatevere.

    the day you contribute to opensource - let me know. put up or shut up.

    --
    --------------- Codito, ergo sum - "I code, therefore I am" --------------------
  110. Re:E uses one config system. It is called vi Use i by ajs · · Score: 1

    What you probably mean is you want a gui

    Not at all. vi is not, in any way, a config system. It lacks any kind of consistent data representation across applications. How, for example, do you interpret a config file with high-bits? Is it ISO-Latin-1? Is it UTF-8? Is it Big5? vi is just an editor, and has no way of being sure of the answer to that. Only cross-application standards (which is about 30% of what a desktop environment is for) can solve this problem.

    Now E might be a fine window manager for your average desktop environment (assuming we front-end its configuration with something more standard in that DE), but it's just a window manager with delusions of grandeur.

  111. Re:Enlightenment's still the best eye candy WM aro by cloudmaster · · Score: 1

    I see you didn't check out my web page (it's linked from the page that's atop each one of my posts). I've written several small pieces of software, and it's all available to the public. Lots of it's out of date by now, replaced by more modern and functional stuff (esp. the LDAP integration stuff), but it's all open source. I've only got the one project up on freshmeat, and again, it's pretty simple and somewhat outdated - but I know that several people use it none the less. The stuff I develop for my employer is intended to be open sourced, but I haven't gotten around to getting it online. Similarly, lots of my most current stuff's not up yet, just because I'm bad about keeping my website up to date.

    Anyway, I've been contributing to open source darn near as long as you have, though my stuff's considerably less popular than E. Perhaps I was a bit harsh calling E a "stupid, dead project", but then again, most of my crap's stupid, dead, and perpetually unfinished too. :) Kudos for sticking with it.