Label not found "JAIL". Undefined symbol: collect(). Undefined symbol: rich. 'rich' used without assignment. Undefined symbol: recieveBeating(). Undefined symbol: jailRape().
Business is about exchanging ( perhaps trading was a misleading term for you ) something I have that you value for something you have that I value. Those somethings can be labor, money, goods or services. And in so exchanging, no-where did I exclude that profiting might be part of the transaction.
So, my point is what is wrong with profiting, but leaving both parties happy?
I always thought "business" was about me wanting something that you had, and you wanting something I had, and we two coming mutually together on trading these things so that we both had things we valued more than what we had previously.
You know, a win-win situation. No exploitation involved.
You have an excellent point. But to the extent that any administration, of whatever genealogy, could have taken steps in the right direction and didn't, I think it right to hold them accountable for it.
"We elected these people before terrorism was a wedge issue; not after."
Darn time! Then let me restate a bit. Some of the decisions our elected officials have been bad, and the politics behind it are about wedge issues rather than "the good of the nation".
"The terrorists have won, in part." "Still untrue. We may be losing, but it isn't because some abstract concept is winning. It just isn't that simple."
OK, you have me on that. They have not won the war. But the battle front is moving the wrong direction in my opinion.
"I can't argue that. We are all kept in such darkness, I'd be surprised if even one of us really knows what's going on. However, it's a safe bet that it isn't what we are being told."
B: How large is the percent of total income in each of those brackets? I.E. If the top 1% of all income earners pay 29%, but make only 20%, then you have something that can be discussed as unfair. But if that same 1% makes 35% of all income, then it gets harder to argue that.
I suspect that these numbers don't have that backing, as the emotional impact of them goes away with it.
Also, I note that large house ownership and luxury car ownership go up with income bracket, so, I have a hard time ( in spite of being in a higher tax bracket myself ) crying for that 1%.
I hope they have thought to provide the crew the ability to lock the generator out of operation, and to force a recharge when they want, else the advantage of silence will sometimes be negated when the generator suddenly runs up to recharge.
Another thought on the hybrid idea, The Saratoga and Lexington ( CV-2 and CV-3 ) where turbo electric. A couple battleships from about that period experimented with turbo-electric drives ( New Mexico, I am pretty sure was in this group ). These were designs built in the 20's and 30's, IIRC, so the idea is not at all new.
Nope, look in the "development" section of the King Tiger
"The Porsche version had a series-hybrid power system where the gasoline engines powered electrical generators which in turned powered electric motors which turned the sprockets. This method of propulsion had been attempted before on the Ferdinand prototypes and in some U.S. designs, but had never been put into production"
I looked in the Tiger I document and did not see it. I was skimming, so...
Looks like the Porsche submissions in both cases were hybrids.
Slashdot Mirror
Everyone has brown zune, unless they are having intestinal difficulties.
Huh? It is OK to prefer audio over network file data copying
because some hardware is not up to some invisible spec?
I dunno, but from where I sit, it looks like failed management
of engineering.
So, you want "The Thin Man".
So, he is a "no choice for you, peon", "what the heck,
I got money, why cant I have everything I want now"
kind of guy?
It could be that this is the only service he could get in his area.
No, it is the script from "The Incredible Shrinking Man".
I think you've confused the socialized health care system with private insurance.
Label not found "JAIL".
Undefined symbol: collect().
Undefined symbol: rich.
'rich' used without assignment.
Undefined symbol: recieveBeating().
Undefined symbol: jailRape().
Are we in charge, or is economics?
I think we are letting the tail wag the dog here. Profitable
cant be the only motivation for us to do everything.
Business is about exchanging ( perhaps trading was a misleading term for you )
something I have that you value for something you have that I value. Those
somethings can be labor, money, goods or services. And in so exchanging,
no-where did I exclude that profiting might be part of the transaction.
So, my point is what is wrong with profiting, but leaving both parties happy?
Funny...
I always thought "business" was about me wanting something
that you had, and you wanting something I had, and we two
coming mutually together on trading these things so that
we both had things we valued more than what we had previously.
You know, a win-win situation. No exploitation involved.
I know, how quaint.
Read both.
No. How many tickets were not opened in the first place because things
just work.
Yeah, I know.
"...GIVE that person $3000 that they can use to purchase music legally..."
Nah. They would probably do something stupid like buy food or books.
( Both words with "oo" in the middle. I think that means something ).
You have an excellent point. But to the extent that any administration,
of whatever genealogy, could have taken steps in the right direction and
didn't, I think it right to hold them accountable for it.
Yeah, I saw that in looking for the Tiger/TigerII example.
Very cool.
"We elected these people before terrorism was a wedge issue; not after."
Darn time! Then let me restate a bit. Some of the decisions
our elected officials have been bad, and the politics behind it
are about wedge issues rather than "the good of the nation".
"The terrorists have won, in part."
"Still untrue. We may be losing, but it isn't because some abstract concept is winning. It just isn't that simple."
OK, you have me on that. They have not won the war.
But the battle front is moving the wrong direction in my opinion.
"I can't argue that. We are all kept in such darkness, I'd be surprised if even one of us really knows what's going on. However, it's a safe bet that it isn't what we are being told."
I agree completely.
A: Your citation is about 7 years out of date.
B: How large is the percent of total income in each
of those brackets? I.E. If the top 1% of all income
earners pay 29%, but make only 20%, then you have
something that can be discussed as unfair. But if that
same 1% makes 35% of all income, then it gets harder to
argue that.
I suspect that these numbers don't have that backing,
as the emotional impact of them goes away with it.
Also, I note that large house ownership and luxury car
ownership go up with income bracket, so, I have a hard
time ( in spite of being in a higher tax bracket myself )
crying for that 1%.
The *only* way?
Only? Really?
The "papers, please" thing that we used to deride Russia about,
as in "you don't have real freedom, you are limited" is upon us.
The terrorists have won, in part. And we elected the people who
used that as a wedge issue to inspire fear in the "home of the brave".
I submit to you that it is equally possible that you are fooled
or trying to fool others.
CV-2, CV-3, and a couple of battleships from the 30's used
turbo electric drive.
I hope they have thought to provide the crew the ability to lock
the generator out of operation, and to force a recharge when they
want, else the advantage of silence will sometimes be negated when
the generator suddenly runs up to recharge.
Another thought on the hybrid idea,
The Saratoga and Lexington ( CV-2 and CV-3 )
where turbo electric. A couple battleships from
about that period experimented with turbo-electric
drives ( New Mexico, I am pretty sure was in this
group ). These were designs built in the 20's and
30's, IIRC, so the idea is not at all new.
Nope, look in the "development" section of the King Tiger
"The Porsche version had a series-hybrid power system where the gasoline engines powered electrical generators which in turned powered electric motors which turned the sprockets. This method of propulsion had been attempted before on the Ferdinand prototypes and in some U.S. designs, but had never been put into production"
I looked in the Tiger I document and did not see it. I was skimming, so...
Looks like the Porsche submissions in both cases were hybrids.
And neither were accepted.
The illustration in the article is a tracked vehicle.
Or kinda like the Porsche version of the Tiger II ( King Tiger )
or the Maus.